
![]() | |

| [-] |

| [−] |
| [−] |
| [−] |
| [−] |
Prev | List | Random | Next |

NZ Bear notes some gamesmanship within the ecosystem, as initially reported by the commissar.
Trendy, did you say? Visit here, and here, and here.
Multiple blogs by the same person, links to the point of absurdity, gaming the system on site counters... to what end? All those great numbers mean nothing when you've got zero credibility for your opinions.
What aspect of anything you say can be considered valid? Comments on your blog and others - how many do you add yourself?
Site meter visits - how many due to your own repeated clicking, when you're not copying and pasting links?
New Weblog Showcase votes - do 4 or 5 people account for those 60-vote results?
Really I think most folks look at the blogosphere as a place where their voice can be heard. What benefit is there in lying about those stats? There's still nobody listening to you now, and less likelihood of it in the future.
Weird. Unfortunate. Sad.
But not surprising. See this post, from early last summer.
The whole thing is especially disappointing with respect to the New Weblog Showcase, where deserving new bloggers come in second every week.
Like Baysense, a Blog with an old fashioned (pre-pure political motivation) look at environmentalism. (Yes, that's my vote.)
A great contrast to the I-believe-anything-I-read, America-is-destroying-the-world robotic collection of comment-free re-posts that is going to win this week.
Keep up the good work NZ. There are those who appreciate what you do.
Marisa Tomei and Joe Pesci in My Cousin Vinny:
Vinny: Is that a drip I hear?
Mona Lisa: Yeah.
Vinny: Weren't you the last one to use the bathroom?
Mona Lisa: So?
Vinny: Well, did you use the faucet?
Mona Lisa Yeah!
Vinny: Why didn't you turn it off?
Mona Lisa: I did turn it off.
Vinny: Well, if you turned it off, why am I listening to it?
Mona Lisa: Did it ever occur to you that it could be turned off and drip at the same time?
Vinny: No, because if you turned it off, it wouldn't drip.
Mona Lisa: Maybe its broken!
Vinny: Is that what you're saying? It's broken?
Mona Lisa: Yeah, that's it, it's broken.
Vinny: You sure?
Mona Lisa: I'm positive.
Vinny: Maybe you didn't twist it hard enough.
Mona Lisa: I twisted it just right.
Vinny: How can you be so sure?
Mona Lisa: If you will look in the manual, you will see that this particular model faucet requires a range of 10-16 foot pounds of torque. I routinely twist the maximum allowable torquage.
Vinny: How can you be sure you used 16 foot pounds of torque?
Mona Lisa: Because I used a Craftsman model 1019 Laboratory edition, signature series torque wrench. The kind used by Cal Tech High Energy physicists, and NASA engineers.
Vinny: In that case, how can you be sure THAT'S accurate?
Mona Lisa: Because a split second before the torque wrench was applied to the faucet handle, it had been calibrated by top members of the state and federal department of weights and measures, to be dead on balls accurate. Here's the certificate of validation!
Vinny: Dead on balls accurate?
Moca Lisa: It's an industry term.
Vinny: I guess the ... thing is broken!
I've shortened "dead on balls accurate" to 'DOBA', and use it to describe any situation where someone is exactly right, certified as calibrated by top members of the state and federal department of weights and measures.
As in "Baldilocks offers a dead-on-balls-accurate assessment of Jesse Jackson here."
(She also has a great MilBlogs roundup).
Drudge has published reporter Mike Allen's private notes taken during the President's Iraq trip.
8:27 p.m. (7:27 p.m. Texan) ? Air Force One was airborne. Journalists peeked out the shades and saw that the plane had on none of the running lights that are customarily visible, including the red or green ones on the wings. The movie "Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines" had begun playing in the press cabin.
Layer upon layer of Republican propaganda. I'm not sure how the intrepid reporters survived this Clockwork Orange-type brainwashing but obviously we can not accept as fact anything these guys reported during the trip. A distinct call for outraged Lefty howling if ever I heard one.
Excerpts from and link to Allen's resulting WaPo story here.
Hat tip to he who knows not rest.
Fox news reports that the fighting in Iraq continues:
MADRID, Spain — Seven members of Spain's military intelligence agency were killed and one was injured on a highway south of Baghdad Saturday when their convoy was ambushed.<...>
The Spaniards weren't the only allies in the war on terror to suffer at the hands of guerrillas Saturday, as two Japanese diplomats were killed after their car was ambushed near the Iraqi city of Tikrit. The two were in the city to attend a reconstruction aid conference, according to Foreign Minister Yoriko Kawaguchi.
The Japanese deaths — believed to be the first by hostile fire in a war zone since World War II — came as the Asian nation prepares to send non-combat troops to help rebuild Iraq.
Japanese officials in Tokyo said Sunday that Japan would not change its plans to dispatch the soldiers.
<...>
After the attack on the Spanish agents, journalists for Sky News, Fox News' sister network in Britain, saw bodies in the road and a jubilant crowd of Iraqis kicking them.
Sky News gave an eyewitness account of a mob of 20 to 30 people rejoicing over the bodies. One correspondent saw a child of eight or nine pretending to kick a body. Another person was seen with a foot on the chest of one of the bodies. Shouts of "Praise to Saddam!" were heard.
The civilians then reportedly turned hostile to the journalists and they were forced to leave.
Some additional details from Sky News:
...seven members of Spain's National Intelligence Centre and two Japanese nationals were killed in separate attacks...The Japanese men were diplomats attending a reconstruction conference.
They were shot as they stopped to buy food and drinks at a stand on the road between Baghdad and Tikrit.
<...>
Spain's defence minister Frederico Trillo said the Spaniards were members of an eight-man team returning from a mission when they were ambushed. Another member escaped.
Sky News correspondent David Bowden was first on the scene of the attack
<...>
"We were actually driving from Hillah and we saw these men lying by the side of the road after the ambush," he said.
"Locals said that 30 minutes earlier the convoy had been attacked."
The Sky team was forced to leave after the crowd turned on them." We filmed for a couple of minutes but the crowd were shouting 'Praise to Saddam', so we left. They were banging on our vehicle as we sped off."
Have we lost the peace? Perhaps not. In stark contrast, MilBlogger Jb at Jb's Sanctuary (Who am I? Well I'm a Program Analyst. In the National Guard I'm a Special Forces Team SGT, Prior Intelligence NCO and Communication NCO 12 years active duty) links to Paratrooper.net posts on some different news coming out of Iraq - forward progress being made towards shutting down some of these anti-coalition attacks and helping the people of Iraq to a better future.
Including
The 82d Abn. Div. has conducted three offensive operations, all of which were cordon and searches. Soldiers also carried out 167 patrols, including eight joint patrols with the Iraqi Border Guard and Iraqi Police, manned 47 observation posts along Highway 10. During this time, one enemy personnel was wounded and 78 were captured.Paratroopers from 1st Battalion, 504th Parachute Infantry Regiment conducted an air assault cordon and search northeast of Fallujah last night. The operation resulted in the capture of 37 enemy personnel. In addition to the captured personnel, the paratroopers confiscated numerous small arms weapons, Jordanian and Syrian currency, fake identification cards, radios, and Thuraya phones. All of the individuals are being held for further investigation.
and
AR RAMADI, Iraq – In a raid last night, soldiers from 1st Battalion, 124th Infantry Regiment of Task Force “All American” captured the individual believed to be responsible for the attack on the Ar Ramadi police chief’s son two nights ago. Coalition forces believe the captured man has also been carrying out attacks on soldiers in the region.Local Iraqis tipped off coalition forces on where the attacker was located. Tips on anti coalition activities have increased six times since last month. Iraqis continue to take security into their own hands by cooperating with the coalition.
In a separate incident near Iskandariyah, soldiers from 1st Battalion, 32nd Infantry Regiment captured 16 individuals in the act of preparing an improvised explosive device. The men were found preparing multiple mortar tubes, mortars, grenades, and rocket propelled grenades for an attack.
and
Based on a tip by a local Iraqi citizen, soldiers from the 1st Battalion, 34th Armor Regiment conducted a search of a house near Habbaniyah. At the house the soldiers detained four former regime loyalists and found two grenades, a shotgun, a computer with printer (found printing counterfeit Dinar as soldiers entered the house), rounds packed with C4 plastic explosives, three sticks of dynamite, 12 blasting caps, a 50 lbs bag of propellant, and a satellite phone. The tip that led to the search further demonstrates the increased cooperation between the local populace and coalition forces.In a separate incident, soldiers from 1st Brigade conducted a cordon and search in Ar Ramadi last night. Their search yielded anti-coalition paperwork including Jihad sign-up sheets. Later this morning, the resident of that house was detained as he went to coalition forces to claim his paperwork. He is also suspected of financing the production and placement of IEDs in the Ramadi area.
In the town of Hit, civil affairs personnel initiated a sewer repair project in conjunction with local officials. The project will correct the current issues, which have local residents concerned about potential health problems in the city. The project will improve the quality of life and living conditions of the town’s 5,000 residents.
Could this all be true? are there two sides to the battle? CNN didn't report it! Reuters, the BBC, and Agence France Presse have no details either. So where's the truth?
Maybe we'll know soon, because on the heels of President Bush and Senator Clinton's Iraq visits comes this. (Hopefully not in the tradition of Jane Fonda, Howie Dean's brother, Rachel Corrie or the human shields - hey, I haven't heard, have the human shields gone over to help rebuild?)
Anti-war groups arrange Baghdad trip for families of servicemembersBy Sandra Jontz, Stars and Stripes Pacific edition, November 29, 2003
ARLINGTON, Va. — A 10-member delegation, made up mostly of U.S. military families, leaves the United States on Saturday for a eight-day tour of Baghdad organized by two antiwar groups to see first-hand what their loved ones face daily.
Their mission is to arm themselves with first-hand knowledge in hopes of enacting change when they come home, said Medea Benjamin, founding director of Global Exchange, an international human rights organization.
“God bless the troops, but bring them home,” Benjamin said. “The delegation is behind their loved ones, but we feel the best thing we can do is get them out of Iraq as quickly as possible.”
<...>
“We’ve talked to troops on the ground who are confused about why they’re there, who feel it’s not the right role for the U.S. … and the occupation has turned into something of a potential for a real quagmire,” Benjamin said.
The group hopes to meet with chief U.S. administrator L. Paul Bremer and Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, the top military commander, and with Iraqi governing council members, other human rights organizations, women’s organizations, and to visit hospitals and schools.
The delegation needs no U.S. military permission to travel into Iraq, though officials have recommended against it.
“We don’t recommend that any private group of individuals, no matter how well-intentioned, travels into Iraq until the country is more stable and secure,” said Central Command spokesman Marine Maj. Pete Mitchell.
So why do they go? One of the mothers had this explanation via press release on Global Exchange's homepage.
"I know it is very risky to go to Iraq right now, but I feel compelled to go there. I want to see my son and daughter and talk to the other troops. I want to talk to the Iraqi people, especially the women," said Anabelle Valencia, a military mother traveling with the delegation.
Sounds reasonable. (Though I'm not sure why women are more important to her then men.)
"And I want to talk to the US authorities there and ask them when they are going to send our troops home and allow the Iraqis to run their own country."
We'll await the answer with bated breath.
Speaking of Senator Clinton in Baghdad, John Galt, in Iraq with the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA), reports (via his Blog Deeds, a "Friend of MilBlogs") some ground truth on that event. Mr. Galt, who met the Senator during her stay, offers a few words and lot of insight.
She seemed disappointed at the cool reception she got at the CPA mess hall for lunch. Most just stared silently.
Some things are just bad for your digestion.
Perhaps while the President was in Iraq he asked around about this story?
If you want to have your voice heard, you may want to try petitions here and here.
From European Stars and Stripes
ARLINGTON, Va. ? The Army?s investigation of an officer accused of crossing the line in an attempt to get information from an Iraqi detainee is generating a grass-roots protest among some Americans who say the safety of troops trumps any temporary violation of interrogation rules.Army Lt. Col. Allen B. West, who is assigned to the 4th Infantry Division?s 2nd Battalion, 20th Field Artillery Regiment, in Tikrit, Iraq, stands accused of actions that occurred Aug. 20, at a detainee holding site in Taji, Iraq.
Some members of Congress, meanwhile, are asking whether those rules may not be too strict in light of the all-out war on terror.
?We?re trying to bring democracy and a better way of life to [Iraq], and you don?t do that by employing terrorist tactics in reverse,? John M. McHugh, R-N.Y., said in a Tuesday telephone interview. ?But how many American lives are we willing to trade for ideals?
?Maybe the days of putting someone in a comfortable chair and giving them a cigarette are over.?
Posted at 2240Z
Let's contrast the domestic reports with the overseas coverage of the latest economic news:
From NY Daily News:
The wind is now solidly at the back of the economy, pushing ahead a long-awaited recovery.Orders for durable goods, those made to last at least three years, climbed 3.3% last month, the biggest gain in 15 months, the Commerce Department said yesterday.
And weekly jobless claims fell 11,000 to 351,000, the lowest level since January 2001, the Labor Department said. Any figure below 400,000 suggests an improving job market.
"We're in a full-blown economic recovery," said Ethan Harris, co-chief economist at Lehman Brothers. "There are encouraging signs, such as a continuing broadening out of the recovery to include the labor market."
And from Chanel News Asia (bold emphasis added by yours truly):
WASHINGTON : US economic growth exploded in the third quarter to hit a 19-year record annual pace of 8.2 percent, much faster than first thought, the government said.An initial estimate last month had already indicated roaring growth in the July-September quarter of 7.2 percent, more than double the 3.3-percent expansion of the second quarter.
