
![]() | |
October 2012
August 2012 July 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003
|
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by! January 13, 2010 The rap sheetBy GreyhawkSometimes the dots are connected before someone gets killed. This is the story of one of those times. Headlines on the upcoming release of the results a Pentagon inquiry into the Ft Hood shootings range from "Emerging picture in Fort Hood review is one of supervisors who voiced concerns, but didn't act" (the Canadian Press) to the New York Post's "Feds' screw-ups in Hood case revealed." The Washington Post runs with "Pentagon inquiry into Fort Hood urges focus on service members who may pose risk" - which at least emphasizes the future rather than the past. Certainly in the Hasan case someone failed to connect the dots - and people died. But what happens when dots are connected? Lives saved, reduced panic, and less dramatic headlines - but as the following example will demonstrate, that last result isn't due to lack of effort on the part of those who write them. "Fuck you colonels, captains, E-7 and above There was at least one empty seat on the plane when the 3rd Infantry Division's 1st Heavy Brigade Combat Team deployed to Iraq late last year. Specialist Marc Hall, author of the above quote, was back at Ft Stewart, Georgia, awaiting trial. Hall, according to charges, did "on divers occasions, between on or about 08 July 2009 and on or about 08 December 2009, wrongfully make statements to members of his battalion that he would engage in acts of violence against members of his unit..." That's one of five specifications; others include telling [names redacted in released charge sheet] that he would "hurt someone if he was deployed" (specification 4) and "that he was planning on shooting the brigade and battalion commanders" (specification 5). Specialist Hall also recorded his threat (according to specification 2 as "original songs wrongfully threatening acts of violence against members of his unit" which he distributed to fellow soldiers) and sent a copy to the Pentagon. Shortly after Hall was charged, milblogger Jonn Lilyea noticed the IVAW crew had taken up his cause. Not long after that, Stars and Stripes ran a story on the case. ("Army specialist jailed for threats against fellow soldiers, commanders," the headline read.)
Klimaski also recommends a "rap exclusion" for threats: "Listen to rap songs," Klimaski said. "I mean there are a whole bunch of rap songs talking about killing people all the time. Nobody gets killed from them." Ft Stewart's response is that the "songs" weren't the only threats, and... "The chain of command has a legal obligation to the citizens of the United States to investigate and deal fairly with SPC Hall's alleged misconduct," Kevin Larson, a spokesman at Fort Stewart, said in an e-mail. "Anything less would be irresponsible to our citizens and soldiers." A Washington DC television station picked up the story, followed by the Associated Press. Their headline? "Soldier Jailed for Angry Rap Song." There's been plenty of news lately about failures to connect the dots - here's the sort of story we'll be seeing more often once those failures are corrected. Posted by Greyhawk / January 13, 2010 2:24 PM | Permalink 3 TrackBacksWelcome to the Dawn Patrol, our daily roundup of information on the War on Terror and other topics - from the MilBlogs and various sources around the world. If you're a blogger, you can join the conversation. If you link to any of these stories, add a ... Read More We ran the live video feed of the DOD briefing with former Army Secretary Togo West and Adm. Vern Clark (Ret.) on the release of their Ft Hood shooting review last week. Since then, some early reviews are in. Bill Bennett calls it a "whitewash."Titled,... Read More "Army mom" gets out:The decision still carries consequences for Hutchinson. She is being demoted in rank to private and will lose benefits afforded to military service members and veterans, Fort Stewart spokesman Kevin Larson said. Larson said the Army... Read More 9 Comments |
November 26, 2010America@war [Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit. That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary. From their about page:
"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation: The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism. Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented. I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are. "Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result. Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web... And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed. The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down. But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:
Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down. If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real. And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale. We've already made history, it's time to save it. (More to follow...) Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink |
Comments (0) |
|
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
![]() Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house. I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email. Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed. Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com ![]() Tending Distant Far from hearth and home, watching What tales we'll tell When things grim Some distant sunset, vision fading Saluting fallen friends whose names - Greyhawk, Baghdad, December 2004 |
Words and actions mean nothing to the PC crowd these days. Even after Major Hasan was found to be in touch with Anwar Al Awlaki, the imam connected to 9/11, the London bombings, and the underpants bomber, the Army, the AG and the FBI have refused to call this an act of terrorism.
The truth is what they want it to be.Plain and simple. And then we hear how confused and sad the shooters were. Enough is enough.
How would Mr. Klimaski feel if I were to say, for instance, "if IVAW don't quit helping traitors, "some of y'all gonna be held in the hospitals...
I'm gonna round them up all eventually, easily,
walk right up peacefully and surprise them all
yes, yes, y'all, up against the wall, turn around
I got a mother fuckin' magazine with 30 rounds,
on a three-round burst, ready to fire down
Still against the wall, I grab my M-4
spray and watch all the bodies hit the floor
I bet you never stop-loss nobody no more."?
Or I were to say I were going to attempt to kill IVAW leaders (I would never say that, of course, or do that) IF they didn't stop aiding traitors.
Would he consider those to be threats? Just askin'.
"I mean there are a whole bunch of rap songs talking about killing people all the time. Nobody gets killed from them."
Google "Farmville Murders" if you think that. My friends were murdered by a
rapper acting out his writings.
Good lord. When I was on active duty, there's no way I would have been comfortable deploying with this clown. Unit cohesion would have gone down the shitter. Klimaski and his ilk apparently have no concept of this. Kudos to the Third ID for showing some balls. More, please!
You have to wonder if the dots would have been connected if his name had been Abdul, rather than Marc.
The question is not whether the Intelligence organizations can connect the dots. Rather, it's whether a PC atmosphere selectively suppresses the ability to connect the dots when the subject is Muslim.
I don't know one way or the other, but there were a very large number of signs with Hasan, and also with the Christmas Day underwear bomber.
"You have to wonder if the dots would have been connected if his name had been Abdul, rather than Marc.
"The question is not whether the Intelligence organizations can connect the dots. Rather, it's whether a PC atmosphere selectively suppresses the ability to connect the dots when the subject is Muslim."
Borepatch has exactly the right questions.
Minority Report.
a Sp Hall is merely using the time tested option of acting as if he is a sociopath or some other type of malcontent in order to avoid his deployment. As a rifle company XO in VN I dealt with these types of soldiers who would do or say anything to avoid "going into the field". In all probability Sp Hall is not a threat but simply a coward. The comment/verse regarding stop-loss is a dead give away of his motive. His unit is upgraded by his self removal from what will be,for them, the ultimate test. It is a test that virtually none of those who purport to lead this country have ever faced. Until they or their loved ones are placed in the crucuble we will continue to sacrifice our best for the most expedient result.
God Bless America.
Paul, I agree with much of what you're saying, but Spc Hall did one tour in Iraq (the surge) with 3ID already. I'd rule out cowardice as motive.