February 2010
January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003
|
February 9, 2010New Standards in Journalism [Greyhawk]A screen capture from the Washington Post: ![]() Classy, huh? I'm not a Sarah Palin voter - but unlike most journalists in the world I don't feel threatened by her either. The Washington Post just succeeded in making the Huffington Post seem reasonable by comparison. Update: just following orders? (Video here.) Posted February 9, 2010 2:40 PM | Permalink | Add Comment | TrackBacks Reviewing the battle of Wanat [Greyhawk]"What once was a hunt for lessons to be learned has turned into a search for scapegoats." Because unlike most human endeavors, scapegoat hunts never fail. Posted February 9, 2010 1:39 PM | Permalink | Add Comment | TrackBacks Happy Birthday Mrs G [Greyhawk]One reason I can't possibly be the grandfather of milbogs: she's still too young to be a grandma*. However, she's spending her birthday working on yet another project to expand the ever-growing milblog world, which you can join. (She'd consider that a nice birthday present, in fact.) *And no, she won't be releasing her birth certificate to "prove it." ;) Posted February 9, 2010 11:58 AM | Permalink | 4 Comments | TrackBacks In this case I'm pro-abortion [Greyhawk]...but it's too late. Uncovering the birther movement's birth certificate: "The far right and the far left can be equally insane, and the extremes end up echoing each other." I suppose the realization that Democrats founded the birther movement could surprise some of the newer advocates - but it's more a reminder than a shocking revelation. Most people have probably forgotten there were birther-type charges floating around against McCain, too. Here's one version in the New York Times from February, 2008 - pre-dating the "early summer of '08" launch of the Obama Birther movement among Clinton supporters. At issue was McCain's birth (as a military dependent) in Panama. (More correctly, the issue was whether any military dependent born overseas had citizenship rights.) By July 2008 Snopes declared his legitimacy "undetermined." And in case I wasn't clear, it's the birther movement that should have been aborted. I've noted before that the Dems should fund the birther movement - it's Barack Obama's best (maybe only) chance for 2012. Given the parentage, maybe they can deduct any donations from taxes as "child support." Added thought: on a more personal note, besides the birthers efforts to undermine the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan linked above, (yes, I know they wouldn't characterize their actions in that way) over the years I served with many Americans (men and women) who married foreign nationals - and had children with them while serving stateside and overseas - the attacks on Obama and McCain all rolled into one. I'd like to see the birthers try and explain to these folks why they consider their children to be second-class citizens unworthy of full rights and privileges granted by the US Constitution. (Hat tip: Instapundit.) Posted February 9, 2010 10:31 AM | Permalink | 2 Comments | TrackBacks Legalize crime! [Greyhawk]Well if nothing was illegal we wouldn't need lawyers: Stolen Valor Act facing legal challenges. I would say this is timely in light of the McManus story, but there's always someone trying to pass themselves off as a "decorated veteran." For example, our old pal Rick Strandlof makes an appearance in the story.
