The reader will kindly forgive any tendency to rough language or behavior on the part of the site owner...
TMGlogo2006-2007phs-copy.jpg
"Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
TMGbloglabel1 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel3 copy.gif
TMGbloglabel10 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette Feeds

 

Add to Technorati Favorites
Technorati Profile
add.gif addtomyyahoo4.gif ngsub1.gif sub_modern5.gif add2netvibes.gif Add to Plusmo subscribe2.gif myaol_cta1.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

digg.jpg

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

pl-news.gif

tvc_logo_small.png

Mrsg- Greyhawk's Profile
Mrsg- Greyhawk's Facebook profile
Create Your Badge
TMGbloglabel5 copy.gif

gngrey120x60.gif

TMGbloglabel6 copy.gif
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by!
« On the radio | Main | Inside Special Forces »

October 3, 2009

Going grim

By Greyhawk

mcciiss.jpg"I arrived in Afghanistan in May 2002 and I have spent a part of every year since then involved in the effort. I have learned a tremendous amount about it and I will tell you, every day, I realize how little about Afghanistan I actually understand. I discount immediately anyone who simplifies the problem or offers a solution, or raises one finger and says 'this is what you gotta do', because they have absolutely no clue of the complexity of what we're dealing with."
    - General Stan McChrystal, Commander, International Security Assistance Force and Commander, U.S. Forces Afghanistan, Special Address on Afghanistan to the International Institute for Strategic Studies, London, 01 October 2009

*****

When did it become permissible for a senior commander to publicly question policy considerations while they were in the process of being formed?

Given that other questions are being asked of General McChrystal and he's providing answers, that question is now being asked with increasing frequency. To buy into the argument (and it's an argument formed as a question - and an unsubtle message that the general should STFU and keep his nose out of the business of his betters) you first have to accept that he's asking questions rather than answering them.

Has the general crossed a line? I certainly don't know - that's a line for the president to draw; as with most of the president's thoughts on Afghanistan that's a detail he's chosen to keep to himself. But I do know that any military officer refusing or undermining the orders of his Commander in Chief (as opposed to indirectly challenging the political views of other Americans by commenting on operational aspects of war on his battlefield) will have crossed a line - and the president's response should be clear and swift. Until then, the political and military intersect (in fact there is nothing about the military that isn't within the sphere of the broader political), and few embody that intersection more than those of flag rank. This isn't new (though rapid, worldwide communication is - relatively speaking). Arguments against his public pronouncements have as much validity as those against Hillary Clinton's on Afghanistan, perhaps less (though both approach zero). They are grown ups working for (and at the convenience and by appointment of) the president with advice and consent of Congress. The president can correct their behavior if need be. He probably doesn't need guidance on that, although obviously there are those who feel he does.

Bruce Ackerman is among that group willing to step up and help our inexperienced president see the error of his ways. You have to scroll to the bottom of his Washington Post diatribe to discover who he is: The writer is a professor at Yale Law School. Perhaps his compulsion can be credited to more than just a desire to lend intellectual aid to an ill-prepared and stumbling Harvard man confronted with a brutish West Pointer.

Whatever his motive, he's very upset:

Unless McChrystal publicly recognizes that he has crossed the line, future generals will become even more aggressive in their efforts to browbeat presidents.

What line has the general crossed?

If the president wanted McChrystal's advice, he was perfectly free to ask him to accompany Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs, when the council held its first meeting on Afghanistan this week.

But Obama did not extend the invitation, even though McChrystal was leaving Kabul and could have gone to Washington easily. Instead, Obama asked the general to report to the council via a brief teleconference.

A bit of confusion there - if the president wanted his advice he'd ask for it, which, um, well, he did. But clearly the general has exceeded his authority...

situationroom.jpg
President Barack Obama holds a strategy review on Afghanistan in the Situation Room of the White House, Sept. 30, 2009. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

But they did meet for 25 minutes on Air Force One this week, too. Perhaps the president took some or all of that time to clarify the general's position for him. Perhaps not, perhaps there was no need.

af1meet1.jpg
President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama greet Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal and his wife, Annie, aboard Air Force One in Copenhagen, Denmark on Oct. 2, 2009. The President and Gen. McChrystal, the Commander of U.S. Forces in Afghanistan, then held a meeting on the plane before the President flew back to Washington, D.C. (Official White House photo by Pete Souza)

Professor Ackerman must have insight into the president's position on Afghanistan that the rest of us lack, given his degree of certainty that General McChrystal is some sort of boorish rogue agent interrupting conversations in which he has no part. But this accusation is becoming a talking point used by those who are apparently concerned that McChrystal's comments are a ploy to influence public sentiment and steer an insecure president's decision process on Afghanistan. Since most statements in opposition to the general's assessment come from "a senior official" or "an official" "in the administration" or "at the Pentagon" (or even a "person familiar with the discussion") the good professor probably sees a great degree of unfairness in a real (and qualified and influential) person explaining his position and claiming ownership of his recommendations. His bottom line: the general should STFU, the masses can make do with what information news reporters can get from anonymous sources and filter for their eighth-grade reading level consumption. They'll still form their opinions, those opinions will still have whatever influence the president assigns them, but at least they won't be contaminated by some uniformed thug bent on destroying... uh... something. Perhaps even something we hold dear.

