S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
1 | 5 | 12 | 16 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
|---|
| Monthly Archives | [−] |

| [−] |
| [−] |
| [−] |
Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1) the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2) in the public domain, with free use granted for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email.
Original content copyright © 2006 - 2008 by the respective authors. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed.
Site contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com
For consideration and review among peers, MilBloggers and readers may be interested in reading a Center for Threat Awareness report we have written and published at ThreatsWatch. It was clearly inspired by our dissatisfaction with the recommendations present within the Iraq Study Group Report. But we began crafting it only after our equal dissatisfaction in the lack of a comprehensive response with a comprehensive set of alternative recommendations guided by a desire to achieve victory rather than the ISG report's guiding principle of achieving 'success' through negotiation with Iraq's principle outside state instigators and without pressing al-Qaeda in Iraq to its own defeat. There was no shortage of criticism, many with an alternative or two, yet many also without recommendation beyond complaint. But there was seemingly no organized and broad alternative to the ISG's body of work when we began the process.
The introduction to the report can be found here: PrincipalAnalysis: Achieving Victory in Iraq
The Full Text Original Doc is here: Achieving Victory in Iraq
Rather than a withdrawal and handing over of the pursuit of al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQAM) and the insurgency to the nascent Iraqi military, we call for a surge and a redefined mission of routing AQAM. Finding value in a regional initiative to support Iraq, we call for such but with the intent and open exclusion of Iran and Syria unless they reverse course, stop importing violence into Iraq and end their terrorist-supporting ways elsewhere. There is absolutely no value in smiling diplomats around a table fantasizing about how Iran and/or Syria are going to assist Iraq's security and stability until such time.
From early on, our first four recommendations (below) address this:
A senior official in the Somali government's new Ministry of the Interior told ABC News government forces had recovered "dozens of foreign passports," including several American passports, on the bodies of al Qaeda fighters killed in combat between forces affiliated with the Union of Islamic Courts (UIC) and Ethiopian forces in Somalia.According to the same source, most of the foreign passports were Sudanese, Pakistani and Yemeni, but several American, British and Australian passports were also recovered.
Story here.
Meanwhile, the cave-hopper is sounding off again.

"We have to get back to the FOB, I hear the News is up!"
Michael Ledeen, in the Corner, reminding us that persuading other countries isn't always binary "diplomats talking or soldiers invading".
Victor Hanson pushes back against some conventional wisdom. "Worn Out" means different things to different people...
'Hawk, I think your point is well taken...and more importantly, the timeline outlined in the links you put together is essential to understanding the "why" for our faltering in that part of the year. (I also learned something; I don't think I will ever look at SFTT the same way again, even though I didn't like it that much when Hack was alive.)
Check out the early comments at the link. There are some very, uhhh... interesting people getting their news from ABC.
We almost lost Fallujah because we pulled back. We had to have a Second Battle of Fallujah because our enemy almost got the benefit of our lack of will to be violent. About this time, we had Sadr in our posession and let him go. This weakness is damaging.I'm going into tangential discussion mode off that quote, Chap, because if I had a dollar for every time I've seen someone ask "Why didn't we get Sadr back when?" I would have a wallet too fat to sit on. You aren't asking that question - but you did remind me I've been meaning to respond.
There are several two word answers. The least arguable is "Abu Ghraib".
April 9, 2004, Iraq:
U.S. troops fanned out across Kut, southeast of Baghdad, after meeting little resistance in the city, witnesses said, in a major foray by the American military into the south, where U.S. allies have struggled to deal with the uprising by the al-Mahdi Army, led by radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr.That same day,
ABC News links, nothing official in my inbox but clearly someone's been talking:
--Khalilzad named to the UN.
--Negroponte resigning from intel to be named as deputy State.
--VADM (ret.) McConnell named to run intel.
--Fallon nominated to CENTCOM; Petraeus to MNF-I.
Whole lotta Hussein stuff tonight, but as with most things, I always like to end my night with a game of "What about Watada?"
I love me some puff pieces. There's nothing quite so enjoyable as an article that doesn't even try to play it straight. Take this wonderful piece in WaPo about 1LT Ehren Watada's mother's trip to Capitol Hill on behalf of her shytebag son.
Carolyn Ho is a mother on a mission.
Good start, nice and neutral.
I really hate saying this: Don't say I didn't warn you.
By the way, this is not good:
Khalaf told the AP that an arrest warrant had been issued for the captain for having contacts with the media in violation of the ministry's regulations.Not good on free speech issues, and because it leads directly to this:Hussein told the AP on Wednesday that he learned the arrest warrant would be issued when he returned to work on Thursday after the Eid al-Adha holiday. His phone was turned off Thursday and he could not be reached for further comment.
Hussein appears to have fallen afoul of a new Iraqi push, encouraged by some U.S. advisers, to more closely monitor the flow of information about the country's violence, and strictly enforce regulations that bar all but authorized spokesmen from talking to media.Let me be the first to send this message: FREE JAMIL.
Let me also assure you all the AP welcomed the Jamil Hussein focus - encouraged it, even. It masked the issue of false reports from Iraq. Were six people burned? Probably not. Were four Mosques burned? Demonstrably not. Did one of those Mosques contain 18 people who were killed in the fire (as the NY Times claimed)? No. Were 184 Mosques attacked last February? No again. Does any of this matter now? Nope. This huge victory (in a battle that shouldn't have been fought) in the information war has essentially given the AP a free pass to report anything without fear of question for months to come.
I'll also assure you this "humbling of bloggers" will be very well covered by the media in the weeks ahead. The AP set 'em up with their "he exists because we say so" responses, (in hindsight, this move was exceptionally well played, just before checkmate) and they'll just love knocking 'em dowm.
And most bloggers walked right into the punch.
Update: Nevermind, that's what they've all been saying all along, apparently. I prefer ArmyLawyer's response.
Now that the AP has located him, they might want to ask him why he can't effectively police the neighborhood he is assigned to without substantial US assistance. We've heard a lot of news from Jamil Hussein about how violent his neighborhood is, but we have heard nothing about what he intends to do PERSONALLY to stop the violence in his neighborhood.
Ministry spokesman Brig. Abdul-Karim Khalaf, who had previously denied there was any such police employee as Capt. Jamil Hussein, said in an interview that Hussein is an officer assigned to the Khadra police station, as had been reported by The Associated Press.Our resident Academy graduate-cum-troll Jadegold queried:
...
Khalaf offered no explanation Thursday for why the ministry had initially denied Hussein's existence, other than to state that its first search of records failed to turn up his full name. He also declined to say how long the ministry had known of its error and why it had made no attempt in the past six weeks to correct the public record.
"Will we see apologies from the keyboard kommandoes?"If true, then yup. I was wrong. The man exists.
The military community has lost another member to cancer. The second in one week.
Hat Tip: ArmyWifeToddlerMom.