The reader will kindly forgive any tendency to rough language or behavior on the part of the site owner...
TMGlogo2006-2007phs-copy.jpg
"Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
TMGbloglabel1 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel3 copy.gif
TMG MONTHLY ARCHIVES
[-]



TMGbloglabel10 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette Feeds

 

Add to Technorati Favorites
Technorati Profile
add.gif
Add to Google
addtomyyahoo4.gif
ngsub1.gif sub_modern5.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

digg.jpg

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

pl-news.gif

tvc_logo_small.png

Mrsg- Greyhawk's Profile
Mrsg- Greyhawk's Facebook profile
Create Your Badge
TMGbloglabel5 copy.gif
TMGbloglabel6 copy.gif
350.jpg
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by!
« The Steve Schippert Show | Main | Troops to Focus on Reversing Taliban's Momentum »

December 2, 2009

greyhawk copy sm.png

Petraeus: Afghan 'Surge' to Target Terrorist Leaders

By Greyhawk

General, how much will be counter-terror and how much counterinsurgency?

PETRAEUS: Well, there's no question that counterterrorist operations are a component of counterinsurgency, and, in fact, those will not only continue. They will be augmented as well. You have to kill or capture the key leaders, the irreconcilables in such an endeavor.

Story, transcript, video below:

Petraeus: Afghan 'Surge' to Target Terrorist Leaders
By Gerry J. Gilmore
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, Dec. 2, 2009 - Tens of thousands of additional U.S. forces slated for deployment to Afghanistan will be employed to target and eliminate terrorist leaders and assist the Afghan government to better safeguard and provide a brighter future for its people, the commander of U.S. Central Command said today.

President Barack Obama last night announced the deployment of 30,000 extra U.S. forces to Afghanistan over the next several months, which would bring the total U.S. troop strength there to about 100,000.

Officials are finalizing plans as to exactly where in Afghanistan the additional troops will be deployed, Army Gen. David H. Petraeus told John D. Roberts today on CNN's "American Morning" television news program. The Afghanistan-bound troops will be deployed to secure the most important elements of the Afghan population, while also securing lines of communication and enabling the training of additional Afghan military and police so that they can eventually assume the security mission, the general said.

Concurrently, he added, counterterrorist operations against Taliban and al-Qaida operatives will be ramped up. "You have to kill or capture key leaders, the irreconcilables, in such an endeavor," Petraeus said.

Meanwhile, he added, efforts to engage and provide better security and economic opportunity for the Afghan people will be increased "so that local individuals don't have to choose sides to go with the Taliban because they're threatened or because it's the only way they can earn a living for their family."

The organization of local community defense cells also is part of the revised Afghanistan strategy, the general said.

Roberts asked Petraeus -- the architect of the successful U.S. military surge of forces that turned the tide in Iraq -- if any lessons learned from the Iraq experience might be applied during the new 'surge' into Afghanistan.

"Well, I think any time you try to apply lessons from one situation to another," Petraeus replied, "you have to be keenly aware of the differences, of the context in which those lessons will be applied."

Obama earlier this year ordered the deployment of more than 20,000 extra U.S. troops to Afghanistan, including 4,000 trainers for Afghan soldiers and police, bringing the current total number of U.S. forces there to about 68,000. Those troops provided "the kind of density to where you can carry out strategies that can capitalize on the lessons that we did bring back from Iraq," Petraeus said, including experience in population protection, community outreach, and reconciliation of former members of the insurgency.

The upcoming deployment of another 30,000 U.S. troops to Afghanistan will be welcomed by its citizens "if we, indeed, are seen by the Afghan people to be helping them realize a better future for themselves and their families," Petraeus said.

Meanwhile, efforts to convince Taliban insurgents to make peace with the Afghan government already are bearing fruit, Petraeus said. After the recent killing of a senior Taliban commander in western Afghanistan's Herat province, for example, his fighters renounced violence and departed the insurgency, the general noted. However, he cautioned, "irreconcilables" who "never will support the new Afghanistan have to be killed, captured or run off."