Consumers, enriched by massive tax cuts and super-low interest rates, splashed out in the quarter and drove economic growth to its steepest rate since 1984, stunning analysts.
Critically, businesses also joined the party.
"The economy is firing on all cylinders," said BMO Financial Group analyst Sal Guatieri on Tuesday.
Consumer spending shot up by a six-year record 6.4 percent, with purchases of big ticket items such as cars up 26.5 percent and other goods up 7.6 percent, the Commerce Department said.
Expenditure on services rose 2.1 percent.
Housing investment leapt 22.7 percent.
The latest figures showed businesses stepped up investment by 14 percent, substantially more than first estimated.
It was the second quarterly increase in investment by companies, which had been too timid to spend money after repeated shocks from the September 11, 2001 attacks to the Iraq war.
Business investment in software and equipment shot up by a five-year record 18.4 percent, while spending on structures edged up 0.2 percent.
As the dollar weakened, exports surged 11.0 percent, reversing a 1.0-percent decline the previous quarter. Imports rose 1.5 percent.
"The report contains the seeds of a strong, sustained recovery," Guatieri said.
Text of another memo recently leaked from some unknown source in the Whitehouse:
Things to do this week1.
Appear in London. Give most important foreign policy speech of recent history while demonstrations fizzle.2.
Get that Medicare bill passed with support of AARP, in the face of rabid Democratic fat-cat opposition.3.
Have secret Thanksgiving diner with troops in Baghdad (check with Laura).4.
Have 3d quarter economic indicators released indicating gains exceeding all expectations; stun analysts, credit tax cuts
DNC operatives are still without comment.
Text of a memo recently leaked from unknown source in the Whitehouse:
Things to do this week1.
Appear in London. Give most important foreign policy speech of recent history while demonstrations fizzle.2.
Get that Medicare bill passed with support of AARP, in the face of rabid Democratic fat-cat opposition.3.
Have secret Thanksgiving diner with troops in Baghdad (check with Laura).
Expect DNC response as soon as their meds kick in.
From The Washington Post:
Inside Bush's Top-Secret Trip...This reporter, who represented newspapers in the media pool and provided a download for all his colleagues who could not be there, was first approached about the trip less than four hours before takeoff. I was talking on my cell phone on the front lawn of Crawford Middle School, where the White House sets up a media filing center in the gymnasium, seven miles down the road from Bush's ranch. Steve Atkiss, 26, deputy director of presidential advance, beckoned for me to climb into his mammoth white rented Dodge pickup.
Atkiss drove a few blocks to a concealed parking lot and told me to step out, that someone wanted to talk to me. Bartlett stepped out of his car, smiling mischievously at the surprise meeting.
"I have news," he said. "The president is going to Baghdad."
He said that I was going, but that I could not tell my employer or family what was up. It was 3:45 p.m. Texas time, and Atkiss told me that I should get changed and meet him at 5:30 p.m. in the parking lot of the Baylor University stadium where the Secret Service and military aides regularly cream the press corps in softball.
At the rendezvous, several of the magazine and wire-service photographers were still convinced that they were the victims of an extremely elaborate practical joke, and were plotting what they were going to do to with Atkiss when he finally came clean.
The two-vehicle motorcade from the softball field was joined by a white Jeep Grand Cherokee with Blake Gottesman, the president's personal aide, at the wheel, Deputy Chief of Staff Joseph Hagin riding shotgun and Bartlett in the back seat.
Bush's simplest movements, even a trip to the Crawford coffee shop or a speech a block from the White House, are usually accompanied by an entourage of 50 or more. For now, it was 12. With no security, Atkiss led the way to the Waco airstrip, getting caught in rush-hour traffic, a rare experience in the White House bubble.
The shades in the press cabin on Air Force One had been pulled down, and both doors were closed, so the reporters could not see Bush arrive or what personnel and firepower accompanied him. The reporters knew he was aboard only when they heard the engines rev.
Now, the plane was cruising at an average speed of 665 mph, Baghdad or bust. Richard Keil, a 6-foot-3 inch reporter for Bloomberg News whom Bush calls "Stretch," leaned across the aisle of the hushed press cabin.
"The president of the United States is AWOL, and we're with him," a grinning Keil said as he shoved aside his iPod headset. "The ultimate road trip."
Two quotes to note "...deputy director of presidential advance, beckoned for me to climb into his mammoth white rented Dodge pickup."
and
"...Richard Keil, a 6-foot-3 inch reporter for Bloomberg News whom Bush calls "Stretch,"..."
White pickup? Stretch?
Feel free to comment to your hearts' content regarding the elitism of the Republican Party in general, and our Commander in Chief in particular. More from me later. (Nyuck nyuck)
Thanksgiving is upon us, feasting and football are in store for America. I certainly hope yours is a peaceful one, with much for which to give thanks.
Speaking of football, former star running back of the Democratic party (and still a power broker) Jesse Jackson had some shocking revelations about the war in Iraq in a Chicago Sun-Times editorial this week:
Rush To Iraq War Backfiring On U.S.By Jesse Jackson
On Sunday, two American soldiers were shot in broad daylight in Mosul, once thought to be a center of pro-America sentiment. An enraged mob of teenagers then dragged their bodies out of their vehicle and stoned them with concrete blocks.
These innocent men -- adding to the now nearly 10,000 casualties in Iraq -- are tragic witness to the gulf between President Bush's promise and his policy, between his rhetoric and reality.
Sure, Jesse's twisting the horrific deaths of two brave Americans to his own purposes, but hey, he's just whipping up the crowd. The early part of the sermon.
On his visit to our closest ally, Great Britain, and in the face of massive opposition from the British people, the president offered the British something that he has not offered his own citizens: a broad explanation of his policy and purpose.
Massive opposition? Since four times the number turned out to protest the fox hunting ban one wonders why the rev isn't cashing in on that hot button issue too. And yes, we can only hope that some day Americans will be able to hear speeches from Britain, and those words delivered only to Londoners could be heard all around the world. Perhaps, somehow, someday, using the web...
Now Jesse starts tossing bombshells.
Bush proclaims his support for strong international institutions and his commitment to NATO. Yet he launched the war on Iraq in the face of opposition from the United Nations and the NATO alliance. Our troops bear the burden of occupation virtually alone in Iraq.
Yes, you heard it here first; Shocker #1: the world was against us.
Only now, with U.S. soldiers shouldering an occupation that they were not trained for and with U.S. citizens presented with an $87 billion bill for a mission they were told would pay for itself, does the president sheepishly return to the U.N. and seek support. Sadly, the U.N. and the allies now demonstrate their relevance by leaving the American people to pay in lives and money for the war they opposed.
Shocker #1a and 2 (in one brief paragraph!): The world is still against us! War is expensive! (Could these be related? Jesse doesn't say.)
The president states that he must defend Americans, and this may require the ''violent restraint of violent men.'' He says that free nations must, when the last resort arises, be willing to ''restrain aggression and evil by force.''But the war on Iraq was not a war of last resort. The administration disdained the pleas of U.N. inspectors and allies for more time. The war on Iraq was not a defense of America against aggression. It was not even part of the war on terror. The president admits that Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with Sept. 11, and in fact, Osama bin Laden despised the secular dictator.
#3: There was a "rush to war" - 12 years was just not enough!
#4: Iraq was not a threat to America!
#5: No connection between Saddam and Osama!
I'm starting to think Bush lied! Why? Why?
No, the war on Iraq was, as Bush's own former head of policy planning states, a ''war of choice'' -- waged not to defend Americans from an imminent threat, but to fulfill an imperial fantasy of freeing Iraq, transforming the Middle East and strengthening America's grip on oil.
Bombshell 6! "It's all about the oiiiiiiil!" Why didn't I think of that? I wonder if Cheney's Halliburton cronies are profiting from this.
Bush told the British that ''freedom must be chosen and defended by those who choose it.'' Heralding the progress of democracy in the Middle East, he acknowledged that the progress ''was not imposed from abroad, and neither will the greater progress we hope to see.''But his policy is to impose democracy on Iraq by the point of a gun, by the boot of an occupying army, by the order of an American proconsul. He vows to ''finish the work of democracy we have begun,'' ending with grandiloquence: ''Democracy will succeed in Iraq because our will is firm, our word is good.'' But it is the Iraqi will that is in question, not ours. They must choose, not us.
Young American men and women are sacrificing their lives and their limbs in the gulf between the president's principles and his practice. They were sent into war without the support of allies or the world community. They were sent into a war not of self-defense -- for Iraq posed no threat to the United States -- but in a ''war of choice.''
They came to Iraq as liberators, but they are despised as occupiers. They came to introduce democracy, but they are viewed as imposing a foreigner's order. They came to build an Iraqi nation, but their presence rouses nationalist opposition. They came to bring peace, and are dying in what is only the beginning of a bitter civil war inside Iraq.
In defense of his policy, the president asks, ''Who will say that Iraq was better off when Saddam Hussein was strutting and killing?'' Surely, we can hope that Iraqis, freed of a brutal dictator, will choose a better way, but that, of course, remains to be seen.
Buried amidst most of this closing hyperbole is this concept, (shocker #7, though only hinted at): The Iraqis aren't capable of having a democratic society. The rev doesn't directly address his causes for concern; one gathers it's somehow because of Bush. They would have replaced Saddam with a democratic paradise, but Bush hosed it up.
But as the mutilation of U.S. soldiers by Iraqis demonstrates, one thing is clear already. This nation and those young men and women who serve it would have been far better off if the president had practiced what he preaches.
Those are Jesse's final words on the subject. (I wish) If you didn't get it, it's another twisted use of the American deaths in Iraq.
Summary of Jesse's points:
1: The world was against us.
1a: The world is still against us.
2: War is expensive.
3: There was a "rush to war" - 12 years was just not enough time. The inspections were working. The sanctions were working.
4: Iraq was not a threat to America.
5: There was no connection between Saddam and Osama.
6: "It's all about the oiiiiiiil!"
7: The Iraqis aren't capable of having a democratic society.
And here's one he missed: Where are the WMDs? Hmmm... perhaps it's inherent in #4.
In light of this new evidence, presented by a man of God, we must now conclude that Bush lied.
< /condescending tongue in cheek attitude. >
Yes, the rev published that screed on the day before Thanksgiving, months after all those arguments were beaten to death by the droolsquad wing of the Democratic party. I'm not sure why he was out of the game when the issues were current.
Jesse is the tired veteran running back of the Democratic Party; once feared by the opposition, still a cause for some concern as he has clout in some corners, but long past his glory. He'll take the ball, he'll run, but just not too far. Touchdowns will be rare, and he didn't score one here.
In fact I have a mental image here of a losing football team's kicker, attempting a meaningless late-game field goal to make the final score 47 - 6. Except Jesse just missed his kick; it went wide left.
Waaay Left.
Yes, Iraqi youth's are reported to have mutilated the corpses of Americans; in times of war and peace one expects such cruelty from certain elements. Recall the Blackhawk Down incident; this is eerily similar, except in that tragedy in Mogadishu we were trying to deliver food. I'm always shocked, always saddened, never surprised at the ruthless behavior of representatives of radical fringe groups like that.
Sadly I'm becoming increasingly less surprised at those like Jackson who cheer them on.
Welcome to 50 north.
Germany (and most of Europe) is on latitude with Canada, for the most part. Forty north, the line that runs through the American near-center-of-mass, paved and labeled I70, barely kisses continental Europe on the far side of the Atlantic.
At 50 north in summer there are a few more precious hours of daylight, and in winter comes the payback. These days I watch the sun rise on my way to work, and if I'm fortunate enough to call a day after a mere nine hours I see it set on my way home.
It's November now, in the sense I remember from where I grew up. November is brown in trees and fields, with green here and there to remind us what green is. But it's the brown month to be sure, leaves off trees, hint of cold, and sheet metal sky, steel-grey with a luminous sheen where sunlight almost pokes through.
There's a beauty in all that. This is a beautiful country, make no mistake. At least this part of it. God and men have conspired well to create a feast for the eyes in almost every direction. The Germans fully appreciate this beauty. Is it strange then that for the ears they rely so much on imports?
American imports, for the most part. Did you catch the American Music Awards? From teeny-bopper icon Justin Timberlake to golden oldies Fleetwood Mac, "appearing via satellite from Germany" and without a Dixie Chicks moment. I note the Dixie Chicks were resoundingly booed when the announcer read their nomination, nearly a year after torpedoing themselves to get a quick burst of applause here in Europe. I had forgotten; for an instant I didn't understand the jeering, for a shorter moment I pitied them, and then I returned to not-giving-a-damn.
The Beatles were here first, you know. These folks whose musical heritage runs the gamut from Wagner to The Scorpions can claim "discovery" of rock's first definitive band.
And the Germans are not fickle in their preferences; once they determine something meets their approval they support it whole-heartedly, and they'll maintain loyalty to the bitter end. Perhaps to a fault. Remember the crowd that cheered Michael Jackson in Berlin, as he dangled a baby over the edge of his 5-star hotel balcony? Accused once again of child molestation in America, the King of Pop can do no wrong here. In America he is innocent until proven guilty, in Europe he is innocent. Rallies are held on his behalf throughout the continent.
How do you supose this (from Agence France Presse) reads to a German audience, almost always eager to believe their atrocities from the past century could be repeated anywhere?
The star's mother, Catherine Jackson, told the online version of Germany's Bunte magazine Friday that there were two interpretations of the law in the United States -- "one for whites and one for blacks".She suggested her 45-year-old son had been tricked ahead of a major police swoop on his house on Tuesday. "I wonder whether somebody could have set a trap for him and hidden false evidence in his house."
