The reader will kindly forgive any tendency to rough language or behavior on the part of the site owner...
TMGlogo2006-2007phs-copy.jpg
"Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
TMGbloglabel1 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel3 copy.gif
TMGbloglabel10 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette Feeds

 

Add to Technorati Favorites
Technorati Profile
add.gif
Add to Google
addtomyyahoo4.gif
ngsub1.gif sub_modern5.gif add2netvibes.gif Add to Plusmo subscribe2.gif myaol_cta1.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

digg.jpg

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

pl-news.gif

tvc_logo_small.png

Mrsg- Greyhawk's Profile
Mrsg- Greyhawk's Facebook profile
Create Your Badge
TMGbloglabel5 copy.gif

gngrey120x60.gif

TMGbloglabel6 copy.gif
350.jpg
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by!
« On the radio | Main | Inside Special Forces »

October 3, 2009

greyhawk copy sm.png

Going grim

By Greyhawk

mcciiss.jpg"I arrived in Afghanistan in May 2002 and I have spent a part of every year since then involved in the effort. I have learned a tremendous amount about it and I will tell you, every day, I realize how little about Afghanistan I actually understand. I discount immediately anyone who simplifies the problem or offers a solution, or raises one finger and says 'this is what you gotta do', because they have absolutely no clue of the complexity of what we're dealing with."
    - General Stan McChrystal, Commander, International Security Assistance Force and Commander, U.S. Forces Afghanistan, Special Address on Afghanistan to the International Institute for Strategic Studies, London, 01 October 2009

*****

When did it become permissible for a senior commander to publicly question policy considerations while they were in the process of being formed?

Given that other questions are being asked of General McChrystal and he's providing answers, that question is now being asked with increasing frequency. To buy into the argument (and it's an argument formed as a question - and an unsubtle message that the general should STFU and keep his nose out of the business of his betters) you first have to accept that he's asking questions rather than answering them.

Has the general crossed a line? I certainly don't know - that's a line for the president to draw; as with most of the president's thoughts on Afghanistan that's a detail he's chosen to keep to himself. But I do know that any military officer refusing or undermining the orders of his Commander in Chief (as opposed to indirectly challenging the political views of other Americans by commenting on operational aspects of war on his battlefield) will have crossed a line - and the president's response should be clear and swift. Until then, the political and military intersect (in fact there is nothing about the military that isn't within the sphere of the broader political), and few embody that intersection more than those of flag rank. This isn't new (though rapid, worldwide communication is - relatively speaking). Arguments against his public pronouncements have as much validity as those against Hillary Clinton's on Afghanistan, perhaps less (though both approach zero). They are grown ups working for (and at the convenience and by appointment of) the president with advice and consent of Congress. The president can correct their behavior if need be. He probably doesn't need guidance on that, although obviously there are those who feel he does.

Bruce Ackerman is among that group willing to step up and help our inexperienced president see the error of his ways. You have to scroll to the bottom of his Washington Post diatribe to discover who he is: The writer is a professor at Yale Law School. Perhaps his compulsion can be credited to more than just a desire to lend intellectual aid to an ill-prepared and stumbling Harvard man confronted with a brutish West Pointer.

Whatever his motive, he's very upset:

Unless McChrystal publicly recognizes that he has crossed the line, future generals will become even more aggressive in their efforts to browbeat presidents.

What line has the general crossed?

If the president wanted McChrystal's advice, he was perfectly free to ask him to accompany Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs, when the council held its first meeting on Afghanistan this week.

But Obama did not extend the invitation, even though McChrystal was leaving Kabul and could have gone to Washington easily. Instead, Obama asked the general to report to the council via a brief teleconference.

A bit of confusion there - if the president wanted his advice he'd ask for it, which, um, well, he did. But clearly the general has exceeded his authority...

situationroom.jpg
President Barack Obama holds a strategy review on Afghanistan in the Situation Room of the White House, Sept. 30, 2009. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

But they did meet for 25 minutes on Air Force One this week, too. Perhaps the president took some or all of that time to clarify the general's position for him. Perhaps not, perhaps there was no need.

af1meet1.jpg
President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama greet Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal and his wife, Annie, aboard Air Force One in Copenhagen, Denmark on Oct. 2, 2009. The President and Gen. McChrystal, the Commander of U.S. Forces in Afghanistan, then held a meeting on the plane before the President flew back to Washington, D.C. (Official White House photo by Pete Souza)

