The reader will kindly forgive any tendency to rough language or behavior on the part of the site owner...
TMGlogo2006-2007phs-copy.jpg
"Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
TMGbloglabel1 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel3 copy.gif
TMG MONTHLY ARCHIVES
[-]



TMGbloglabel10 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette Feeds

 

Add to Technorati Favorites
Technorati Profile
add.gif
Add to Google
addtomyyahoo4.gif
ngsub1.gif sub_modern5.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

digg.jpg

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

pl-news.gif

tvc_logo_small.png

Mrsg- Greyhawk's Profile
Mrsg- Greyhawk's Facebook profile
Create Your Badge
TMGbloglabel5 copy.gif
TMGbloglabel6 copy.gif
350.jpg
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by!
« The Secret Planners Club | Main | Gates blasts Obama on Afghanistan »

October 5, 2009

greyhawk copy sm.png

Victory through chairpower

By Greyhawk

To me it seems like not much of a story - but it's clearly the story that will not die:

Deep down, national-security conservatives know President Obama will not wage a decisive war against America's enemies in Afghanistan. They also know that the young men and women we already have there are sitting ducks. Ralph Peters notes that our commanders, obsessed with avoiding civilian casualties, have imposed mind-boggling rules of engagement (ROE) on our forces, compelling them to retreat from contact with the enemy and denying them resort to overwhelming force -- including the denial of artillery and air cover when they are under siege.

That October 2nd National Review piece from Andrew McCarthy reflects the position of the anti-war right, who, like the anti war left, express concern primarily for the health and welfare of US troops, of course.

It could also be seen as the first attempt to merge two mutually exclusive narratives that have developed over the past month or so - General McChrystal as ambitious tool of his civilian masters, willing to sacrifice his troops on the altar of politically-correct ROE and General McChrystal as bold leader defending his troops from foolish, timid, and distant leadership on high. The newly merged and reconciled McCarthy McChrystal is another Obama underling struggling to avoid being "tossed under the bus".

[McChrystal] is also a progressive big-thinker on geopolitics, having been a military fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and Harvard's Kennedy School. One perceives more of the academic than the warrior in his startling white paper proposal for what is labeled a "counterinsurgency" campaign.

The proposal was strategically leaked to the Washington Post last week. The president's knees are buckling as opportunistic politics give way to political accountability. The general has seen many a former courtier thrown under Obama's bus and has no intention of finding tire tracks across his camouflage.

From the other side, the left (and this view, somehow, seems to dominate the more traditional media) prefers McChrystal as guy who threatens national security by challenging his civilian leadership, and they haven't yet attempted their own merger of that with the ROE issue, preferring to dismiss the latter point as indicative of the fever-gripped, anti-Obama, racially-motivated, kill 'em all let God sort 'em out-right.

Those who can view war without consideration for politics and party talking points should realize that generals would like nothing more than to be among them.

*****

McCarthy's point, it turns out, was ill-timed - published immediately before an intense firefight in Nuristan, wherein outnumbered coalition forces fought off insurgent/militia/Taliban (take your pick) attackers, with the aid of artillery and close air support.

The fighting came on a day when poor weather limited visibility. The insurgents struck from positions in a mosque, village buildings and hillside positions above the outpost, which is in the Kamdesh area of Nurestan province. Surrounded by enemy fighters and under heavy fire, U.S. soldiers called in ground reinforcements, along with attack helicopters, airplanes and surveillance drones. U.S. forces eventually repelled the attack while inflicting "a significant amount of casualties" on insurgents, Smith said. "Virtually everything that could be thrown at it was thrown at it."

"Artillery, helicopter gunships, surveillance drones and airstrikes inflicted "heavy enemy casualties," according to NATO. One estimate was 50 insurgents killed."

That should offer a bit of perspective to the ROE debate. But already there are those who would ask the "hard questions" regarding the contribution of overly-restrictive ROE to Saturday's battle. If anything, the anticipation that such support would be denied could have emboldened the attackers (and will in the future). If so in this case, in the end they realized they were mistaken.

For a more well-informed discussion on the topic of artillery and air support, there's a good (speculative - but from someone more qualified to speculate than most) look at some tactical aspects of the battle here. (Not limited to tactical; strategic and IO concerns are addressed as well.)

