
![]() | |
July 2010
June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003
|
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by! December 6, 2009 Twelve leakers leakingBy Greyhawk
I always get confused by the words to that song. Was it ten secret meetings... two calling birds...? No, it's two very long stories, based on leaks from administration sources.
If that's confusing, here's one distinction: the Post's story is based on "interviews by more than a dozen senior administration and military officials who took part in the strategy review" - but didn't want their names in the paper. (The first citation: "a senior adviser who read from notes he took at the meeting.") And while the Post story is based on interviews with dozens, the Times' is based on "dozens of interviews": This account of how the president reached his decision is based on dozens of interviews with participants as well as a review of notes some of them took during Mr. Obama's 10 meetings with his national security team. Most of those interviewed spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations, but their accounts have been matched against those of other participants wherever possible. So given the comparisons of stories from dozens of interviews with leakers, it might be safe to believe the Times account of one event: "The president erupted at the leaks with an anger advisers had rarely seen". That must be the Obama nobody sees on TV. But for one final comparison, the Post's version compiled from dozens of senior administration leakers is less emotional: "Obama expressed frustration with the leaks." But all that's in the past. Given the number of leakers leaking information into these new accounts it could take quite some time to sort through all the information they don't want their names associated with. But here's something that stood out to me. The Post: "After his return from Asia, Obama convened a Nov. 23 session on how to gain leverage over the Karzai government." The Times: "The president gathered his team in the Situation Room at 8:15 p.m. on Nov. 23 ... Mr. Obama presented a revised version of Option 2A, this one titled "Max Leverage," pushing 30,000 troops into Afghanistan by mid-2010 and beginning to pull them out by July 2011." And one more from the Post: "Obama explained his goal: "We send a message to Karzai of a short-leash..." So if anything about the plan confuses you - the reasoning behind it, its purpose or goals - just refer back to its title. And if all that confuses you, start here, this might help. ![]() Posted by Greyhawk / December 6, 2009 10:15 AM | Permalink 1 TrackBackWelcome to the Dawn Patrol, our daily roundup of information on the War on Terror and other topics - from the MilBlogs and various sources around the world. If you're a blogger, you can join the conversation. If you link to any of these stories, add a ... Read More 3 Comments |
July 19, 2010Dawn Patrol 07/19/2010 [Greyhawk]
Welcome to the Dawn Patrol, our ongoing roundup of information on war and other topics - from the MilBlogs and other sources around the world.
Always updating - refresh for updates.
AFGHANISTANProspects for stability in Musa Qala: challenges and possible solutions -- [Bill Ardolino /Long War Journal - in Afghanistan] Exploding Culverts -- [Kandahar Diary - in Afghanistan] Arbaki -- [Free Range International - in Afghanistan] Weather -- [A Major's Perspective - in Afghanistan] Fête Nationale -- [Field Notes: One Soldier's Perspective - in Afghanistan] Goodbye "FaST" Food (and good riddance) -- [FaST Surgeon - in Afghanistan] IRAQOn The Iran, Iraq Border -- [J.D. Johannes - in Iraq] WAR ON TERROR /TERRORISMSenators Look For Smoking Gun In BP-Lockerbie Link -- [AP] No Link Between BP And Lockerbie Release: UK Envoy -- [NPR news blog] UK's Cameron: Releasing Lockerbie Bomber Was Wrong -- [AP] U.S. AND OTHER PARTS OF THE WORLDAs Cameron and Obama Meet, BP Will Be Top Issue -- [NY Times] Afghanistan tops agenda for British PM's visit -- [Washington Times] WELCOME HOMEHomecoming -- [Rajiv Srinivasan - home from Afghanistan] STRATEGY & TACTICSISAF, SCR Address Military ROE and Tactical Directives -- [ISAF] SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGYRaytheon's pain gun finally gets deployed in Afghanistan (update: recalled) -- [Engadget] Pain Ray Recalled From Afghanistan -- [Noah Shachtman/Danger Room] The Active Denial System: the weapon that's a hot topic -- [The Telegraph (UK)] World's Fastest Helicopter Boosts Battle Against Insurgents -- [ISAF]
POLITICSIs it time for a real GI Jane? -- [CNN] HUMOR/SATIRE(Need more? Dawn Patrols Archives are here.) Iraq, Afghanistan, War, Terrorism, Military, Politics, Media, MilBlogs, dawn patrol Mudville |
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
![]() I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email. Original content copyright © 2003 - 2009 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed. Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com ![]() |
I think one of the most interesting pieces I have read regarding Afghanistan is how McChrystal and the Whitehouse were on different pages of how the mission was to be defined between the time McChrystal arrived in Afghanistan and October 8th.
Some how McChrystal thought that his mission was to come up with a plan to "Defeat the Taliban. Secure the Population." because that was stated in Strategic Implementation Plan -- the execution orders for the March strategy, written by the NSC staff. That was a moment that Senior Staffers at the Whitehouse realized McChrystal read and followed the orders of the Strategic Implementation Plan that the President signed but No one else had read. Great read over at Jihad Watch.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2009/12/obama-adviser-to-mcchrystal-on-defeating-the-taliban-is-that-really-what-you-think-your-mission-is.html
I guess that is why in civilian business world we have status meeting and reports as we kick off projects that have importance and follow up till closure of the projects with handoffs. I guess Washington DC has different methods.
Ah c'mon. He committed the troops - with foreign support. Let's applaud that.
Bill I am all in favor of applauding the President and Military for getting on the same page. They seem to have a plan of action and now we need to support them.