Professor Ackerman must have insight into the president's position on Afghanistan that the rest of us lack, given his degree of certainty that General McChrystal is some sort of boorish rogue agent interrupting conversations in which he has no part. But this accusation is becoming a talking point used by those who are apparently concerned that McChrystal's comments are a ploy to influence public sentiment and steer an insecure president's decision process on Afghanistan. Since most statements in opposition to the general's assessment come from "a senior official" or "an official" "in the administration" or "at the Pentagon" (or even a "person familiar with the discussion") the good professor probably sees a great degree of unfairness in a real (and qualified and influential) person explaining his position and claiming ownership of his recommendations. His bottom line: the general should STFU, the masses can make do with what information news reporters can get from anonymous sources and filter for their eighth-grade reading level consumption. They'll still form their opinions, those opinions will still have whatever influence the president assigns them, but at least they won't be contaminated by some uniformed thug bent on destroying... uh... something. Perhaps even something we hold dear.

Also missing from the vague accusations leveled at the general is some sort of motive for his behavior. No one has accused him of racism yet, but others imply that perhaps this man who spent so much of his career in the near-invisible special ops world now enjoys nothing so much as seeing his name in the paper. Since that's true of many folks who feel their opinions are wrongfully ignored it's easy enough to project. Besides that, it seems every couple of years some general turns up out of nowhere and is suddenly an instant expert. Who do these guys think they are? Other than that, those who accuse the general tend to leave motive to the reader's imagination.

But no one acts without a motive. So let's also consider that Professor Ackerman of Yale ("Bruce Ackerman is Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science at Yale, and the author of fifteen books that have had a broad influence in political philosophy, constitutional law, and public policy. His major works include Social Justice in the Liberal State and his multivolume constitutional history, We the People. His most recent books are The Failure of the Founding Fathers (2005) and Before the Next Attack (2006)." He's also a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and a Commander of the French Order of Merit...) is legitimately concerned about a constitutional crisis, an encroachment by the military into the sovereign territory of our duly elected or appointed civilian leaders - precisely the sort of thing that left unchecked begins the downhill slide to a coup and military dictatorship.

Now we're certainly approaching the deep end. Certainly we must all remain ever vigilant against such threats to good order, but before venturing too far into that territory something mentioned briefly earlier in this discussion bears a bit more consideration: "...the masses can make do with what information news reporters can get from anonymous sources and filter for their eighth-grade reading level consumption". Sadly, that's exactly what much of this discussion results from, and unfortunately even a Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science at Yale is vulnerable to stumbling into that trap.

Here's the trick (and newspapers do this all the time, in part on the assumption that readers will fall for it every time): take two people explaining all sides of an issue, quote only that part of each that makes it appear they're in opposition, and you've got a "juicy" story. The opposition may be real, but if nothing else the degree of that contention, or of either side's understanding of the position of the other (or the certainty of their own) must be ignored in the interest of portraying a brawl or smackdown that fans of professional wrestling can understand. Put that in writing (in addition to motive, leaving the audible grunts and visible sweat of the grudge-match contenders to the imagination) and you've got something that even a Yale Man can cheer (or jeer) from ringside.

At this point, for those interested in full quotes a good reading of (self-identified progressive) Spencer Ackerman's commentary and analysis is in order - and highly recommended. For those who appreciate insight from those a bit closer to the fire, here's a milbogger in Afghanistan who won't dissapoint. And for the rare few who might want to bypass all filters and read the general's remarks in their entirety, here they are. Should you prefer to view the proceedings, you can do so here.

*****

Hopefully at this point we're past the greatest part of foolishness in the argument (we aren't really - the world is full of wrestling fans) but before closing this discussion it's worth noting a final accusation from Professor Pain's cage match with General Disorder: "He emphasized that the president had "encouraged" him to be blunt when making his grim report on Afghanistan." The word report (or assessment) now appears to be inseparable from the adjective grim. (By the way, here's the report - you can decide for yourself whether that's the best possible one-word description.) The report (and the situation in Afghanistan) is grim, but suddenly there's another talking point bubbling up through the noise implying that this is deceptive. Nothing anyone would want to actually say, of course (at least not in a manner that their name or reputation could ever be connected to the comment), but like "the general is treasonous" the message is there.