Also missing from the vague accusations leveled at the general is some sort of motive for his behavior. No one has accused him of racism yet, but others imply that perhaps this man who spent so much of his career in the near-invisible special ops world now enjoys nothing so much as seeing his name in the paper. Since that's true of many folks who feel their opinions are wrongfully ignored it's easy enough to project. Besides that, it seems every couple of years some general turns up out of nowhere and is suddenly an instant expert. Who do these guys think they are? Other than that, those who accuse the general tend to leave motive to the reader's imagination.

But no one acts without a motive. So let's also consider that Professor Ackerman of Yale ("Bruce Ackerman is Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science at Yale, and the author of fifteen books that have had a broad influence in political philosophy, constitutional law, and public policy. His major works include Social Justice in the Liberal State and his multivolume constitutional history, We the People. His most recent books are The Failure of the Founding Fathers (2005) and Before the Next Attack (2006)." He's also a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and a Commander of the French Order of Merit...) is legitimately concerned about a constitutional crisis, an encroachment by the military into the sovereign territory of our duly elected or appointed civilian leaders - precisely the sort of thing that left unchecked begins the downhill slide to a coup and military dictatorship.

Now we're certainly approaching the deep end. Certainly we must all remain ever vigilant against such threats to good order, but before venturing too far into that territory something mentioned briefly earlier in this discussion bears a bit more consideration: "...the masses can make do with what information news reporters can get from anonymous sources and filter for their eighth-grade reading level consumption". Sadly, that's exactly what much of this discussion results from, and unfortunately even a Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science at Yale is vulnerable to stumbling into that trap.

Here's the trick (and newspapers do this all the time, in part on the assumption that readers will fall for it every time): take two people explaining all sides of an issue, quote only that part of each that makes it appear they're in opposition, and you've got a "juicy" story. The opposition may be real, but if nothing else the degree of that contention, or of either side's understanding of the position of the other (or the certainty of their own) must be ignored in the interest of portraying a brawl or smackdown that fans of professional wrestling can understand. Put that in writing (in addition to motive, leaving the audible grunts and visible sweat of the grudge-match contenders to the imagination) and you've got something that even a Yale Man can cheer (or jeer) from ringside.

At this point, for those interested in full quotes a good reading of (self-identified progressive) Spencer Ackerman's commentary and analysis is in order - and highly recommended. For those who appreciate insight from those a bit closer to the fire, here's a milbogger in Afghanistan who won't dissapoint. And for the rare few who might want to bypass all filters and read the general's remarks in their entirety, here they are. Should you prefer to view the proceedings, you can do so here.

*****

Hopefully at this point we're past the greatest part of foolishness in the argument (we aren't really - the world is full of wrestling fans) but before closing this discussion it's worth noting a final accusation from Professor Pain's cage match with General Disorder: "He emphasized that the president had "encouraged" him to be blunt when making his grim report on Afghanistan." The word report (or assessment) now appears to be inseparable from the adjective grim. (By the way, here's the report - you can decide for yourself whether that's the best possible one-word description.) The report (and the situation in Afghanistan) is grim, but suddenly there's another talking point bubbling up through the noise implying that this is deceptive. Nothing anyone would want to actually say, of course (at least not in a manner that their name or reputation could ever be connected to the comment), but like "the general is treasonous" the message is there.

What next? The general returns to the battlefield, of course - where other pressing issues will limit his time for The Press. Perhaps we'll hear little from him for a while - perhaps not:

To include his interview with 60 Minutes, taped before he submitted his assessment, General McChrystal has done a total of five press events in five weeks -- two of them not in English. In the same period, there have been nearly 100 requests for interviews with him from major U.S. and international media outlets. The general's "high-profile campaign on behalf of his assessment" is more the fever dream of political junkies in Washington than the reality of the current situation in Kabul.

That fever shows no sign of breaking just yet.


*****


af1meet2.jpg
President Barack Obama meets with Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the Commander of U.S. Forces in Afghanistan, aboard Air Force One in Copenhagen, Denmark on Oct. 2, 2009. (Official White House photo by Pete Souza)


*****


Update: SUNDAY! SUNDAY! SUNDAY! "Officials" push back - smack general with realistic metal folding chair!!!!

According to sources close to the administration, Gen McChrystal shocked and angered presidential advisers with the bluntness of a speech given in London last week.
<...>
An adviser to the administration said: "People aren't sure whether McChrystal is being naïve or an upstart. To my mind he doesn't seem ready for this Washington hard-ball and is just speaking his mind too plainly."
<...>
The remarks have been seen by some in the Obama administration as a barbed reference to the slow pace of debate within the White House.
<...>
A military expert said: "They still have working relationship but all in all it's not great for now."

