
![]() | |
October 2012
August 2012 July 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003
|
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by! June 3, 2010 Magnifisent Basterds (III)By Greyhawk(Read this part in Grandpa Simpson voice.) It's another Mudville anniversary re-run, this from the 3rd a' June, way back in aught ten. (/Grandpa Simpson) What would Patton do? By early June last year it was tough for me to write about Afghanistan. So instead I put together this tale of the ultra high-tech, state-of-the-art (with aeroplanes, even) US Army operating against terrorists who'd attacked US soil. It's a story of combat in a foreign desert land with no roads, little water, and a people so savage and ignorant that the idea they could ever form a Republic was a joke. ("A despot is all they know.") Sure - if you want to believe this story of young Lieutenant George Patton in Mexico is really about George Patton in Mexico that's your right. I mean, read it and you'll also learn what General Pershing thought of the whole thing. (Publishing history: just a couple weeks after this, Rolling Stone unleashed their Runaway General on the world.) "I have at last succeeded in getting into a fight." ![]() Friends, we'll return our attention to more recent news in good time, but our reading today comes from the Book of Patton, an early chapter, in which our young hero, though restricted by onerous rules of engagement, sets out to lead a spontaneous raid while serving as part of a military counterinsurgency effort in a foreign, desert land... And it came to pass in those days that VILLA rode forth from MEXICO into these lands, and did burn and loot and pillage and kill.
Then scribes and pundits did rend their clothing so that a hue and cry was raised among the people throughout the nation, and there was much lamenting. WILSON looked upon these acts, and saw that it was not good, and was sorely vexed.
Then did WILSON summon unto him PERSHING the champion, and to him spake: "Now shalt thou take thine Army and set forth to seek retribution, and pursue this evil-doer even unto the ends of the earth. Thou shall not rest until thine mission be accomplished." "Sir, yes sir!"
"And along with sufficient men and horses for thy task, unto thee I bequeath these many other great and wonderful things, heretofore never used in such an endeavor. Thou shalt have at thy disposal self-propelled vehicles that move without horses...
"...and wondrous aeroplanes to bear men aloft as an eagle, to see all things from afar and aid thee greatly in thy quest to seek mine enemy and smite him."
"Thank you sir. Truly the advantage is ours!"
"No questions, sir!" And the scribes were dismissed, and then did PERSHING salute smartly, and prepared to take his leave. "Oh," added WILSON, "I almost forgot. Here's a list of various restrictions
Amidst the knowing nods of the congregation I see some nodding off... so let's skip forward a few verses...
And it came to pass that the mighty host went forth unto MEXICO, Now there was in those days a man CARDENAS, who was under VILLA a mighty leader, a High Value Target, men would call him today. His home was near that place where PATTON sought food, but each time before when they had launched a no-knock raid in hopes of nailing that sumbitch it had come to naught. Annnnnd... action! The story as told by Patton:
"So schooled was I not to shoot..." - as Patton biographer Martin Blumenson explained the comment(3), "Pershing's orders prohibited Americans from firing against Mexicans until their hostile intentions were certain." But "Pershing's orders" were based less on tactical expediency than political reality. The situation in Mexico, where civil war and revolution had brought Venustiano Carranza to the presidency, was volatile. In Mexico Villa was viewed as an insurgent (one who employed brutal tactics, including rape and murder But Patton's thoughts on Wilson, the president who had ordered and restricted Pershing's mission, would most certainly not appear in the newspapers. They are revealed in numerous letters home to his family at the time. Compounding the many political difficulties regarding the expedition, it was conducted during a U.S. election year. Among the candidates for office, President Wilson was seeking re-election. Also on the Democratic ticket in California was Senate candidate George Smith Patton, Sr, father of young Lt. George. While many of Patton's private observations of the president appear brutally frank and candid - the sort that would end the career of a young officer (or his father the same-party candidate) were they stated publicly (ranging from "Wilson ought to take iron or something to stiffen his back..." to "I would like to go to hell so that I might be able to shovel a few extra coals on that unspeakable ass...") this complaint from a later note sent from Mexico to his wife Beatrice likely reflected its writer's sense of humor: "I wish Pa was out of politics so I could say what I think about Wilson." (1) Pershing, too, would keep his opinions out of the public fora, but confide in his (also politically-connected) family: "When the true history of the Expedition, especially the diplomatic side of it, is written," he wrote to his father-in-law, Senator Warren, "it will not be a very inspiring chapter for school children, or even grownups to contemplate. Having dashed into Mexico with the intention of eating the Mexicans raw, we turn back at the very first repulse and are now sneaking home under cover like a whipped cur with his tail between his legs." (4) The expedition would actually consume most of a long year, during which many hard lessons were learned, even as - for a mostly reluctant America - a war in Europe loomed. But while Patton's actions, like those of soldiers today, were restricted by guidance from on high, his decision to have only five rounds loaded in his six-shooter was a safety measure of his own. Returning to the action: Meanwhile, ...Still uncertain how many Villistas were present, Patton "thought there were some men in the patio and as the flat roof had a parapet I was afraid they would climb up there and shoot us. I hated to climb up but hated worse not to, so took two men and told two others to watch the roof." Two soldiers propped a dead tree against the wall while Patton climbed onto the dirt roof of the hacienda. Suddenly it gave way under his feet, plunging him through up to his armpits. He might have been cut in half if there had been anyone inside the house with a saber, and with considerable urgency he quickly managed to pull himself back atop the roof. (3) "All this time," Patton wrote, "there had been four men