Always alert for opportunities to garner publicity get media "face time" serve justice, Jesse Jackson (no relation) has also gotten into the act.
"Michael deserves due process, the newsrooms should remain objective and the global community must not hasten to judgement (sic)," he said, branding the raid by up to 70 investigators on Jackson's Neverland Ranch "overkill."
Outrage from a man whose support of Shoshana Johnson has evaporated from the press and whose silence on the Lieutenant Colonel Allen West case speaks volumes as to his true character and motivation.
Make no mistake; Jacko is far from proven guilty. Perhaps, like Roman Polanski before him, he will come to live in Europe, where minds are apparently more open and accepting to certain behaviors. And where (at least in certain media circles) this view of American justice is considered witty and insightful.
(Cartoon and translation via David's Medienkritik.)
More to come...
Meet Colin Gregory Palmer:
After graduating from high school, I enrolled at SUNY Geneseo, in upstate New York.Geneseo was great for me. I became startlingly extroverted and I really enjoyed myself. I started out as a physics major. The department was a family and it was great to be surrounded my so many intelligent people. I had many interesting conversations that lasted long into the night.
A nice young man, and humble in not outright including himself as one of the intelligent, for from his writing one gets the impression he would be justified to do so. Let's learn more:
I eventually added a second major in sociology, and it was the best decision I made in college. It helped me better understand the environment I grew up in and to see the larger picture of the world. My political views on many subjects did a complete reversal. I've been unable to watch television since. It's great.
Indoctrination, anyone? Really, when I was in my late teens/early twenties, in post-draft, post-Vietnam America "cults" were the great threat to youth; young disaffected people much too savvy to be swayed by foolish ideas who 10-20 years earlier would have joined the hippies in San Fran were being snapped up by "religious" leaders who would "help them better understand the environment they grew up in and to see the larger picture of the world. Their political views on many subjects did a complete reversal." Echoes of such statements always set the alarm buzz off in the back of my mind.
Continuing, Colin tells us
I moved to London to attend the London Metropolitan University to obtain a masters in international economics and trade. It sounds like a plan, but I really have no idea what I want to do with my life. Sometimes I worry about the future, but I try not to. As Oscar Wilde says: Life is too important to be taken seriously.
We can check back with Colin in 20 years as to that last line, but for now let's assume his motivation is something other then to emulate a former president, that he is not a brainwashed product of lefty sociology professors desperately trying to re-ignite the passions of their youths, and instead is merely a young man on a voyage of discovery, out to broaden his horizons and see the wide, wide world.
Including the "big" anti-American demonstrations coinciding with his president's visit to London:
George Bush made me do it.Politically apathetic all my life, I barely followed the issues, never voted, and never much cared to.
After September 11th, the United States had the sympathy of the world. There was so much potential. But, in a few short years, Bush and his foreign policy turned that sympathy into hatred.
Bush forced me to get up, get out, and take to the streets.
At 11:00AM on November 19th, I joined the anti-war coalition at the London Eye for a protest march against Bush. It was the first political action of my life.
Young Colin is going to provide a participant's viewpoint into the demonstrations for us. I will tell you right away that his report is characterized by thoughtful commentary and his personal views are not unusual for someone young and in his position. He is candid and without guile, thus he does not even realize those passages in his story that strip bare the ludicrous position of the left and give insight into the motivations that really drive their 'movement':
We rounded the first street corner, and there was the media. Dozens of video cameras were carefully aligned an the same side of the street so as not to film each other. I'm used to watching events unfold on television - not being part of them.
Posted at 0846Z
At a certain few points in the President's speech in London one could believe for a minute that his writer was not unfamiliar with the blogosphere, as I heard the echo of a few points I've seen touted here and there over the past few weeks.
Take for instance the comparison of post-war Iraq to post war Germany. As noted by the CINC:
Since the liberation of Iraq, we have seen changes that could hardly have been imagined a year ago. A new Iraqi police force protects the people, instead of bullying them. More than 150 Iraqi newspapers are now in circulation, printing what they choose, not what they're ordered. Schools are open with textbooks free of propaganda. Hospitals are functioning and are well-supplied. Iraq has a new currency, the first battalion of a new army, representative local governments, and a Governing Council with an aggressive timetable for national sovereignty. This is substantial progress. And much of it has proceeded faster than similar efforts in Germany and Japan after World War II.
Now, certainly the blogosphere can't claim to be the source of this comparison point; one could as successfully claim the patent for the wheel. But without a doubt Glenn Reynolds has been the internet clearinghouse for supporting information, having linked numerous other bloggers' commendable efforts to document and validate the similarities.
Jessica's Well, perhaps the first out the gate, with the Life Magazine article that became an internet phenomenon:
The troops returning home are worried. “We’ve lost the peace,” men tell you. “We can’t make it stick.”A tour of the beaten-up cities of Europe six months after victory is a mighty sobering experience for anyone. Europeans. Friend and foe alike, look you accusingly in the face and tell you how bitterly they are disappointed in you as an American.
We have swept away Hitlerism, but a great many Europeans feel that the cure has been worse than the disease.
Then this from Instapundit's look at The Saturday Evening Post:
We have got into this German job without understanding what we were tackling or why. Imagine how incredulous we would have been if anybody had told us---even so recently as five years ago---that hundreds of thousands of Americans would be camped in the middle of Europe in 1946, completely responsible for the conduct and welfare of approximately 20,000,000 Germans?No wonder so many Americans are asking, “What are we doing in Germany?” They can see that the Russians and British and French are initiating projects which promise some direct benefits to them in their zones. But when they look at our zone they see only headaches.
And most recently this on occupied Japan:
Tokyo endured [the] winter [of 1945-1946] on the workings of an illegal economy. The black market encompassed thousands of sellers and millions of buyers dealing in every commodity of daily life. It was also a vast jungle of lawlessness that began with thefts and led to gang killings, turf wars, and casual murders, becoming at last a criminal demimonde of immense proportions. It embraced all classes and kinds of people. <...> It was the beginning for many mobster organizations, some of whose descendants still operate today. In Tokyo there were eight major syndicates, each with its own piece of turf around the major train stations...They fought amongst themselves and against other gangs, the Japanese mobs battling constantly for territory against the Koreans and Chinese. Guns were plentiful, another result of looted army depots. Unable or unwilling to intervene, police let gangs have at one another, and the shootouts continued for several years into the Occupation.
True or not it's well within the realm of possibility, and perhaps likely, that members of "Team Bush" are more then passingly familiar with Instapundit (and perhaps even Jessica's Well, it being a Midland, Texas based blog). So some influence from that source may have contributed to that brief mention in the speech.
You see the similarities, yes? The above articles give you that feeling of deja-vu? Of course, all of them are wrong. Thus sayeth Richard Benedetto of USA Today in an article Comparing Iraq To Nations After WWII (originally subtitled President's analogy draws criticism):
"It is correct to say that it took two to three years to establish democratic government in Japan," says John Dower, author of Japan in War and Peace. "But throughout that period, you had a stable society and an intact (local) government. You had terrific misery and confusion in Japan, but no chaos like you have in Iraq."Japan adopted its constitution nearly two years after the war ended and put it into effect a year later.
Bush's timetable for Iraq envisions establishment of an assembly by May to form a provisional government by June. That would be the end of the U.S.-appointed Governing Council. By 2005, Iraq would write a constitution and elect a democratic government.
William Hitchcock, author of The Struggle for Europe, says the situation in Germany was similar to the one in Japan. Allied bombs had leveled many cities, and millions were hungry and homeless.
"The German story of U.S. occupation is an amazing success story, but you would not know it six months after the war ended," he says. "It took time."
It was three years before Germany had a constitution and four years before democratic elections.
Iraq is not as devastated as those countries were. That means things Bush named, such as schools, hospitals and newspapers, were back in operation more quickly.
Iraq is different in other ways:
• Unlike the violent daily attacks in Iraq, there was no resistance to occupying forces in Germany and Japan.
• Germany and Japan formally surrendered, which gave the United States authority in their countries. Iraq did not.
• Essential government-run services continued after the war ended. Iraq has no such system.
Note the introduction of the concept that Iraq never surrendered, thus the US has no authority to be there, a none-too-subtle hint as to the slant of this "news story". (Hopefully this isn't another pointless meme-flag to wave for the Baathists, al Queda, and the American Left)
If the contrast points were valid in the context of the argument (is there a legitimate comparison?) one might still wonder why such effort is put into refuting 18 words (count 'em: 'And much of it has proceeded faster than similar efforts in Germany and Japan after World War II') of a 4025 word (trust me) speech.
There are differences, but USA Today has missed the point. They could more effectively argue that "Germany" and "Japan" start with "G" and "J" while clearly "Iraq" is spelled with an I. Yes, Germany and Japan had been bombed into submission. The population was weak and demoralized with a significant number of draft-age men gone. Everyone needed shelter and food and the US was the only source of hope for survival. Generally this precludes even the angriest of vanquished combatants from taking pot-shots at the victors. This situation clearly does not exist in Iraq. (Because of US efforts, foresight, and humanity, I might add) But for those who "get it" the gist of the comparison argument is not academic, and is valid only in the context of supporting the "stay the course" position vs. the "cut and run" mantra perversely making it's way through certain quarters of the American population.
The point of the post-war comparison is akin to that nothing worth doing is easy concept that parents once instilled in their children. (And assuredly many still do.) But I believe that Mr. Benedetto and his USA Today editor (and the folks there that sign the paychecks) do 'get it' - and their reasons for attempting to cast doubt on an essentially minor supporting detail in one of the most important political speeches of this era obviously lie elsewhere.
Whatever their motives, they've proved the need to make the comparisons. There are those in our own country who would insist we can not overcome the degree of hardship we face in Iraq. Doubtless they state this in the full knowledge that they themselves could certainly not accomplish such a lofty goal. That's to be expected, but I ask that they please stand aside; there are those made of stronger stuff, those with a bit more intestinal fortitude who will carry this task to its conclusion.
USA Today's chooses to end their "news" article with an unsupported opinion:
"It is not, in fact, a great analogy," says Tom Engelhardt, a fellow of the liberal Nation Institute and author of The End of Victory Culture.
I'll add this insight on Mr. Engelhardt's worldview from the editorial review by Publishers Weekly on Amazon.com's site:
Freelance writer Engelhardt here traces the roots of American "triumphalism" back to early New England, where the massacre of Indians set the pattern for the self-justified slaughter of external enemies, a ritual that would be replayed endlessly not only in life but also in fiction, movies, toys and comics. In his sprawling meditation, he considers the effect of our "loss of enemy" when the Japanese surrendered in 1945. In his tedious recap of the Vietnam tragedy Engelhardt suggests that the American public's inability to view the Viet Cong as a savage, lesser adversary contributed to our becoming "the world's most extraordinary [because least expected] losers." The desire to create a Third World battlefield with maximum U.S. weaponry and minimum U.S. casualties was briefly satisfied, he contends, by the Gulf War with its seemingly bloodless, machine-versus-machine destructiveness. America, according to Engelhardt, is still yearning for a revival of our national identity via the victory culture, "the story of their slaughter and our triumph."
Far be it from me to refute a sprawling meditator, so I'll say indeed, it's not a great analogy. We've done far more and faster in Iraq, against greater opposition. Three cheers for our side, and thank you Mr. Bush.
To Mr.’s Benedetto and Engelhardt and others of like mind, another 'compare and contrast' topic: 'The difference between making history and making noise'.
Lileks and I are on the same wavelength today.
You know what? Michael Moore is right. There are many Americans who are ignorant of the world around them. And they’re all TV news producers. Two big bombs in Istanbul, and what’s the big story of the day? Following around a pervy slab of albino Play-Doh as he turns himself into the police. I was stunned to discover last night that Nightline not only covered the Jackson case in detail, but bumped coverage of the Whitehall speech, which was the most important speech since the Iraq campaign began and arguably the most important speech of the war, period.
Hmmmm... come to think of it, I wasn't stunned by the supreme idiocy of the media. Disappointed, to be sure, just not stunned.
But he's got a lot more to say about a lot of things. All of which were on my mind already. I find myself shouting "Yes, yes, exactly!" when I read Lileks, but today for whatever reason that's especially true.

MilBlogs want you! Be an ally with 28 world wide locations, one simple link away.
The Forward Strategy of Freedom
I've already seen the CINC’s speech hailed here and there through the blogosphere as one of his best; I agree. Quotable throughout, but I note a definite ideological and introductory first half and a somewhat more brass-tacks second half. The shift occurs at the moment The Boss begins transitioning from historical ties to modern conflict, and takes a jab at old Europe:
Today's raucous London protests bring to mind the San Francisco protests of last February. (Ahhh, February! The nadir, the halcyon heyday of the modern anti-war movement!).
This:
TIKRIT, Iraq (Reuters). - A senior U.S. army officer told a military hearing in Iraq Wednesday he was wrong to fire his pistol near a detained Iraqi's head but vowed he would sacrifice his life to protect his men.His voice breaking with emotion, Lieutenant Colonel Allen West of the 4th Infantry Division said he had told the families of the men and women in his battalion before leaving for Iraq that he would bring them home alive.
West said he believed the detained Iraqi, a policeman called Yahya Jhodri Hamoody, had information about plots to attack American troops when he was brought in for questioning at Taji, just north of Baghdad, around August 20.
Other officers testifying in the preliminary hearing at a base in Saddam Hussein's hometown of Tikrit have said the plots included an imminent plan to kill West, the most senior soldier charged with assaulting Iraqis since the invasion last March.