Some commentators regarded the general's London comments as verging on insubordination.
<...>
White House aides have since briefed against the general's recommendations.
<...>
As a divide opened up between the military and the White House, senior military figures began criticising the White House for failing to tackle the issue more quickly.

The championship belt goes to whatever nameless, spineless, 98-pound weakling came up with this line: An adviser to the administration said: "People aren't sure whether McChrystal is being naïve or an upstart. To my mind he doesn't seem ready for this Washington hard-ball and is just speaking his mind too plainly."

*****

LATE UPDATE: Meanwhile, back in Afghanistan, Combat in Nuristan - U.S. Forces Afghanistan reports "eight ISAF and two ANSF service members" killed in action.

"Coalition forces' previously announced plans to depart the area as part of a broader realignment to protect larger population centers remain unchanged."

"Unchanged" also means "waiting for Washington" - and moving in slow motion. More here.


Bookmark and Share - via email, facebook, twitter, etc.

Posted by Greyhawk / October 3, 2009 2:45 PM | Permalink

1 TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://www.mudvillegazette.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/16769

Also missing from the vague accusations leveled at the general is some sort of motive for his behavior. No one has accused him of racism yet...Here's why I said "yet":The army is also "in a war against the White House -- and they feel they have [Presid... Read More

16 Comments

Prof. Ackerman is full of it- ever since there has been a military, there have been commanders who "request" leadership, a mission statement, or at least a little guidance - the Civil War is rife with Generals who questioned Lincoln, indeed took the President to task over their part in the war.
It is not unusual, Indeed it would be more unusual, if a General, faced with the myriad challenges that Gen. McChrystal has to deal with, if he did not ask for clarification from his Commander in Chief.
The fact that the CINC has given him such short shrift is more indicative of the state of mind of a person who is disengaged from the realities of the military situation, and unfortunately does not know or care that their lack of rapport is affecting real world, life and death decisions.
Pity.

I thought the exchange between Dr. Bernard Finel, on his blog, and Spencer Ackerman, on *his* blog, was interesting. I tend to side with Spencer Ackerman, who links to multiple other examples of, well, what you'd expect of people in D.C, I'd imagine, in or out of uniform.

I don't know much about this topic, to be honest, and what is appropriate, but I really don't see it as so very egregious. Your point about a new media enviroment is astute: in this day and age, when speeches can be so easily broadcast online, does that change the standard civ-mil dynamic? I don't know.

Why did he give the speech and was it out of line with what previous generals have done?

I guess I still don't see it. I am yet to be convinced that in such a rapacious media and political enviroment, the GEN crossed the line so unequivocally. I just don't see it.

What can the President do to McChrystal? Reassign him. But doesn't McChrystal have the option of retiring, if he thinks this President ordering him to lead a disaster? If the general hasn't been told to keep his mouth such, I as a citizen appreciate hearing his views. If Obama fires him, he'll show up on Fox News within a month anyway.

And if Bruce Ackerman doesn't like it, he can go suck an egg.

What's the job of a general if not to give honest assessments to the CINC? The main reason he's making statements is that the President hasn't seen fit to meet with him and seek his advice, or am I wrong?

All good theatre.

As Iraq draws down we will have the troops to end the holding action in Afghanistan.

"Social Justice in the Liberal State"

What I dislike most about Ivy-league Law Professors is they are arrogant tyrants with idiotic degrees.


All the Liberal State has ever achieved through Social Justice is to abort the body of Christ in the Catholic Church; I do not want the Professor's Liberal State of Roman Polanskis anywhere near me

"The situation is serious, and I choose that word very carefully. I would add that neither success nor failure for our endeavour in support of the Afghan people and government can be taken for granted. My assessment and my best military judgment is that the situation is, in some ways, deteriorating, but not in all ways." GEN McChrystal

Okay, I've now listened to the address (having trouble with the Q&A), but, uh, that is the most plain vanilla speech (no offense to the General, I just mean it doesn't seem very political to me).

Seriously, it's exactly the sort of plain vanilla speech you'd expect a COIN-oriented General to give, particularly given the fact that this General was HAND-PICKED by the administration because he 'got it', and the other guy supposedly didn't.

Another thought occurred to me: the beginning and end remarks touched on the sacrifices of British soldiers. In a coalition, is such a speech so egregious? Do our coalition partners expect an American General to address them from time to time? Even if GEN McChrystal did go a little far, I think the situation is so complicated that the more fervid accusations thrown at him are completely unfair. It is a difficult and complicated situation. Anything he says could be politicized. If he said absolutely nothing, the accusation would be that he is being pressured to change his best military advice, or something. Well, I'm just spinning as a political animal. Anything these generals say, even if they say 'no comment', will be politicized.