What next? The general returns to the battlefield, of course - where other pressing issues will limit his time for The Press. Perhaps we'll hear little from him for a while - perhaps not:

To include his interview with 60 Minutes, taped before he submitted his assessment, General McChrystal has done a total of five press events in five weeks -- two of them not in English. In the same period, there have been nearly 100 requests for interviews with him from major U.S. and international media outlets. The general's "high-profile campaign on behalf of his assessment" is more the fever dream of political junkies in Washington than the reality of the current situation in Kabul.

That fever shows no sign of breaking just yet.


*****


af1meet2.jpg
President Barack Obama meets with Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the Commander of U.S. Forces in Afghanistan, aboard Air Force One in Copenhagen, Denmark on Oct. 2, 2009. (Official White House photo by Pete Souza)


*****


Update: SUNDAY! SUNDAY! SUNDAY! "Officials" push back - smack general with realistic metal folding chair!!!!

According to sources close to the administration, Gen McChrystal shocked and angered presidential advisers with the bluntness of a speech given in London last week.
<...>
An adviser to the administration said: "People aren't sure whether McChrystal is being naïve or an upstart. To my mind he doesn't seem ready for this Washington hard-ball and is just speaking his mind too plainly."
<...>
The remarks have been seen by some in the Obama administration as a barbed reference to the slow pace of debate within the White House.
<...>
A military expert said: "They still have working relationship but all in all it's not great for now."

Some commentators regarded the general's London comments as verging on insubordination.
<...>
White House aides have since briefed against the general's recommendations.
<...>
As a divide opened up between the military and the White House, senior military figures began criticising the White House for failing to tackle the issue more quickly.

The championship belt goes to whatever nameless, spineless, 98-pound weakling came up with this line: An adviser to the administration said: "People aren't sure whether McChrystal is being naïve or an upstart. To my mind he doesn't seem ready for this Washington hard-ball and is just speaking his mind too plainly."

*****

LATE UPDATE: Meanwhile, back in Afghanistan, Combat in Nuristan - U.S. Forces Afghanistan reports "eight ISAF and two ANSF service members" killed in action.

"Coalition forces' previously announced plans to depart the area as part of a broader realignment to protect larger population centers remain unchanged."

"Unchanged" also means "waiting for Washington" - and moving in slow motion. More here.


Bookmark and Share - via email, facebook, twitter, etc.

Posted by Greyhawk / October 3, 2009 2:45 PM | Permalink

1 TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://www.mudvillegazette.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/16769

Also missing from the vague accusations leveled at the general is some sort of motive for his behavior. No one has accused him of racism yet...Here's why I said "yet":The army is also "in a war against the White House -- and they feel they have [Presid... Read More

16 Comments

Prof. Ackerman is full of it- ever since there has been a military, there have been commanders who "request" leadership, a mission statement, or at least a little guidance - the Civil War is rife with Generals who questioned Lincoln, indeed took the President to task over their part in the war.
It is not unusual, Indeed it would be more unusual, if a General, faced with the myriad challenges that Gen. McChrystal has to deal with, if he did not ask for clarification from his Commander in Chief.
The fact that the CINC has given him such short shrift is more indicative of the state of mind of a person who is disengaged from the realities of the military situation, and unfortunately does not know or care that their lack of rapport is affecting real world, life and death decisions.
Pity.

I thought the exchange between Dr. Bernard Finel, on his blog, and Spencer Ackerman, on *his* blog, was interesting. I tend to side with Spencer Ackerman, who links to multiple other examples of, well, what you'd expect of people in D.C, I'd imagine, in or out of uniform.

I don't know much about this topic, to be honest, and what is appropriate, but I really don't see it as so very egregious. Your point about a new media enviroment is astute: in this day and age, when speeches can be so easily broadcast online, does that change the standard civ-mil dynamic? I don't know.

Why did he give the speech and was it out of line with what previous generals have done?

I guess I still don't see it. I am yet to be convinced that in such a rapacious media and political enviroment, the GEN crossed the line so unequivocally. I just don't see it.

What can the President do to McChrystal? Reassign him. But doesn't McChrystal have the option of retiring, if he thinks this President ordering him to lead a disaster? If the general hasn't been told to keep his mouth such, I as a citizen appreciate hearing his views. If Obama fires him, he'll show up on Fox News within a month anyway.

And if Bruce Ackerman doesn't like it, he can go suck an egg.

What's the job of a general if not to give honest assessments to the CINC? The main reason he's making statements is that the President hasn't seen fit to meet with him and seek his advice, or am I wrong?