The military has charged West with beating up Hamoody, firing a pistol near his head and threatening to kill him.
"I know the method I used was not the right method...I was going to do anything to intimidate and scare him, but I was not going to endanger his life," West told the hearing.
West said he watched his men beat Hamoody without intervening. He said he then went outside and fired a warning shot into the air.
Still unable to get information, West said Hamoody was forced over a sandbox which soldiers use to clear weapons.
"I placed my left hand against the side of his head and fired away from him," West said.
Hamoody then told of plans to set up a sniper position near a police station that West's soldiers visited, West said.
Asked by his defense lawyer if he would used such tactics to obtain information again, West, dressed in combat fatigues and wiping tears from his eyes, said:
"If it's about the lives of my men and their safety, I'd go through hell with a gasoline can.
"But that's what's going on out there in the streets here and that's how I feel about my boys. There is not a person in this room I would not sacrifice my life for."
After the incident, West lost command of his battalion of 650 soldiers. A number of them attended the hearing.
Jessep: You want answers?
Kaffee (Tom Cruise): I think I'm entitled to them.
Jessep: You want answers?
Kaffee: I want the truth!
Jessep: You can't handle the truth! Son, we live in a world that has walls. And those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lt. Weinberg? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Santiago and you curse the Marines. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know: that Santiago's death, while tragic, probably saved lives. And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives...You don't want the truth. Because deep down, in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that wall. You need me on that wall.
We use words like honor, code, loyalty...we use these words as the backbone to a life spent defending something. You use 'em as a punchline. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom I provide, then questions the manner in which I provide it! I'd rather you just said thank you and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a weapon and stand a post. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you're entitled to!
Welcome Cold Fury to the Friends of MilBlogs list. If there's anyone out there that hasn't visited Mike's place, now would be a good time.
Pete Nelson is a bit newer on the Blogging scene, and brand new on the Friends of MilBlogs too.
Meanwhile, Carnival of the Vanities is up at Peaktalk this week.
FREE MARKET FAIRY TALES is going to be a Big Blog. A free-market conservative friend-of-America Brit with attitude, gun pics, and healthy young rugby fans all over his Blog. What's not to like? (Ok, so he hasn't linked MilBlogs yet. Nobody's perfect.) This is the link to his New Weblogs Showcase entry. (Which of course means I'm voting for him.)
Bloggers, go vote for him now. Like me, you'll be able to say you helped "discover" him. The rest of you go visit and enjoy! (Did I mention the quality writing? The lively wit? The biting satire?)

From Stars and Stripes:
A recent study done by Quality Planning Corporation, a company hired by the insurance industry to analyze data such as driving patterns or uncover fraudulent claims, looked into the occupations of more than 1 million drivers in the nation. The results show that enlisted military drivers were the second leading offenders of speeding violations after students, and ranked sixth in the number of accidents.<...>
Over an 18-month period ending in December 2002, QPC looked at 1 million records of data from all over the United States to analyze the accident and traffic violation of drivers and their occupations, said Tim Cox, with Zing Public Relations, a firm hired to release QPC?s study results. No data was collected on overseas drivers.
?Quality Planning works with insurance companies to help them better understand the composition of the people they?re insuring,? he said.
<...>
Insurance companies don?t determine if a 16-year-old high school dropout makes a better driver than a 36-year-old mother and real estate agent, Berry said. Instead, rates are based on a history of the number of claims filed by certain age groups, driving patters and crime rates in geographical areas, type of vehicles driven, and drivers? credit history, he cited as examples.
And what QPC does not do in its research is determine why certain demographics are more or less prone, Cox said.
?It?s hard to draw conclusions from the data,? he said. ?For example, the professions of doctor and lawyer seem to be scoring high on speeding. For some people, it might indicate they tend to be arrogant or self-important or risk takers. The medical associations will say they are rather tired, fatigued and inattentive.
?It?s hard to know what?s going on here and that?s frustrating. At a minimum, it makes for interesting cocktail conversation,? he joked.
"Ha ha", he laughed. Grab your cocktails folks, I've a couple of points to note. Someone familiar with a military lifestyle might suggest the following hypotheses.
1. Military drive faster to work because the consequences of being late are greater then for non-military, both for the individual (federal crime) and perhaps for his mission (almost everyone is needed) Short-notice recalls where reporting in with full gear (ready to deploy) within 1 hour of telephone notification is not uncommon.
2. Off duty military folks are more likely to make long trips in limited time. Spending a weekend with family halfway across the country is not unusual. It's a bad idea, it's discouraged, but it happens.
This may be so, but a stereotype needs broken to some degree.
"Fireman," "policeman," "teacher," or "manual laborer", besides being individual occupations, all describe specialties of military enlisted people. Look at it this way; a military installation is a small town, with a police force, fire department, a transportation infrastructure and the people who maintain it (both roads and vehicles), lawyers, doctors, dentists,... need I go on? And the people doing those jobs are as diverse a group as the people who do them in your city.
Don't confuse this issue with Blackfive's Warrior Caste talking point; all those diverse folks working all those diverse tasks are bonded in a way the folks outside the gate will likely never be. Still, there's a wrongness in assuming a military member is a category like proctologist or insurance underwriter. The variety is too great. (Note I haven't even discussed the cross-service variations on the theme. Suffice to say from my experience the bond still exists, though the differences are quite real.)
Now the truly savvy will note that junior enlisted (about 45% of the force, DoD-wide) are about the same age (upper teens to early 20s) of the typical student. This suggests strongly that age, vs. occupation, is a better determinant of an individual's likelihood of speeding and or being involved in an accident. This is a generally accepted insurance industry fact anyway, but perhaps an inconvenient one if they are determined to raise rates for certain groups of drivers.
One could infer I'm calling into question the validity of the results of this study. I can't; I've yet to be able to determine from the reports on the subject or from Quality Planning Corporation's homepage exactly how this study was conducted, or what unit of measure is used to gauge "likelihood of accident". I can, however, state that their classification of "enlisted military" as a category similar to "architect" indicates a feeble corporate understanding of the subjects of their investigation.
From Quality Planning Corporation's on-line press release:ACCIDENTS
Top 5 Occupations
1. Student
2. Medical doctor
3. Attorney/lawyer
4. Architect
5. Real estate agent
Bottom 5 Occupations
36. Homemaker
37. Politician
38. Pilot
39. Fireman
40. Farmer
SPEEDING VIOLATIONS
Top 5 Occupations
1. Student
2. Enlisted military
3. Manual laborer
4. Politician
5. ArchitectBottom 5 Occupations
36. Teacher/professor
37. Clerical/secretary
38. Law enforcement
39. Librarian
40. Homemaker
Commenting on the statistics, Dr. Daniel Finnegan, president and founder of QPC, noted, ?The numbers blow big holes in the conventional wisdom about which professions are accident-prone or dangerous drivers. Interestingly, it appears that it is educated professionals who are most likely to be involved in accidents. Fortunately for those unlucky enough to be involved in an accident, individuals from two professions which are most helpful after such an incident ? doctors and lawyers ? are the most likely to be on the scene.?
This also won't help dispel the rumor that cops don't write each other speeding tickets. Oh, and mothers, hide your children when the architects hit the streets!
Today is Friends of MilBlogs appreciation day. I urge all who pass by here to visit the many fine sites who've thus far "supported the troops" with a link to the MilBlogs page. You'll find them permanently listed there.
Blogrolling is still undergoing maintenance so I can't add etalkinghead and The Country Pundit to the friends of MilBlogs roll yet.
But I can thank them here, along with all the other good folks who've linked to MilBlogs. Take one of our banners and link yourself to 25 26 sites (welcome Magic in the Baghdad cafe) reporting from Baghdad to Europe to all over America.
Oh, and please make sure I know (via comments or e-mail) that you've linked up. At the end of this week (maybe future ones too) I'm buying a drink for a random member of that "friends" list. Just saying thanks.
Hope to see you here soon.
I'll be taking the day off from Blogging today. (I try to once every week!)
Sixteen years ago today the now not-so-little middle hawk child was born. All these years later Im absolutely proud of my sweet sixteen, who has trooped aroud the world with dad, three continents, five states, and a hundred sad goodbyes.
Happy Birthday Baby!
One week from the launch of MilBlogs and the reviews are flooding in from chat rooms, message boards, and comment sections all over the internet.
Personally, If I were in the service, I'd be very careful about bitchin' and moaning in a public forum like the internet.
The 19 hijackers used blogs similar to this to execute their plan.
If your're in the military and blogging you really have to consider the risk. You should only debate the topic with commonly known facts (news releases, etc). There is no reason to state who you are, what you do and where you have been. Just assume that nobody has a need to know because the whole world is reading.

We'll be careful guys. Honest. Some of us even have security clearances...
Actually we're part of a long tradition. As you should know, the first computers were developed for military use, and the first users immediately started Milblogs.
Dad first started the Gazette back in '46, as an answer to "Hitlerpundit" and "StalinBlog", the Left's early entries into the blogosphere.
How well I recall him (after many later upgrades) having all night writing sessions at the building of the Berlin wall and the launch of Sputnik. And I'm convinced that his relentless attack on the Beatles is probably the only thing that stopped them from becoming the most popular rock band in the history of the world.
But ooh how only too soon after the glory days of the moon landing was he covering the tragic downfall of Nixon. (Oh how those loonies at the McGovern-ment Blog gloated!)
Back then of course, there were no graphics online, so Bloggers had to send large colorful posters to one another to remind them to visit from time to time. I recently ran across dad's old set while cleaning out a closet.
Hope you enjoy them. They sure brought back memories to me.
Bet you didn't know all this, did you?
Like Glenn Reynolds said, "You can learn all sorts of things from reading those blogs."
Magic in the Baghdad Cafe is a member of MilBlogs, but can't add the Ring html to their site. Since I can't link them that way yet, I'll tell you about them like this.
From the site's about post
Bear, in Chicago, has a sister, in Iraq, who emails him letters.
Her name is Major Pain (not really, but well earned none the less).
Bear shares the Major's letters with you.
Major Pain is a nurse. She wears army boots.
She is near Baghdad at an Army hospital.
She has a rather, um, 'unique' sense of humor.
She is a terrible speller.
And we love her.
And Bear just got a new e-mail from his sister. Two, actually with amazing stories to tell.
She's been helping helicopter crash victims. Go on, click the link.
Update: Magic is now in the ring.
Visit Random Nuclear Strikes and Friend-of-MilBlogs own Michael Medved Fans soon and read several great posts on an anti-protest. Start with the linked ones and keep going. Great stuff, lots of pictures; anti-American demonstrators attempting to protest deploying troops sent running by counter-protest. God bless America!
I found those links via Swanky Conservative, a Navy Reservist and new MilBlogs member who also sent me this much needed Navy-based MilBlogs banner:

I found this next guy through Sarah, who's trying to grok Germany (as am I).
David tells me he's German, living in Germany, and an economist who spent a couple years in America "doing econometric research, and that's when I learned to love the country."
He adds
"My blog is a modest attempt to counter or correct the anti-American reporting of German media. Well, that at least was the original concept. Now, I'm more into telling Americans about German media. On some days more than 90 % of the blog visitors are from the US."
Davids Medienkritik is a bi-lingual blog reporting on the German media for Americans. I'll be visiting regularly.
Danke, Sarah! Gracias, elgato!
You never know what you might find when you run a lap around MilBlogs, but I know you'll find lots of great stuff.
From Military Update by Tom Philpott:
``It’s unbelievable that places like this exist,’’ said Brian Alaniz, 29, a Navy hospitalman who lost part of his right leg and suffered other wounds just four days after President Bush ordered the invasion last March.Brian isn’t referring to Iraq. What he wants to talk about are Fisher Houses. He knew nothing about them before he was wounded but he saw first hand what comfort zones they are for military families when loved ones need care at military medical centers, or select VA hospitals, far from home.
The usual mix of Fisher House guests are active duty families, many of them with children needing special care, and an older population of retirees, veterans and their spouses. About 8500 families a year use Fisher Houses, stay an average of 12 days and pay daily room rates of $8 and $12.
This year, so far, families of 200 wounded service members from Iraq and Afghanistan have joined the mix. Fisher Houses for them are a kind of sanctuary to help transition from war to rest of their lives. For these guests, rooms are free, said Jim Weiskopf of the Fisher House Foundation. Their stays can run into weeks or months, given the long road back for some.
I've had Fisher House as a banner link for a while now. They are also associated with the Intrepid Fallen Heroes fund, both having been started by Zachary Fisher. Read about his amazing life here.
There's a Fisher House at Landstuhl, the US Army Medical Center here in Germany where the injured from Iraq are sent for care. It's a Godsend for those families coming over from the states or elsewhere to be with their loved ones, likewise for those military families in Europe with a child in the hospital.
Click the banner to visit Fisher House on line.

From Blogrolling:
Blogrolling has been the victim off a malicious hack in the past 9 hours. The blogroll links have been restored from an offsite backup from Saturday. I'm tracing the cause off this now and the site may go offline at some point today while I make changes and collect evidence. All new links since Saturday afternoon have unfortunately been lost due to this. I'll post more here as I know it.
Posted on 8:31 AM by Jason
It's a good thing there's no wars going on right now, as some "unnamed Senators" are in a pi$$ing match over general officer promotions.
From the Huntsville (Alabama) Times:
The leadership of key Army commands in Huntsville is caught in a game of political brinkmanship while the U.S. Senate works out its partisan differences.The promotion of Maj. Gen. Larry Dodgen, current commanding general of the Army Aviation and Missile Command on Redstone Arsenal, to a three-star general is one of several Army promotions being held up by an unidentified U.S. senator.
