The reader will kindly forgive any tendency to rough language or behavior on the part of the site owner...
TMGlogo2006-2007phs-copy.jpg
"Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
TMGbloglabel1 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel3 copy.gif
TMG MONTHLY ARCHIVES
[-]



TMGbloglabel10 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette Feeds

 

Add to Technorati Favorites
Technorati Profile
add.gif
Add to Google
addtomyyahoo4.gif
ngsub1.gif sub_modern5.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

digg.jpg

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

pl-news.gif

tvc_logo_small.png

Mrsg- Greyhawk's Profile
Mrsg- Greyhawk's Facebook profile
Create Your Badge
TMGbloglabel5 copy.gif
TMGbloglabel6 copy.gif
350.jpg
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by!
« Don't Miss... | Main | Cop Kills Marine »

June 7, 2010

greyhawk copy sm.png

Well whaddya know - wikileaker was a GI Joe

By Greyhawk

Wired:

Federal officials have arrested an Army intelligence analyst who boasted of giving classified U.S. combat video and hundreds of thousands of classified State Department records to whistleblower site Wikileaks, Wired.com has learned.

Read the whole thing - there's no "upside" to what this punk was doing, and the guy who exposed him is the hero in this story. (One who had even donated to Wikileaks in the past.)

The snuff porn videos SPC Bradley Manning, 22, of Potomac, Maryland (allegedly!) provided for world wide enjoyment (and wikileaks fundraising) are different only in length from the sort of stuff that's been available on Youtube and LiveLeak for years. The additional (and fraudulent) commentary and editing provided by Wikileaks, along with a massive PR campaign, turned that video into a brief sensation - though any hopes for a repeat of the abu Ghraib photos media extravaganza fizzled rapidly. I think Jules is exactly right in his comments here. (But to be clear - while the wikileaks video won't result in the thousands - if not tens of thousands - of deaths the release of the abu Ghraib photos did, it could inspire at least a handful of suicide bombers - I'm not calling it 'harmless.')

But apparently Manning also leaked "260,000 classified U.S. diplomatic cables that Manning described as exposing "almost criminal political back dealings."" I'm not sure if he understands the difference between "criminal" (example: 'leaking classified' - which is) and "stuff I don't like" - or "embarrassing," but I'm fairly certain most DoS folks do....

"Hillary Clinton, and several thousand diplomats around the world are going to have a heart attack when they wake up one morning, and find an entire repository of classified foreign policy is available, in searchable format, to the public," Manning wrote.

The words "Hillary Clinton" might temper the support from some folks who'd otherwise be inclined to rush to the defense of the guy who leaked the snuff porn vids - time will tell.

And forget anything about "lax security measures" - this is someone who had achieved a position of trust, who had cleared a background check (at least, he better have) that (along with 'need to know') gained him access to information classified at a specific level. You don't need to strip search and body scan folks like that every day. However, if you're their supervisor, you do need to know them.

The real question is one of clearance (and I've been a security manager for a large unit - I know how this stuff works). Specifically, why did this guy still have one? (Or at least, access to SIPR.) If this is true:

He discussed personal issues that got him into trouble with his superiors and left him socially isolated, and said he had been demoted and was headed for an early discharge from the Army.

...his clearance should have been yanked long before - as in step one. "Manpower shortage" isn't the answer - as this case demonstrates all too clearly, not everyone is "better than nothing" - sometimes you're infinitely better off being a man down. (I've made those sorts of decisions before, too - with an eye towards deploying to a war zone and otherwise.)

In spite of the length of the linked article there's certainly not enough information available to draw the conclusions that would answer the questions I'm raising above, those may or may not come out in time. (Just like those quarter million State Department emails. Which, by the way, if they really are that damning, the net, secure or not, is not compartmentalized enough. See 'need to know' reference above. There are lots of potential lessons learned here...)

As for probable outcomes, these seem likely:

  1. Wikileaks launches a big fundraiser for Manning's defense (possibly w/t-shirt sales)
  2. They give some of the money to an attorney to represent him
  3. He's found guilty and spends years in prison

Update - Stars and Stripes:

Wikileaks spokesman Julian Assange said his group does not have 260,000 classified cables. He added that Wikileaks does "not keep personally identifying information" on its sources.

"If Mr. Manning is indeed the source for the 'Collateral Murder' video, which depicts a gratuitous attack by an Apache helicopter on a van [carrying] unarmed people helping a wounded Reuters reporter, among other slayings, and which were the subject of a Pentagon coverup, no praise can be too high for this brave soldier," Assange said in an e-mail.

Per Karaka's comment below, chances of 1 and 2 above were slim, and it looks like they're getting slimmer. As for 3, does the Army have a case? Is there evidence beyond "he bragged online that he had done it?"

