
![]() | |
October 2012
August 2012 July 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003
|
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by! February 7, 2010 Sunday FunniesBy GreyhawkHere in Mudville we believe everyone deserves a chance to chuckle:
So what's the next topic to laugh at her about? She vacuums her own floors? Posted by Greyhawk / February 7, 2010 11:14 AM | Permalink 8 Comments |
November 26, 2010America@war [Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit. That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary. From their about page:
"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation: The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism. Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented. I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are. "Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result. Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web... And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed. The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down. But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:
Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down. If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real. And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale. We've already made history, it's time to save it. (More to follow...) Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink |
Comments (0) |
|
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
![]() Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house. I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email. Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed. Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com ![]() Tending Distant Far from hearth and home, watching What tales we'll tell When things grim Some distant sunset, vision fading Saluting fallen friends whose names - Greyhawk, Baghdad, December 2004 |
Lets see...
The Won uses a teleprompter in a conference room with about a dozen people in it and again in a grade school classroom-nope, nothing to make fun of there.
Sarah uses notes consisting of a few words written on the palm of her hand to give a nationally televised 45 minute speech followed by a Q&A session-oh yeah, solid evidence of a complete and utter moron.
/sarc
I dunno man, writing crib notes on your hand - especially ones with 4-5 tacky, simplistic, broad talking points anyone should be able to memorize - is:
a. Tacky (but I repeat myself)
b. Not a sign of a particularly sharp mind.
c. Plays into the late night comic stereotype about her (just wait for the jokes, and see "b.")
It's kind of a dumb, random issue, and not a big deal, but anyone so daft as to not consciously avoid giving SNL a free skit at this point ...
The higher her profile gets beyond rallying the base to candidates, the more this woman is an albatross around the GOP's neck. Wondering when more folks in the blogospeheric echo chamber are going to realize that. Being slimed by the NYT and MSM, being attractive, and knowing how to shoot moose does not equal "good political leader."
I voted for mcCain, have 0 intention of voting for Obama next time around, and roughly 0 intention of ever casting a vote for Palin. If she's nominated - Hell, if she even comes close to being nominated - O will get the nod again in 2012. Count on it.
Hey, I heard Ms Sarah Palin breathes in air and exhales carbon dioxide. Shhhhhh... don't let this get around. Who knows how much damage it could do. What with Obama being immortal and all.
Seriously silly. It's tacky to write on your hand? Seriously? You respect less as a person because they write on their hand.
I'm much more troubled by Palin's condemnation on Rahm's use of the word "retarded". He wasn't even referring to her son but to some Democrat Congressman. It was none of her damn business.
Is this the best the Left can do to malign Palin? Wow, this is really substantive. So Palin is using a low tech version of reminder notes as opposed to Barach Obama’s high tech teleprompter that he never leaves home without, even when appearing in front of 5th graders.
That’s really a bang up job of reporting Huffington Post!
The Last Tradition
"Seriously silly. It's tacky to write on your hand? Seriously? You respect less as a person because they write on their hand. "
"A person?" No. Though if someone at a work conference or meeting did it, yeah, I'd probably shake my head. (What, no cue cards?) And a national politician? In a word? Yes.
In a few more words? We're not talking about my mom headed to the grocery store, we're talking about a national politician giving a speech that will get more attention from the media than the SOTU. An *apparent* presidential candidate. Writing stuff on your hand has generally been considered the province of stoners and 12 year olds, and, completely fairly or not, she is already defined as a late night punchline by about 2/5 - 2/3 of the country (depending on the poll).
Re: her condemnation of the word "retarded." Yeah: she moves to strike when PC is to her advantage, backs off on Limbaugh. Not a sign of discretion or steadfast character, IMO.
More re: her intelligence. The woman is simply not a keen intellect. From the first big campaign interview with Couric onward, she has ranged from minimally competent soundbyte machine to incoherent word salad. The exception has been a few times she's absolutely shone in scripted environments (ie RNC). In addition, anyone who begrudges "fruit fly research in France" because she's too ignorant about science to realize that fruit fly research is one of the basic animal models for all research ... or knows it and wants to demagogue anyway ... I mean, c'mon. This is the best the right can do? Fiercely proud anti-intellectualism? (No. The answer is no.)
But because she's got folksy charisma and the NYT et al did a nasty hit on her (which yeah, they did), she's canonized by too many people on the right. Shrug.
Thought experiment: if Obama would have written on his hand, the usual suspects (most of them currently defending Palin) would have gone predictably apeshit.
I think making fun of Obama and his teleprompter is kind of funny, tho old at this point. But Palin writing talking points on her *hand?* Mildly silly on its face, and politically ignorant given the venue and the reputation as a lightweight she should be smart enough to try and escape.
I'm not voting for Sarah Palin for president either. She's more qualified for the job than Barack Obama, but not qualified enough.
The three pictures above are funny. The President of the United States needing a que card to remember the name of the major command in Iraq is not.
there is a better than even chance that Palin did this on purpose to create this exact match-storm of debate.
The MSM broadcast her speech so her message got out ... and on the Left, are they talking about refuting her speech ? nope, they are stuck on stupid ...
I would bet that she will write something on her hand for every public appearance for the next 2 years ...
I would not be suprised if some Tea Party participants start writing their protest slogans on their hands (note: write on both hands and raise them together, one hand up will get you labeled as a nazi)