| [−] |
| [−] |
| [−] |
Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1) the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2) in the public domain, with free use granted for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email.
Original content copyright © 2006 by the respective authors. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed.
Site contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com
At first blush, this seems encouraging.
Just across on CNN. According to the Iraqi Ministry of the Interior, Iraqi police ran across “an insurgent group” on the road between Fallujah and Samarra and shot it out with them, wounding Abu al-Masri and killing one of his top associates. They have the associate’s body, but al-Masri got away.How they knew for sure it was him, particularly amidst the fog of a gunfight, is anyone’s guess. But this would be a hell of a way to start the surge.
The U.S. military has no comment yet. Standby.
Update: My mistake — MOI hasn’t explicitly said that al-Masri got away. In fact, they’re refusing to comment on how they know he was wounded. Do they have him in custody?
Update: It turns out the MOI spokesman responsible for this story is none other than Brig. Gen. Abdul Karim-Khalaf, the same guy who gave us bad information about the alleged nonexistence of Capt. Jamil Hussein. Proceed with caution.
Stay tuned. Let's see how this shakes out.
Update: NBC claims he's in custody.
Sources tell NBC News that al-Masri is in custody.
Wouldn't that be something?
Update II: The quote from the NBC story above has now been removed (by them).
Murtha hopes to choke off the 4-year-old war in Iraq by placing four conditions on combat funds through Sept. 30:The Pentagon would have to certify that troops being sent to Iraq are "fully combat ready" with training and equipment; troops must have at least one year at home between combat deployments; combat assignments could not be extended beyond one year; a "stop-loss" program forcing soldiers to extend their enlistment periods would be prohibited.
Looks like Murtha's proposal is a lot of bark without much bite.
(Well, maybe a wee bit. )
Two key Democrats in Congress disclosed Wednesday that they are digging through Defense Department funding mechanisms to find a method to choke off funding for the Guantanamo Bay detention facilities."We're looking at a schedule - a reasonable schedule - to close it down in stages," Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., said in a broadcast on National Public Radio. "We can limit the funds for it and that would shut it down."
Take a look at what's been going on in Baghdad this week, then see if you think this NY Times story is an accurate depiction.
...in the world now has one assignment: Find the most bitter, disgruntled troop you can and get an interview.
With the recent signing of a deal between the US and North Korea over their nuclear program, should we hail this as a success of diplomacy? Well, no and I'll tell you why.
The trial court found a Syrian man guilty of entering the country illegally in violation of the Passport Law. On Feb. 2, 2005, MNF-I detained the defendant in an insurgent safe house. On multiple occasions the defendant provided accurate details of his illegal entry into Iraq along with another Syrian national. More specifically the defendant admitted to being a lieutenant in the Syrian Intelligence sent to Iraq to oversee a small group of foreign fighters that use mortars around Mosul and recruit Iraqis for suicide missions against MNF-I. On Feb. 4 the trial panel found the defendant guilty and sentenced him to 15 years imprisonment.An awful lot of "foreign fighters" are being convicted in Iraq's courts these days. (And I do mean "awful lot")
Oh, now this is a gracious little speech by a college professor at Loyola...
(h/t LGF)
Can you identify the source of this chastisement of American Democrats for lack of action on Iraq withdrawal?
"The people chose you [Democrats] due to your opposition to Bush's policy in Iraq, but it appears that you are marching with him to the same abyss, and it appears that you will take part with him in the defeat."Answer below...
I think Mark Steyn has it right:
Sadr running around Baghdad: Iraq in bloody sectarian civil war.Sadr fled to Tehran: Dangerous power vacuum in Iraq.
Sadr lying in a big hole in the ground underneath US ordnance dropped from a great height: Beloved martyr whose death will be a recruiting tool across the Muslim world.
So far, so good for part of the surge:
BAGHDAD -- Iraqi troops have passed a key test by showing up at 70 percent strength or better for President Bush's "surge" in Baghdad, a senior U.S. general said.It's early, of course."This movement of these three brigades and two separate battalions into Baghdad to our way of looking at it has gone very well," Lt. Gen. Martin Dempsey, commander of the Multi-National Security Transition Command-Iraq, said in an interview.
"We've also learned more lessons from this one, and in future deployments, we'll make it even better," added Gen. Dempsey, the top American in charge of building up Iraq's security forces.
Update - Just a few early results:
Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates told a Senate committee in January that the arrival of those Iraqi brigades by mid-February would be a litmus test of whether the Iraqi government was serious about securing its capital city.
(By the way, note the reference to "President Bush's surge"? That's the common media frame now. Will it still be his if it works?)