Elsewhere:

Karaka Pend - Hammer meet nail


Previously: War Porn (part three - for the children)





Posted by Greyhawk / June 7, 2010 4:03 PM | Permalink

1 TrackBack

The NY Times profiles Bradass87:He spent part of his childhood with his father in the arid plains of central Oklahoma, where classmates made fun of him for being a geek. He spent another part with his mother in a small, remote corner of southwest Wales... Read More

7 Comments

I would be *very* surprised if Wikileaks contributed anything to Manning's defense. I don't think they particularly concern themselves with the sources of their leaks; only the leaks themselves and the verification of their authenticity.

Probably not - I won't be surprised either way. But I listed items in order of lilihood, with 3 being "most."

Liked your War review at SWJ. Good discussion strted over there.

I think #3 is a certainty! There is very little chance they won't make an example of him.

Thanks very much! It was a very good book, and I'm pleased to contribute to SWJ. Appreciate the linking, too!

The SIPRnet is so ubiquitous now that I've seen clearances to nearly everyone. This may change things...

Think about it--nowadays, hardly any traffic in a combat theater travels via NIPR. Everything from threat information, to evaluation reports, routine taskings, and salsa night travels over secure lines. As a result, unit S-2s are burning the midnight oil trying to grant everyone an interim clearance. I think we might need to re-look this policy...

Heh - being the SWO I actually had one of the VERY few official NIPR links - because there's some stuff you just can't get on SIPR... that might be part of the reason people were nice to me even if I ruined their day.

Aw, come on. We're not really mad at the SWO.

I always felt sorry for the SWO because he/she was almost always a convenient scapegoat for everyone's frustration about the weather.

Another heh - our office also featured a table full of good stuff from Soldiers' Angels and other care packages, easily accessible to all who wandered in from the cold. Or heat. Or dust, or...

Not heaven on earth, for sure, but a haven on the flightline! This old man was all about customer service.

350.jpg
Mrs G copy.png

November 26, 2010


America@war
[Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit.

That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary.

From their about page:

The Naval Institute shall remain

INDEPENDENT - A non-profit member association, with no government support, that does not lobby for special interests;

NON-PARTISAN - An independent, professional military association with a mission, goals and objectives that transcend political affiliations; and shall encourage

IDEAS - Through its respected journals Proceedings and Naval History, its conferences, its books and its online content, in support of those who serve.

"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation:

The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism.

Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented.

I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are.

"Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result.

Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web...

And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed.

The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down.

*****

But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:

Closing Blogs is nothing new. So many site's owners just give up on their own. They come and go, you know, these MilBloggers do. Like any other sort of blogger. Many post in the lonely down hours far from home, spill their guts for the world, then abandon their spots when the tour of duty is up. They have lives again somewhere in the world, and no need to share the details. So it goes.

Many are truly gone - no site left at all. "The page cannot be found." Other blogs remain, like abandoned defensive positions in shifting desert sands.

Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down.

If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real.

And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale.

We've already made history, it's time to save it.

(More to follow...)




Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) |

TMGbloglabel7copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
TMGrecentcomments.gif
  • Greyhawk: Another heh - our office also featured a table full read more
  • Starbuck: Aw, come on. We're not really mad at the SWO. read more
  • Greyhawk: Heh - being the SWO I actually had one of read more
  • Starbuck: The SIPRnet is so ubiquitous now that I've seen clearances read more
  • Karaka: I think #3 is a certainty! There is very little read more
  • Greyhawk: Probably not - I won't be surprised either way. But read more
  • Karaka: I would be *very* surprised if Wikileaks contributed anything to read more

MBC2010.jpg

MILBLOGS NEWS

*****

Latest Posts From MilBlogs

*****

milblogsa1.jpg Prev | List | Random | Next
Join
Powered by RingSurf!
TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Dawn Patrol Feeds

 

Add to Google Reader or Homepage Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to netvibes Add to Plusmo myaol_cta1.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

TMGbloglabel8copy.gif

TMGbloglabel9 copy.gif
Blah Blah Blah
me220.JPG

The Mudville Gazette is written and produced by Greyhawk, who recently retired from 24 years of active duty in the US military, but will maintain this disclaimer: Unless otherwise credited, the opinions expressed are those of the author, and nothing here is to be taken as representing the official position of or endorsement by the United States Department of Defense or any of its subordinate components.

Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house.

I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email.

Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed.

Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com

andsm.jpg

*****

Tending Distant
Fires


Far from hearth and home, watching
Cold alone but not alone
On distant shore and only wanting
Safe return and little more

What tales we'll tell
When that time comes
When tales can be told

When things grim
Seem far away
When other fires go cold

Some distant sunset, vision fading
Memories remain
And tired eyes gaze 'pon folded flags
While distant drums beat their refrain

Saluting fallen friends whose names
And youth will never fade
Here's to those on other shores,
for them live well, the price is paid

- Greyhawk,
Baghdad,
December 2004