milblog1archives.jpg
PDA
Shop
Contact
YouTube Videos
To Mudville
Join MilBlogs
Someone You Should Know
MilBlogs


milblogsa1.jpg
Prev | List | Random | Next
Join
Powered by RingSurf!

Authors























Ground Support

SoA_proudsupporter.gif

soldiersangels.jpg

AnySoldierLogo.jpg

topmain.jpg

books_for_soldiers.gif

foundation_heroesfund02.jpg

fallen pats.jpg

fisherhouse.jpg

hopevil.jpg

opac.jpg

Adopt a platoon.jpg

Homes for our troops.jpg

WWproject.jpg

heromiles200.jpg

operation morale.jpg

cbrdg.jpg

op-give.jpg

mamo.jpg

Sponsors

Archives
April 2008

S
M
T
W
T
F
S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30

Monthly Archives []


Feed me:

Sponsors

Roll Call

miblog-conf.jpg

MilBlog Ring Members
Random 20 Blogroll
[]

Angels / Supporting
our Troops Blogroll
[]

Friends of MilBlogs
Random 20 Blogroll
[]

The Fine Print

The Milblogs site has multiple authors. Unless otherwise credited, the opinions expressed are those of the specific author, and not the official position of any other contributor or any organization to which they belong, to include the United States Department of Defense or any of its subordinate components.

Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1) the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2) in the public domain, with free use granted for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email.

Original content copyright © 2006 - 2008 by the respective authors. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed.

Site contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com

« January 05, 2007 | Main | January 07, 2007 »

January 06, 2007

Impetus?

[Greyhawk]

I find most talk from Washington these days disturbing - I'm not a supporter of surge or retreat. But perhaps that talk is designed to disturb someone else:

Iraqi PM Announces New Security Plan for Baghdad

Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has announced a new security plan for Baghdad aimed at curbing the raging insurgent and sectarian violence that is plaguing the capital.

In a speech marking the anniversary of the Iraqi army Saturday, Mr. Maliki said Iraqi forces will begin cracking down on militants in Baghdad, regardless of their sectarian or political affiliation.



Posted at 1814Z

Re: Mothballing the RN

[Chap]

This speech from April 2006 (Tory defence spokesman Liam Fox) indicates the depth of the rot. And it's not really only "due to Iraq costs", it's more a case of the bills coming due. Here's a teaser:

This year we will spend only 2.2% of our GDP on defence. This is the smallest proportion of our national wealth that we have spent on defending our country since 1930. By the time we finish the new Wembley Stadium, we will be able to seat the ranks of the whole of the British army inside it. The Royal Navy will be smaller than the French navy. And the RAF Museum at Hendon will have more attack aircraft than the RAF does now…

There's one other big deal that we should watch closely. The British are now struggling through questions of modernization and force structure for nuclear weapons, and it's a thorny problem that I have seen people in their organization very worried about. We will have to answer similar questions later on as well.


Posted at 1806Z | Comments (2)

Re: End of the Royal...

[Greyhawk]

Something is certainly afoot in Britain:

Figures from Defence Analytical Services Agency show 14,460 personnel left the Army in 2006.
<...>
Tory MP and former Army officer, Patrick Mercer, told the Sun newspaper: "This is the greatest emergency facing the Army for many years, yet the government continues to talk about recruitment as if it is improving."

He added: "The facts are staggering. Battalions are reaching the point where they can hardly do their jobs in war - but they continue to be sent to the front.

"This can only put soldiers' lives in greater peril."

The Sun newspaper cited a leaked document revealing that infantry battalions were 2,788 men short - three times worse than in December 2004.

The revelations come a day after a senior officer criticised the standard of living accommodation for soldiers and their families.

Adjutant-general Lt Gen Freddie Viggers condemned cramped and decaying living quarters in barracks, saying soldiers and their families deserved better.

See also: Army living conditions: Even prisoners are better off

See also Tommy (Not the one by Townshend, the one by Kipling, discussed at length in comments here, though God only knows why.)


Posted at 1728Z | Comments (4)

End Of The Royal Navy?

[Bubblehead]

There are a couple of articles in the Telegraph this week that seem almost implausible, but I couldn't find anyone disputing them. The first says that the British Government is planning on drastically reducing the number of operational ships in the RN by "moth-balling" several frigates and destroyers; now, they're claiming that the Royal Navy will be putting a five year freeze on officer promotions for LCDRs and above. (Articles from the Daily Mail here and here seem to support these claims.) Is this the end of the Royal Navy as an effective force? And should we celebrate this as our final victory over the embarrassers of USS Chesapeake, or wonder why even our closest allies are expecting us to pick up more and more of the worldwide missions in the middle of a war?


Posted at 1633Z | Comments (1)

Forgiving

[Greyhawk]

Douglas Wood, who was rescued from captivity in Iraq last year, has an opinion piece in Australia's The Age: Time to forgive and forget if Iraq is to rebuild.

Via Tim Blair, who notes

Wood is obviously a very forgiving man; his piece appears in the Age, the same paper that previously condemned him as insensitive, a graceless, undignified, blustering buffoon, and unreliable.


Posted at 1428Z

The Kagan-Keane Plan: Choosing Victory: A Plan for Success in Iraq

[CDR Salamander]

Looks like Steve and I want to suck up all your spare time this Saturday!

Good ideas are all over the place. In case you missed it, yesterday Frederick W. Kagan and General Jack Keane (USA, ret.) presented their plan at a conf. hosted at the AEI. Also speaking were Senators McCain and Lieberman. They have produced a compact Executive Summary and 50-page OPLAN, but you can also listen or watch the whole conf. All the appropriate links over at my place. A quick snip of the opening of the ES, with the rest of the ES after the jump.

Victory is still an option in Iraq. America, a country of 300 million people with a GDP of $12 trillion and more than 1 million soldiers and Marines, has the resources to stabilize Iraq, a state the size of California with a population of 25 million and a GDP under $100 billion. America must use its resources skillfully and decisively to help build a successful democratically elected, sovereign government in Iraq.

Victory in Iraq is vital to America’s security. Defeat will likely lead to regional conflict, humanitarian catastrophe, and increased global terrorism.

Iraq has reached a critical point. The strategy of relying on a political process to eliminate the insurgency has failed. Rising sectarian violence threatens to break America’s will to fight. This violence will destroy the Iraqi government, armed forces, and people if it is not rapidly controlled.

Victory in Iraq is still possible at an acceptable level of effort. We must adopt a new approach to the war and implement it quickly and decisively.

We must act now to restore security and stability to Baghdad. We and the enemy have identified it as the decisive point.

The whole thing is worth your time.


Posted at 1400Z | Comments (3)

« January 05, 2007 | Main | January 07, 2007 »