
![]() | |
October 2012
August 2012 July 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003
|
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by! June 13, 2010 An open letter to Mike YonBy Greyhawk
Mike's correspondent goes on to detail various outrages he claims are perpetrated on the troops from on high, the sort of statements that from such a questionable source can only be called baseless claims.
Consider this a public email from me, Mike - the guy who introduced you to the blogosphere over five years ago. As a guy who's been there and done that in Iraq, as a guy who served in uniform for a quarter century, and as a guy who's concern for his brothers who are still in uniform or in combat zones is exceeded by no one's, I ask you to stop publishing whatever drops into your email inbox as if it were something more significant than Nigerian spam. Whatever led you to this point doesn't matter. What does matter is you're at a point where your lack of any sort of filter leaves you open to being used by people with an agenda, whose motives you can't possibly understand. And take a look at the comment thread that follows your post linked above. There are people there who trust you without question when you claim to be posting information by the troops, for the troops. Here's an example from "Scott Klimczak": "Mike wouldn't publish ANYTHING if he hadn't seen multiple futile attempts to notify up the line. These posts ain't just willy-nilly! They're directed fire, short bursts, to wake the staff up and spotlight the drool on the chins of those not paying attention." Or this brief and even more frightened comment from Glenda Hunn-Felando that follows it: "God help my son....." (Glenda, for the record, and for all mothers of troops who've written me about Mike's recent behavior: you're looking for truth in all the wrong places - Mike doesn't give a damn for you or your son.) Mike, these people think they're getting light from you, when in reality it's just heat. Maybe heat brings in the donations, I don't know, I've never tried it. But whatever your motive, when you operate without a filter the end result is at best a jumbled mess that no one on earth could have time to sort, certainly the guys who are fighting a war don't. In the future, If you get more emails like this one you claim is from Afghanistan (and I suspect you will) it might be a good idea to check with the folks on scene who know the answers before you publish them. Give them a chance to verify accuracy and correct problems before you publish something that may or may not be true, may or may not include OPSEC violations, and may get troops killed. If for some reason you can't do that, forward them to someone like Jeff Shogol at Stars and Stripes. He's not in Afghanistan, but his journalistic insight and contacts are obviously useful at separating fact from fiction. His efforts at running down the truth about an earlier email are exemplary - think how much better it would have been for all involved in that case if you had turned to him first. Or me, whose experience at this sort of thing is exceeded only by my concern for the lives of troops. Either of us can provide you with that much needed filter, do a bit of fact checking, get problems solved with no risk to the troops (I'd be perfectly happy to credit you with that result), and save you from potential embarrassment. We're just two examples, there are countless other folks with a combination of knowledge, experience, insight, and interest who are capable of doing the same. Again, I'm convinced that whether through misguided rage, confusion, or lack of knowledge and experience you've allowed yourself to be used by people with an agenda that you believe matches yours. I'm not so sure it does, and I'm certain you yourself have no idea when you're being so used. And as so many of your readers reveal in their comments, your posting of material like this lends it false credibility. Your remaining readers trust you, and I've warned you before that you run great risks when you run roughshod over that trust. They deserve better. More importantly, the men and women in harm's way deserve better. They deserve light, and they're getting heat. You're vulnerable and you're being used. It's time to man up, admit your failure, and stop. J.R. (Greyhawk) Michael
Next day update: Ladies and gentlemen, meet Sam Thistle. "Newspaper correspondents with an army, as a rule, are mischievous. They are the world's gossips, pick up and retail the camp scandal, and gradually drift to the headquarters of some general, who finds it easier to make reputation at home than with his own corps or division. They are also tempted to prophesy events and state facts which, to an enemy, reveal a purpose in time to guard against it. Moreover, they are always bound to see facts colored by the partisan or political character of their own patrons, and thus bring army officers into the political controversies of the day, which are always mischievous and wrong. Yet, so greedy are the people at large for war news, that it is doubtful whether any army commander can exclude all reporters, without bringing down on himself a clamor that may imperil his own safety. Time and moderation must bring a just solution to this modern difficulty." Posted by Greyhawk / June 13, 2010 4:45 PM | Permalink 2 TrackBacksBack in 2006 I criticized NY Times editor Bill Keller for using suspected lawbreaking and his distrust of George Bush to justify his own deliberate law breaking. In that post I tried to point out the problems with Keller's argument.... Read More Welcome to the Dawn Patrol, our daily roundup of information on the War on Terror and other topics - from the MilBlogs and various sources around the world. If you're a blogger, you can join the conversation. If you link to any of these stories, add a ... Read More 16 Comments |
November 26, 2010America@war [Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit. That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary. From their about page:
"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation: The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism. Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented. I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are. "Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result. Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web... And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed. The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down. But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:
Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down. If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real. And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale. We've already made history, it's time to save it. (More to follow...) Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink |
Comments (0) |
|
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
![]() Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house. I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email. Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed. Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com ![]() Tending Distant Far from hearth and home, watching What tales we'll tell When things grim Some distant sunset, vision fading Saluting fallen friends whose names - Greyhawk, Baghdad, December 2004 |
Two words say it all, "Well done."