Posted February 9, 2010 8:29 AM | Permalink | Add Comment | TrackBacks
February 8, 2010Sometimes a hero [Greyhawk]...suffers an ironic fate. A team from SOUTHCOM went to Haiti for a disaster relief conference - and one member was killed in his hotel when the earthquake struck that day:
Our thoughts and prayers to the family. Posted February 8, 2010 6:36 PM | Permalink | Add Comment | TrackBacks John-Jack Murtha is Dead [Greyhawk]He is now, as I was just told via email, what President Obama would call an "ex-Marine Corpse." His final appearances at Mudville as a living person will be his role as "guy who threatened to cut military funding unless they'd give Nancy Pelosi a plane". Prior to that, his efforts last fall to raise taxes. ("The tax should be paid by all taxpayers, with rates ranging from 1 percent for lower wage earners to 5 percent for the wealthy.") But whether you think you pay too many taxes or too few, Jack Murtha got more of your tax dollars than anyone else. (At that time he was also being investigated for "ethics violations.") Now he's dead. So this quote on Afghanistan might be his last on the topic of war: "I'm not sure there's a threat to our national security." Maybe he thought his gallbladder was nothing serious, either. The Washington Post: "He was revered among Democrats." Critics dubbed Rep. Murtha, the chairman of the powerful subcommittee that controls Pentagon spending, the "King of Pork" for the volume of taxpayer money he could direct to the area around his home town of Johnstown. Most of the largesse came in defense and military research contracts he steered to companies based in his district or with small offices there. I will pause now to say something nice about him: he was never convicted. "Murtha was beloved by his constituents for tapping billions of dollars in federal funds to seed new industries there," reports the Post. That might be true - he could call them "racists and rednecks" and still be re-elected. I don't know if any of them actually voted for him - but he was always reelected. In the 2008 election, Democrats had to burn a last-minute half million dollars in response to a strong campaign from Murtha's opponent, in what they thought was an easily held district - despite Murtha's "best efforts" on the "campaign trail":
Russell has now issued a statement requesting prayers for Murtha's family. The Post story neglects to mention that Murtha called several Marines killers, that they were absolved, and that they in turn sued him for libel - along with various other reasons that most veterans consider him "the second ex-Marine." But who cares - he's dead. A blast from Mudville' past - back in 2006, Congressman Jim Moran had arranged a "Town Hall" meeting in his Virginia district just outside of D.C. One invited guest was Jack Murtha - other invited guests were Iraq Veterans Against War members who were brought in to appear as local veterans there to say wonderful things about Murtha and Moran's anti war stands. Most of Murtha and Moran's talking points from this event are from 2003-2004 - not enough armor, Abu Ghraib was a result of poor training, troops aren't getting medical care, only poor people join the army - we've debunked them all here over the past several months. As the Post noted, MoveOn.org sent e-mails to opponents of the war urging the faithful to attend. And although several Iraq war veterans turned activist made the long trek to cheer him on, an actual "local vet" also made an appearance... Surprise! And just before the end of the meeting, Vietnam veteran General (retired) Louis C. Wagner approached the mic. Enough of the past - on to the future: According to state law, the governor has ten days once the vacancy is officially declared to decide on the date for the special election, which can come no sooner than 60 days following that proclamation. The story also notes that "Murtha's passing comes at a tenuous time for House Democrats as they seek to convince some of their older members to re-up for another term in the face of what looks to be a difficult national political environment for the party." Posted February 8, 2010 3:05 PM | Permalink | 3 Comments | TrackBacks Child Abuse: Because of Bush! [Greyhawk]or "how America's news is made". Chapter one: the locals Our story begins with the sort of tragic child abuse story that appears in local papers all too often. This one was from the Nisqually Valley (Washington) News - a report of an arrest made on January 31.
The Seattle-Tacoma News Tribune added additional details, including that the suspect was "a Joint Base Lewis-McChord soldier."
The "dunking" was an important point because - as the Nisqually Valley News had reported - "Tabor was arrested for third-degree assault of a child, but police are requesting charges be increased to second-degree assault of a child because of the alleged water incidents." And "they are also asking the prosecutor to charge Tabor's girlfriend, who he said helped hold the girl down in the water." And according to the News Tribune: The Thurston County Prosecuting Attorney's Office filed a charge of second-degree assault of a child against Joshua Ryan Tabor, 27, on Tuesday. As to why he chose dunking her in the sink "until the water came around her forehead and jawline" - "Tabor allegedly admitted to police that he did it because he knew she was terrified of water." And there you have it. Tabor's arraignment is scheduled for Feb. 16. Until then he is confined to post. It's a tragic story, and it happens all too often. As a parent, it's horrifying and unforgivable and a reminder that ability to have children and ability to raise children are two different things - and that some thankfully small percentage of people just barely qualify as "people". There are some in your neighborhood and mine. That's one of the reasons when it happens in your neighborhood, it isn't news in mine. Chapter two: Tabloid data (in which our story sets out for Britain to seek it's fortune) Somehow the British tabloid Daily Mail heard the child abuse story, and one week after the arrest they found a way to make news from Nisqually Valley an international sensation: add "waterboarding" and CIA" to the mix.
