
![]() | |
October 2012
August 2012 July 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003
|
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by! October 30, 2009 The New York Times rewritesBy Greyhawk...the Obama at Dover story. (Bumped - see update) Oops! The New York Times original report on the president's midnight trip to Dover said: The images and the sentiment of the president's five-hour trip to Delaware were intended by the White House to convey to the nation that Mr. Obama was not making his Afghanistan decision lightly or in haste....but somebody didn't like that. The new version (hat tip to Nice Deb) reads:
...which undeniably does a great job of conveying to Americans that Mr. Obama was not making his Afghanistan decision lightly or in haste - without saying that's the intent. The original quote can still be seen in part if you enter the deleted phrase in a Times search window - but that likely won't last long. Here's a screen capture for posterity (click for a larger version): There is no correction or change notice appended to the new version of the news, and no indication whether the White House made some calls or if the Times handled the problem "internally" swiftly enough to prevent just that. If so their concerns shouldn't be dismissed as unfounded or overblown; the Obama administration has recently moved from avoiding news agencies that don't meet their approval to active attack mode against one. But while Fox News is routinely disparaged by the White House, the New York Times receives executive branch praise for their efforts, including kudos in this recent example from the White House web page because the paper "decried and debunked Republican 'scare-mongering'" on health care issues. Regardless of government honors, the paper of record has lately fallen on rough financial straits...
However, the president has recently hinted that help could be forthcoming. His expressed concerns were quoted in a report from The Hill headlined Obama open to newspaper bailout bill: "I am concerned that if the direction of the news is all blogosphere, all opinions, with no serious fact-checking, no serious attempts to put stories in context, that what you will end up getting is people shouting at each other across the void but not a lot of mutual understanding," he said. More from Hot Air: Did White House pressure NYT into changing Dover story? And more still from the New York Times. The rewrite wasn't enough; here's their editorial today:
And your newspaper was disappearing chunks of it's original story on the topic - more specifically the part that detailed the event was a "photo op exploitation". Stunning. Whether forced upon them from the White House or done of their own "free will" to earn praise from those they serve, this is a new and loathsome low - even for a paper with a history of re-writing the words of soldiers while deep-discounting full-page "Betrayus" ads. Elsewhere/related: Gray Lady Sings the Blues: NY Times Leads Newspapers in Death Spiral Poll: 63% say media coverage of Obama is either fair or ... too critical 05:09:13 Posted by Greyhawk / October 30, 2009 3:28 PM | Permalink 2 TrackBacksWelcome to the Dawn Patrol, our daily roundup of information on the War on Terror and other topics - from the MilBlogs and various sources around the world. If you're a blogger, you can join the conversation. If you link to any of these stories, add a ... Read More Pvt Joseph Foster is yet another soldier reporting that Nidal Hasan shouted "Allah Akbar" when he began firing last week - but Foster made the mistake of saying it on CNN:Roberts: So the first moments of Thursday afternoon, can you tell our viewers, yo... Read More 6 Comments |
November 26, 2010America@war [Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit. That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary. From their about page:
"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation: The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism. Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented. I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are. "Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result. Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web... And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed. The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down. But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:
Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down. If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real. And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale. We've already made history, it's time to save it. (More to follow...) Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink |
Comments (0) |
|
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
![]() Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house. I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email. Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed. Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com ![]() Tending Distant Far from hearth and home, watching What tales we'll tell When things grim Some distant sunset, vision fading Saluting fallen friends whose names - Greyhawk, Baghdad, December 2004 |
Are they still giving discounts on full page ads?
What a mindf*ck Obama is. Sick, disgusting, revolting. I believe the worst is yet to come. Not only ain't we in Kansas no mo, but it looks like Glinda might be dead. We're on our own. I haven't given up. But am experinecing some weariness. Pray G*d America survives.
The Thunder Run has linked to this post in the blog post From the Front: 10/30/2009 News and Personal dispatches from the front and the home front.
You would think these constant comparisons to Bush would get on Obama's nerves after awhile, even when they're supposed to cast Obama in a more favorable light. It's as if everything about his Presidency is controlled by George W. Bush, which I guess makes Bush still the most powerful man in the world even though he's hunkered down there in the Big D writing his book and watching sports or whatever. His mojo still rises. At least as far as Obama is concerned. And the media as well. They can't stop thinking about Bush. He's in their heads all the time.
For Elmo: You are right, the worse is yet to come. I am getting tired of Obama's administration & new media using Bush for all the wrongs in America. Someday (soon I hope) they need to accept responsibility for what's happening in America. Obama was not elected to 'bad-mouth' Bush, but for change. I haven't see the change yet except dividing Americans against each other instead of uniting us.
I encourage others to read that new political thriller just out. It's a small town in America that stands up to the same ole politicians, regardless of political party & ends up starting the 2nd American Revolution. It's insightful of current events & enjoyable cause there are Americans just like you & me...i.e. tired of all politicians & who is really running the country. See what's nxt for us in the coming 3 yrs. Great read!
www.booksbyoliver.com
G and MrsG,
Thanks for covering this. As distasteful as it is, I appreciate your voices of reason through it.
I will admit, yesterday was a rough one, damn near physically ill over this. Violated, betrayed trust, I'm not sure how best to describe what's going on...it just hurts. Today is a bit better, thanks.
DS