All good theatre.

As Iraq draws down we will have the troops to end the holding action in Afghanistan.

"Social Justice in the Liberal State"

What I dislike most about Ivy-league Law Professors is they are arrogant tyrants with idiotic degrees.


All the Liberal State has ever achieved through Social Justice is to abort the body of Christ in the Catholic Church; I do not want the Professor's Liberal State of Roman Polanskis anywhere near me

"The situation is serious, and I choose that word very carefully. I would add that neither success nor failure for our endeavour in support of the Afghan people and government can be taken for granted. My assessment and my best military judgment is that the situation is, in some ways, deteriorating, but not in all ways." GEN McChrystal

Okay, I've now listened to the address (having trouble with the Q&A), but, uh, that is the most plain vanilla speech (no offense to the General, I just mean it doesn't seem very political to me).

Seriously, it's exactly the sort of plain vanilla speech you'd expect a COIN-oriented General to give, particularly given the fact that this General was HAND-PICKED by the administration because he 'got it', and the other guy supposedly didn't.

Another thought occurred to me: the beginning and end remarks touched on the sacrifices of British soldiers. In a coalition, is such a speech so egregious? Do our coalition partners expect an American General to address them from time to time? Even if GEN McChrystal did go a little far, I think the situation is so complicated that the more fervid accusations thrown at him are completely unfair. It is a difficult and complicated situation. Anything he says could be politicized. If he said absolutely nothing, the accusation would be that he is being pressured to change his best military advice, or something. Well, I'm just spinning as a political animal. Anything these generals say, even if they say 'no comment', will be politicized.

In fact, if they say "no comment" we have what we had within hours of the leak of his report - others claiming on his behalf that he's ready to resign if he doesn't get his way.

With friends like that, as they say.

Here is Bruce

Oh look. He's writing for The American Prospect, the ultra-left neo-treasonous publication that people like William Ayers love.

Mutt. Uncovered.

To me as far as I can see, this could only mean one of two things

1.McChrystal wants Obama's attention. It seems Obama spoke with him ONCE before his meeting with him on AF1 - Obama has already spent more time talking to talk show hosts like Letterman and Leno. Not to mention that he is actually more concerned about public heath insurance and pushing forward cap and trade.

2.He is trying to make clear what the best strategy is going forward, no matter what the Commander in Chief decides - this seems to stem from what I perceive as McChrystal's lack of faith in Obama's commitment to winning the war.

the General sees that the situation as grave and that a wakeup call is needed to salvage the region and the war efforts so far.

Of course i may be imagining too much as well.But i think McChrystal is clearly concerned that he is not going to get the support that he thinks that he needs.

Lets be clear ... If the General were recommending we run away from Afghanistan the Ackerman article would never have been written ... end of story ...

Obama has not stated a public opinion about it one way or the other recently and all of his past pronouncements have been to fight to the bitter end ...

Sounds to me like the General was simply backing up his CINC's public stance with his own professional opinion ...

The military is under the direction and command of the civilian government ... the one thing that Obama better be very careful about is ordering military personnel to cease exercising their 1st amendment rights ... he can try it and they may follow his order but its not lawful and everyone knows it, including Ackerman ...

"If the General were recommending we run away from Afghanistan the Ackerman article would never have been written..."

By Ackerman. Ralph Peters would have been all over it, though.

Did Obama speak to McChrystal or did he LISTEN to him? On a war that's going south, Obama spends twenty-five (25) minutes with the general in command. Twenty-five minutes, after he spent weeks and hours shilling for Chicago with his boys Daley, et al. Yet, the Afghanistan war in which U.S. military is facing the fire, he can hardly find time to talk to McChrystal. Twenty-five minutes since August.

In spite of inheriting a winning hand in Iraq and Afghanistan, Obama has no intention of winning. He stated emphatically that “victory isn’t necessarily the United States’ goal”.
He blows off the external threats from Iran and Pakistan and is pathetically indecisive.
This war is not to nation build Afghanistan, but to destroy our sworn enemies where ever they hide.
Afghanistan has several religious sects and a host of different ethnic, linguistic, and tribal groups.
They are territorial and don’t like outsiders. And unfortunately, Hamid Karzai’s corrupt government is not fulfilling expectations.
President Punchdrunk is in way over his head. He has no idea how to manage the business of fighting the nations wars. To cut and run would give Islamofascists the ‘hope and change’ they’re looking for, and pave the way for a global resurgence in mass terrorism.
This narcissistic buffoon would rather dismiss the advice of a seasoned military commander than admit he has no fucking strategy.
The solution to this is to commit as many troops as necessary, give them the go ahead to go into Waziristan and Pakistan to hunt down and kill as many Taliban as possible. Fly Predator missions. Use MOABs and MLRS. Dedicate this country to winning this war and sending the message that America will not run from its enemies. Muslim fanatic fucksticks started this war, we will finish it.
If Obama has one iota of decency, he’ll get the hell out of the way and let the Army do its job.
My guess is that he doesn’t.