"The practice of waterboarding was used by the CIA to break Al Qaeda suspects at Guantanamo Bay," the Daily Mail helpfully adds. "Detainees had water poured over their face until they feared they would drown. President Barack Obama has since outlawed the practice." But they also include a description of what allegedly did to his daughter. The story even includes a photo captioned "Human rights activists demonstrate waterboarding in front of the Justice Department. A soldier father stands accused of waterboarding his daughter because she couldn't recite the alphabet" - even though the photo itself is proof that what Tabor is accused of isn't waterboarding. But that's what tabloids do. Here's the front page of the Daily Mail's web site, here's a list of libel suits that have been filed against them in the recent past - that has no bearing on this particular story, just an indication of how they do business. This is no secret - "Brangelina's Secret UFO Sex Diet" sells - especially with added Beckham quotes. "Man beats kid near Seattle" doesn't draw the average housewife's attention away from the Snickers bars in the checkout lanes - unless he used secret CIA waterboarding techniques. Fortunately, no one's really that gullible. (/kidding) Chapter 3: Back in the USA (In which our week-old story makes it's way back across the Atlantic to it's home country, reborn.) "Money see, monkey do. And the chimp in chief made it a household word," explains the American web site Political Carnival in their endorsement of the Daily Mail story. Fortunately no one reads... wait - "Joshua Tabor admitted to police that he used a CIA torture technique on his 4-year-old daughter because he was angry she couldn't recite the alphabet. (h/t The Political Carnival)" reports Alan Colmes (fomerly of Fox News). So now we have a man admitting he used a CIA technique? Astoundingly, Colmes uses the Daily Mail photo, too - but doesn't quote the portion of the story that reveals this isn't what the father is accused of doing. The Daily Beast web site links the Daily Mail story too, and adds another twist: "He chose waterboarding--the CIA torture technique that simulates drowning and has been banned by the Obama administration--because he knew the girl was terrified of water." AOL News Filter ("With so many news aggregators out there, who can keep up? AOL News filters the filters to steer you to the headlines that really matter" reads their banner) announces "The Daily Beast picks up a story from Britain's Daily Mail, reporting on a U.S. soldier who allegedly waterboarded his 4-year-old daughter." The AOL roundup includes several stories - but the overall headline is "The Filter: Soldier Accused of Waterboarding Daughter". One of the people who writes at The Atlantic using the name Andrew Sullivan writes "A US Soldier Waterboards His Own Child." He (I believe all the "Andrew Sullivans" are he) calls the Daily Mail a "populist paper" (the original Andrew Sullivan is British - so he should know) but is mostly concerned that Marc Thiessen might claim "she wasn't really "waterboarded" as the professionals do it." I have no idea who Mark Theissen is, but if he does make that claim it's because it's true, and apparently at least one of the "Andrew Sullivans" knows this. (Does his willingness to acknowledge up front that he's wrong somehow increase the truthiness of what he writes?) But more hilariously, "Andrew Sullivan" further notes that "No US paper has yet to report the story. Why am I not surprised?" Except that US papers broke the story a week ago - a British paper twisted it into a form suitable for international news of the tabloid variety, and not only are lefty bloggers and web sites falling for it, but the New York Daily News, Fox News, and ABC all have the "waterboarding" headlines now, too. (ABC News adds that the suspect served in Iraq!!!!) With at least three "Andrew Sullivans" you'd think at least one of them could have checked that. But there you have it - that's how "news" is made in America today. And if you ever doubted that leftists are convinced that American soldiers are "monkeys" who would torture their own children because of Bush, now you know a little more about that, too. Oh, and free advice to any potential lawyer in this case: ignore the people quoted above, don't try to blame Bush. Story tip: Miss Ladybug. (Instant update: Fox has re-written their story to eliminate the false "waterboarding" claim. You can see their original headline here) Elsewhere: And update: this is Mark Thiessen. Now I know. Posted February 8, 2010 2:30 PM | Permalink | 3 Comments | TrackBacks One more into the breach? [Greyhawk]Retired Navy Commander Kirk S. Lippold, who has an extensive background in the military including a major run-in with al-Qaida, is pondering a run for U.S. Senate in Nevada, two sources said Thursday. Why, that's Harry ("the war is lost") Reid's seat. (Or the people's, depending on your point of view.) I can think of no other I'd more enjoy seeing defeated by a veteran. "At this point I would just say, stay tuned," Lippold said in a brief interview. "Nevada clearly needs more experienced leadership than candidates who are in the race right now are capable of providing." Posted February 8, 2010 6:57 AM | Permalink | 2 Comments | TrackBacks
February 7, 2010Escape from Corregidor [Greyhawk]We met (or re-met, if you grew up in Indiana like me - though I hadn't heard of him in years) Edgar Whitcomb at Castle Argghhh last week.