*****

We'd do well to remember that by their nature ambush and surprise attacks are faster than response, that most casualties are suffered in the immediate onslaught, and that our "sitting ducks under siege" are a bit more dangerous than most water fowl. (And that by its nature, war is very much hell.)

And without expectation that it will do anything whatsoever to reduce claims of soldiers as "sitting ducks", here are the CENTAF Airpower Summaries for October 1st and 2nd - what they were doing while others were furiously typing away.

2 October:

U.S. Air Forces Central Public Affairs

SOUTHWEST ASIA -- Coalition airpower integrated with ground forces in Iraq and the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan in the following operations Oct. 2, according to Combined Air and Space Operations Center officials here.

In Afghanistan, Air Force F-15E Strike Eagle aircraft flew armed overwatch in the Asmar area. Friendly forces reported receiving fire and requested air power assistance to deter the enemy action. When target coordinates were confirmed, the aircraft deployed numerous precision guided munitions ending the attack. A show of force was also conducted to deter further enemy action.

Air Force A-10 Thunderbolt II and MQ-1B Predator aircraft were in the vicinity of Tarin Kowt providing armed overwatch for friendly ground forces when the unit received enemy small arms fire. The point of origin for the enemy fire was confirmed and shows of force were made with flares expended. An enemy weapon was located and destroyed by a missile strike that triggered a major secondary explosion. The actions were considered successful.

Asadabad saw F-15E aircraft in the skies providing overwatch for a friendly forces' convoy. Shows of force were requested to deter any enemy action while the convoy passed through the area. The shows of force were successful in defusing an imminent threat to the safety of the convoy, there was no enemy attack.

In the vicinity of Nad E Ali, Air Force A-10 Thunderbolt II aircraft were providing armed overwatch for friendly ground forces when they came under enemy small arms fire. The ground forces returned fire and aircrews supported the ground forces by conducting strafing runs against the enemy position ending the enemy fire.

At Asmar, Air Force F-16C and F-15E aircraft provided overwatch for friendly forces. The aircraft were also conducting reconnaissance for suspicious activity in the area. When enemy forces were identified at several locations, precision guided munitions and a strafing run were employed to successfully destroy the enemy positions.

Marine AV-8B Harrier aircraft were in the area over Lashkar Gah providing armed overwatch for friendly forces in the area. The aircraft responded to a request for air support when the enemy attacked from a treeline position. The coordinates for the enemy position were passed to the aircraft and strafing runs were executed that neutralized the enemy position.

Remak had F-15E aircraft overhead providing armed overwatch for friendly forces during a helicopter resupply operation. The aircraft noted suspicious activity in the form of possible improvised explosive device emplacement teams and performed a show force to interrupt the enemy activity. The action was successful as the suspected emplacers immediately vacated the scene.

Sheykhabad had F-16C aircraft providing armed overwatch for coalition forces in the area. The F-16Cs were also tasked to support a friendly forces patrol in the area and when requested provided a show of force that successfully deterred enemy action.

A-10 aircraft provided armed overwatch for friendly forces in the Kandahar area. The A-10s were tasked to support a friendly forces' patrol in an area that had earlier been subjected to an IED attack. As the patrol approached, shows of force were performed to deter any potential enemy action. The shows of force were successful.

In Kabul, F-15E aircraft supported a friendly forces foot patrol that was searching for hostile personnel. The aircraft provided armed overwatch and then displayed a show of force, with flares expended for the patrol when requested.

In Iraq, Air Force F-16C aircraft were in the vicinity of Rawah when friendly forces requested a show of force. The show of force was performed and declared successful.

In total, 68 close air support missions were flown in support of the ISAF and Afghan security forces, reconstruction activities and route patrols.

Thirty-two Air Force, Navy and coalition surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft flew missions as part of operations in Afghanistan.

In total, 23 close air support missions were flown in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom. These missions integrated and synchronized with ground forces, protected key infrastructure, provided overwatch for reconstruction activities, and helped to deter and disrupt hostile activities

Twenty-five Air Force and Navy surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft flew missions as part of operations in Iraq. In addition, two Air Force aircraft performed tactical reconnaissance.