In fact, if they say "no comment" we have what we had within hours of the leak of his report - others claiming on his behalf that he's ready to resign if he doesn't get his way.

With friends like that, as they say.

Here is Bruce

Oh look. He's writing for The American Prospect, the ultra-left neo-treasonous publication that people like William Ayers love.

Mutt. Uncovered.

To me as far as I can see, this could only mean one of two things

1.McChrystal wants Obama's attention. It seems Obama spoke with him ONCE before his meeting with him on AF1 - Obama has already spent more time talking to talk show hosts like Letterman and Leno. Not to mention that he is actually more concerned about public heath insurance and pushing forward cap and trade.

2.He is trying to make clear what the best strategy is going forward, no matter what the Commander in Chief decides - this seems to stem from what I perceive as McChrystal's lack of faith in Obama's commitment to winning the war.

the General sees that the situation as grave and that a wakeup call is needed to salvage the region and the war efforts so far.

Of course i may be imagining too much as well.But i think McChrystal is clearly concerned that he is not going to get the support that he thinks that he needs.

Lets be clear ... If the General were recommending we run away from Afghanistan the Ackerman article would never have been written ... end of story ...

Obama has not stated a public opinion about it one way or the other recently and all of his past pronouncements have been to fight to the bitter end ...

Sounds to me like the General was simply backing up his CINC's public stance with his own professional opinion ...

The military is under the direction and command of the civilian government ... the one thing that Obama better be very careful about is ordering military personnel to cease exercising their 1st amendment rights ... he can try it and they may follow his order but its not lawful and everyone knows it, including Ackerman ...

"If the General were recommending we run away from Afghanistan the Ackerman article would never have been written..."

By Ackerman. Ralph Peters would have been all over it, though.

Did Obama speak to McChrystal or did he LISTEN to him? On a war that's going south, Obama spends twenty-five (25) minutes with the general in command. Twenty-five minutes, after he spent weeks and hours shilling for Chicago with his boys Daley, et al. Yet, the Afghanistan war in which U.S. military is facing the fire, he can hardly find time to talk to McChrystal. Twenty-five minutes since August.

In spite of inheriting a winning hand in Iraq and Afghanistan, Obama has no intention of winning. He stated emphatically that “victory isn’t necessarily the United States’ goal”.
He blows off the external threats from Iran and Pakistan and is pathetically indecisive.
This war is not to nation build Afghanistan, but to destroy our sworn enemies where ever they hide.
Afghanistan has several religious sects and a host of different ethnic, linguistic, and tribal groups.
They are territorial and don’t like outsiders. And unfortunately, Hamid Karzai’s corrupt government is not fulfilling expectations.
President Punchdrunk is in way over his head. He has no idea how to manage the business of fighting the nations wars. To cut and run would give Islamofascists the ‘hope and change’ they’re looking for, and pave the way for a global resurgence in mass terrorism.
This narcissistic buffoon would rather dismiss the advice of a seasoned military commander than admit he has no fucking strategy.
The solution to this is to commit as many troops as necessary, give them the go ahead to go into Waziristan and Pakistan to hunt down and kill as many Taliban as possible. Fly Predator missions. Use MOABs and MLRS. Dedicate this country to winning this war and sending the message that America will not run from its enemies. Muslim fanatic fucksticks started this war, we will finish it.
If Obama has one iota of decency, he’ll get the hell out of the way and let the Army do its job.
My guess is that he doesn’t.

My take is that Gen. McChrystal is doing everything he can to complete the mission and not sacrifice our soldiers needlessly. This includes public comments to focus attention on the need to fish or cut bait in Afganistan. Having lived through the Vietnam debacle, the current situation has all the earmarks of another Democrat clusterf*ck where they dither while our guys and gals are in harm's way with no commitment to victory.

For Obama, Afganistan was always only a political issue to bash Bush. He is now trimming while trying to figure out how far he has to go to appease his base.

After Vietnam, it became clear that generals who 'shut up and soldiered,' or worse, echoed the party line, were blamed for failures not of their doing. It would not be surprising that a general might prefer being fired to having his judgment and honor compromised. If the President can't stand a public discussion of our options, then he should replace all of his high ranking officers with yes-men and have done with it. Nothing prevents McChrystal, or Petraeus, for that matter, from retiring and running for office. In fact, if they were to shut up and lose, then I expect that such action would terminate any political career which either might want. Could that be the idea?

When Clark was head of NATO, I shivered with his pronouncements and his general incompetency until Clinton fired him.

I get the same shiver, not with McCrystal, but with Obama. Unfortunately, "We The People" have to wait until 2012 to fire Obama.

Excellent post Greyhawk. Just damn excellent!

Leave a comment

Mrs G copy.png

November 18, 2009


Dawn Patrol 11/18/2009
[Mrs Greyhawk]
Bookmark and Share - via email, facebook, twitter, etc.