He enlisted in the United States Army Air Corps in 1940 and was deployed to the Pacific Theater. He was commissioned as a Lieutenant in 1941 and made an aerial navigator. He served two tours of duty in the Philippines and was promoted to Second Lieutenant. During the Battle of the Philippines, Whitcomb's base was overrun; he was captured by the Japanese and was beaten and tortured by his captors, but was able to escape. Recaptured a few days later, he escaped a second time and was hunted for several more days but was able to evade his pursuers. He escaped by swimming all night through shark infested waters to an island unoccupied by the Japanese army. He made contact with the Filipino resistance and fought with them for two years, loosing his vision in one eye, severe hearing loss, and injuring his back in the progress. He was eventually able to secure passage to China under an assumed name where he made contact with the United States Army and was repatriated in December 1943. He wrote a book about his experience entitled Escape from Corregidor, published in 1958.[2][3] He was discharged from active duty in 1946, though he remained in the reserve military forces until 1977 holding the rank of colonel. ![]() That Wikipedia bio also explains why I hadn't heard of him in years - his life after the Governor's office was almost as interesting as his life before. But the happy discovery he was alive and kicking set me searching the internet, wondering if his book was still available. The bad news - it's out of print. The good news - it's available online in its entirety for free. Click here to read & enjoy. (Or here for a pdf version.) "This ability of our American youth to adjust from the quiet American home to the hardships and grimness of the battlefield is a quality that I have often marveled at and long admired," wrote Marine Lt. General Field Harris in the 1958 introduction. "He has been described in some quarters as soft and not able to take it. However, it has been my observation that, given the proper tools and training, he is the equal, perhaps the superior, of any fighting man in the world. Maybe it is our competitive sports and competitive way of life that develop this quality, but whatever it is, the American serviceman is tops in my book." Aside from the very interesting reading offered by this book, I feel that it cannot help stirring up a quiet pride in the breast of every American parent whose boy has participated in our wars. These boys asked for so little and gave so much. Posted February 7, 2010 2:00 PM | Permalink | Add Comment | TrackBacks Sunday Funnies [Greyhawk]Here in Mudville we believe everyone deserves a chance to chuckle:
So what's the next topic to laugh at her about? She vacuums her own floors? Posted February 7, 2010 11:14 AM | Permalink | 8 Comments | TrackBacks When the Saints go marching [Greyhawk]U.S. soldiers are dying in Afghanistan. One died just Monday in southern Afghanistan, blown up by an improvised bomb. And I'm supposed to sit here in my cozy media work room in Miami and demand to know why Kyle Eckel is playing football for the Saints while some of his classmates are tiptoeing around IED's in Kabul? Sorry. Can't do it. Another reason to cheer for the Colts - they hold their players to higher standards than the Naval Academy.
Posted February 7, 2010 8:59 AM | Permalink | 1 Comment | TrackBacks Blue's back in the 'Stan [Greyhawk]Old Blue just returned to Afghanistan from leave, which means Afghan Quest is "back in business" after a brief (and deserved) pause. Which is good news for those interested in news from Afghanistan. I linked his latest entry in the previous post, but it deserves more attention.