U.S. Air Force C-130s and C-17s provided intra-theater heavy airlift, helping to sustain operations throughout Afghanistan, Iraq, and the Horn of Africa.

U.S. Air Force airlift crews flew 138 airlift sorties; 452 short tons of cargo were delivered; and about 4,000 passengers were transported. This included about 105,000 pounds of aerial resupply cargo dropped over Afghanistan.

Coalition C-130 crews flew as part of operations in Afghanistan and Iraq.

On Oct. 1, Air Force HH-60 Pave Hawk helicopters and "Guardian Angel" teams transported eight patients to coalition field hospitals from locations in Afghanistan. Pararescue team members aboard located, rescued and began treatment to stabilize patients in the battlefield. The Pave Hawk transported these patients to field hospitals in less time than it takes for a civilian patient to reach emergency care by ambulance in most major cities.

U.S. Air Force aerial refueling crews flew 53 sorties and off-loaded approximately 3.4 million pounds of fuel to 246 receiving aircraft.

1 October:

SOUTHWEST ASIA -- Coalition airpower integrated with ground forces in Iraq and the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan in the following operations Oct. 1, according to Combined Air and Space Operations Center officials here.

In Afghanistan, Air Force F-15E Strike Eagle aircraft flew armed overwatch in the Asmar area. Friendly forces reported receiving fire and requested shows of force to deter the enemy action. The shows of force were considered successful in deterring enemy activity.

Sheykhabad saw F-15E aircraft in the skies providing overwatch for friendly forces. When friendly forces started receiving sporadic enemy fire a request for air support was made. Several enemy positions were confirmed and strafing runs made to eliminate the positions. One enemy position required a precision guided munition to end the attack from that location. Two additional shows of force were made to deter further potential enemy aggression.

Air Force A-10 Thunderbolt II aircraft were in the vicinity of Chahar Bagh providing armed overwatch for friendly ground forces and a convoy when the friendly ground forces reported receiving enemy small arms fire. The point of origin for the enemy fire was confirmed and marked with a rocket. Aircrews supported the ground forces by conducting strafing runs against the enemy compound. The action was considered successful.

At Balocan, coalition aircraft provided overwatch for a friendly forces' patrol. The aircraft were also conducting reconnaissance for any suspicious activity in the patrol area. When friendly forces came under enemy fire, a show of force was conducted to deter the enemy aggression. The show of force successfully terminated enemy action.

Sheykhabad had F-15E Strike Eagle aircraft providing armed overwatch for friendly forces in the area. The F-15Es were also tasked to support helicopter operations in the area and when requested provided several shows of force that successfully deterred enemy action.

F-15E Strike Eagle aircraft were also overhead at Farah providing armed overwatch for friendly forces. The aircraft performed several shows of force in an effort to deter enemy action during an operation and they were considered successful as no enemy action occurred.

Near Shurakian, Navy F/A-18C Hornet aircraft provided armed overwatch for a coalition forces' convoy in the area. The convoy passed a compound where suspicious activity had been noted earlier. A show of force was requested and was successful in deterring any threatening activity while the convoy passed.

In Iraq, Air Force F-16C aircraft were in the vicinity of Tall Afar when friendly forces requested a show of force. The action successfully deterred enemy aggression and was declared a success.

In total, 86 close air support missions were flown in support of the ISAF and Afghan security forces, reconstruction activities and route patrols.

Thirty-one Air Force, Navy and coalition surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft flew missions as part of operations in Afghanistan. In addition, two Navy aircraft performed tactical reconnaissance.

In total, 22 close air support missions were flown in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom. These missions integrated and synchronized with ground forces, protected key infrastructure, provided overwatch for reconstruction activities, and helped to deter and disrupt hostile activities

Twenty-four Air Force and Navy surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft flew missions as part of operations in Iraq. In addition, two Air Force aircraft performed tactical reconnaissance.

U.S. Air Force C-130 Hercules and C-17 Globemaster IIIs provided intra-theater heavy airlift, helping to sustain operations throughout Afghanistan, Iraq, and the Horn of Africa.

