
![]() | |
March 2010
February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003
|
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by! February 2, 2010 DoD re-writes Congressional Travel RulesBy GreyhawkNo, you can not have a free ride home. No, you can't bring the kids. While accepting their newly-acquired role as "shuttle service" for the Speaker of the House, the Department of Defense is attempting to draw a line in the sand regarding congressional transportation with an updated directive on DoD Support for Travel of Members and Employees of Congress. Some of the language in the newly-released regulation (dated 15 January, 2010 - the first update since 1964) appears to be the direct result of lessons learned in dealing with Nancy Pelosi. Among other changes, the directive now specifies that "outside of the Speaker Shuttle, no funds will be made available by the Department of Defense to pay the expenses of travel or subsistence for any trip made by any Senator or Representative between Andrews AFB and their home State." For other travel, if "deemed in the national interest" the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Legislative Affairs may "authorize the travel of ONE family member" accompanying a lawmaker at no expense to the government. While an adult child can take the place of a spouse under those circumstances, "children under 18 years of age are not authorized travel" on Congressional flights. The old version simply stated "DoD policy prohibiting accompanying travel of dependents of Department of Defense personnel on military carriers is equally applicable to travel of dependents of members and employees of the Congress" but allowed for exceptions (only if authorized by the SecDef or branch secretary) "when essential to the proper accomplishment of the mission, desirable because of diplomatic or public relations, or necessary for the health of the individuals concerned." Partly due to modern requirements to spell out in detail what used to be considered "common sense," the new version of 4515.12 is twice as long as the old. But I suspect our highly dedicated and patriotic lawmakers (mostly via the magic of interpretive kabuki) won't find it overly restrictive. (File all that under "Pelosi Rules.") Added thought: in 1964 the regulation cautioned those planning Congressional transportation to ensure any such travel was primarily in the interest of the DoD - (not the traveling Congressman) - and further defined that interest as "not merely for the purpose of engendering goodwill or obtaining possible future benefits." That sort of thing was called fraud, waste, and abuse - and was frowned upon. By 2007, Jack Murtha could comfortably declare (to reporters, even) that the DoD had damn well better provide Nancy Pelosi a plane because she controls their budget. I guess that's what they call "progress". Previously: The Jet Set Recent/related: Everyone gets a Fifth Posted by Greyhawk / February 2, 2010 9:42 AM | Permalink 1 TrackBackTrackBack URL: http://www.mudvillegazette.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/17294 For those aircraft aficionados out there, thought you might appreciate a look at part of Nancy Pelosi's fleet: Okay, actually it's yours - she just gets to use it. To fly her family around. On official government business. Anyhow, the little one is a C... Read More 4 CommentsLeave a comment |
March 15, 2010Dawn Patrol 03/15/2010 [Greyhawk]
Welcome to the Dawn Patrol, our daily roundup of information on the War on Terror and other topics - from the MilBlogs and various sources around the world. If you're a blogger, you can join the conversation. If you link to any of these stories, add a link to the Dawn Patrol too and your trackback will be added to the list. Hat Tips to the Dawn Patrol are greatly appreciated.Refresh for updates.
AFGHANISTANMore Marjah Madness -- [The Quatto Zone - in Afghanistan] Downrange: An Informal Report on a trip to Afghanistan with Marine Gen. James N. Mattis -- [Steven Pressfield - in Afghanistan] Blast From the Past -- [Rajiv Srinivasan - in Afghanistan] AAR -- [Riding Shotgun with Team Zombie Killer - in Afghanistan] The Deep End of the Pool -- [Knights of Afghanistan - in Afghanistan] The Economics of Insurgency -- [270 Days in Afghanistan - in Afghanistan] A true Cavalry officer -- [Mob 2009 Blog - in Afghanistan] Excess Humvees to BAF -- [Afghanistan my Last Tour - in Afghanistan] Details -- [Sgt Danger - in Afghanistan] Man Versus Afghanistan -- [A Major's Perspective - in Afghanistan] Tracking New Blog -- [My View, Our Mission - in Afghanistan] Friday Motivator -- [The Sniper] ![]() (Click image for larger version) IRAQJambo! -- [Ramblings from a painter - in Iraq] Maliki has shaky lead in Iraq vote count -- [LA Times] Iraqi PM Remains Ahead After Partial Vote Count -- [Voice of America] Iraq vote signals shift from hard-line leaders -- [Washington Times] Issue of Presidency Endangers Iraq's Tenuous Balance -- [NY Times] U.S. AND OTHER PARTS OF THE WORLDPanic in Georgia over Russian 'invasion' report -- [Times (UK) Online] WAR ON TERROR /TERRORISMJustice, CIA clash over probe of interrogator IDs -- [Washington Times] SUPPORTING THE TROOPSSoldier Rocks with Bad Company (See also "Jambo!" from Ramblings from a Painter, milblogger in Iraq.) MILITARY LIFEThe Hardest Thing I've Ever Done: A Series of Screw-Ups and Lessons Learned -- [Andi/Spouse Buzz] WELCOME HOMELZ Lambeau seen as overdue welcome home for Vietnam veterans -- [Green Bay Press-Gazette] VETERANSTime to refresh your memories... -- [Castle Argghhh] BLOGGING/MILBLOGS/SOCIAL MEDIASaving Abel to Perform at the 2010 MilBlog Conference -- [Andi/milblogging.com] CULTURE/THE MEDIALiveblogging The Pacific -- [Jules Crittenden] Prelude to The Pacific -- [Comment from Bill D] 'The Pacific' review: Brilliant, brutal, and, yes, very enjoyable -- [Entertainment Weekly] EOD on standby -- [Greyhawk] Weekend Box Office -- [Box Office Mojo] POLITICSPA12 GOP: Burns over Russell -- [Greyhawk] Kokesh's final delegate count? -- [This Ain't Hell] STRATEGY & TACTICSMuch Ado? -- [Neptunus Lex] MILITARY HISTORYFrench Counterinsurgency in Algeria: HUMOR/SATIREThe CDS goes to war -- [Greyhawk] ![]() (Need more? Dawn Patrols Archives are here.) Iraq, Afghanistan, War, Terrorism, Military, Politics, Media, MilBlogs, dawn patrol Mudville
|
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
![]() I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email. Original content copyright © 2003 - 2009 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed. Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com ![]() |
One only wonders what members of the Administration are doing, since unlike Pelosi, Obama is in the military's chain of command.
Is, say, Geithner's girlfriend hopping military flights?
The sad part in all of this is that our public servants have come to expect that they are DUE this kind of perk. What ever happened to the concept of service for the national good? (As opposed to the personal pork of course.)
Until we get some military leadership in the services that value the junior soldiers more than they value licking the boots of Senators and Congressmen, this type of directive will be completely useless. Until we get civilian leadership that values the men and women in the service more than they value a free limo ride on a cool airplane, we can expect them to continue to abuse this perk.
I don't see either coming very soon.
Murtha is ill. I hope he lives long and prospers. Outside Congress.