An example follows - read the whole thing. (As usual, via the Mrs, who's always first.) Posted February 7, 2010 8:15 AM | Permalink | Add Comment | TrackBacks A little unconventional war [Greyhawk]
It seems you can't read (or watch) a news report on Afghanistan lately without encountering something new and different - radical, even - about our approach to war. Like this unusual example of advertising in the Washington Post:
The plan has indeed been advertised. Admiral Mullen mentioned Marja during a pre-Christmas visit to Afghanistan, Marja - a region west of Kandahar - remains a Taliban hotbed. "It's been very clear for weeks now for the need to clear out Marja, and that's going to happen," Mullen said. "It's going to happen at a time and place of our choosing, but it's going to happen." ...and multiple news articles on the pending offensive have appeared since. Some may question the wisdom of the approach, but certainly announcing our intent is not a radical new concept. The November 2004 attack on Fallujah was undoubtedly the most widely telegraphed punch ever thrown in the history of warfare - at least since the first battle for Fallujah - even though no one expected the enemy would choose peace there. But as for the wish that a potential enemy will "see the inevitability" rather than choose to fight - as much as some might be disappointed in that outcome it's something we should all want. Similar sentiments were expressed in a less newspaper-friendly way by Marine General James Mattis in Iraq in 2003 After the invasion he sent home his tanks and artillery pieces and went to Iraqi military leaders in each area his troops were in."I come in peace," Mattis recalled telling them. "I didn't bring artillery. But I'm pleading with you, with tears in my eyes: If you fuck with me, I'll kill you all." In fact, little has changed from our approach to the battlefields of Iraq to the battlefields of Afghanistan. Follow the Fallujah link above and you'll find this post-battle quote from 2005: "We're mostly known for killing the bad guys" says Lt. Col. Harvey Williams, a reserve officer with the Marine 5th Civil Affairs Group. But killing alone can't defeat the insurgency. Win over the populace or lose the war. And explanations of exactly that approach were appearing in newspapers as early as 2003 - where they were dismissed as an illegal Bush administration propaganda effort directed at the American public. What has changed - and clearly - is the tone of newspaper coverage. And the certain knowledge in the minds of those who would potentially lead or encourage a bloody opposition to US and Afghan forces in Marja or elsewhere that General Mattis wasn't bluffing. In that regards, it's a damn good thing, one might correctly conclude, that we didn't abandon Iraq. Posted February 7, 2010 7:39 AM | Permalink | 3 Comments | TrackBacks
February 6, 2010"Nine good men died that day" [Greyhawk]Jim Hanson on the Battle of Wanat: "I happen to know a number of folks who were there - who survived that," Jim says, "I've had the time to hear their stories about that first hand, and I'm not convinced that what I'm reading in the media these days matches up with what I was told by these folks." Audio at the link. Update: a missive on accountability from the Sniper here. Posted February 6, 2010 2:33 PM | Permalink | Add Comment | TrackBacks
February 5, 2010Remember this man? Michael Patrick McManus Arrested [Mrs Greyhawk]Michael Patrick McManus was arrested tonight by the Houston FBI. Charge is Stolen Valor. "The blog reads like an old time wanted poster: Wanted for stolen valor. Do you know this man? Reward" ![]() "He also said the chin whiskers are a dead giveaway. He says no true serviceman would dishonor the uniform by appearing in public with facial hair." Cdr Salamander: "This was a Joint operation between milbloggers, the traditional media, POWNet, the FBI, and mostly you - the readers of milblogs." More from KTRK Houston:
Good advice from Chuck Z: "Don't ask, Don't tell, and don't wear medals you didn't earn." More here and here and here and here... Greyhawk update: That infamous wanted poster used by ABC, was made (and shared) by Mrs G. I learned long ago it's not wise to p!$$ her off... For the real deal, read about Capt. Joshua Glover
Previously: CSI Milbloggers Michael Patrick McManus Chan, aka General Ballduster McSoulpatch Meet Michael Patrick McManus aka General Douchey McChinpubes Pitchfork Brigade, Stolen Valor Imposter Wanted Posted February 5, 2010 9:48 PM | Permalink | 9 Comments | TrackBacks The hold up [Greyhawk]Like William Jacobson, I had to wonder why so many left wing blogs spontaneously demonstrated concern over the "Shelby hold" story today. It's just not that big a problem - as he notes, Just as there are rules to place a "hold" on nominees, there are rules to remove that hold. The Democrats just don't want to follow those rules. Which is correct- but not entirely. In fact, on further review: Holds can be overcome, but it takes 60 votes in the 100-member Senate. While tradition-bound senators are typically reluctant to take that step, they did so Thursday in voting to confirm nominees to the Labor Department and the General Services Administration. So not only can they do it, they did it this week. They unblocked the ones they wanted, and sent out a memo on the rest. (Seventy? Really?) Anyhow, finally found the answer:
Now that at least makes sense - if they wanted to confirm the President's nominees they'd confirm them; if they wanted to change the Senate rules now that they no longer have a "supermajority" they'd send a memo and get a dutifully outraged response. I doubt they really want to change the rules though - more likely they just want to remind voters that they just can't get anything done because of those damn Republicans! (Pay no attention to those two behind the curtain, or this demonstration that the House can do anything it wants as fast as it wants, too...) I'm still left with questions - like "is that a backlog, or did the President just nominate 70 new government employees?" Or "are they newly-created positions, or are these replacements for people who recently quit?" Or (on another tangential issue), "do we need a counter-IED Center at Redstone? It sounds more important than anything Jack Murtha ever earmarked, but is it?" And "can the USAF Tanker issue ever be resolved?" (I think that last one's a "no" - too many congress types in too many States and too many companies making parts and sub-parts...) But the President does have one answer - and it explains why they thought going this route was a good idea: Americans are too stupid to "get it."