Roberts asked Petraeus if reports of corruption within some elements of the Afghan governmental bureaucracy would impair the war effort there. Citing Afghan President Hamid Karzai's recent second-term inauguration address, Petraeus said the newly elected Afghan leader "had some very important language in it about tackling corruption, about government serving its people rather than preying on them."

Petraeus said he is buoyed by news of recent arrests and detentions of "certain fairly senior Afghan government officials" in the country's border forces and in some ministries.

[Link]


ROBERTS: There's mixed reaction this morning on Capitol Hill to President Obama's decision to send another 30,000 troops to Afghanistan, but what about reaction from top military commanders? Can 30,000 really turn the tide, and how will the war strategy change?

Joining me now is General David Petraeus. He is the commander of the U.S. Central Command, better none at CentCom. He was also the architect of the surge strategy in Iraq. General, great to see you. Thanks for taking the time this morning.

GEN. DAVID PETRAEUS, COMMANDER, U.S. CENTRAL COMMAND: Good to be with you, John. Thanks.

ROBERTS: So 30,000 troops going to Afghanistan. Folks at home might say where are they going, how will they be deployed to maximize effectiveness?

PETRAEUS: Well, we're not going to lay at the operational campaign plan here this morning, but they'll be deployed to secure the most important elements of the Afghan population, the lines of communication, and enable the training and development of Afghan security forces and the Afghan authorities who need to take over more and more of their people's own needs.

ROBERTS: General, how much will be counter-terror and how much counterinsurgency?

PETRAEUS: Well, there's no question that counterterrorist operations are a component of counterinsurgency, and, in fact, those will not only continue. They will be augmented as well. You have to kill or capture the key leaders, the irreconcilables in such and endeavor.

But you also want to provide greater security for the population so that local individuals don't have to choose sides to go with the Taliban because they're so threatened or because it's the only way they can earn a living for their family.

And so there has to be outreach at local levels, community defense initiatives will be among the components of the overall comprehensive effort that will go forward.

ROBERTS: And as we mentioned, general, you were the architect of the surge strategy in Iraq, also talking about community protection, you designed that whole thing as well. How many of the lessons learned in Iraq can be applied to Afghanistan, because while there are similarities, they are also very different places?

PETRAEUS: Well I think any time you try to apply lessons from one situation to another, you have to be keenly aware of the differences, of the context in which those lessons will be applied.

And we've spent a great deal of recent months to get the kind of nuanced understanding in local areas and the additional forces that have already flown in this year have enabled us in certain of those areas to provide the kind of density to where you can carry out strategies that can capitalize on the lessons that we did bring from Iraq about securing the population, about reaching out to it, about reconciling, reintegrating the reconcilables is the term in Afghanistan, and so for.

ROBERTS: Some Democratic lawmakers, general, have made the argument that just the very presence of American forces in Afghanistan is aggravating factor, has turned the Afghan population against us, and that increasing the number of troop there's will only make the situation worse. What do you say to that argument?

PETRAEUS: Well, I'd say that it depends on our actions. If we indeed are seen by the Afghan people to be helping them realize a better future for themselves and their families, then they will welcome that. If we are helping to improve security, to make their lives better, then they will support not just us but the Afghan authorities, Afghan forces, and the new Afghanistan. But the contrary is true as well.

ROBERTS: Right. General, you mentioned the irreconcilables among the Taliban. And part of this strategy is with those who are reconcilable to try to peel them away, what I would imagine be lower level Taliban, the so-called economic Taliban, you mentioned people who are fighting just to try to put food on the table.

Can you, do you believe, in Afghanistan create a similar environment as you did in Iraq in the Sunni provinces with the so- called Sunni awakening?

ROBERTS: Well, it's different. This will be more of a village or valley awakening, we suspect. There won't be the larger tribal confederations we don't believe that we were able to achieve over time in Iraq after supporting the early, very small elements that wanted to reject in that case Al Qaeda in Iraq.