Dodgen was set to turn AMCOM command over to Brig. Gen. James H. Pillsbury sometime this week and move over to command the Army Space and Missile Defense Command, or SMDC, which employs more than 1,000 people in Huntsville. Lt. Gen. Joseph Cosumano, current SMDC head, is rumored to have retirement plans, but neither the Pentagon nor SMDC will confirm that.
Those command changes and promotions have been placed on hold in a secret move by a single senator. By law, the Senate holds the power to approve general officer promotions, and just one senator can block, or "hold" as the maneuver is called in the Senate, these nominations.
<...>
"The members do this for a variety of reasons sometimes. In these cases, sometimes the member is known, sometimes the name is not known. In this case, the name isn't known." (Mike Brumas, spokesman for Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Al)
<...>
According to the Associated Press, the senator blocking the military promotions is thought to be acting in retaliation for a separate hold placed by an unnamed Democrat on an Army general's promotion.
Maj. Gen. Robert Clark was nominated by President Bush for his third star and a promotion. However, the nomination has been criticized by Democrats and gay-rights groups, because Clark presided over an Army post where a soldier thought to be gay was murdered.
If approved by the Senate, Clark would become a lieutenant general and the commanding general of the Fifth U.S. Army at Fort Sam Houston, Texas. Clark is currently the acting commanding general there.
Do I need to comment?
Looks like blogrolling has been hacked. The linked blog is an innocuous looking on-line diary, perhaps chosen at random by hackers. Please don't click.
No time - follow this link to story of Mil Blogger wounded in Iraq.
A letter from an Army Major in Afghanistan, in Power Line:
"I would like to make one more observation if I may. Since I have been in Afghanistan, I would say that, on average, I know of about one U.S. or coalition soldier getting killed every week. However, I see almost no news reports on these deaths - and my wife at home does not either. My point is that per capita (with 10 - 15k soldiers in country), we are taking as many, or more hits than Iraq, yet no press coverage. Given this fact, it seems to me that the mainstream media are controlling public opinion by which information they cover. The liberals have a difficult time saying they are against the war in Afghanistan, but can oppose Iraq because the decision to attack wasn't as clearly obvious - thus only report the bad stuff in Iraq - at least this is my take.
Must read. As I've said, a great Blog, even though they pointed me to this. The Dems have recovered. Bush is done for.
Perhaps my final word on the "Chickenhawk"debate. I know, it's done to death, but I've something new to add, hear me out.
As a military guy stationed overseas it has meant much to me to have stateside Blogs to read over the past year, to get a feel for the mood of America, the mood that isn't reflected in mainstream media.
I'm have no problem whatsoever with some of the anti-war crowd, insofar as that outspoken but misguided minority proves to me beyond a shadow of a doubt that Freedom of Speech, something I defend, is not in danger in America - even as they ironically protest otherwise. Thank you for validating my efforts. Now please stop helping kill my brothers in arms.

I'm eternally greatful to the so-called "chickenhawks." Those who present their case for all the world to see via the internet, subjecting themselves to ridicule from that same misguided Left who would silence them forever if they could only get the majority of Americans to recognize their inherent inborn superiority.
In John Cole's comments I offered to buy any "chickenhawk" blogger a drink when I return stateside. Mike from Cold Fury pointed out I was digging myself a deep hole with such an offer. He was giving me a good-natured joshing, but I was serious, and his comment made me realize I'd better not wait to get home. Too many bloggers.
I appreciate you guys, and over the next year or so it's drinks on me.
I'll find you, big blogs, small blogs, in between. Four each month, around the weekends, a drink in the tip jar. I've already started.
Military guy buys drinks for "chickenhawks". The loony lefties will hate me for it. But they're not gettin' my Bud Lite.
Last word; by the power vested in me by Tom Tomorrow I left this in comments at Winds of Change:
Even though I'm a staunch moderate I've finally been convinced by the anti-war Left on this issue; everyone who doesn't wear a military uniform can henceforth only Blog about cats.
I mean, only if they have a cat.
From CNN, on Louisiana gubernatorial candidate Bobby Jindal, born 6 months after his parents left India for America:
Jindal, who is married with one child, was born Piyush Jindal before he changed his name to a character on "The Brady Bunch" television show. His parents immigrated to the United States in the early 1970s, and he was born in Baton Rouge.
Not sure whether CNN does any fact checking, but that seems like Blog fodder to me.
Something about the Democrats loosing a southern state to a 32-year old "Indian-American" named after a Brady Bunch character, and who has never before held elected office.
But I just can't think of anything.
Check out the cool WWII poster I found. It's authentic, and now you can click it and enjoy the latest updates on the story!

The troops are coming home, and stories are beginning to be told. This from WSJ via Power Line Blog:
"When American troops were attacked on April 7 on a road to Baghdad, a battle broke out at a dot on the map Army commanders called 'Objective Curly.' Eighty U.S. soldiers, expecting little resistance, were met by 300 well-armed Iraqi and Syrian fighters. Grenades and bullets flew for eight hours. The U.S. counterattack killed an estimated 200 enemy fighters, according to the commanding officer who oversaw the battle. The American team had never trained or fought together, but all its men got out alive. The team was headed by Capt. Harry Alexander Hornbuckle, a 29-year-old staff officer who had never been in combat before. He was later awarded the Bronze Star, with a V for valor, for his efforts that day.
You know you want to read the whole thing!
Good stuff from top to bottom, Power Line is another excellent blog I thought I had on my Blog Roll long ago. Nope! But I fixed that!
The Louisiana governor's race is in the homestretch.
BATON ROUGE — A class of 30 LSU political science majors said there was little doubt about the winner of Wednesday night’s final gubernatorial debate going into Saturday’s election.For most of the students, this was the first time they had seen Bobby Jindal and Kathleen Blanco in a “live” setting and not in well-rehearsed and edited campaign ads. Political science professor Robert Hogan incorporated the debate into his night political science class for juniors and seniors.
“Jindal smoked her,” said Darrell Kropog of Hammond, summing up the feelings of many of his classmates. “You can tell he thinks even faster than he talks because he never paused” in his answers.
Or perhaps not, as stated in this from WaPo:
Louisiana Governor's Race Douglas Brinkley Eisenhower Center for American Studies Thursday, November 13, 2003; 10:30 AMIn Saturday gubernatorial runoff election, voters in Louisiana will choose between Republican candidate Piyush "Bobby" Jindal, a 32 year old son of Indian immigrants, and Democrat Lt. Gov. Kathleen Blanco, a 60-year-old veteran of Louisiana politics
Who is leading in the latest polls? How are the two candidates different? What are the national implications of Saturday's outcome?
Douglas Brinkley, director of the Eisenhower Center for American Studies at the University of New Orleans, was online to discuss the Louisiana governor's race and Saturday's runoff election
<...>
New Orleans, La.: Recent polls have indicated about 20 percent of voters are undecided. Historically, how have these voters influenced elections? Do they typically swing toward one party or the other, or do they stay home?
Douglas Brinkley: Historically they stay home, but this is not a normal election. According to a south Eastern Louisiana university poll 24 percent of Democrats have crossed over to support the Republican Jindal. A University of New Orleans shows that 6 percent of Republicans are crossing over to Blanco. The point is not everybody is voting along straight party line.
Alexandria, Va.: What are the latest polls?
Douglas Brinkley: It is essentially a dead heat. There are two different important polls - one giving Jindal a slight edge, the other giving it to Blanco. It is a down to the wire election.
My prediction, Jindal 55, Blanco 45. About the same as every other recent governor's race.
Update: Wrong! And I admit I was way too optimistic. I'll let others post-mortem.
A follow-up to yesterday's post about Rock the Vote's Democratic candidate worship session being broadcast in my son's classroom.
My son explained this about why he and his classmates (18 year olds who will vote next year) were not impressed with the selection of Democratic presidential wanna-bes:
"They (the candidates) all claimed that troop morale is low, that the soldiers don't want to be over there. They all said we should leave Iraq right away."
Now, I recognize that only most, not all of the Dems feel that way, but for a teenager his accuracy was typical. Still I explained to him that some were in favor of us staying. Then I asked him how his classmates felt about it. Many of them have parents deployed in Iraq, indefinitely, and the rest are well aware that their mom or dad could go any time.
"They think those guys are all full of crap. Everyone made fun of them."
"Everyone?" I asked him, mindful of his previous mild exaggeration, "Even those with a deployed parent?"
"Yea, even them. One girl in my class works at Landstuhl (the large Army Medical Center here where the wounded in Iraq are recovering) and she says that they say it will all be worth it."
"Say again?"
"The wounded, she says they say it will all be worth it."
End of conversation.
Rock the vote? You bet they will. The kids are all right.
"Wait a minute... wait just one #$%# #$^& minute! What is that in your hand? A jelly donut? You have got to be kidding me! You are sitting here eating a jelly donut at my beloved web site! Put that %@#$ thing down right now, grab your mouse and take one lap around the MilBlogs web ring! You will by God feel like a true American when you are done, I assure you! And then get your $^% over to the MilBlogs page, download one of our many fine banners, and link the ring! Move move move..."
The Smash/Tom Tomorrow debate has really made its way around the internet, and with some humorous results. Take a look at how Chris Muir at Day by Day (always funny) and Mary at Exit Zero (a new-to-me blog, well written and beautifully designed) have responded. Worth your time, guaranteed!
New entries today will be posted below the MilBlogs post. Thanks for taking the time to scroll!

We Want You!
(To Join MilBlogs, that is)!
MilBlogs is open to any blog operated by a current Active Duty, Guard or Reserve member of the US military. Veterans, spouses, or other close relatives of eligible participants are also welcome if a significant amount of their content is devoted to military issues. Sites devoted to military issues but not operated by people in the above described categories may also be considered for membership. Non-blog web sites are also eligible if they meet the same criteria. Non military sites are not left out. You're invited to join our "Friends of MilBlogs" Blogroll.
One purpose of the MilBlogs Ring is to promote awareness of the individuality and humanity of the members of the US Armed Forces. Members are aware of the liklihood of difference of opinions between fellow members, and although we may not agree with each other on everything we say we will fight for the rights of each other to say it.
We mean that literally.
Read here for all the details.
Know why Misha fisks things like this? So I won't have to.
U.S. Troops More Hostile With Reporters
By SLOBODAN LEKIC, Associated Press Writer
BAGHDAD, Iraq - With casualties mounting in Iraq, jumpy U.S. soldiers are becoming more aggressive in their treatment of journalists covering the conflict.Media people have been detained, news equipment has been confiscated and some journalists have suffered verbal and physical abuse while trying to report on events.
Refresh my memory, is it the reporter or the soldier that brings us freedom of the press?
eTalkinghead gets a vote from me on New Weblogs Showcase this week. Just what I needed, another fine Blog to demand my time!
The Misleading Statements of a Misleading Misleader is the showcase entry, but I also liked Caskets and the War.
Check him out. Vote for him if you can.
The Carnival of the Vanities is at Dead Ends this week.
You know the drill.
True story:
The kids get home from school and my son (HS Senior) starts telling me (rare!) about his Government class today. Bear in mind these are voting age kids, in High School on an overseas US military installation:
Son: We had to watch these nine Democrats debate today.
Me: What do you mean, had to?
Son: We watched it on TV in class...
Me: Watched what, exactly?
Son: "Rock the Vote", it was stupid.
Me: What did your classmates think of it?
Son: Oh they all thought it was dumb. Except this one annoying girl who says Bush is an idiot. But we all agreed they were losers.
Me: Why did you think so?
Son: They wouldn't give straight answers to any of the questions. They just kept dodging and changing the subject.
Me: They never said anything worthwhile?
Son: Well, finally someone asked whether they liked Macs or PCs and they answered that.
He did not know about this story. I swear to you this conversation is reproduced here as it happened, mere moments ago.
I still have a lot of follow up questions...
And while on the subject, I sure think this non-partisan organization looks awfully uh... Democratic to me.
I think they'll be unpleasantly surprised at the results of voting by the young people next year.
More on the scandal "rocking" Rock the Vote (for those who didn't click):
... During the program, which was taped at Boston's Faneuil Hall, Alexandra Trustman stepped up to the microphone and said: "I'm a freshman at Brown University. And going to college this year, I was confused with an important decision. My mom advised me one way, my dad the other. And so my question for you all is - and it's not quite boxers or briefs, but - Mac's, or PCs?"Audience members then learned of the candidates' preferences, from former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean's personal computer, to Connecticut Sen. Joseph Lieberman's hand-held wireless, to the Rev. Al Sharpton's playful "politically correct Mac."
But the question wasn't part of a conversation with young America at all. Trustman's question was a plant from CNN.
In a column published Monday in the Brown Daily Herald, Trustman tried to deflect her fellow students' derision. The question was dumb, they said. The question, from its topic to its formulation, was the invention of a CNN producer, she wrote.
As she recounted the episode in her column, Trustman said she was called by a CNN producer and told what to ask. When she suggested a broader query on technology, she was cut short. (Though she wrote she was frustrated that student journalists hadn't sought her perspective before criticizing her, Trustman declined to respond to messages via e-mail and telephone seeking interviews for this column.)
"He took a look at my question and told me I couldn't ask it because it wasn't lighthearted enough and they wanted to modulate the event with various types of questions - mine was to be on the lighthearted side," Trustman wrote. "The show's host [CNN's Anderson Cooper] wanted the Macs or PCs question asked, not because he was wondering about the candidates' views of technology, but because he thought it would be a good opportunity for the candidates to relate to a younger audience."