At least he didn't call us "retarded". Update: another odd aspect of this story is the misuse and abuse of the terms "pork" and "earmark" - errors addressed here. It's amazing how many people apparently misunderstand the terms (see links at first two links in this post). One might be tempted to claim that vindicates Obama's "American's just don't understand" statement, but I think the majority of those who've made the "error" do so under the (White House-approved) assumption that their readers are stupid ( nothing new). As to motive, the desire for hypocrisy charges against Tea Party folks (should they choose not to condemn the Senator from Alabama) is probably more than enough. Posted February 5, 2010 7:27 PM | Permalink | 2 Comments | TrackBacks Heads will roll [Greyhawk]...but they'll be the wrong ones. "U.S. commanders in Afghanistan face tougher discipline for battlefield failures" reads the headline in the Washington Post. Hard to quibble about that. I mean, I suppose one could argue that the words are vague and undefined, but since we're now officially committed to "success" in Afghanistan, failure is clearly the exact opposite of that. The military does not release figures on disciplinary actions taken against field commanders. But officials familiar with recent investigations said letters of reprimand or other disciplinary action have been recommended for officers involved in three ambushes in which U.S. troops battled Taliban forces in remote villages in 2008 and 2009. And certainly we all agree that failure shouldn't be rewarded, that nobody's perfect, and that many successful people are those who learned from failure and became better for it - though sometimes not in the military. "Such administrative actions can scuttle chances for promotion and end a career if they are made part of an officer's permanent personnel file," - but that still beats death, another punishment for battlefield failure often meted out during the battle by those who didn't. Such are the fortunes of war. The story also mentions the surviving family members of those who fell at Keating - fell most likely due to the failures of others. They are part of the source of pressure as used in this quote: "The reprimands come amid growing political pressure from lawmakers who have pushed the military to assign greater accountability for incidents in which large numbers of U.S. troops are killed or wounded." And they absolutely have a right to expect answers. The question - as it always is - is who screwed up? Here's one example of a government answer:
But that's followed immediately with "the squadron and brigade commanders overseeing the Kamdesh outpost had been pressing to close it for months after they determined that it made no sense to keep troops in the area." So here's the answer they should get, but won't - in as simple terms as possible.
That answer doesn't appear in the newspaper coverage. It isn't news - it's just the truth. But all that's in the past. So let's keep moving forward, with all eyes focused on our clear path to success. Posted February 5, 2010 4:07 PM | Permalink | 2 Comments | TrackBacks Corpsmen: here to help [Greyhawk]I'm not going to bash anyone for mispronouncing an unfamiliar term - all of us have done it at one time or another, especially if trying to speak a foreign language or just discussing areas in which we have little experience or expertise. Since I've always seen one purpose of this site as familiarizing those not familiar I sure don't want to humiliate anyone who's trying to learn. And I also try to ask the questions others fear to ask - like when you think about it, shouldn't it be corpsperson? Back to the educatin': for those who aren't familiar with their mission, among other things they're the front line guys in charge of doctrine. (Click that link or audio player below for correct pronunciation.) Whenever someone gets hurt, they immediately start doctrine, and hopefully their patient gets better. (A more graphic explanation here.) And once again... ...but this time to give credit for at least not pronouncing it "Multi-National Corpse-Iraq." Now, for serious education: for those actually interested in what Navy Corpsmen are all about, Doc in the Box is the place to go. Besides operating one of the longest-running milblogs around, Sean Dustman is a veteran of multiple combat tours in which he had more important things to worry about than the King's English. (In addition to all that, I've met him and he's a great guy.) Posted February 5, 2010 1:01 PM | Permalink | 2 Comments | TrackBacks |
February 8, 2010Dawn Patrol 02/07/2010 [Mrs Greyhawk]
Welcome to the Dawn Patrol, our daily roundup of information on the War on Terror and other topics - from the MilBlogs and various sources around the world. If you're a blogger, you can join the conversation. If you link to any of these stories, add a link to the Dawn Patrol too and your trackback will be added to the list. Hat Tips to the Dawn Patrol are greatly appreciated.Refresh for updates.