But there are already cases. Very recently a senior Taliban figure in Harat (ph) province in the west was killed. Dozens of his fighters came in from the cold, if you will, renounced violence, as the words from the president's speech last night, that we will deal with individuals willing to renounce violence.

That is how you, one of the ways in which you do, in fact, end these kinds of wars, as we saw in Iraq and as we've seen in a number of other historical case.

But make no mistake about it, there are also very clearly irreconcilables. These are never going to support the new Afghanistan, and they have to be killed, captured, or run off.

ROBERTS: Another big piece of the strategy is going to be partnering with good governance. Do you have any confidence that the Karzai government can be an effective partner in this strategy?

Tom Friedman of the "New York Times" writes in a column today, he says, quote, "How do we succeed with such a tainted government as our partner?"

PETRAEUS: Well, there's no question that that will be one of the long poles in the tent, if you will, in the way ahead. President Karzai's inaugural speech had some very important language in it about tackling corruption, about government serving its people rather than preying on them.

There have in fact in recent weeks been some arrests, detention of certain fairly senior Afghan officials in the border forces and in some of the ministries.

So our every effort will be to reinforce that, to support it, encourage it, needless to say, and then to applaud it when it takes place.

ROBERTS: General David Petraeus, CentCom commander, good to catch up with you this morning, sir. Thanks for taking the time. We sure appreciate your time.

PETRAEUS: Pleasure, John.

[Link]


Posted by Greyhawk / December 2, 2009 3:40 PM | Permalink
350.jpg
Mrs G copy.png

November 26, 2010


America@war
[Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit.

That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary.

From their about page:

The Naval Institute shall remain

INDEPENDENT - A non-profit member association, with no government support, that does not lobby for special interests;

NON-PARTISAN - An independent, professional military association with a mission, goals and objectives that transcend political affiliations; and shall encourage

IDEAS - Through its respected journals Proceedings and Naval History, its conferences, its books and its online content, in support of those who serve.

"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation:

The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism.

Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented.

I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are.

"Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result.

Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web...

And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed.

The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down.

*****

But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:

Closing Blogs is nothing new. So many site's owners just give up on their own. They come and go, you know, these MilBloggers do. Like any other sort of blogger. Many post in the lonely down hours far from home, spill their guts for the world, then abandon their spots when the tour of duty is up. They have lives again somewhere in the world, and no need to share the details. So it goes.

Many are truly gone - no site left at all. "The page cannot be found." Other blogs remain, like abandoned defensive positions in shifting desert sands.

Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down.

If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real.

And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale.

We've already made history, it's time to save it.

(More to follow...)




Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) |

TMGbloglabel7copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
TMGrecentcomments.gif
TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Dawn Patrol Feeds

 

Add to Google Reader or Homepage Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to netvibes Add to Plusmo myaol_cta1.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

TMGbloglabel8copy.gif

TMGbloglabel9 copy.gif
Blah Blah Blah
me220.JPG

The Mudville Gazette is written and produced by Greyhawk, who recently retired from 24 years of active duty in the US military, but will maintain this disclaimer: Unless otherwise credited, the opinions expressed are those of the author, and nothing here is to be taken as representing the official position of or endorsement by the United States Department of Defense or any of its subordinate components.

Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house.

I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email.

Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed.

Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com

andsm.jpg

*****

Tending Distant
Fires


Far from hearth and home, watching
Cold alone but not alone
On distant shore and only wanting
Safe return and little more

What tales we'll tell
When that time comes
When tales can be told

When things grim
Seem far away
When other fires go cold

Some distant sunset, vision fading
Memories remain
And tired eyes gaze 'pon folded flags
While distant drums beat their refrain

Saluting fallen friends whose names
And youth will never fade
Here's to those on other shores,
for them live well, the price is paid

- Greyhawk,
Baghdad,
December 2004