She continued: "At this point it was clear to me that the question would be asked regardless of whether I was the person to ask it. ... [T]he opportunity to be involved in Rock the Vote outweighed any criticism I thought would come from the question."
And it was the only question a group of 18 year olds thought was answered truthfully. Draw your own conclusions.
The Smash/Tom Tomorrow debate (now linked by Instapundit with our MilBlogs launch) reminded me of the very reason I started this weblog a few months back.
Has anybody noticed that in this go-round satire is used by the conservative side, while feeble jokes and slogans (..."Buck Fush" - that's convincing!) seem to be the main heavy artillery of the more pompous liberal establishment. (Political satire...requires a target that in a way invites the attack due to the ridiculous nature of their position. This is why (the left) can't use it in this current situation... Note "Bush is a big fat dummy" is not satire) How the brightest of the left must wince in pain when seeing clearly the truth between the lines of every "news" story (on ScrappleFace)....I submit the precursor to Greyhawk's Theory is Greyhawk's statement on satire in political debate. The side that can use satire is close to the truth. A side whose attempts at satire inevitably backfire probably needs to re-examine their motives.
Greyhawk's Theory on Satire Backfire? Hmmmmm....
Interesting, to me at least, that Glenn obliquely tied me into something that actually was one of my original inspirations for blogging, but he made the connection for a different reason altogether.
Actually, the memory kicked in while I was entering this comment at Dean's World, in response to his insightful observations of the situation:
Parody and satire work best when the target is worthy, with some fundamental flaw in their thinking or action that when exposed via a skilled humorist reveals them for the misguided buffoons that they are. (This can be done without rancor if one avoids attacking the fundamental character of the individual.)For so many years the Right has been the target of so many such jokes, and perhaps deservedly so. Now I'm quite convinced the Right is often mocked out of habit without any real examination of the issue that is being mocked.
Satire and parody work best now when pointed Left. Witness the success of ScrappleFace.
As further illustration I offer the decline of Saturday Night Live as a comedy program over the past few years. Can't wait to see that Sharpton episode though, maybe they'll reverse the trend!
"Greyhawk's Theory" referenced above, was (is) this:
"The liberal view in the liberal vs. conservative debate can not survive the immediate "printed" media that is today's web." --Greyhawk's TheoryNonetheless, the liberals will not go away.
--The Terwilliger corollary
I would re-state the same today using Left and Right in place of liberal and conservative. Good folks like Dean long ago convinced me that the Left has converted "liberal" into something meaning exactly the opposite of its long accepted use. I am a liberal.
Now as to the MilBlog/Chickenhawk thing, let me make this clear: I'm anti-war. You may know someone in Iraq, I learn every day about another friend I've got over there, and my turn may come. War gets people killed, and good people are now very dead because of one man's vanity. That Saddam Hussein forced my nation to war will anger me forever, and here's an example of the type of anti-war rally I'd attend.
Those out there who are anti-war for the purist of ideological reasons, I salute. Those who would be "anti-war" for personal or political gain I refute.
Smash's linked 'Tom Tomorrow' comic features a quote that makes me wonder: is this a swipe at ScrappleFace? Cheeto Eaters are an inside joke there...
Of course, we can be sure Mr Tomorrow was busy drawing against the war, right? Much preferable to writing for it!
Nice work Smash!
The eleventh month, eleventh day, eleventh hour, eleventh minute, and the war ended.
And the modern world began.
Armistice Day is now Veterans Day in America, but Armistice Day is still celebrated 'down under', though it seems even a day commemorating the end of war can be marred by misguided few.
It occurs to me I could do no more justice to Armistice Day then I did in the latest installment of Democracy, Whiskey, Sexy? So it's reposted directly below here (or linked here).
I hope to have something else veterans-related for you later, til then I hope you enjoy this brief story of a few generations of one family at war.
(I tried to fit some subtle connections to today in there too. Perhaps you can find them?)
Wishing a safe and happy Armistice Day to all...
Place holder. Post moved here http://www.mudvillegazette.com/archives/000561.html
Speaking of battle ready Marines, I should take a minute here to warn you all about my dogs. I said before, they're furly dangerous, and I wasn't kidding. As a military guy in Germany near the border with France... well let's just say I know I need all the help I can get.


And you can bet anybody tries anything funny near Greyhawk manor and there's going to be an international incident, if you know what I mean.
And oh by the way, lest you believe I haven't thought of everything these little beasties are taught to pee towards France too. At least the big one is, and he's quite the rifleman. The little one is still soiling the carpets. But that's okay, we have patience.
And I'll tell ya, I'm looking forward to the day I can recreate live the great Peter Sellers scene from Pink Panther:
French twit: Does your dog bite?
Me: No.
French twit: Hello there little...
Dog: Grrrr chomp chomp rarrrr!!
Bleeding one-armed French twit: I thought you said your dog didn't bite!
Me: (Using phony French accent as ridicule) Zis is not my dog, you fool!
He heh. Yeah, that's the ticket...
Quotes of the Day:
"When in doubt, empty the magazine."
"To ERR is human, to FORGIVE divine. HOWEVER, neither is Marine Corps Policy."
"Marines never die! They just go to hell and regroup."
Okay, today is the Marine Corps' birthday - 228 years of awesome sponsorship of NFL football telecasts...
Okay, just kidding. The early ads were rather rough, they didn't get awesome until after electricity was discovered by Tom Edison, a Marine rifleman who wanted to shoot better in the dark.
Ha! Kidding again! Football wasn't invented until the mid-18th century when several Marine riflemen were fighting for control of a pig.
Did you catch the big error in the above post? Yep, all Marines are riflemen, thus the phrase 'Marine rifleman' is repetitive and redundant. All true Marines got that one right away.
Okay, serious now. Great uniforms, great songs, great people. Happy birthday to the USMC! Now go visit Doc Russia, once-a-Marine-always-a-Marine, a Med student, and VRWC
co-conspirator. I bow to his expertise on the Lore of the Corps.
From Blackfive, a story without major mainstream media coverage. While in America you like to hear from GIs about the "ground truth" of world events, overseas we appreciate stories like this one in much the same manner. The real stories of the American mindset, vice what the media claims. (Though I'd certainly prefer such stories weren't necessary.)
I'm starting a category called Homefront Voices, so us GIs can get the much-needed morale boost from stories like this one. Anyone with similar stories or links please comment or e-mail me. Help spread the word if you'd like, maybe this will grow.
Oh, and the absence of Blackfive from the Blogroll is corrected. Thought I had added him a while back. As an former GI with emphasis on life in uniform he's on the "Rough Men" list.
Huaaah.
From Wallace at Streams, a timely warning for those who live in heated homes who don't want to wake up dead some day. Read and heed.
Big Dumb Puppy and Crazy Little Dingo:

Don't be fooled; they're furly dangerous types!
The cool edge to the air is expected, and its absence today is noted. The morning sunshine through the big front glass warmed the house to the point the Mrs. thought the heat was on. We'd attended a big hail and farewell party the night before, featuring a cloudless sky and spectacular view of the red moon and goodbyes to folks moving on; such things are no less difficult for being routine after so many years. We'd slept in this morning after last night's big to-do (the eclipse began at 2am our time), and once we were up and about the dogs demanded walking before the coffee had a chance to boil.
Off we went, the Mrs. and I and the big dumb puppy and the crazy little dingo, the four of us through the woods where the multitude of colors on the hardwoods, peaked about one week ago, now approach the unity of pale golden brown. Inevitable. The top branches of some trees are bare, as are all of others. The path under foot is plush-carpeted in leaves; the rich smell of autumn seems fine to me today, as fine as the coffee I'll have back at the house.
No rush, the day is warm with a fine breeze, unbelievably warm for 50 north. But such days are altogether too short this time of year. We get back and drink coffee and read news and the daughter calls. She'd spent the night at a girlfriend’s, with four other girls too. Now it's time to get her, so we hop in the car and cruise the Autobahn, taking the dogs along. They love car rides, of course, and their enthusiasm is strangely contagious. Through forest all the way, with a few spots still at that peak color, those bright yellows, the mellow deep reds, the burnt orange, and the contrast of the evergreens...
Her friend lives alone now with just mom. Five more girls in the house for the night was probably a welcome diversion. Dad's an Army Surgeon deployed to Iraq since May. Daughter's making her way through sophomore year in High School in Germany without him. On the way home my daughter mentions her friend's excitement over her dad's stories. "He got to ride in a Blackhawk!" We say nothing much in reply.
Home again. As previously planned it's bike time. I bought the Mrs. a bike for our anniversary last month. Though she may claim the present is mine, and having her along on rides through the countryside is indeed my pleasure. A hard ride up hill to the ridgeline that runs behind our house brings the reward of the view. And what a view today! Under almost-summer-like warmth of cloudless blue skies (what do the Europeans call Indian Summer?) everyone is out. A large group of older folks volksmarches along; we ring bells and pedal slowly through. Riders on horses, people with dogs, the usually empty road is a bustling thoroughfare on this rare November day.
As we pass a group of parents and young children going the other way I hear a father say something about "balloons". I coast a bit further away then stop and turn. The horizon is dotted with hot air balloons, grey and small in the hazy distance. I've seen them before; they will put down in fields not far from here. But that is still some time away, judging by the distance, and we are moving on, riding along on the top of the world.
The view from those gently floating platforms must be indescribable. The view from the ground is nearly that. A rare day in autumn is a treasure; to have nothing making immediate demands of my time is sweet beyond compare.
I've many things to tell you, but they will wait for tomorrow. Tomorrow when I leave before dawn and return after sunset and consider myself fortunate to be here at all.
Thanks for stopping by.
Sgt Hook reports a follow up to his Jessica Blankenbecler story. Moving and awesome.
Also from Sgt Hook a link to Capt Patti, another GI in Baghdad and on the blogroll.
Capt Patti directs us to this site, where you can sign a get well card for a soldier recuperating from serious wounds received in Iraq.
Caringbridge (the host site of the "get well card") looks like a worthwhile organization. Tour their site a bit if you can.
Visit them all. You'll be glad you did.
My recent Rick Rescorla post generated a bit of attention, and I've still got quite a few things to follow up on with regards to that. One thing I'm long overdue to accomplish is this:
GreyHawk Sir,I visited your site yesterday and found posted a poem by David Prowse, "Hero" re Rick Rescorla.
I've set it to music, as promised, and the MP3 notes internally that D.Prowse holds copyright and that I was only the voice.
I actually recorded it early this morning, not having enough time to polish it, but its good.
Rick would've approved.
<...>
Its been a long 9/11 for me, here in Bangkok. I hope this I send is accepted in the same spirit it is offered.
With loving regards,
Carridine
Many thanks Carridine. Sorry for the long delay in posting.
Ladies and Gentlemen, tonight, the Inn at Mudville, following a time-honored tradition of celebrating heroic deeds in poetry, prose, and song, respectfully offers the work of the Bard Carradine. Enjoy.
A quick thought. I'm still working this one through.
Here and there around the blogosphere (and elsewhere) you can find speculation about the possibility of escalation of the current war on terror. Whether it be sincere voices calling for an evaluation of our relationship with the Saudis, or others decrying our imminent invasion of Iran or Syria (seems less likely lately), or those alarmists expecting another major terrorist strike on US soil and the expected US response, there are voices in the wilderness on this issue. I use that "wilderness" terminology intentionally, because even though it exists, the escalation scenario is given little (albeit some) consideration in public discourse these days.
But escalation is a real (and currently undesirable) possibility, with a number of scenarios. Rumsfeld, IMHO, was approaching this (among other things) in his infamous memo, getting people to think about "how we're doing".
Meanwhile, the press has eagerly been filling its roll of thorn-in-the-side of the current administration, focusing on the negative aspect of current events. Admittedly, happy positive stories don't sell newspapers or win Pulitzer prizes. Still most lucid people think the bias is distinctly anti-Bush.
This serves the purpose of the Democratic candidates for president. There is no organized collusion between the press and the Democrats, but there might as well be. A significant number of Democrats appear to be ready to use whatever methods are needed to lower public opinion of the current President. A not-unpredictable goal, but one that some people would consider as being practiced a bit too enthusiastically lately, given that we are at war.
Stay with me: What's bad for our side in a conflict is good for the other. Thus it is inferred that the press/political opposition to the current administration (and please believe me I wear the uniform of this country's armed forces to ensure your right to said protest) benefits the terrorists, lending them hope that there are those in this country whose interests parallel their own, if only on a shallow level. (And perhaps in some radical cases on a deeper level.) A simplified analogy from a comment I left at Deans: if two people are fighting and a third begins pummeling one of them, it is pointless to argue whether he is hurting that one or helping the other; he is doing both regardless of his motive.
So then: if the situation were to escalate, at what point would the press/political opponents of the current administration switch sides and begin to trumpet support for our cause?
Would a small nuclear device detonated in an American city do it? Or would the headlines the next day hint at Bush's ultimate responsibility for the event? A successful shoe bomber? Would Howard Dean in his next appearance on MTV Rock the Vote decry the villainy of the president?
Where will the candidates jump off the bandwagon and rejoin mainstream America? Surely each has a point they will not pass? Surely there are levels to which some lingering shred of personal integrity will not let them sink? There are endless possibilities here. Some Democrats and some members of the press seem to take the current situation for a simple opportunity to benefit themselves. It's not hard to imagine the worst of this bunch quietly cheering each American death in Iraq, though most are simply playing a game. "I'm the better man then him" being the theme.
