
![]() |
|
|

| [-] |

| [−] |
| [−] |
| [−] |
| [−] |
Prev | List | Random | Next |

Physician, heal thyself:
...a series of online audits, conducted by the Army, suggests that official Defense Department websites post far more potentially-harmful than blogs do.Noah Schachtmann: "Um, no."The audits, performed by the Army Web Risk Assessment Cell between January 2006 and January 2007, found at least 1,813 violations of operational security policy on 878 official military websites. In contrast, the 10-man, Manassas, Virginia, unit discovered 28 breaches, at most, on 594 individual blogs during the same period.
<...>
There are many more Army web sites and web pages available for review on traditional Army web sites than there are BLOGs and BLOG pages, therefore because of volume alone, it must be expected that there will be more violations found on the traditional web sites.
Me: Gosh, I can't decide which snappy one liner to use...
1. A helpful link.
2. This might explain the problem.
3. Oh, by the way - that's just the Army web sites. Who knows what treasures await on the pages of the other three...
4. Heh - I'd better be safe and never quote an offical public web page here.
5. All the above.