Welcome to the Dawn Patrol, our daily roundup of information on the War on Terror and other topics - from the MilBlogs and various sources around the world. If you're a blogger, you can join the conversation. If you link to any of these stories, add a link to the Dawn Patrol too and your trackback will be added to the list. Hat Tips to the Dawn Patrol are greatly appreciated.Refresh for updates.


Support Our Troops, Read Their Stories

----------------------------

AFGHANISTAN/PAKISTAN

Boondoggle -- [3rd Time, New Country - in Afghanistan]
I know I am a little late on posting to my blog, but I returned from a boondoggle out to Mazar-e-Sharif in the Northern provinces. I even have some pictures to post with this entry. First, let me recap last week. We did make a normal trip to NDS. It was actually a clear, cool morning which is a rarity here in Kabul. The pollution is so thick that it is very rare to see the distant mountains. So, here is a picture of the snow-capped mountains, west of Kabul. This picture was taken last Monday. I haven't seen the mountains since. Other than that, it was a normal week of mentoring. There are always little things to work on and improve in the OT. Friday was another violent day here in Kabul. The Taliban used a SVBIED outside Camp Phoenix a little before 0800. There were no American casualties, but there were injuries.

Clinton in Kabul for Karzai's inauguration -- [Foreign Policy - AfPak]
U.S. President Barack Obama reportedly told CNN today that he is "very close" to making a decision about whether to send more U.S. troops to Afghanistan and plans to make an announcement "in the next several weeks," after more than two months of deliberations (Reuters, Reuters). Obama is reportedly angry about the stream of leaks that has come out about his Afghanistan decision, telling CBS, "For people to be releasing info in the course of deliberations is not appropriate" and said yes when asked if that is a "firing offense" (CBS, Politico). Meanwhile

The war of leaks -- [Foreign Policy - AfPak]
The Obama Administration's social media prowess has been a novelty among latter day political media machines. It helped to crowd-source the campaign funding needed to put Barack Obama in the White House, and generated a populist gloss that was, at the time, convincingly fresh and transparent. What was equally admirable was its apparent internal discipline over when information made the transition from government secret to press release. Controlling the flow of data and keeping secrets secret is a challenge under any circumstance. Combine that with a predilection for Facebook and Twitter, and a hyperactive security officer might expect policy waters to muddy more quickly than they would under normal circumstances.
So when U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan Karl Eikenberry's expressed his "discomfort" last week over a possible troop surge, via diplomatic cable to Washington, it's no wonder that the message ended up dominating headlines.

Ridding Afghanistan of Corruption Will Be No Easy Task -- [Los Angeles Times]
Afghans have a name for the huge, gaudy mansions that have sprung up in Kabul's wealthy Sherpur neighborhood since 2001. They call them "poppy palaces." The cost of building one of these homes, which are adorned with sweeping terraces and ornate columns, can run into the hundreds of thousands of dollars. Many are owned by government officials whose formal salaries are a few hundred dollars a month. To the capital's jaded residents, there are few more potent symbols of the corruption that permeates every level of Afghan society, from the traffic policemen who shake down motorists to top government officials and their relatives who are implicated in the opium trade.

Afghan Minister Accused of Taking Bribe -- [Washington Post]
The Afghan minister of mines accepted a roughly $30 million bribe to award the country's largest development project to a Chinese mining firm, according to a US official who is familiar with military intelligence reports. The allegation, if proved true, would mark one of the most brazen examples of corruption yet disclosed in a country where the problem has become so pervasive that it is now at the heart of Obama administration doubts over Afghan President Hamid Karzai's reliability as a partner.

Vision for Victory, Part I -- [Washington Times]
The news from Afghanistan all year has been dispiriting, and the last few weeks have been especially tough in terms of the violence. Yet most foreign and Afghan officials and officers who I encountered on a recent weeklong visit sponsored by the U. military are guardedly optimistic about our prospects. How can this be so?

U.S. Turns to Local Guns-for-Hire to Guard Afghan Outpost -- [Danger Room - Noah Shachtman]
The U.S. military is turning to guns-for-hire to guard one of its outposts in Afghanistan. But Blackwaters of the world, take note: simply hiring former G.I.s or American cops or even Nepalese Gurkhas won't do the trick this time. At least half of the 50-man force has to come "from within a 50 kilometer radius" of the base, according to a contract solicitation issued by the U.S. Air Force. Over the summer, the American military signaled its interest in hiring an army of contractors to help handle security at as many as 50 outposts in Afghanistan. It's one of several efforts efforts designed to free up uniformed troops for combat and counterinsurgency work. Now, U.S. forces appear to be taking the first step towards building that country-wide private security force, by soliciting bids for a team that watch over Forward Operating Base Lightening, in Paktya province.