It's a dangerous game though, and I truly wonder how far they are willing to take it.
And now the vicious circle closes, because I think their current actions increase the likelihood of that escalation.
The ever increasing number of my fellow GI's taking up blogging has led to some recent additions to the Military Blogroll (the top one over there). And I still need to add more!
You might want to get to know Jason, who says he's just another soldier. That might be true but he's also a heck of a writer. His Guard unit is spinning up to deploy to Iraq, and via the magic of Blogging you can take that journey with him. Or at least encourage him on the way.
Baldilocks is equally awesome. She just retired from the USAF Reserve. A great read, I think you'll agree.
The Cone Zone is a blog of one of Chief Wiggle's fellow Utah Guardsmen in Iraq. He loves Michael Bolton music, and you should send him some... not.
Where The Wild Thoughts Are is a military family blog, predominantly run by the Mrs (as all Military families are!) Great design, perhaps not what you'd expect (you'll see when you click), and some interesting info on the joy of being in medical hold limbo...
bis später...
Interviews with surviving soldiers from the Blackhawk shoot down, now recuperating a couple miles up the road:
?It started out fine. We were like little kids on a plane ride,? Nelson, 28, said with a quick smile as he lay in his bed at Landstuhl Regional Medical Center on Wednesday.Above the thunderous whir of the aircraft rotors, Nelson and his buddies yelled back and forth, shooting the bull as the copter lifted off.
About 12 of the guys from his Fort Sill, Okla.-based 2nd Battalion, 5th Field Artillery, were with Nelson, including a best friend sitting across from him.
The back door of the helicopter was open and lots of soldiers were snapping pictures, said Nelson, of Orange, Texas. A second Chinook carrying other soldiers going on rest-and-recuperation leave in the United States was flying behind them.
And a Blackhawk is down. Six heroes lost. (Note this story is an AP story in the Stars and Stripes)
The helicopter went down about 9:40 a.m. on a riverbank along the Tigris River about a half mile from the U.S. base in Saddam Hussein's former palace. The military said it did not know how many people were aboard...(Now referring to the Chinook shoot-down) ...Another of the wounded soldiers died in a hospital in Germany Thursday, bringing the Chinook death toll to 16.
The death Friday brought to 142 the number of U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq by hostile fire since President Bush declared an end to major combat May 1. A total of 114 U.S. soldiers were killed in action before Bush's declaration.
Thanks for keeping score. I can almost hear the cheering at DNC headquarters. Probably won't help Army morale though.
Of course everyone knows about the large number of folks who won't re-enlist due to the low morale caused by extensive deployments and danger in Iraq, right? And following on the heels of the recent Stars and Stripes "morale series" is this:
As the Army closed out fiscal 2003 at the end of September, so many soldiers had raised their right hands to re-enlist that the service met its retention goals and then some, retaining 106 percent of the soldiers it hoped to keep.?We needed 51,000 soldiers to re-enlist, and we got 54,151,? said Sgt. Maj. James Vales, a senior retention manager at Army headquarters in Washington.
Read the rest here. I hope to have a bit more on this subject later.
After the sensational coverage of the "morale" stories it should be interesting to see how the mainstream press covers this reality story about retention. "Not at all" is my guess.
Former Republican National Committee chairman (Haley) Barbour handily defeated incumbent Democrat Ronnie Musgrove in another closely watched race. Barbour, who also campaigned with Bush over the weekend, told supporters in Mississippi Tuesday night, "Tomorrow is a day to move on and put this day behind us and get ready to accentuate the positive."...state officials said they were investigating dozens of reports of irregularities Tuesday, including allegations that observers followed voters into ballot booths or videotaped voters and their completed ballots.
"The Republican Party has run this election with a fist full of dollars in one hand and a Confederate flag in the other," said state Democratic Party chairman Rickey L. Cole.
Posted at 1935Z
Building on the success they've had through the south this week the Dems have now turned the "hate Bush" theme into a contest at their website. It's too late to enter, the comments are closed, but 140+ people composed and posted haiku about the president.
Because really, what could be more all-American and patriotic then bashing the president using Japanese poetry forms? Some examples:
International
policy is not for me.
Who cares anyway?
or
I made up my mind.
I do not care who will die.
Iraq will be mine.
and
Two burning towers.
Lies will now go unquestioned.
The neocons smile.
and this "golden oldie"
Our man won last time
But Florida stole the vote.
Al, PLEASE run again.
Prize for the winning entry?
A pair of tickets to Al Gore's speech this Sunday at the Daughters of the American Revolution building in Washington, DC.
It's on the DNC homepage folks. You just can't make this stuff up.
The Carnival of the Vanities is at Wizbang!
I got my entry in just at the deadline and probably helped create more work then Kevin wanted, but he's a great guy and made it happen. Thanks Kevin!
Then, on his homepage I noticed a question-of-the-day poll: "Should the number of entries in the Carnival be limited?"
Interesting concept. Current voting at about 60% "yes", so it's probably worthy of more discussion.
Also note his link to an Amazon "Search inside the book" feature. Innovative - I like it.
Patriot Paradox is a fine new blog. I found it late Tuesday night (my time) with what I believe may be the first blog coverage of the "Democrat Memo".
His entry in the Showcase is "I Pray Daily. Am I an Extremist?".
Check it out.
After graduating from the University of Kentucky with a mechanical engineering degree in 1974, Fletcher became a fighter pilot in the Air Force, a first step to going into space. Based in Alaska, his job was to intercept Soviet jets that tested U.S. defenses during the Cold War.Amid military cutbacks during the Carter administration, Fletcher left the Air Force, returned to Lexington, enrolled in the UK medical school, graduated in 1984, and became a family-practice physician.
Fletcher was ordained and served as a pastor at a Baptist church in Lexington from 1989 to 1994.
Fletcher has never been shy about his Christian faith.
Who is this guy? The new governor of Kentucky, that's who. (Emphasis in following quotes is added, as a gentle tap with a clue bat to my Democrat readers.)
Rep. Ernie Fletcher easily won the Kentucky governor's race Tuesday, becoming the first Republican to lead the state in 32 years......With 55 percent of precincts reporting, Fletcher -- who got a big campaign assist from President Bush in the campaign's final days -- led with 54 percent, or 339,688 votes, to Democratic Attorney General Ben Chandler's 46 percent, or 285,941 votes.
Note to Democrats, the following strategy won't work (It's okay, they won't listen):
Chandler has tried to link Fletcher to Bush administration policies he says have cost Kentucky 67,000 jobs since 2001.
Now here comes the excuse-du-jour (drumroll please):
But polls suggest Chandler may have been hurt by his closeness to Democratic Gov. Paul E. Patton, who is finishing his term despite a scandal involving an alleged affair and charges of misconduct.
ohhhhhh...
Watch out next year though, when the Democrats bring out their genius fighter pilot-turned-doctor-and-pastor types. Cause I'm sure they've learned from this one...
Among the details provided by Aziz and the captured files:
— Saddam did not attack invading American and British forces because he believed that France and Russia would use the U.N. Security Council to stop the war.— Ties were even stronger to two other nations: North Korea, which was in the process of selling Iraq a long-range No Dong missile, and Serbia, which provided Iraq with a sort of "lessons learned" template from its experience in dealing with the NATO-led air campaign over Kosovo.
— Iraq had no biological, chemical or nuclear weapons, according to Aziz, an assertion echoed by most other captured Iraqi leaders. But Saddam was insistent on developing long-range missiles despite the U.N. resolution barring him from doing so.
— The names of every Iraqi intelligence agent working abroad over the past few years. "We know [Saddam] had agents all over the world. We know who they are, and we're going to find all of them," one official told Fox News. "The Iraqis were meticulous record keepers."
In early May, President Bush said Aziz, who once served as the public face of Saddam's regime, "doesn't know how to tell the truth."
Well then, I guess that's that. Or as Forrest Gump said "That's all I've got to say about that."
Except to note that "North Korea... was in the process of selling Iraq a long-range No Dong missile"...
You just can't make up stuff like that.
A study has shown that domestic cats infected with a parasite called toxoplasma gondii can actually alter the personalities of their human owners, turning women into ?sex kittens" and men into ?alley cats.??We found they [the infected women] were more easygoing, more warm-hearted, had more friends and cared more about how they looked. However, they were also less trustworthy and had more relationships with men,? Dr. Jaroslav Flegr, who conducted the study at Charles University in Prague, told London?s Sunday Times newspaper.
Infected men, on the other hand, became more aggressive, less well-groomed, undesirable loners who were more likely to be suspicious and jealous.
At first I wondered why such a study was being given any legitimacy, then I noticed there on the same page an add for a kitty litter box. Advertising disguised as news? Or are all such news stories automatically tagged with a related add? Either way the line is disturbingly blurred between news and advertising, and the credibility of the story and the study become questionable.
However, I would add that I've noticed that cat owners are driven to blog. And not just blog anything, they are driven to blog about their cats.
There are more out out there... there's no end of them...
Sinister, I tell you. Sinister.
Comment on the $87-billion Iraqi aid bill passed by the Senate today:
"Every day, when we see these bloody headlines of American soldiers being killed, we are reminded that had this been a global coalition, ... what we're facing today could have been so much different," said Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill.
Huh? Is he calling for international deaths? Did he know the secret way to get the French and Russians on board? Why didn't he do something?
I used to think that indeed, a "Global Coalition" could have forced Saddam to give up his WMD programs and avoid a war. Now it seems he may have been bluffing all along, thus the efficacy of such a coalition seems doubtful. (Though this does lend credence to the Tarik Aziz revelations... more from me on that later.) So in hindsight I'm not sure what Senator Durbin thinks a global coalition could have done.
Unless one reads "France and Russia on our side instead of assuring Saddam they would stop us in the UN" where he says global coalition. If he's slamming the Russo/Franco alliance then I understand.
But he's not.
Meanwhile, former Kleagle Bob Byrd of WV was the only person heard shouting "nay" in the voice vote.
Insert your own punchlines. I'm going for a run.
Instapundit has more on America's failed post-war occupation of Germany. I'm going to write a follow up one of these days - maybe even a series. "Real Voices From On-The-Scene" -type stuff to counter all the negative press...
(Y'all know I'm in Germany, right?)
In the meantime here's a few quick observations:
Transportation
...However, it was imperative to get the railroads running again in order to supply food for the approximately 20,000,000 persons for whom our Army was responsible for this winter, including our own soldiers, displaced persons and German prisoners and civilians. American engineers assigned to this job scoured our zone for trained German workers, while our counterintelligence officers were scouring the countryside arresting ex-Nazis.In Berlin I heard an argument between two American officers. One cried despairingly, “How can I keep this railroad operating if you take away all my skilled workers?”
The other replied, “Don’t think you are the only one with problems. Where am I going to find enough jails to accommodate all these fellows we are arresting?” . . .
The trains are running okay now. No complaints on that.
Energy
...“Just what I expected!” angrily exclaimed the official from Washington. “I told President Truman that the Army doesn’t understand coal mining. I told him he would have to send civilian specialists to manage this coal business in Germany.”The official was exasperated. Here he was, inspecting the fuel situation in Europe, and what did he find? He found that although winter was already here, the rich German coal fields still were not producing much, and the United States would have to ship our own coal to Europe to make up the deficiency...
The boats must have been too slow, because the coal thing has been a miserable failure. They've had to resort to other methods. You launch a dead cat into the air here and there's a good chance it will land on a nuclear power plant. At least, they say they're for generating power...
Food
...The mayor of this suburb came to our Berlin headquarters to plead for help, declaring there were 1000 women and children in his little town, and all the food reserves had been exhausted.“But why do you come to us?” inquired Col. Howley. “Your town is in the Russian zone.”
“The Russians say they cannot do anything for us,” replied the mayor...
No more Russian zone. Some Russians are here doing menial labor, but they have to compete with middle-easterners and all the other eastern Europeans for these jobs.
Long-term stategic planning
Here in Germany there is no indication that Washington politicians have any clear conception of the precise purposes and probable duration of our German occupation. Our administrative machinery here is building up in a hit-or-miss fashion, and the men to run the machine are being recruited hastily and haphazardly, with almost no evidence of a coherent long range plan. Nevertheless, the chances are very great that this American bureaucracy in the heart of Europe will survive for at least a generation---and perhaps more. We have caught a bear by the tail in Germany, and it will not be easy to let loose without endangering the peace of Europe, which involves our own peace as well.
Hmmm... I'll have to check on that one...
But I'm sure you can see that this stuff works itself out in the long run...
(By the way, this Instapundit guy is doing great stuff. I think he could really catch on!)
I may be in error here but from a distance it seems that outside of there's not much reporting on this month's governors' races, and with three statehouses up for grabs I'm surprised at the lack of coverage. I suppose the networks exhausted their gubernatorial election coverage funds last month? Do they anticipate the results may be not-to-their-liking, or not Nielson-worthy, and thus worthy of ignoring? Or is it just that flyover country, especially south of the Mason Dixon, just doesn't matter?
Just kidding. Lacking big star power, the state campaigns just aren't all that sexy, are they? So until The Rock (eminently qualified as both a wrestler and a movie star) runs for Governor of your state we'll just have to settle for the mundane.