out in front skinning a cow. They never looked at us at all." The New York Times report does not include the bit about Patton falling through the roof - but does emphasize the soldiers' efforts to observe the rules of engagement, withhold fire and protect the innocent... "As yet the ranch house had not been searched," wrote correspondent Frank Elser. "How many Villistas were there Lieutenant Patton did not know..." He got a long ladder and with four enlisted men scaled the flat 'dobe roof. No one was there. But from that vantage point he saw a strange and curious sight. The four Mexicans who were skinning a beef when the Army cars first came up were still engaged in that occupation. With rare cool-headedness they had reasoned that if they kept busy with heads bent they would not be shot at. And so they had worked on during all the shooting. If any of them had broken and run he would have been killed. That none of them was shot at by the enlisted men speaks well for the discipline maintained by the expedition. Such support for the troops is admirable, but while emphasis on (and praise for) their courageous restraint is welcome it's difficult to imagine the rest of the story reported without criticism in the New York Times today. ![]()
"Mr Elser New York Times wrote a good article about me," Patton wrote his wife. "He thinks that it is published today." Numerous reporters accompanied the expedition, and Patton's exploit, early in the mission, gave them a welcome opportunity to provide readers - already losing interest just weeks into the larger effort - a glimpse of something other than the utter boredom of camp life. ![]() He hadn't revealed the nature of the forthcoming report to Bea, but to his father he wrote "I have at last succeeded in getting into a fight..." a proud note to which he appended this advice: "Run for the Senate." Patton's raid would be one of the few such "good" news stories from the expedition. But while historians still debate the "success" of the mission (here's a recent example But on that earlier day Lt Patton was triumphant, though his letter to his Aunt Nannie revealed his reception on returning to camp from his routine supply run with an enemy corpse strapped to the hood of each car: "People have been teasing me about not using the saber on them," he wrote - a bit of good-natured ribbing explained here. Sources: 1. Martin Blumenson, The Patton Papers, Vol 1 2. Martin Blumenson, Patton: The Man Behind the Legend, 1885-1945 3. Carlo D'Este, Patton: A Genius for War 4. Stanley Hirshson, General Patton: A Soldier's Life Previously: Posted by Greyhawk / June 3, 2010 12:27 PM | Permalink 4 TrackBacksOver at Mudville, there is a story about dirty little war and one George Patton...it's worth your time to read. Read More Hugh Hewitt is right:Reasonable people can conclude, and many have, that the comments in the article are just not at the level where a dismissal is warranted. Everyone can read them, and no one can point to any line uttered by the general that challeng... Read More "When the skirmish was over, I retrieved my hat, and found it had a bullet hole through the crown a half inch from the top of my head. It was one time in my life I was glad I wasn't a full five feet six inches tall." - Benjamin Foulois, from his memoir... Read More (Part one - raising the question "what would Patton do?" - is here.) In that 1913 issue of Cavalry Journal quoted above, Patton was advocating adoption of a new saber, a better fit for what he believed to be a more effective style of combat, and to tha... Read More 6 Comments |
November 26, 2010America@war [Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit. That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary. From their about page:
"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation: The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism. Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented. I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are. "Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result. Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web... And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed. The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down. But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:
Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down. If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real. And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale. We've already made history, it's time to save it. (More to follow...) Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink |
Comments (0) |
|
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
![]() Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house. I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email. Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed. Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com ![]() Tending Distant Far from hearth and home, watching What tales we'll tell When things grim Some distant sunset, vision fading Saluting fallen friends whose names - Greyhawk, Baghdad, December 2004 |
"Then did PERSHING call forth PATTON, and he said unto him: "Lieutenant, take these men and those cars and drive into town and get us some food.""
What, he was tired of the Burger King?
But why didn't he bring his sword? He'd written all that stuff about it...
Grim, as I understand it, he had his sword with him.
His saber, however, was back in his tent.
Just scored something on ebay you might appreciate - 1st ed. boxed set Pershing's My Experiences in the World War. Box and covers are rough (I'd never even seen a surviving box before - never knew it existed), but books look like they were printed yesterday.
Can you believe Mrs G didn't even so much as "ooh" or "aah?"
I haven't laughed this hard in a long time. Very well done historical analysis. I'm saying that it made me laugh strictly in your delivery however the parallels are too close to ignore with regard to today's ROE in Iraq and Afghanistan. If restraint means sacrificing more of our own to save those perceived to be weak not only are we repeating history and in a bad way.
Thanks. I wrote that in hopes it would make most people think, and make thinking people laugh.
Restraint has always been part of these 'small wars' as waged by Americans - each time with a new marketing campaign.
For a somewhat related point (to the 'marketing' concept), see the conclusion of my immediate post-election 2008 comments here. History is a great hobby, but only useful if it can be applied in real time.
I'll tell ya, I love coming here. You educate in such an entertaining way. Starting with the title! LOL