NATO Chief Confident Afghanistan Will Have More Troops -- [Voice of America]
The NATO secretary-general says he is confident the United States and other NATO allies will send more troops to Afghanistan, where insurgent attacks have surged in recent months. He spoke at the NATO Parliamentary Assembly Meeting in Edinburgh, where Britain's foreign secretary outlined the strategy his nation would support.

Germany to extend Afghanistan mission another year -- [AP]
Germany will extend its mission in Afghanistan for another year, the government said Wednesday, despite the growing unpopularity of the war at home



Pakistani Successes May Sway US Troop Decision -- [New York Times]
A month after the Pakistani military began its push into the Taliban stronghold of South Waziristan, militants appear to have been dispersed, not eliminated, with most simply fleeing. That recurring pattern illustrated the problems facing the Obama administration as it enters its final days of a decision on its strategy for Afghanistan. Success in this region, in the remote mountains near the Afghan border, could have a direct bearing on how many more American troops are ultimately sent to Afghanistan, and how long they must stay. Pakistan has shown increased willingness to tackle the problem, launching sweeping operations in the north and west of the country this year, but

Where are Taliban and al Qaeda commanders, US media asks Pak -- [Daily News & Analysis]
Washington: A day after senior Pakistani army commanders claimed that their forces have captured all major towns and population centres of the extremist-ridden South Waziristan, Taliban and foreign militants appear to have disappeared and not been eliminated.

Pakistani Army Shows Off Captured Taliban Posts -- [Washington Post]
A toy car booby-trapped with explosives, chemistry textbooks and handwritten case files from a Taliban court were among the debris left behind by fleeing Islamist militants in this remote village in the conflicted tribal region of South Waziristan. The now-deserted village, which was retaken by Pakistani army forces two weeks ago and visited by Western journalists on Tuesday for the first time since, had been a stronghold of Taliban forces for nearly five years.


IRAQ

Iraqi Kurds Warn of Election Boycott in Dispute Over Seats - [Washington Post]
Kurdish officials threatened Tuesday to boycott the upcoming national election in the three provinces they control in northern Iraq unless more parliament seats are allocated to the region. The threat came two days after Iraq's Sunni vice president said he would veto the election law passed last week unless more seats are set aside for representatives of Iraqi refugees. The majority of Iraqis abroad are Sunni. Vice President Tariq al-Hashimi has until Wednesday to veto the law, which legislators approved after weeks of wrangling, primarily over how the vote would be held in the disputed northern city of Kirkuk. The two ultimatums underscored the deep divisions among Iraqi politicians and raised fresh concerns about Iraq's ability to hold a credible election by Jan. 18.

Iraq's national elections in jeopardy as Sunni VP issues veto
-- [McClatchy News]
BAGHDAD -- Iraq's pivotal national elections were thrown back into turmoil and potential delay Wednesday after Vice President Tariq al Hashemi vetoed part of an election law and sent it back to parliament.

US has time to reconsider Iraq drawdown plan-Odierno -- [Reuters]
The US military does not have to decide until April or May whether to push back the end of its combat operations in Iraq due to...

A few words from medics for the 41st Brigade -- [The Oregonian]
I spent an hour or two last month with Oregon National Guard medics who are based at Al Asad Airbase, discussing a little of what they've observed since coming to Iraq this summer. The discussion, as you might think, covered issues in two categories: The physical and the mental. The Physical - CPT Scott Johnson of Newport, who is the highest-ranking soldier in the medical support unit at Al Asad, said that medics are seeing a significant share of orthopedic issues that stem from the heavy loads that soldiers carry. Even though the war has wound down considerably over the last few years, soldiers on convoys and at checkpoints still wear a lot of body armor and carry a lot of ammunition and weaponry, as much as 65 pounds or even more. Over time, even young soldiers experience increased stress on their joints from walking, running and jumping with that much gear.

Goodbye to Iraq, and thanks -- [The Oregonian]
The soldiers of Oregon's 41st Brigade are about halfway through their Iraq deployment, but I'm finally home after a gruelling passage through Kuwait and a misadventure or two. I said goodbye to my last acquaintance in the Oregon National Guard on Monday afternoon in Salt Lake City. SSG Tom McNeil of Central Point was peeling off to fly to Medford, close to his home in Central Point, while I continued on to Portland. Have a terrific Thanksgiving at home, Tom. Thanks to all the folks along the way, especially the soldiers of Oregon's 41st Brigade Combat Team, for the many kindnesses extended to me during my sojourn among them. This toast to you, and I'm starting with you two, since you challenged me to do this, Scott and Mike


U.S. AND OTHER PARTS OF THE WORLD

US, China in Strained Diplomatic Embrace -- [Wall Street Journal]
President Barack Obama was set to leave China on Wednesday after an awkward summit with some achievements but a long list of unfinished business - a result that suggests challenges ahead for the US as it struggles to come to terms with Asia's increasingly assertive superpower. The president secured a far-ranging framework for cooperation Tuesday with Beijing. But that deal was announced as frictions between the two nations appeared to increase over human rights and economic policy. President Obama and Chinese leader Hu Jintao issued their ambitious statement on cooperation in a clumsy fashion - at a media "availability" where they took no questions, didn't address each other and exhibited body language that seemed to say they had been frustrated by the entire exercise.

