S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
1 | 5 | 12 | 16 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
|---|
| Monthly Archives | [−] |

| [−] |
| [−] |
| [−] |
Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1) the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2) in the public domain, with free use granted for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email.
Original content copyright © 2006 - 2008 by the respective authors. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed.
Site contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com

Do you think they know that MoveAmericaForward is SELLING t-shirts with their picture on it? HERE
I'd only buy one if the money was going to Project VALOUR-IT... Army, of course!

For more of these go to The Professional Cartoonists Index...
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT has shut down a website featuring documents captured from the Saddam Hussein regime after alert New York Times reporters discovered that some of the documents might reveal sensitive information about how to build an atomic bomb.

You know, like the nuclear weapons that Saddam wasn't pursuing before we invaded in 2003. Because he wasn't a threat to anyone. Just a pussycat, that Saddam (yes, this is the same Saddam who is expected to be sentenced on Sunday by an Iraqi court on for murdering thousands of his countrymen).
I, for one, would like to thank the New York Times for alerting the government to this dangerous breach of national security.
JIM GERAGHTY has more.
Unique? Why? Well, it features Hamid Karzai's new website!

"Next thing you know, I'll be blogging!"
Was done by David Brooks. Another idea, better written and grounded. Chewable.
Partitioning the country would be traumatic, so after the election it probably makes sense to make one last effort to hold the place together. Fire Donald Rumsfeld to signal a break with the past. Alter troop rotations so that 30,000 more troops are policing Baghdad.But if that does not restore order, if Iraqi ministries remain dysfunctional and the national institutions remain sectarian institutions in disguise, then surely it will be time to accede to reality. It will be time to effectively end Iraq, with a remaining fig-leaf central government or not. It will be time to radically diffuse authority down to the only communities that are viable — the clan, tribe or sect.
A muscular U.S. military presence will be more necessary than ever, to deter neighboring powers and contain bloodshed. And the goals will remain the same: to nurture civilized democratic societies that reject extremism and terror.
But the boundaries may have to change. The war was an attempt to lift a unified Iraq out of its awful history, but history has proved stubborn. It’s time to adjust the plans to reality.
By the way, for an introduction to some of Hersh's methods used in fabricating the Abu Ghraib story, read this (to inlude the links).
I need to update this some day soon. Much more information has come to light since then (some of which we've seen here, or some near here), information that makes the actions of Hersh and Mapes even more disgusting in hindsight...
When Seymour Hersh writes, he uses facts (albeit selectively and sensationally). Here's an example regarding an incident alleged to have occurred at Abu Ghraib:
His book Chain of Command would deliver the authoritative Seymour M. version: “An attorney involved in the case told me in July 2004 that one of the witness statements he had read described the rape of a boy by a foreign contract employee who served as an interpreter at Abu Ghraib,” Hersh wrote. “In the statement, which had not been made public, the lawyer told me, a prisoner stated that he was a witness to the rape, and that a woman was taking pictures.”
What we have here is third hand information about a horrifying (if true) event. But Hersh probably isn't lying when he says "an attorney involved in the case" told him he had read a document in which "a prisoner stated that he was a witness to the rape" of a young boy by "a foreign contract employee".
But when Seymour does a public speaking engagement, he tends to (ahem) expand. For instance, here's how he described the event to the annual membership conference of the American Civil Liberties Union: