Hide Comments
Somebody, somewhere, must have a gallery of Saddam Hussein 'throne photos'. How powerful would such a thing be?
Or, maybe you might have just founded a photographic genre, Greyhawk, I haven't seen an idea communicated so essentially in a long time.
Posted by Neuroto at October 31, 2004 05:28 PM
Yes.
Here is a different angle but with the same conclusion:
http://www.jessicaswell.com/MT/archives/001713.html
Posted by Natalie at October 31, 2004 06:53 PM
As most Liberals would say:
"It's good that Saddam Hussein is out of power, but...."
They just don't get it.
Thanks for a great post that explains it perfectly.
Posted by ArtbyRuth at October 31, 2004 06:56 PM
Good work!
Posted by Curtis at October 31, 2004 07:25 PM
Oh yeah!
Right on target!
Posted by John at October 31, 2004 07:34 PM
Too bad we didn't also empty out Osama Bin Ladin's cave. Remember OBL? The man who *actually* attacked us? Or have you, like Mr. Bush, forgotten all about him? I don't have a problem with having gone to war post-9/11, but how about a little focus? Pfft.
Posted by Amy at October 31, 2004 08:36 PM
Very nice. This also reminded me that the media, along with never playing Sept. 11th footage anymore, never plays the footage of Saddam's statues being pulled down anymore.
Posted by twalsh at October 31, 2004 08:39 PM
Thanks for that wonderful parrotting of Kerry's lies, Amy.
Posted by Jinx McHue at October 31, 2004 08:44 PM
Amy-
I have 1 word for you...
multitasking....what can't walk and chew gum at the same time? In your words...Pfft....
Posted by Scrotis Lo Knows at October 31, 2004 09:04 PM
Yes, Amy, no problem. And I am sure when Japan attacked us, we should have only fought them. Leave those pesky Germans alone. After all they never attacked us.
Iraq attacked (recently, 2000-2003) our ally, Israel. Iraq had a terror organization, in place. Iraq had called for terror attack on Americans. Saddam was killing his own people at a rate of 100 a day. Saddam was profiting from sanctions, and bribing UN officals.
Did you look at the picture above the 'throne'? Do you really think that he would not have made it come true if he could?
Even Kerry admits (just today for goodness sake) that he too would have gone to war with Iraq. Only he would have waited a bit longer.
We know he would not have been able to get the bribed French, German, or Russian to join us. Kerry know it too. He just pretends not to care.
Read that line again:
Kerry admits that he too would have gone to war with Iraq.
If you are convinced otyherwise then you don't see that, then Kerry has you conviced that he can have it both ways.
Posted by Buck at October 31, 2004 09:07 PM
Amy,
Have you forgotten the terrorists that HAVE been captured or killed in Iraq. I guess they all just happened to be in the neighborhood when we invaded? I guess Sadaam's payoffs to terrorists who killed Israelis wasn't proof that he supported terrorism?
Wow, it's amazing how ignorant some people are.
Posted by Methusela at October 31, 2004 09:08 PM
Well, you have to remember: people like Amy were gloating that we hadn't caught Saddam yet. Until December of last year...
Makes me wonder what the cry will be when Osama is captured or his remains are identified.
Posted by Patrick Chester at October 31, 2004 09:28 PM
Nicelt illistrated! Amy is a Liberal, and you must understand what happens in the mind of a Liberal. Liberalism is a deadly desease, as we all can see by watching this desease in action throughout Europe. Liberals say they are peaceful "anti-war" people, but spread hatred through the media and idols such as Michael Moore, Soros, Woopy, ect... Look at media outlets in Europe such as the Guardian, and you will see hatred driping off the pages posted by the Liberal left arm. Go to moveon.org and you will see hatred dripping from the monitor as you view the home page. Liberals believe that France and Germany are still our allies. No way, as they haven't been our allies for many years now. Our real allies in the year 2004 are never talked about by the left wing media in American, because Liberalism is a desease and only allows these people to see into the tunnel. Only a desease would allow a fair minded person to believe that OBL was the Terrorist and once removed the threat posed by Terrorism would go away from America. The rest of the world believes that Terrorism is a global threat, with thousands of leaders, in hundreds of countries, with so many heads, it can play hide and seek forever unless we have a leader such as Geroge W. Bush, who will hold anybody or any country that sponsors Terrorism accountable and cut the heads of the beast wherever they are found. You can't expect people like Amy to understand and comprehend this reality, as she is inflicted by a very powerful and deadly desease!
Posted by kim skelton at October 31, 2004 10:31 PM
I've sat on that throne. Here are a few of my pictures:
http://phases.blogdrive.com/galleries?g=01
Check em out if you like.
Posted by Phases at October 31, 2004 10:39 PM
I certainly wish I could believe that even Kerry (the ultimate pacifist) would have went to war with Sadaam. Sadly, I'm a pessimist. I think Kerry would NEVER have attacked Sadaam. Furthermore, I think Kerry will pull out of Iraq prematurely.
Posted by Methusela at October 31, 2004 10:40 PM
Amy- here's a free clue.
Kerry voted for the war. He thought it was ok to go to war with Iraq too.
Or do you have him confused for Howard Dean?
Posted by h0mi at October 31, 2004 11:40 PM
People like Amy are what is wrong with liberals and anti-war moonbats the world over. They care not for the outcome of the actions they call for but in the act of resistance itself. This 'moral' stand they appear to take is for one person only, themselves. Often you will find these people dissatisfied with their lives and suffer from low self-esteem that only attention of the kind they bring on themselves through their 'selfless' act of taking what they see as the superior moral high-ground. They have not thought their actions through as they care not for the outcome as long as they feel good doing it.
Amy, get a hobby or something that does not include the misery of others to boost your flagging ego.
Posted by deadmaus at October 31, 2004 11:43 PM
Ceci n'est pas une pipe.
Posted by Rene Magritte at October 31, 2004 11:56 PM
Amy ... have you been reading just the headlines again? .... or did you read the whole pile of crap (If it comes from the MSM) ...... Obviously, you have been indoctrinated ..... so sad :-(
Posted by cavy at October 31, 2004 11:56 PM
Lovely. Point out an inadequacy in someone's logic, and get flamed for it in posts and get nasty email (and I quote: "It must suck to be you, Amy. You dumb bitch." wow. I'm so upset! *rolls eyes*).
Now, would anyone care to actually address the point I made? Oh wait, I forgot - you can't!
LOL
Have a lovely day. I shan't return, so you all needn't flame further.
a.
Posted by Amy at November 1, 2004 12:40 AM
Everyone addressed your "point." You're apparently too stupid to understand.
Posted by Kee at November 1, 2004 12:44 AM
"Now, would anyone care to actually address the point I made?"
Ok well it's like this....
"Have a lovely day. I shan't return, so you all needn't flame further."
Oh I see, well I guess I won't waste my breath educating you then. Run away little girl.
Posted by deadmaus at November 1, 2004 01:07 AM
Many liberals think removing Sadam was bad! JFK has said both before and again after saying it was a good idea that it was *not* a good idea. Because it was a bad idea he voted against the funding for arms for the troops. This picture will be proof to them that the war is wrong! Its the old glass .5 full vs .5 empty deal.
Rod Stanton
Cerritos, Cal
Posted by Rod Stanton at November 1, 2004 01:38 AM
Amy didn't have a point, or at least she didn't make it clear what had her panties in a wad. So I will fill it in. The point, not the panties.
No OBL in Chains. Amy belongs to the cult of personalty. She cannot understand that Oshama is a religous nutbag as are the rest of our enemies. They listen to allah and only allah. A cult of death, not personalty.
Kerry would not have caught Oshama either. He slipped over the border to Pakistan. It would have been war to go and get him. That would have turned our most valuable ally into a nuclear armed enemy. One day the assassins will get Mashariff (sp?) and Pakistan will then be our enemy. That is when we go after Oshama, hammer and tong. You think we got problems now, wait till every raghead with a donkey has his own nuke.
Posted by Stehpinkeln at November 1, 2004 01:40 AM
Just goes to prove my theory ... the LLL's favorite expression is ...... SO THERE!
Posted by cavy at November 1, 2004 01:47 AM
--Have a lovely day. I shan't return, so you all needn't flame further.--
Don't let the door hit you in the ass on your way out.
Posted by Kee at November 1, 2004 02:09 AM
I had never seen that mural.
My God.
The madman's dream was to launch a nuclear strike.
He wanted to destroy half the world just so he could rule what was left of it.
America and Israel would have been the first countries targeted.
Posted by Cap'n Yoaz at November 1, 2004 02:44 AM
Just wait 'til you see his other twelve bathrooms!!
Posted by Renee at November 1, 2004 02:50 AM
When American soldiers are dying in combat, there is no shame in suggesting that a course of action, though essentially good, could have been carried out in a much more intelligent and less burdensome manner. I support Iraqi Freedom; I will vote for Kerry. Is there some contradiction? Sure. Kerry has been nearly incoherent in forging his position on the issue, but Bush has been demonstrably incompetent. I would betray my support of our efforts in Iraq more by voting for Mr. Bush.
Posted by Mike at November 1, 2004 03:50 AM
If Bush is incompetent, then so were FDR/Truman/Eisenhower/MacArthur.
Posted by Rich Casebolt at November 1, 2004 04:04 AM
For people like John Kerry, there is "always" one more negotiation we can try before going to war ... if for no other reason, because they can use it to paint themselves as today's Ghandi.
Unfortunately, they too often end up looking like Chamberlain, instead.
Posted by Rich Casebolt at November 1, 2004 04:11 AM
Amy liked the pretty colors in the big picture, and would like a gold chair too. Mike, Kerry has proven himself both incoherent and incompetent. Didn't you even read his own words from the interview ? That man represents a grave danger to the United States.
Posted by American Mother at November 1, 2004 05:04 AM
Let's see, the last time we went to work with the assistance of our glorious allies, we had to leave Saddam on his throne.
Remember the Gulf War? That was the price we had to pay so that the Saudis would give us access to their country and airspace.
That decision ended up getting a lot of Kurds killed. The Marsh Arabs lost their way of live. Thousands of Iraqis died, and we spent god knows how many millions running air interdiction over Iraq for the next 12 years.
Oh yes, that allowed Kofi to set up his humanitarian Oil for Food program that routed billions of dollars into the coffers of criminals and terrorist groups alike.
Anyone still think that kind of coalition building worked?
Posted by Bill Peschel at November 1, 2004 05:18 AM
I have been back to this picture four times today. It still gives me chills.
And it sure makes me glad that I took the time to find out why I hadn't got my absentee ballot yet. And then got it. And then sent it back.
Posted by Dawn at November 1, 2004 05:56 AM
Excellent post.
Kerry says: "We'd have gone to war with allies in a way that the American people weren't carrying the burden."
Ponder that for a second. Kerry is saying that he'll be smart enough and persuasive enough and just downright Presidential enough to get other countries to fight a war that the United States wants to be fought. And he criticizes President Bush for 'out-sourcing' the Tora Bora battle? He would out-source entire wars! He's invented the concept of 'war without war'!
But, of course, what he'd really produce for us is 'peace without peace'
What a piece of work the guy is.
Posted by Ann_Observer at November 1, 2004 06:57 AM
Incompetence is cureable.
Incoherence is not.
Posted by M. Simon at November 1, 2004 09:52 AM
Remember that George Bush is a peacemaker. A peacemaker takes the battle to the enemy. A pacifist (liberal) sits back and does nothing but "negotiate".
Posted by buggyman at November 1, 2004 11:59 AM
Candidate wrong war, wrong time has strengthened the will of the very terrorists we are fighting thereby putting all in more danger. All his pathetic posturing about serving this country when his 'tour' lasted a mere 4 1/2 months is sickening. I pray to God that there are enough of us voting to keep this danger to America out of office.
Posted by roklobsta at November 1, 2004 12:11 PM
Gotta love Amy's last post:
"Have a lovely day. I shan't return, so you all needn't flame further."
Guess she took her little green football and went home!
Posted by Mike G. at November 1, 2004 12:29 PM
I guess shooting at our pilots for a dozen years while they were enforcing Useless Nations resolutions doesn't qualify as attacking us.
"But we support the troops!"
God help us. Please don't let these people take power tomorrow.
Posted by Pablo at November 1, 2004 02:01 PM
Kill 'em all and let Allah sort 'em out!
USA! USA!
Posted by Doug at November 1, 2004 02:38 PM
Kerry is a "Monday morning quarterback" in the words of President Bush on the Iraq war. It is so easy to criticize and he still hasn't explained how he would conduct the war except for utilizing more allies. Of course, he won't get specific so all he is doing is complaining. The rule is always provide a solution to a problem, otherwise you're just a big whiner.
Posted by Steve at November 1, 2004 03:00 PM
Ah! So the foe had *pictures* of WMDs. This changes everything, and I will of course reconsider my vote. Many thanks for bringing this to light.
Posted by rcareaga at November 1, 2004 03:05 PM
Just after our invasion of Iraq, I remember
seeing a photo of two soldiers walking in front of a mural of the twin towers on fire. I haven't
been able to find it since. Can you help?
Posted by R.A.H. at November 1, 2004 04:03 PM
To the Mike that posted this:
"Kerry has been nearly incoherent in forging his position on the issue, but Bush has been demonstrably incompetent. I would betray my support of our efforts in Iraq more by voting for Mr. Bush."
Please watch Stolen Honor at:
http://www.stolenhonor.com/
After watching it, please tell me if you still believe the same way.
Posted by Jeff at November 1, 2004 04:18 PM
R.A.H., this what you were looking for?
http://www.spiritoftruth.org/911mural.htm
Posted by Michael_in_TN at November 1, 2004 04:29 PM
Having served for six months in Iraq, and having seen this throne, there is one more bit of information worth mentioning. The mural shown is on the west wall of the palace so that makes missiles westbound. Take a guess in what country their terminal points lie.
Posted by Greg at November 1, 2004 05:03 PM
Since Amy won't be back (wink, wink, Amy) it is still important others consider what all the world (with the possible exception of France) was saying before the Iraqi war. Everyone thought Sadam had WMDs so today's 'Monday morning quarterbacking only confuses ones like Amy. I am not sure why they aren't happy to see milliions not live under a threat like Saddam, for me it is enough that they have hope of enjoying freedom like Amy. Though they most likely will know how they came about to enjoy it and not have it lost in their history to be ignored.
God Bless George W. Bush
Posted by Thom at November 1, 2004 05:25 PM
Please. Elevate the discourse.
Posted by Concerned Citizen at November 1, 2004 05:33 PM
Ya' know, the missles in that image only go a few hundred miles. So your imagery dosen't fly very far either.
Posted by greyrat at November 1, 2004 05:54 PM
A friend pointed me to an article by Raymond S. Kraft that does a nice job of illustrating why the war in Iraq is necessary. I think you'll enjoy it:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1244632/posts
Posted by Shockwave at November 1, 2004 06:01 PM
Amy spewed:
"Too bad we didn't also empty out Osama Bin Ladin's cave."
Yeah, it is too bad. Do you have any clue what such a accomplishment entails? We didn't get Hitler out of his bunker, either.
"Remember OBL? The man who *actually* attacked us?"
Do you realize this is a war on TERRORISM, not just as retribution for 9/11?
"Or have you, like Mr. Bush, forgotten all about him?"
I guess that's why we still have operations on the Afghan/Pakistani border, ya' think?"
I don't have a problem with having gone to war post-9/11, but how about a little focus? Pfft."
Do you have even the slightest clue what you're blathering about? Before inserting both feet in your mouth you should do a little research outside the MSM and academia. I'd suggest reading Tommy Franks "American Soldier" for a summary of how such opertions work (outside the Hollyweird scripts).
Oh, I'm sorry; liberalism says you're entitled to your opinion and asking that your actually use even an ounce of intellect in deriving that opinion is racist and suppression.
Try thinking between your ears, rather than between your legs, for a change.
Posted by Sharpshooter at November 1, 2004 06:48 PM
Greyrat,
I'm impressed with your knowledge of the specifications of enemy missiles. What is the designator for the missiles pictured? What are the possible types of warheads these vehicles are capable of delivering? Assuming it's true that these missiles are limited by the distance you prescribe, how many innocent civilians are within "a few hundred miles" of Iraq? Does a leader that sits on a throne in front of an image of a sky full of missiles represent peace or terror?
I think the imagery flies pretty far.
Posted by Jeff at November 1, 2004 06:49 PM
Jeff wrote:
"I'm impressed with your knowledge of the specifications of enemy missiles. What is the designator for the missiles pictured? What are the possible types of warheads these vehicles are capable of delivering?"
Jeff,
Do you get the idea that most of the left's understanding of military operations comes from watching movies? Or their notions of intelligence from James Bond movies?
Or their entire world wiew for that matter...
Posted by Sharpshooter at November 1, 2004 07:01 PM
Amy puked:
Lovely. Point out an inadequacy in someone's logic, and get flamed for it in posts and get nasty email (and I quote: "It must suck to be you, Amy. You dumb bitch." wow. I'm so upset! *rolls eyes*).
Now, would anyone care to actually address the point I made? Oh wait, I forgot - you can't!
LOL
Have a lovely day. I shan't return, so you all needn't flame further.
-----------
But we need to flame your dense, cement lined cerebral cavity.
No, you shan't return because your idiotic MSM/DU BS doesn;t fly here like it does on the left's normally captive audience (like schools...).
Posted by Sharpshooter at November 1, 2004 07:06 PM
Mike farted:
"When American soldiers are dying in combat, there is no shame in suggesting that a course of action, though essentially good, could have been carried out in a much more intelligent and less burdensome manner. "
Such as, what maybe??
So easy to sit on the sidelines with your treasonable candidate....
Well, I still haven't forgiven Dennis Eckersley for throwing that 1-2 fastball in the 87 Series...
Man, the more the left shoots off their mouths, the more they drive people into the Bush camp.
Posted by Sharpshooter at November 1, 2004 07:12 PM
Oh my God! This completely changes my mind about John Kerry! Before i'd seen this picture it had never even occurred to me that Saddam Hussein might be a really bad guy bent on destroying the West. Whew! Boy, i'm really glad now that President Bush lied to us so that he could get support for the war, because i can't imagine what a more dangerous place the world would be if it weren't for the peaceful island of democracy that we've established in the middle east.
If you'd like to make my day, please flame me for spouting half-truths in order to support my liberal "convictions". That stuff is absolutely hilarious, and we get a real kick out of it at the office.
Posted by mike at November 1, 2004 07:13 PM
One last thing before lunch is over:
http://www.victorhanson.com/articles/hanson071604.htm
And Kerry things Hollyweird is the bastion of American culture? The left needs some reality, not movies, to generate working PLANS. Kerry couldn't plan a circle-jerk!
Posted by Sharpshooter at November 1, 2004 07:22 PM
OK, Amy, so Saddam didnt attack us. What would you call the firing of hundreds SAMs and uncountable AA rounds at our planes while patrolling over the (UN created no less!) no-fly zones over northern and southern Iraq?
Posted by TJ at November 1, 2004 08:08 PM
To the mike that wrote:
'If you'd like to make my day, please flame me for spouting half-truths in order to support my liberal "convictions".'
You're right. The act of flaming people does little to support the credibility of the people doing the flaming, and the valid points that they may have. I do not intend to flame anyone, but would like to provide some additional food for thought.
Please understand that the President of the United States (not just Bush, but any President) is privy to information that only a select few in the intelligence/military sector have access to. Like it, or not, "need to know" is for the protection of the citizens of the United States. If the information is made available to the public, then the enemy is aware of the information.
President Bush said that he had reason to believe, based on intelligence reports provided to him, that Iraq was in possesion of WMD. Senator John Kerry voted for the threat of force, based on this same information. It does absolutely no good to threaten force if you don't plan to use it when your threat isn't responded to.
If you're saying President Bush lied by not providing all classified information to the public, then you need to know that all government officials (Democrat or Republican) with access to classified information "lie" for our protection. If you're saying that he lied by claiming that there were WMD in Iraq, and you think there weren't, then please look at this possibility: Could there have been WMD in Iraq that were transported out of Iraq before or during the war? Supposedly, there were 380 tons of plastic explosives that were on a military installation in Iraq and suddenly disappeared. Also, what are the possible military uses of 380 tons of plastic explosives (in a country where known terrorists were captured)?
Posted by Jeff at November 1, 2004 08:35 PM
Sigh. Mike, try and focus with me. Bush....did....not.....lie. Say it out loud. Think about it. Repeat as necessary. And the next time you go to the doctor you might want to have him look at that nasty case of moonbat pox you seem to have developed.
Posted by Dan at November 1, 2004 08:38 PM
Mike ... who lied about stockpiles of WMD?
http://casebolt.blogspot.com/2004/10/before-you-punch-that-chad.html
Posted by Rich Casebolt at November 1, 2004 09:58 PM
Without complying with your knee-jerk instinct to label anyone who questions Bush a far-left crazy (a reaction which has been faithfully taught by this administration), think about what one would want in a president.
-someone who will face up to both successes and potential mistakes, and rationally analyze what needs to be done to make our country secure today and well into the future
-someone who will represent our country in a respectful, intelligent way to the rest of the world, because as we saw, when an atrocity like what happened on Sept. 11th occurs, the international community will support victims (us). We need a president who will utilize the goodwill afforded America, not one who will distance us from the rest of the world while tinkering with important civil rights policy
-someone who will preserve the quality of our environment for years to come
-someone who will look out for the economic well-being of more than his richest constiuents (his cronies or no)
-someone who has the mentality to lead the country, to deal with effectively with international threats while developing alliances, not alienating other countries with a misguided "us vs. them" mentality when "us" just waged a war (and, make no mistake, continues to wage a full-fledged WAR in Iraq) with no coherent exit strategy and no plans to change strategy based on past failures. Remember, like Bush has said in numerous interviews, he hasn't made any mistakes as President. Making mistakes isn't an indictment of one's character, but refusing to admit mistakes made, especially when your refusals cost more American lives, is traitorous at the bare minimum.
There is NO WAY that the scared little boy that is George W. Bush can come close to claming any of these abilities. Vote your conscience and allow our country to flourish in the next four years.
Posted by Kenny at November 1, 2004 10:35 PM
Kenny,
Does John Kerry have any of the abilities you seek in a President?
After his "success" in Vietnam, he returned to the United States and slandered the rest of our troops that were fighting (or had died in battle) in Vietnam. He said they were war criminals, and provided propaganda for North Vietnam to use against POW's. He cost more lives, by encouraging the North Vietnam government. Isn't that "traitorous at the bare minimun"?
Also, as part of his anti-war demonstration (in effort to gain attention) he threw medals over the White House fence -- The medals he threw over the fence weren't even his medals. His excuse was that he "didn't have them with him". I also find it strange that he wore ribbons on the outside of his fatigues, during his demonstrations, for two reasons: Ribbons are not part of a combat uniform (fatigues or BDU's); and if he was so ashamed of the medals he earned that he would (supposedly) throw them over the White House fence, why did he wear the ribbons that represent those medals?
Further, if you are looking for someone who will look out for the "economic well-being of more than his richest constiuents", then it's not Kerry. While he blames President Bush for increased Medicare premiums, the increase was actually the result of a law that he (Senator John Kerry) voted for in 1997.
It seems to me that all Kerry has done is propagate lies and blame President Bush for anything and everything that is going wrong in the world, today.
Posted by Jeff at November 1, 2004 11:30 PM
In the midst of a very heated campaign you expect either candidate to "admit mistakes" to be spun to death by the other? Hmmmph.
Benefit cronies? A partisan lie.
Mental capacity? A pretty good case has been made for a Bush IQ greater than Kerry's, a charge publicly made to Kerry with which he did not argue. But, he did let slip that his military records were hidden. Why is that?
Face up to successes and potential mistakes? The strategy is there. The communication of it has not been well done. (skipping the "face up to success" awkwardness.)
Aw, why bother with this? It's been done.
By the way, way back in this thread, to the question of whether the glass is half full or half empty, the answer is "It depends." What was the intent? Not enough information to formulate an answer.
Posted by loren at November 2, 2004 12:49 AM
Speaking of thrones...
Did the Butcher of Bagdad have a gold plated toilet? Also, please note, "Amy" is a typical close-minded person: "don't confuse me with another opinion now, I might have the liberal bubble broken!"
Posted by Rico at November 2, 2004 02:24 AM
Amy most certainly does have a point. Unfortunately, it's on top of her head.
Posted by Buster at November 2, 2004 04:33 AM
Mind boggling; how in the world can you believe anything that comes from this administration. From their "election" in 2000 to their dogged denial of anything going badly under their watch, they have ducked, dodged, prevaricated and outright lied. Wake up, folks. There were no "weapons of mass destruction", Saddam had nothing to do with the terrorists of 9/11 and Bush has failed to make anyone safer. On the contrary, Osama is alive and well and producing videos, Halliburton is under investigation and no one in this "administration" has been taken to task for all of it's failures. God help us if this goes another four years...are we going for six trillion in debt or more massive high income tax deductions? Wake up, folks...
Posted by rey dekker at November 2, 2004 03:49 PM
Rey -- wake up, and read this to see who was the real liar about WMD:
http://casebolt.blogspot.com/2004/10/before-you-punch-that-chad.html
Mark Davis (on WBAP-AM in Dallas) said it best -- three years after 911, and the best Osama can throw at us is a VHS tape?
Posted by Rich Casebolt at November 2, 2004 07:02 PM
IT IS ELECTION DAY OOOPS NO IT IS 1;00 am so
it is really the next day - waiting for final
results.
They are saying that Florida and Ohio has
Bush - is this for real? How long do we stay
up and see if this is a dream?
Grayhawk and Mrs. you are in our prayers and we
will see you soon in our backyard and will drink
some beers to the victory - Bush and Grayhawk
have SURVIVED!! Forever XXXX OOOO
Posted by LEEANN at November 3, 2004 06:20 AM
Leanne, It ain't over til it's over. You guys must get some sleep. I think you can rest easy, though. Love and miss you.
Posted by Mrs greyhawk at November 3, 2004 09:30 AM
Well, I think that I lost a friend since Kerry lost the election. Yes - he is conceding.
I called my friend last night and she stated that she could not talk to me on election night.
We have always spoken about issues before - I hate to label ourselves, but we do have differing opinions and views.
She has stated that when interpreting the Osama video that Muslims (I understand this does not apply to all) brought down Russia and that they would bring down the USA. That this began with 9/11 and he will continue to attack financial targets and bankrupt as well. I stated that I did not agree with this theory - we are not comparing apples to apples - Russia to America?
My husband and I agree - didn't Ronald Reagan
and Star Wars help to bankrupt Russia?
Well, I have prided myself in not labeling - Republican, Christian, etc. and thought I could discuss this issue with respect for all, but when I very respectfully disagreed then all dialogue had to stop.
Can't we keep our values, but as Rodney King stated - Can't we all get along?
Posted by Leeann at November 3, 2004 04:18 PM
Hide Comments |
Show/Add Comments in Popup Window(72) | (
Note: You must refresh main page to view newly posted comments here)