Obama: 'We've restored America's standing' -- [CNN]
A little more than a year after his election, President Obama said his administration has laid the groundwork for success on global and domestic matters. -- "I think that we've restored America's standing in the world

Somali Pirates : Maersk Alabama Attacked, Fights Back -- [Eagle Speak]
On the early morning of 18 November 2009, 350 nautical miles east from the Somali coast, pirates attacked MV Maersk Alabama, a US flagged, Danish owned, 155 meter long, Container ship.

Iranian COS Warns Russia: Your Security Is Tied To Ours -- [Memri Blog]
Iranian Army chief of staff Hassan Firouzabadi has warned Russia that delay in the supply of S-300 missile systems could harm Russia because its security is tied to that of Iran.




WAR ON TERROR /TERRORISM

Suspected Fort Hood Shooter Believed to Be Self-Radicalized -- [Wall Street Journal]
Some lawmakers briefed Tuesday on the Fort Hood shooting said the suspect, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, was most likely a self-radicalized extremist. The briefing for select members of Congress came as Republicans with oversight of national-security issues called on Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to open a full congressional inquiry into alleged government miscues in the case of Maj. Hasan. He is charged with murdering 13 people Nov. 5 on the sprawling US Army base where he served as a psychiatrist.

Guantánamo Won't Close by January, Obama Says -- [NY Times]
President Obama acknowledged for the first time on Wednesday that his administration would miss a self-imposed deadline to close the detention center at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, by mid-January, admitting the difficulties of following through on one of his first pledges as president.


SUPPORTING THE TROOPS...OR NOT

No Man Left Behind -- [Knottie's Niche]
We've all heard the military quote "No Man left behind" But it wasn't until last weekend as I sat listening to a veteran Marine talking to an Army Sgt about how the Army helicopter pilot who saved him and many others in Vietnam by flying in a hot zone repeatedly to save men that it hit home. The words took on a whole new meaning to me. When Micheal was killed the Army did not leave us behind. It started with a visit to tell us the news and they did not leave until there was no more they could do for us in that moment. Then there was the email to let us know no one else had been hurt from one of the medics. The Army did not leave us behind when they assigned us a causality assistance officer who walked us through each step, even offering to go to the store for us at any hour of the day if we needed anything at all. Then the emails, calls and instant message conversations from the men who served with Micheal began.

LTC Tim Karcher Update -- [Soldiers' Angels Germany]
Wonderful update on LTC Tim Karcher, Commander of the 1st Cavalry Division's 2nd Battalion, 5th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Brigade Combat Team, wounded June 28 in Sadr City.
4 weeks later, after fighting for his life in Iraq, here in Germany, and at Walter Reed, the loss of both legs was the least of his problems:

Support SA while Christmas shopping this year! -- [Soldiers' Angels Germany]
Through Soldiers' Angels, patriotic Americans can do their Holiday shopping or planning and support the troops at the same time!
The easiest way to do this is shop online at all your favorite stores. If you stop by GoodShop and Shop to Earn before you start, you can visit all your favorite online stores, purchase anything you want at the usual great prices, and a portion of what you spend will be donated to Soldiers' Angels--at no extra cost to you! On GoodShop, be sure you select Soldiers' Angels as the charity you are "GoodShopping for."

Trees for Troops: Helping Military Families -- [AdAge.com]
Military families. Transportation. Tree growers. Logistics. These seemingly incongruous words provide a case study in cause marketing.

FOX 5 Special: I-Team VA Loans -- [FOX News]


A FOX 5 I-Team investigation uncovered allegations of a nationwide scheme by banks and mortgage companies to defraud U.S. military veterans. The scheme, spelled out in court documents, claims banks are overcharging veterans on home refinancing loans.
The question raised in a racketeering and class action law suit is how many of those loans involved banks defrauding U.S. military veterans.



MILITARY

Muslim discrimination in the U.S. military. Not. -- [Castra Praetoria]
I'm done listening to any more bellyaching about how Muslims have it bad in the American military. It's a lie.
At this very moment there are American Muslims serving in our armed forces with valor. Muslim interpreters work along side us daily who aren't even American citizens and they have proven themselves as well. All these pansies wailing and moaning about discrimination against them because they are Muslims are not doing anyone any favors. Take it from a guy who has served along side Muslim Marines and Sailors in combat; worked with Jordanian and Iraqi interpreters in country; trained with Iraqi-Americans who have contributed to the effort by working as role players and training our troops in culture and language classes.

