******************************************

Greyhawk here, using my blogger power to usurp a comment originally left by Willsnout.

Willy - you might want to consider that she wasn't addressing you, at least not you alone.

Your comments reveal much about you, indeed that's why we usually leave them untouched. There are also grownups who comment here, and they are getting a bit tired of some of the childishness that seems to revolve around you.

******************************************

It's only a matter of time. Maybe you ought to just do the wingnut thing and ban me outright. Censoring my comments is a little cowardly. Go into full-coward mode and ban me. Make my day. Really. After all, spirited opposition is the last thing you people can ever stand being exposed to. Such delicate flowers you are!

Willy, when I asked in a post "who you gonna believe, CNN or your own damn lyin' eyes?" Your unhesitating answer "CNN!" ensured that you will never be banned here. You are to this blog what Howard Dean is to the Republican party. Some days I'm convinced you're Seymour Hersh, on others I believe you're just another lackey in Karl Rove's office of disinformation.

You have a nice way, so common to people on the far right wing, of misrepresenting the views of your opponents. And when you really don't like them, you simply censor them. I think it speaks volumes about you.

You are too easy. That comment above ranks right up with the CNN comments for revealing your own logical shortfalls. I will add it to the Mudville Hall of Fame.

Clarifying: Willy's comment was overwritten above because he thought it would be funny to start calling people names in the comment thread where Mrs G - who daily presents the most balanced news round up in the world on Iraq without editorial comment - asked people to please refrain from name calling. She had, in fact, been prompted to write this post after deleting profanity in another comment directed at Willysnout.

Which is why his response equals his CNN gaffe, and his pro-torture gaffe, though I'm sure he can and will exceed all expectations in the future.

Greyhawk, you outdo yourself.

What I wrote was that when I arrived here I did not engage in any sort of labeled but changed that after having found myself labeled by the (self-censored to keep Greyhawk from applying the chloroform gag on the entire posting) here. I further stated that if the (censored) want to keep applying their labels they can expect me to respond in kind, but if they want to back off of their labeling then I might even quit calling them (censored to protect Greyhawk's fragile equillibrium).

It's unfortunate that the (censored) here want to do the labeling thing, but I'm fully capable of throwing it right back in the (censored)s' faces. Therefore, I wrote, (censored) it's up to you. So Greyhawk, does that help?

Aw, Greyhawk's just a big meanie. Not banning Willysnout so he can go back to his buddies and wail about his awful oppression.

Shame on you, Greyhawk. ;)