
![]() | |
October 2012
August 2012 July 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003
|
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by! September 28, 2010 More ways to lose a warBy Greyhawk"...he showed bad judgment. When I put somebody in charge of the lives of 100,000 young men and women in a very hazardous situation, they've got to conduct themselves at the highest standards, and he didn't meet those standards." - Barack Obama, on General Stan McChrystal That's a quote from this month's Rolling Stone interview with the President, likely a return favor for their earlier efforts on his behalf. Here's more:
Which really isn't talking about Afghanistan so much at all. But this is: What we've had to do after an extensive review that I engaged in was to say to our commanders on the ground, "You guys have to have a strategy in which we are training Afghan security forces, we're going to break the Taliban momentum, but I am going to establish a date at which we start transitioning down and we start turning these security functions over to a newly trained Afghan security force." That is what we're in the process of doing. So I told 'em, I said - you people go do your Army stuff or whatever, but I'm putting a stop to it as soon as I can. (High five.) And there's that message to the base, one of those messages directed at some that may undercut the messages sent to others that are the hallmark of "strategy" in Obama's war. (There's this assurance, too: "The fact of the matter is, when we came in, what we learned was that the neglect of Afghanistan had been more profound than we expected." So blame Bush apparently still works in some quarters.) Let's leave the Lady GaGa Fan Club Newsletter (or the big-time magazine that "got" McChrystal, if you prefer) for a moment. Bob Woodward appeared on ABC's Good Morning America today (video) to discuss Obama's Wars "He wants out of Afghanistan," Woodward explained, adding "the thing you never see in all of these discussions is the president stepping up like he did in his political campaign in 2008 and say 'yes we can.'" Turning back to the Rolling Stone, as evidenced by the tone of the article (and sheesh - we know fellating the president is the cost of access - but Wenner must have popped his whole damn stash of Women Extenze before he cleared security...) Obama could have found no friendlier environment in which to rally the support of that base - and on every other issue he availed himself of that opportunity. Witness the intense passion displayed in the surprise encore with which our story concludes.
Then he grabbed a Stratocaster from Rahm Emanuel, lit it on fire, and like totally smashed it through a Marshall Stack... Seriously though, it's not hard to imagine Jann Wenner and Company, Bic lighters held high, chanting "yes we can, yes we can" after Obama first left the Oval Office, then cheering lustily on his return. Without noticing that the Afghanistan song and dance number didn't make the cut for that medley of greatest hits.
***** Postscript - a bit more from those old dudes Woodward and Stephanopoulos... "He wants out of Afghanistan," Woodward explained, adding "the thing you never see in all of these discussions is the president stepping up like he did in his political campaign in 2008 and say 'yes we can.'" "That's what gets your Washington Post colleague David Ignatious," Stephanopoulus responded, "he wrote about your portrayal of the president, and he said this:
"He [Obama] is an intellectual, as we know," Woodward observed. "He's the law professor, and he's looked at the facts on Afghanistan which I lay out. It's a dreary picture... last spring at the end of one of these briefings he said 'given that definition of the problem I don't know how we're going to come up with a solution.' And so intellectually he realizes 'real, real hard' - he knows as commander in chief he has to do something..." Which brings to my (non-intellectual) mind an Orwell quote... The English intelligentsia, on the whole, were more defeatist than the mass of the people - and some of them went on being defeatist at a time when the war was quite plainly won - partly because they were better able to visualize the dreary years of warfare that lay ahead. Their morale was worse because their imaginations were stronger. The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it, and if one finds the prospect of a long war intolerable, it is natural to disbelieve in the possibility of victory. If only the rest of us had imagination, we could understand how they must feel. ***** Previously: There are many ways to lose a war... Next: How to lose a war (part three: with friends like us...) Posted by Greyhawk / September 28, 2010 1:40 PM | Permalink 2 TrackBacksIn one discussion about the tensions between Pakistan and India, Holbrooke introduced a new angle. "There's a global warming dimension of this struggle, Mr. President," he said. His words baffled many in the room. There are tens of thousands of Indian ... Read More Politico frames "Obama's dilemma"...The generals want to stick it out. His supporters - and a growing number of Republicans - think Obama can't get out of Afghanistan fast enough, particularly now that Osama bin Laden is dead. And so it's left to Obama... Read More 2 Comments |
November 26, 2010America@war [Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit. That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary. From their about page:
"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation: The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism. Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented. I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are. "Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result. Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web... And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed. The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down. But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:
Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down. If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real. And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale. We've already made history, it's time to save it. (More to follow...) Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink |
Comments (0) |
|
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
![]() Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house. I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email. Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed. Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com ![]() Tending Distant Far from hearth and home, watching What tales we'll tell When things grim Some distant sunset, vision fading Saluting fallen friends whose names - Greyhawk, Baghdad, December 2004 |
May the Lord change our President's mind and heart--or change our President...
Greyhawk
Just to bring a possible story to your, and milbloggers, attention.
Another way to lose a war- mistreat your vets.
Recently I reported to the VA hospital in Madison, Wisconsin for an operation to repair a bone that had not set properly. (Note: I'm over 50% disability, therefor authorized though it's not service connected.) During pre-op processing, I had an interview with the resident who was to do the operation. His news- you're a smoker, so I will not operate. A complaint to the Chief of Staff's office led to a conversation with a senior orthopod, who told me that they would not do "elective", meaning, apparently, non-emegency, not unnecessary, surguries on smokers. He mentioned hip and knee surgery in particular.
Contact with another VA doc confirmed that that is policy at least in Wisconsin, and another doctor, a friend, called it ridiculous. My question is, has anyone else heard anything about this, and how widespread is it? When did it start, after, say, Jan,2009?
I'm retired Army, and have Tricare for another year, so I'll get this taken care of, but what effect will it have on vets who don't have other sources of care, and who can't or won't quit. The PTSD rate amoung Irag/Afghan vets is supposed to be about 1 in 7. Will a smoker fresh out of Afghanistan be denied treatment?
The smoking rate of vets is higher than the overall population, and this will save them money, or the smokers will be forced to quit a legal habit to get treatment to which they are otherwise entitled. Coercion (blackmail) anyone? Smokers are a perfect target for what one of my doctors called rationing. Politically incorrect and maginalized already, they deserve it!
I'd appreciate it if you could point me at someone who knows more about this than I do. I don't want to start a flap that's already being fought elsewhere, but I think this policy is BS, and I need to get involved.