Time to revisit firearms policies on military posts -- [Atlanta Journal Constitution]
Just as legitimate questions were raised following the mass killings on the Virginia Tech campus in 2007, both military personnel and civilian citizens

Army's Record Suicide Rate 'Horrible,' General Says -- [Washington Post]
Army Vice Chief of Staff Gen. Peter W. Chiarelli on Tuesday called the Army's record suicide rate this year "horrible" and said the problem of soldiers taking their own lives is the toughest he has faced in his 37 years in service. As of Nov. 16, 140 soldiers on active duty and 71 soldiers not on active duty were suspected to have committed suicide. "We are almost certainly going to end the year higher than last year,"




WELCOME HOME

Veterans' descendants welcome troops home to Fort Campbell -- [Clarksville Leaf Chronicle]
Their day concluded with the Welcome Home ceremony for 80 soldiers who returned from a year in Afghanistan. "We are descendants of our country's first

'Greywolf' Among First CAV Troops to Return Home -- [DVIDS]
Once the buses arrived at Cooper Field, chants of "move that bus" were heard from Families waiting to welcome home their Soldiers. Tommy Tatum, from Kempner


THE MEDIA

Where are Taliban and al Qaeda commanders, US media asks Pak -- [Daily News & Analysis]
Washington: A day after senior Pakistani army commanders claimed that their forces have captured all major towns and population centres of the extremist-ridden South Waziristan, Taliban and foreign militants appear to have disappeared and not been eliminated.

Army officials said that they have killed as many as 550 Taliban militants a month after the military began its campaign into the lawless territory, yet they acknowledge that hundreds, perhaps thousands more have melted away.
As the offensive into the area, considered to be a sanctuary of al Qaeda and Taliban militants gained momentum, Boston Globe said, "Vast numbers of Taliban and foreign terrorists had disappeared into the vast desert scrub and craggy hills surrounding their strongholds of Sararogha and Ladha".
"Where are they? That's what bothers me," New York Times quoted a senior American intelligence officer as saying.




POLITICS

Republicans Criticize Obama's Call to Delay Hill Inquiries on Fort Hood -- [Washington Post]
The Obama administration's request that congressional committees slow their investigations of the Fort Hood shootings sparked denunciations Tuesday from Republicans on Capitol Hill, who pushed for an immediate inquiry of any warning signs before the massacre. House and Senate Republicans, emerging from the most detailed briefings given to Congress since the Nov. 5 attack killed 13 at the central Texas Army post, said delaying investigations would put off legislative efforts to give military officials the tools to prevent similar tragedies in the future. They said such an effort would not interfere with the criminal investigation of shooting suspect Nidal M. Hasan, an Army major who was scheduled to deploy to Afghanistan.


Obama Approval Dips Below 50% For First Time
-- [Quinnipiac University]
Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds; Support For U.S. Troops In Afghanistan Drops Below 50% -- President Barack Obama's job approval rating is 48 - 42 percent, the first time he has slipped below the 50 percent threshold nationally ...


HUMOR / SATIRE

Day By Day



(Need more? Dawn Patrols Archives are here.)



, , , , , , , ,




Posted 12:28 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0)


Bookmark and Share - via email, facebook, twitter, etc.

Air For Valour-it wigetsm2.png
TMGbloglabel7copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
150px
TMGrecentcomments.gif
  • GM Roper: When Clark was head of NATO, I shivered with his read more
  • wGraves: After Vietnam, it became clear that generals who 'shut up read more
  • Jack Okie: My take is that Gen. McChrystal is doing everything he read more
  • SFC MAC: In spite of inheriting a winning hand in Iraq and read more
  • apodoca: Did Obama speak to McChrystal or did he LISTEN to read more
  • Ol Sarge: "If the General were recommending we run away from Afghanistan read more
  • Jeff Carlson: Lets be clear ... If the General were recommending we read more
  • Nagarajan Sivakumar: To me as far as I can see, this could read more
  • Paul A'Barge: Here is Bruce Oh look. He's writing for The American read more
  • Greyhawk: In fact, if they say "no comment" we have what read more

6a00d83487393d53ef010536defce7970b-800wi.png

MilBlog Conference Sponsors

GA_150x253_milblog.jpg

onesource logo.bmp

BAE_BannerAd_MilBlog_0309.jpg

MILBLOGS NEWS

*****

Latest Posts From MilBlogs

*****

milblogsa1.jpg Prev | List | Random | Next
Join
Powered by RingSurf!
TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Dawn Patrol Feeds

 

Add to Google Reader or Homepage Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to netvibes Add to Plusmo myaol_cta1.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

TMGbloglabel8copy.gif

TMGbloglabel9 copy.gif
Blah Blah Blah
me220.JPG

The Mudville Gazette is written and produced by Greyhawk. Unless otherwise credited, the opinions expressed are those of the author, and nothing here is to be taken as representing the official position of or endorsement by the United States Department of Defense or any of its subordinate components. Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house.

I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email.

Original content copyright © 2003 - 2009 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed.

Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com

andsm.jpg