You're about the most decent guy in the world, Hawk. I was really expecting you to kick him in the teeth over this one, given the unit.
For the record, Grim's referencing the 3CAB email Mike published, a different one than the one I'm discussing above, and one with massive OPSEC violations.
Yeah, Grim, those are the men and women I served with in Iraq during the surge, but now that Mike's veered into the world of putting troops at risk - with no validation, verification or fact checking, and with who knows what coming as his next example - the specific patches on the sleeves don't matter.
Just so. I figured you'd be after him with a Bowie knife today. Your tone is more along the lines of giving him a last chance to try to realize what he's doing to the families, and how he's opening himself to being humiliated and played.
You're a class act, my friend. That's all I wanted to say.
Back atcha Grim. I saw where Jimbo already took on the 3CAB post, lots of other folks are too. Bottom line, none of us who've been there and done that feel good seeing that sort of stuff in print. Mike knows damn well that email was one that could get people killed.
Thank you, GH. God bless you. You have true humility.
I've been following his statements and accusations with dismay and outright fear for our troops, and each time one of you stalwart milbloggers pull me back from the brink. I truly appreciate this -- and I truly value you. Thank you for defending and protecting our troops, and thank you for defending and protecting the psyche and emotions of those who love and support them. You have my deepest gratitude and respect. God bless you.
Thanks, GH. It's good to 'hear' a voice of sanity.
Thanks, Greyhawk, for publishing this. I've always admired Yon's writing and photo skills, but something isn't right with him. He's become the story, gotten too involved in everything, and perhaps has reached that point where he cannot hit the brakes even if he wanted to.
It's like being in a spin. Most of the time, especially with enough altitude, you can recover. However, once you pass through a certain altitude, even the ejection seat won't save you and you end up riding it in.
Other pilots have gotten target fixation, and followed it all the way into the ground. I'm concerned that that's what has happened here. Yon is locked onto a target, and can't see how fast the ground is coming up.
Respects,
I get that Yon has gone completely around the bend... And really needs to be put into a padded room with one of those lovely coats with the really long arms that tie up so beautifully. But my question is about OPSEC violation. Even if he was fed that email as bait, wouldn't his publishing it result in some kind of punishment? Espionage? Treason? Inquiring mind would like to know. Thanks.
Our troops, and those who love them, deserve so much better than Yon has been feeding them lately.
Thank YOU!
GreyHawk and Grim are, and probably always will be, the smartest guys in the room. I'm glad you both are on the troops side. God bless you both.
Subsunk
ditto what subby says. except, they may well be the smartest guys in the building.
I'm convinced. Yon was once one of my main go to guys for information but I've watched his slide with dismay. I've held on and hoped for the best but I'm done. FWIW Michael, you've managed to alienate another veteran.
We must always keep in mind that the King-In-Chief can order McChrystal to do about anything and McChrystal has to do it if it is legal. We have no idea what the King-In-Chief is ordering McChrystal to do and to keep his mouth shut about it.
"the King-in-Chief" and McChrystal have nothing to do with this. This ends that line of conversation in this thread.