
![]() | |
October 2012
August 2012 July 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003
|
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by! February 9, 2011 Picking at scabsBy Greyhawk
...Zeyad, an Iraqi doctor whose "Healing Iraq" blog was promoted by war-blogger Glenn Reynolds and others in the run up to the Iraq war, and then abruptly dropped when Zeyad's cousin was murdered by US troops and he had the bad taste to make a big deal about it. In addition to Glenn's point, I'll offer this observation:
The date on Zeyad's first post is October 17, 2003 - so scratch "promoted by war-blogger Glenn Reynolds and others in the run up to the Iraq war" from the fact column, too. (And yes, that leaves it empty.) Salam Pax and Riverbend were the "big" Iraqi blogs in the "run up"/earliest days of the war - there were few others, if any. Neither of those two can be labeled either "pro-war" or "ignored" by bloggers who could be. In actual fact, something (nudge wink) must have happened in between "the run up to the Iraq war" and October, 2003 to lead Zeyad to predict (accurately) more would follow, adding "Their voice will be heard at last, now that they have nothing to fear from doing so." While I believe Iraqi bloggers were taking more than negligible risk in sharing their experiences with the world, that Zeyad went on to report a murder committed by US soldiers - and got results - reinforces his point. As for links to Healing Iraq, here are mine (including to the finish on that particular story line and other "not good" news that followed). Glenn's provided his. And while not comparable to that assumed by Zeyad, for me - active duty at the time - or Andrew Olmsted or Chief Wiggles - guard members - to shine a light on that story at the time involved potential risk, too. (Note that none of us took the THIS CAN'T BE TEH Truth!!! position.) Raimondo's post is far removed from reality; it's an extreme example of the sort of damn the facts - I'm hammering this into my narrative re-write that's increasingly characterized much of the post-World War Two era "history." (His effort even encompasses WWII...) That sort of absurdity is part of my motivation for the america@war project, the Healing Iraq story is but one example of new media's immediate impact on the war (and Glenn Reynolds' contribution is an immeasurably large factor in that) - and this provides a minor coda. Besides increased odds of "truth will out," add "if you make up garbage out of thin air someone's going to call you on it" to the list. None of that addresses Raimondo's questions: "what are we creating in Iraq? What have we created?" The first is indicative of his ignorance of Iraq, an assumption of the superiority of "we" - or both. While not washing our hands of it, "we" have had damn little influence in Iraq since summer 2009. That's due in equal part to the Bush-era timeline for withdrawal and a mutual lack of respect/trust between the current governments of Iraq and the US - but I'm not hand-wringing over that, either. While any hope for the future of Iraq is very much political, not military, we do still have 50,000 troops there. From time to time I offer glimpses of what they're doing. There are few Iraqi bloggers left, and few milbloggers (I suspect "not enough interest" is one reason for low motivation) but in addition to Zeyad, (who I'm not sure is in Iraq...) if you want a boots on ground report Chief Wiggles is back in Iraq and blogging, too. What have we created? Opportunity, nothing more. As Zeyad demonstrates once again (and as people like Justin Raimondo overlook) the answer is still - for now - a place where people like Zeyad can write about Iraq, good or bad. Or to paraphrase Ben Franklin, a democracy, madam - if you can keep it. Added: here's an October, 2005 examination of the story from Dexter Filkins in the New York Times. That's one of the finest bits of war reporting of the past several years, something I've said before re: Filkin's work. (The "Warrior King Posted by Greyhawk / February 9, 2011 11:14 AM | Permalink 10 Comments |
November 26, 2010America@war [Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit. That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary. From their about page:
"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation: The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism. Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented. I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are. "Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result. Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web... And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed. The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down. But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:
Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down. If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real. And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale. We've already made history, it's time to save it. (More to follow...) Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink |
Comments (0) |
|
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
![]() Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house. I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email. Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed. Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com ![]() Tending Distant Far from hearth and home, watching What tales we'll tell When things grim Some distant sunset, vision fading Saluting fallen friends whose names - Greyhawk, Baghdad, December 2004 |
Bullshit.
Zeyad's cousin was murdered by US soldiers, and ONE soldier was given a slap on the wrist for "assault" -- six months in the brig. Glenn, at the time, said he "I don't know if this verdict is just." Uh huh. And then after that, there was no mention of the case -- nor was there any reevaluation of the war itself, its consequences, etc. And you remarked that the murder wasn't "the same story" as Abu Ghraib. Wasn't it?
And now you wash your hands of it, because, according to you, since 2009 the US has had "damn little influence." Quick, easy, clean, and very Pontius Pilate.
You'll never learn, never admit you were wrong, because, after all, Zeyad has to live there. You do't.
"wash your hands of it..." - no, read your own post again. That would be you. I'd love to live in a world of splendid isolationism, too, but ours is the only one we've got.
But by all means, tell me more of these remarkable "war is hell" and "killing is wrong" theories you've developed. I'm always eager to learn new things.
"Zeyad has to live there", in an imperfect but developing democracy you mean? Yeah, things were much better when he had to live there under kindly uncle Saddam. I love the way the compassionate left is full of pity for the victims of the world- as long as they are politically useful. If they're not they don't exist.
You're a contemptible, lying disgrace, Raimondo.
"An imperfect but developing democracy" -- yeah, just like Iran, only with US troops. What a joke you are.
You're missing the real joke: you accusing Glenn Reynolds of ignoring a story you only heard of because Glenn Reynolds linked it in the first place. In other words, this is a case of someone who's done nothing complaining that someone who's done something hasn't done enough.
I repeat- a contemptible, lying disgrace. You lost, Bush, and the Iraqis, won. Your terrorist friends failed to strangle the new democracy in its crib and, when you die, you'll burn in hell with them.
Egads. Raimondo is still around? I would rather read Zeyad because 'he lives there and Raimondo doesn't.'
Sorry, Raimondo lost his truthiness when I saw some really weird vids on his site...he damned all American troops as perverts. I continued to read, thinking there might be some objectivity instead of inflammatory hyperbolic rhetoric. There was none.
All you can do is show the facts and let them speak for themselves. Liberals never get it, especially when they tend to muck things up whenever they are in charge.
Hi warmonger. Thanks for the pontifications.
Good to see Leadership School worked for you.
MSgt-AF(Retired)73-93 Nam-Desert Storm
Hey, that might not have sounded like the compliment I had intended.
Anyway, I enjoy your writing.
Craig -> Skivvy Niner-IYAS9YAS
I figured that, but thanks for clarifying, brother! :)