The reader will kindly forgive any tendency to rough language or behavior on the part of the site owner...
TMGlogo2006-2007phs-copy.jpg
"Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
TMGbloglabel1 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel3 copy.gif
TMG MONTHLY ARCHIVES
[-]



TMGbloglabel10 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette Feeds

 

Add to Technorati Favorites
Technorati Profile
add.gif
Add to Google
addtomyyahoo4.gif
ngsub1.gif sub_modern5.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

digg.jpg

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

pl-news.gif

tvc_logo_small.png

Mrsg- Greyhawk's Profile
Mrsg- Greyhawk's Facebook profile
Create Your Badge
TMGbloglabel5 copy.gif
TMGbloglabel6 copy.gif
350.jpg
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by!
« Spit Take | Main | Push meets shove »

April 2, 2010

greyhawk copy sm.png

Casablanca means "White House," you know

By Greyhawk

Any invitations Steve Clemons might have had to the best parties just got canceled:

What I have learned after discussions over the last several days with several journalists who either have regular access to the White House or are part of the White House press corps is that there is a growing sense that access is traded for positive stories -- or perhaps worse, an agreement that things learned will not be reported in the near term.

The White House is working hard to secure deals that yield fluffy, feel good commentary about the Obama White House. One American White House reporter used colorful terms to describe the arrangement. The reporter said, "They want 'blow jobs' first [in the press sense]. Then you have to be on good behavior for a bit or be willing to deal, and then you get access."

The "best follow-up headline" award goes to philly.com, for "Access of Evil."

But I'm shocked - shocked I tell you, to find that things like this are happening in Barack Obama's White House!

But really, isn't the more salient focus the effect of access on daily/hourly/constant journalism?

Why yes, Spencer, it is indeed.

But much of the outrage directed at the White House can be attributed to jealousy or resentment on the part of "journalists" (really though, with "7-figure deals" on the line, who can blame them?) who would write nothing but glowing accounts of the Obama administration anyway - deal or no deal. (Basically, it's the way groupies feel about hookers - some of the folks who've been providing those BJs for free have discovered others are cashing in - and are starting to feel a bit under-appreciated.)

In the interest of honesty (and for those folks not familiar with Casablanca), I'll note I'm not shocked at all. Here's a post I began last June but never hit the publish button on.

According to this New Republic story, there are at least "half a dozen major reporters under contract to write books about the nascent Obama presidency and the 2008 campaign". But the White House has concerns:
In early May, White House Counsel Greg Craig circulated a memo inside the West Wing. Part of a series of memos on protocol, it explained how to deal with writers researching books and articles on the White House. (Craig's unsurprising instructions: Clear interview requests with the press office.) While the memo didn't mention any journalists by name--and while there are currently no fewer than half a dozen major reporters under contract to write books about the nascent Obama presidency and the 2008 campaign, any of whom could conceivably end up embarrassing the administration--there is one person in particular the White House is undoubtedly nervous about: Bob Woodward.

That may be a result of lessons learned in the Clinton era. The current Secretary of State's husband is described as "furious at Woodward's portrayal of his administration" ("freewheeling and dysfunctional") - enough so to replace his chief of staff.

In contrast:

From the outset, the Bush White House decided to cooperate with Woodward. ...Bush himself urged staffers to cooperate with Woodward, especially then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, who was reluctant to grant an interview (he did). "The message got down to everybody: 'Talk to him,'" Fleischer says.
Woodward completed four books on the Bush years in the White House. Based on sales, "going negative" is money:
The War Within, sold just 159,000 copies, according to Nielsen BookScan, far below his third Bush installment, State of Denial, which sold more than half a million.

Still, as subsequent events have revealed, Kurtz, Woodward, and the Post aren't completely opposed to "working with" the White House.

Update: Coincidence? (Yes, probably.) "Actor Kal Penn is leaving his White House job to film another sequel to the Harold & Kumar movies." I wonder where they'll go this time?



Posted by Greyhawk / April 2, 2010 4:06 PM | Permalink

2 TrackBacks

In our last episode:The White House is working hard to secure deals that yield fluffy, feel good commentary about the Obama White House. One American White House reporter used colorful terms to describe the arrangement. The reporter said, "They want 'b... Read More

Petraeus Testimony from Mudville Gazette on June 29, 2010 1:16 PM

Live: var so = new FlashObject ("http://pentagontv.pb.feedroom.com/usgov/pentagontv/embedoneclip/player.swf", "Player", "322", "277", "8", "#FFFFFF"); so.addVariable ("Environment", ""); so.addVariable ("SkinName", "pblibrary"); so.addVariable ("SiteI... Read More

8 Comments

Well, if the press was willing to cover-up the systematic rapings and brush-chippering of Iraqis under the Saddam Administration so as to maintain access and sell their 'reportage', why should the press not also be compliant with the raping of the taxpayers and brushchippering of the Constitution?
At least they are consistent.