U.S. Air Force airlift crews flew 165 airlift sorties; 4,680 short tons of cargo were delivered; and about 3,000 passengers were transported. This included about 110,000 pounds of aerial resupply cargo dropped over Afghanistan.

Coalition C-130 crews flew as part of operations in Afghanistan and Iraq.

On Sept. 30, Air Force HH-60 Pave Hawk helicopters and "Guardian Angel" teams transported seven patients to Coalition field hospitals from locations in Afghanistan. Pararescue Team members aboard located, rescued and began treatment to stabilize patients in the battlefield. The Pave Hawk transported these patients to field hospitals in less time than it takes for a civilian patient to reach emergency care by ambulance in most major cities.

U.S. Air Force aerial refueling crews flew 57 sorties and off-loaded approximately 3.6 million pounds of fuel to 264 receiving aircraft.

*****

Previously:

A man for all seasons

Unkind of War

This is the enemy

And now this kind of war

War Games (II)

Let's play war games

Quick response - and otherwise

Echoes from the blast

Tic tic tic...


Posted by Greyhawk / October 5, 2009 2:25 PM | Permalink

2 Comments

By the way--all those aircraft you listed in Afghanistan are just the US Air Force aircraft. There's still Marines, Army, Navy and NATO aircraft there as well.

True. Well, Navy is in there, but CENTAF PAO would break under the workload if they had to cover every Army aviation sortie.

They do love to control that airspace, though.

350.jpg
Mrs G copy.png

November 26, 2010


America@war
[Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit.

That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary.

From their about page:

The Naval Institute shall remain

INDEPENDENT - A non-profit member association, with no government support, that does not lobby for special interests;

NON-PARTISAN - An independent, professional military association with a mission, goals and objectives that transcend political affiliations; and shall encourage

IDEAS - Through its respected journals Proceedings and Naval History, its conferences, its books and its online content, in support of those who serve.

"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation:

The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism.

Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented.

I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are.

"Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result.

Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web...

And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed.

The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down.

*****

But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:

Closing Blogs is nothing new. So many site's owners just give up on their own. They come and go, you know, these MilBloggers do. Like any other sort of blogger. Many post in the lonely down hours far from home, spill their guts for the world, then abandon their spots when the tour of duty is up. They have lives again somewhere in the world, and no need to share the details. So it goes.

Many are truly gone - no site left at all. "The page cannot be found." Other blogs remain, like abandoned defensive positions in shifting desert sands.

Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down.

If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real.

And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale.

We've already made history, it's time to save it.

(More to follow...)




Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) |

TMGbloglabel7copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
TMGrecentcomments.gif
  • Greyhawk: True. Well, Navy is in there, but CENTAF PAO would read more
  • Starbuck: By the way--all those aircraft you listed in Afghanistan are read more

MBC2010.jpg

MILBLOGS NEWS

*****

Latest Posts From MilBlogs

*****

milblogsa1.jpg Prev | List | Random | Next
Join
Powered by RingSurf!
TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Dawn Patrol Feeds

 

Add to Google Reader or Homepage Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to netvibes Add to Plusmo myaol_cta1.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

TMGbloglabel8copy.gif

TMGbloglabel9 copy.gif
Blah Blah Blah
me220.JPG

The Mudville Gazette is written and produced by Greyhawk, who recently retired from 24 years of active duty in the US military, but will maintain this disclaimer: Unless otherwise credited, the opinions expressed are those of the author, and nothing here is to be taken as representing the official position of or endorsement by the United States Department of Defense or any of its subordinate components.

Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house.

I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email.

Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed.

Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com

andsm.jpg

*****

Tending Distant
Fires


Far from hearth and home, watching
Cold alone but not alone
On distant shore and only wanting
Safe return and little more

What tales we'll tell
When that time comes
When tales can be told

When things grim
Seem far away
When other fires go cold

Some distant sunset, vision fading
Memories remain
And tired eyes gaze 'pon folded flags
While distant drums beat their refrain

Saluting fallen friends whose names
And youth will never fade
Here's to those on other shores,
for them live well, the price is paid

- Greyhawk,
Baghdad,
December 2004