Take ho-hum Louisiana, for instance, where on the heels of Georgia Senator Zel Miller's endorsement of President Bush comes another endorsement of a Republican candidate by a prominent Democrat. As a former resident of the Pelican State I find this an interesting story:
Jumping party lines, Nagin backs Jindal
In a bold and potentially risky move, New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin crossed party lines Monday to endorse Republican Bobby Jindal, who is locked in a tight governor's race with Lt. Gov. Kathleen Blanco, the Democratic standard bearer in the Nov. 15 runoff.Nagin's announcement marks a historic break with tradition for African-American leaders of the state's largest city and a major advance in Jindal's efforts to reach beyond his conservative base. Democratic candidates for governor in the past have regarded as automatic the backing of the mayor of New Orleans, where nearly seven of 10 voters are registered Democrats. With that history in mind, Nagin, a lifelong Democrat, called his decision "an extremely tough choice" that came only after soul-searching and extensive research.
"We're at a time in our history right now where we can move our state forward as never seen before or we can continue to languish in mediocrity and complacency," Nagin said, flanked by Jindal and his supporters who gathered outside a park across from the Ernest N. Morial Convention Center. "I choose to move forward and help write this history, not just be part of it."
<...>
Nagin praised Jindal as an issues-oriented "problem-solver," borrowing language from Jindal's campaign ads.
"Quite frankly, whenever I presented Bobby Jindal with a challenge or a question he replied with optimistic opportunity, not pessimistic posturing," Nagin said, a pointed reference to Blanco's responses. He offered only faint praise for the Democratic candidate, calling her "a very nice lady" who has a "pretty good record of doing things" as lieutenant governor.
But he said it was Jindal's specific plans for economic development, health care and education that sold him. "Bobby and I just got to a little . . . you know, deeper level of detail and specificity," Nagin said.
In recent days, Nagin said he faced considerable pressure from the state Democratic power structure to go with Blanco, citing U.S. Sens. John Breaux and Mary Landrieu in particular.
Without naming names, Nagin said Blanco supporters attached words like "risk" and "consequences" and "repercussions" to the prospect of his backing Jindal.
"They talked about this not being in the best interests of the city of New Orleans and that they would let people know that," Nagin said.
Using what he described as the "hip hop vernacular" favored by his teenage sons, Nagin hinted that Blanco's backers issued threats, indicating that "if we get in we're going to basically ice you out."
Read it all, as we say. (You'll need to provide a fake name and birthday, but who cares?)
A couple things to note regarding Louisiana Politics. One: There's New Orleans and then there's the rest of the state. Although I'm sure all will deny the validity of the comparison a similar situation exists in New York and Chicago. A predictable love-hate synergy results.
And two: no political discussion can be held without race being a major part of said discussion. You'll see a matter-of-fact sort of treatment of the issue in any Louisiana paper, while reporting from national news outlets usually tend to ignore, encode, or downplay it. I was surprised watching Shreveport television coverage from each party's local campaign headquarters in 2000; not a single white face in the Democratic headquarters and not a single black face in the crowd at Republican HQ. I'm sure there are such people, but none were evident in the very large crowds shown then. I am not exaggerating for emphasis, there were no, none, zip, zero, "crossovers".
Jindal, you may know, is the son of Indian (from India) immigrants. His rather "swarthy complexion" defies recent southern Republican stereotypes, and must be giving some Democratic strategists fits. I'd expect these same folks must be apoplectic at the endorsement by Nagin. Still, one could argue that the mayor is merely politikin', (as in covering all his bases) since he can be fairly well assured his town will be well treated by a Democratic Governor once they've "mended fences" (though "ice out" may take some time to get over) should his candidate not win.
The mayor's endorsement is not a "jumping on the bandwagon" maneuver either. If polls are to be believed, the race is neck and neck. (Perhaps in the same sense as the California governor's race?) Which means interesting days to come on the bayou.
OBTW, Kentucky and Mississippi are electing Governors too.
Meanwhile, in Florida:
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — Florida Sen. Bob Graham said Monday he will not seek re-election to a fourth term in the U.S. Senate."I will not be a candidate for election to a fourth term," Graham announced as he stood in front of a group of students from Lincoln High School in Tallahassee. The senator, who ended his bid for the Democratic nomination for president last month, was at the school for a "work day," in which he was working with construction workers on a new school roof and athletic track.
Did you catch it? Lincoln High School. A subtle endorsement of the Republicans if ever I heard one.
But seriously folks... I've lived in the southern US more then anywhere else over the past 20 years, and I will guarantee you the old stereotypes are fading fast, including the stereotype of the south being a Democratic stronghold. Plenty of folks wouldn't be caught dead registering as Republicans, but what they do in the voting booth is their business. Howard Dean may not know that though, if he thinks he can garner votes from all them rebel flag wavin', pickup drivin', beer drinkin' Lynyrd Skynyrd lovin', World Wrestlin' watchin' NASCAR fans.
Yeeeehaw!
I was considering providing some more serious commentary about all this but then found this guy and his commenters who pretty much said it all anyway.
Enjoy.
Bad news for Dems:
Sen. Zell Miller doesn't have many bridges to today's Democratic Party left to burn.
Whatever bridges remain are crumbling as the party's national leaders — specifically, its nine candidates for president — read the Georgia Democrat's blunt and often-scathing new book, "A National Party No More: The Conscience of a Conservative Democrat.""They have managed to take the main plank of the McGovern race, antiwar, and the main plank in the Mondale race, raising taxes, and put them together," Mr. Miller said in an exclusive interview with The Washington Times to mark the book's release tomorrow. "How dumb can you get?"
Mr. Miller revealed in the interview that he will buck his party and its leftward lurch next year by casting his ballot for President Bush, which would be the first time a Republican ever won his vote for president.
Good news for Dems: If Zell's switching he's doing so at the wrong time!!!
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Bush is losing public support for his war and economic policies, according to a new poll which for the first time shows that a majority of Americans disapprove of his handling of Iraq.A slim majority, 51%, disapprove of his Iraq policy, while 47% approve, according to the ABC News-Washington Post poll released Sunday.
Most Americans, 54%, continue to believe the Iraq war was worth fighting, but that's down from 70% in April. A new high — 62% — say the level of U.S. casualties is unacceptable.
Fewer than one in 10 Americans say Bush has made the nation more prosperous, while 58% — a new high — say the president fails to understand their problems.
The economy remains a major issue, with 45% of Americans approving of the way Bush is handling the economy and 53% disapproving. By a wide margin, 62% to 35%, the public sees the economy as a more pressing problem than terrorism.
The poll was conducted before Thursday's report that the economy surged from July through September at the fastest pace in nearly two decades.
Even more good news for Dems (but bad for those who were hoping for a quick end to the war)
Attack Dispels Hopes of War's Quick End
At least given all the above "good news" for the Dems they probably won't realize the ironic fact that Zell Miller is the only electable potential presidential candidate they have!
Thanks AP!
"The colour scheme throughout this bright, airy chalet is light jade green. The Führer is his own decorator, designer and furnisher, as well as architect... [Hitler] has a passion about cut flowers in his home."And he is seldom alone in his mountain hideaway, as he "delights in the society of brilliant foreigners, especially painters, musicians and singers. As host, he is a droll raconteur... "
Oh, and look who's practising his archery in the garden: "It is strange to watch the burly Field-Marshal Göering, as chief of the most formidable airforce in Europe, taking a turn with the bow-and-arrow at straw targets of 25 yards range."

Looks like finding old magazine articles and posting them on the web is becoming quite a trend. The story that developed around this one is interesting (and perhaps bizarre) in its own right, and amongst other things involves copyright issues and demonstrates that no generation has a monopoly on embarassing commentary and/or foolish behavior.
From The Guardian article:
November 1938 was two years after Hitler had occupied the Rhineland and six months after "union" with Austria. He had just taken Czechoslovakia and Germany was weeks away from the horrors of Kristallnacht. Yet here was a British interiors magazine treating the architect of all this as if he were the Laurence Llewelyn-Bowen of his day.I scanned the pages of the article, and put them up on my (not frequently visited) weblog. Nothing really happened, and I forgot about it. In August, I revamped my weblog, and wrote about the software I was using in the pages of Guardian Online. I also gave a bit of prominence again on my site to the Hitler scans. Within a week or so, I noticed I was getting about 10,000 page impressions a day on the Hitler pages. Given that I was used to about 300 on a good day on the whole site, this was quite remarkable. I emailed Isobel McKenzie-Price, the editor of Homes and Gardens, which is now published by the Time Warner-owned publishing giant, IPC. I told her about the piece, asked if she or anyone there knew anything about it, and whether they had any other copies.
Two weeks later, I received an email from McKenzie-Price saying: "This piece, text and photographs is still in copyright and any unauthorised reproduction is an infringement of copyright. In the circumstances I must request you to remove this article from your website."
It gets even better. Read it all; enjoy!
A few weeks back I was talking to a friend, recent returnee from Iraq, a guy who'd made the very fast ride to Baghdad last spring. His first comment to me about "what was it really like?" was to this effect: "War is hell. And no amount of training prepares you for the moment when you wake up in the morning and crawl out of your tent to be greeted by the corpses of enemy soldiers."
As yesterday's battlefield became tonight's campground, such grisly encounters were unavoidable. "Clean up" came later. We train to fight; we train to be good at our particular specialties. In casualty exercises we even train with very realistic but very fake wounds. We do not train to develop a callous attitude towards death.
Lacking a ready supply of people freshly killed by trainees, you just can't train for that. Only experience can bring acceptance of some aspects of war.
The US Army treats some folks differently then it does other folks. Or so says Jesse Jackson, on behalf of the parents of Spc. Shoshana Johnson, who was captured March 23 near Nasiriya along with Pfc. Jessica Lynch and three other members of the Army's 507th Maintenance Company.
Jackson told CNN Friday that the family was upset because Johnson, who is about to be discharged from the Army, will get a 30 percent disability benefit, while the Post reports that Lynch has received an 80 percent disability benefit.
Posted at 1413Z
A cold front is moving through Iraq, and temperatures are falling a bit, with highs now only in the 80's. Remember Operation Air Conditioner? (if not read here and here) Here, from Stars and Stripes, is the latest:
ARLINGTON, Va. ? Frankie Mayo is running both hot and cold these days.The intrepid mom from Delaware, founder of ?Operation Air Conditioner,? has branched out for the winter months, switching her focus from AC units to free shipments of space heaters and top-of-the-line combat boots to troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Mayo said she wants all of the servicemembers who will spend the Christmas holidays far from home ?to know you have not been forgotten.
?Anything you need, just let me know, and I?ll get it to you,? Mayo said in a Thursday telephone interview.
Mayo launched Operation AC back in June, after her son, Cpl. Chris Tomlinson of the Army?s 300th Military Police Co, e-mailed her from Iraq:
?Hey mom, yeah i am OK it is hot as hell here. last week the temp reached 143 my platoon said they would be very grateful if you guys sent us air conditioners.?
Mayo not only sent Chris the unit he craved, she decided to send more to his buddies ? the entire deployed Army, to be precise.
In addition to thousands of air conditioners, Mayo has sent troops everything from medical supplies to toilet seats ? over $500,000 worth of supplies, she said.
The funds to purchase the supplies came from corporate sponsors, particularly Home Depot ? which gave her 600 air conditioners and $25,000 ? and more than 10,000 people who have sent everything from 50 cents to $5,000, Mayo said.
Most of the money was generated in July, when Mayo received a spate of media attention that included appearances on ?Good Morning America,? Fox News, CNN, and numerous other outlets.
With Iraq on the verge of winter, and snow already on the mountaintops of Afghanistan, Mayo has switched her focus to space heaters and boots.
She has also started a new ?adopt a soldier? program, which links American families with a deployed member. Already, Mayo has ?placed? 2,000 servicemembers with families who want to offer special holiday cheer to someone in the military, sending ?care packages,? letters and cards.
Mayo is also getting ready to start shipping ?predecorated Christmas trees? to units that would like to add some Yuletide cheer to their quarters.
Mayo is using the U.S. Postal Service to send the heaters, boots and other items. But after shipping 1,450 AC units, the Post Office stopped accepting the air conditioners, because they contain potentially hazardous substances that are not legal to ship.
In early September, the Army and the military?s Air Mobility Command helped by airlifting a shipment of 560 air conditioners to Iraq from Dover, Del.
But Mayo had to send a second shipment of 540 units through DHL-Danzis Air & Ocean, at a cost of $71,900, after the Army balked at using military transport.
The reason Mayo was given was that Pentagon lawyers found a policy prohibiting servicemembers from accepting gifts worth more than $20.
Okay, emphasis in last line added by yours truly. It really looks like the military is just struggling to avoid shipping these units, and perhaps given the immediate demands of airlift they are justified. But why the Pentagon always seems to need to fabricate some outrageous "extra reason" to justify their actions is beyond me. Guess I'll never achieve the highest ranks, I'm just not a top-caliber kind of guy.
I would expect the decorated Christmas trees to meet some resistance too. If I'm not mistaken such things are unfit for public display in America and may offend certain elements in Baghdad. Not to mention it's got to be tough to find one fully decorated for under 20 bucks too. Stay tuned.
Frankie Mayo has been working with great determination against this obviously well organized resistance movement for some time now, and her efforts are worthy of support. With a little help (hint hint) I'm sure Operation Air Conditioner (or Heater or Christmas Tree) will bring a small bit of yuletide cheer to the folks deployed far from their families. Here's their home page.
And here's the Baghdad forecast.
this from Instapundit and all attached stories. As a member of the occupation force I can agree with Life and The Post; we've botched it. More later.
Sorry, been away. I'm back. In my business that's life. Should be no other interruptions in the immediate future.
I feel like Blogging a bit this week. Hope you can join me.
Here (below) is an entry in a long delayed series. The end is near... hope you enjoy.
I's good to be back. To any who may have noticed: sorry. Pass it on?