Hide Comments
Wow. Interesting analysis - points I've never heard voiced before.
Posted by Miss Ladybug at February 8, 2007 12:58 PM
It would've been sufficient to have understood how correct Tocqueville was, or for that matter Aquinas and Aristotle, on the psychology of despotism and the effects of habitual submission to central authority. Pusillanimity, fear, lack of will, corruption, vice of all kinds is the result.
Can you say Katrina?
Dumb Ox
Posted by Dumb Ox at February 8, 2007 01:32 PM
John Burns, even if he is with the NYTimes, I believe, is on the the best, fairest reporters out there. (But some days..his hair gets a little wild..:) )
Posted by Sapper at February 8, 2007 03:43 PM
Very insightful comments
Posted by Carolina at February 8, 2007 11:26 PM
Could this be the beginning of a trend?
Is it possible that people who spend time in Baghdad have begun to comprehend that they risk making themselves irrelevant by sticking to the old narrative of incompetence, stupidity and defeat? That victory is indeed at the very least one of the possible outcomes?
Why are the fatalists getting so much mileage out of their advocacy of doom?
Posted by Dom at February 9, 2007 05:19 AM
I guess what gets to me the most is the implicit argument that "Gosh, I guess we shouldn't have gone in because now we realize just how messy it is despite the fact, that, yes, it really was hell on earth. But what's a 'mother' to do? Sigh."
I guess it is just me but I'd much rather be a wetnurse to sickly freedom than a diner at a despot's hateful banquet.
Posted by Michael at February 9, 2007 03:44 PM
Hide Comments |
Show/Add Comments in Popup Window(6) | (
Note: You must refresh main page to view newly posted comments here)