Heh. Most of the "journalists" who cover the WH wouldn't even make decent groupies. They're more like the hangers-on who give BJs to the roadies in the vain hope of even getting close to the band.

In the interest of fairness and openness, I should add that I visited the White House last year, a visit during which I was assured that the Pakistanis really love us more now. I never passed that off-the-record insight along, and I'm only revealing it now that a year has passed.

And I'll bet they thought I couldn't keep a secret!

So in response I asked why this had happened, by the way. Didn't get a good answer. But it made be suspect they were mistaken in their assessment - of me and of Pakistan.

If this is true, David Brooks ought to have his own wing at the White House in a matter of days

This is known as buyer's remorse. The brown nosing reporters, water carriers for Obama are a tawdry lot of self serving, mos unethical creeps. They did not do any homework in preparation for the campaign, they mislead the public with their coverage and to this day they cannot own up to the fact that they were not only a bunch of lazy cheerleaders but corrupt one as well. If they confess they'd look like real jerks, therefore, they continue to pretend that they are on the inner circle, but in fact those offer worthless information because the real story is coming from outside sources, those who knew POTUS before and understand his schtick. It is so shameful that a big country like the USA has to contend with such mediocre media run by a bunch of sleazy editors.

I don't blame Obama for making sure that the reporters from Fox News, the Washington Times, and National Review don't smear him in order to make a buck with their right-wing propaganda and lies.

The negative Bush books, on the othr hand, were full of truth, which is why they sold big. Bush was the most idiotic and corrupt President in history, starting two illegal wars and torturing people just to make his cronies rich.

Hmm. Still confusing "wingnut Republican" with "patriot," are you?

350.jpg
Mrs G copy.png

November 26, 2010


America@war
[Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit.

That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary.

From their about page:

The Naval Institute shall remain

INDEPENDENT - A non-profit member association, with no government support, that does not lobby for special interests;

NON-PARTISAN - An independent, professional military association with a mission, goals and objectives that transcend political affiliations; and shall encourage

IDEAS - Through its respected journals Proceedings and Naval History, its conferences, its books and its online content, in support of those who serve.

"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation:

The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism.

Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented.

I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are.

"Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result.

Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web...

And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed.

The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down.

*****

But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:

Closing Blogs is nothing new. So many site's owners just give up on their own. They come and go, you know, these MilBloggers do. Like any other sort of blogger. Many post in the lonely down hours far from home, spill their guts for the world, then abandon their spots when the tour of duty is up. They have lives again somewhere in the world, and no need to share the details. So it goes.

Many are truly gone - no site left at all. "The page cannot be found." Other blogs remain, like abandoned defensive positions in shifting desert sands.

Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down.

If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real.

And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale.

We've already made history, it's time to save it.

(More to follow...)




Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) |

TMGbloglabel7copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
TMGrecentcomments.gif
  • Shocked: Hmm. Still confusing "wingnut Republican" with "patriot," are you? read more
  • Vinny B.: I don't blame Obama for making sure that the reporters read more
  • Al Redwood: This is known as buyer's remorse. The brown nosing reporters, read more
  • Jeffersonian: If this is true, David Brooks ought to have his read more
  • Greyhawk: So in response I asked why this had happened, by read more
  • Greyhawk: In the interest of fairness and openness, I should add read more
  • JorgXMcKie: Heh. Most of the "journalists" who cover the WH wouldn't read more
  • livermoron: Well, if the press was willing to cover-up the systematic read more

MBC2010.jpg

MILBLOGS NEWS

*****

Latest Posts From MilBlogs

*****

milblogsa1.jpg Prev | List | Random | Next
Join
Powered by RingSurf!
TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Dawn Patrol Feeds

 

Add to Google Reader or Homepage Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to netvibes Add to Plusmo myaol_cta1.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

TMGbloglabel8copy.gif

TMGbloglabel9 copy.gif
Blah Blah Blah
me220.JPG

The Mudville Gazette is written and produced by Greyhawk, who recently retired from 24 years of active duty in the US military, but will maintain this disclaimer: Unless otherwise credited, the opinions expressed are those of the author, and nothing here is to be taken as representing the official position of or endorsement by the United States Department of Defense or any of its subordinate components.

Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house.

I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email.

Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed.

Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com

andsm.jpg

*****

Tending Distant
Fires


Far from hearth and home, watching
Cold alone but not alone
On distant shore and only wanting
Safe return and little more

What tales we'll tell
When that time comes
When tales can be told

When things grim
Seem far away
When other fires go cold

Some distant sunset, vision fading
Memories remain
And tired eyes gaze 'pon folded flags
While distant drums beat their refrain

Saluting fallen friends whose names
And youth will never fade
Here's to those on other shores,
for them live well, the price is paid

- Greyhawk,
Baghdad,
December 2004