Updating... AFGHANISTANTaliban Prepares for Major NATO Offensive -- [Voice of America] Special Forces Assassins Infiltrate Taliban Stronghold in Afghanistan -- [Times Online] Dear Moderate Taliban -- [David Bellavia site - Semperpapa] British sniper avenges his friend by killing Taliban -- [Telegraph] Taliban defiant as Afghans flee ahead of assault -- [AFP] Afghanistan's NATO head: Military push needs gov't -- [Herald-Standard] Gen. McChrystal Discusses Next Phase in Counterinsurgency Effort
An Epic Tragedy -- [Afghanistan My Last Tour - in Afghanistan] Love, No War -- [Afghanistan My Last Tour - in Afghanistan] First MEDEVAC for Joint U.S., Afghan Crew -- [Soldiers' Angels Germany] Amnesty International is 'damaged' by Taliban link -- [Times Online] IRAQOfficials Confirm Kidnapping of U.S. Contractor in Iraq -- [Washington Post] Iraq Militant Video Shows Abducted American -- [Voice of America] Iraq vote row to be resolved before campaign starts -- [AFP] Former Iraqi premier slams de-Baathification -- [The Peninsula] U.S. AND OTHER PARTS OF THE WORLDAfrican Taliban Appoint Special Envoy to US -- [Jawa Report] Ahmadinejad Orders Production of Higher-enriched Uranium -- [Washington Post] Gates: Tough Sanctions Could Still Work -- [Defense Link] WAR ON TERROR /TERRORISMObama Challenges Terrorism Critics -- [New York Times] Obama official accuses GOP of using terrorism as 'political football' -- [Los Angeles Times] Clinton Sees Islamist Terror as No. 1 Threat -- [Washington Times] SUPPORTING THE TROOPS...OR NOTSpecial Delivery -- [Michael Yon] German-born US Soldier headed for OCS two years after being seriously wounded in Iraq -- [Soldiers' Angels Germany] MILITARYStolen Honor as A Pick-Up Line? -- [Maggie's Farm] Absurd Stolen Valor case moves to the judicial phase -- [BurnPit - MOTHAX] Guess what I have in my hot little hands? -- [This Ain't Hell...] Another Update on Stolen Valor Imposter; what his real rank was -- [Bouhammer]
WELCOME HOMEGIs back from Iraq get 'rock star' welcome -- [Waukegan News Sun] Ashwaubenon students welcome home Iraq veteran Steve Nolan with hugs -- [Green Bay Press Gazette] THE MEDIA/SOCIAL MEDIAChild Abuse: Because of Bush! -- [Greyhawk] A Well-Written War, Told in the First Person -- [NY Times] To be fair, "fog of war" was suggested by the editors... -- [Abu Muqawama] On military blogs and social media. -- [Castra Praetoria - in Bahrain] White House press corps feels bypassed by Obama in favor of TV shows, YouTube -- [Washington Post] POLITICSRep. John Murtha dead at 77 -- [Washington Post] John-Jack Murtha is Dead -- [Greyhawk] Blast from the Past - Murtha: 2006 Town Hall
HUMOR / SATIRE
Iraq, Afghanistan, War, Terrorism, Military, Politics, Media, MilBlogs, dawn patrol Mudville
|
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
![]()
![]() I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email. Original content copyright © 2003 - 2009 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed. Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com ![]() |