My take is that Gen. McChrystal is doing everything he can to complete the mission and not sacrifice our soldiers needlessly. This includes public comments to focus attention on the need to fish or cut bait in Afganistan. Having lived through the Vietnam debacle, the current situation has all the earmarks of another Democrat clusterf*ck where they dither while our guys and gals are in harm's way with no commitment to victory.

For Obama, Afganistan was always only a political issue to bash Bush. He is now trimming while trying to figure out how far he has to go to appease his base.

After Vietnam, it became clear that generals who 'shut up and soldiered,' or worse, echoed the party line, were blamed for failures not of their doing. It would not be surprising that a general might prefer being fired to having his judgment and honor compromised. If the President can't stand a public discussion of our options, then he should replace all of his high ranking officers with yes-men and have done with it. Nothing prevents McChrystal, or Petraeus, for that matter, from retiring and running for office. In fact, if they were to shut up and lose, then I expect that such action would terminate any political career which either might want. Could that be the idea?

When Clark was head of NATO, I shivered with his pronouncements and his general incompetency until Clinton fired him.

I get the same shiver, not with McCrystal, but with Obama. Unfortunately, "We The People" have to wait until 2012 to fire Obama.

Excellent post Greyhawk. Just damn excellent!

Leave a comment

Mrs G copy.png

February 3, 2010


Dawn Patrol 02/03/2010
[Mrs Greyhawk]
Bookmark and Share - via email, facebook, twitter, etc.

Welcome to the Dawn Patrol, our daily roundup of information on the War on Terror and other topics - from the MilBlogs and various sources around the world. If you're a blogger, you can join the conversation. If you link to any of these stories, add a link to the Dawn Patrol too and your trackback will be added to the list. Hat Tips to the Dawn Patrol are greatly appreciated.Refresh for updates.



Support Our Troops, Read Their Stories

----------------------------


AFGHANISTAN/PAKISTAN

Pentagon Behind Obama Schedule for Deploying Troops to Afghanistan -- [FOX]
The Pentagon expects to deploy 18,000 of the 30,000 troops called up to Afghanistan by late spring, a slower pace than the White House envisioned, but necessary, say Pentagon officials, because President Obama did not want to shorten troops' rest time at home.

Mullen: Afghanistan success window small -- [Washington Times]
U.S. 'imperiled' if war not won, Joint Chiefs chairman warns
The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said Tuesday the next 12 to 18 months will be critical in reversing momentum gained by insurgents in Afghanistan, with nothing short of the war-torn nation's security at stake.
Not only that, Adm. Mike Mullen told the Senate Armed Services Committee: "Our future security is greatly imperiled if we do not win the wars we are in."

US Marines facing a 'different war' in Afghanistan -- [AFP]
For the US Marines deployed to the battlefields of southern Afghanistan, life is fragile and thoughts focus on the day they see their families again, but something about this war is different. They are preparing for an offensive on Marjah, one of the Taliban's big urban strongholds in the southern province of Helmand, but progress is slow with the militants apparently preferring fight to flight.
The Marines will soon be joined by tens of thousands more soldiers, the lion's share of the 30,000-strong troop surge promised by US President Barack Obama in December to try and turn around the grinding Afghan war.

Predators pound terrorist camp in North Waziristan -- [Long War Journal - Bill Roggio]
A swarm of unmanned US aircraft pounded an al Qaeda camp today in the Taliban-controlled tribal agency of North Waziristan.
Five unmanned US strike aircraft, likely the Predators and Reapers, are reported to have fired 18 missiles at a camp and vehicles in the village of Datta Khel, a known al Qaeda and Taliban stronghold. This is the largest recorded US airstrike in Pakistan, indicating a top al Qaeda, Taliban, or Haqqani Network leader, or leaders, may have been present.

Eyes in the Sky -- [Army Live]
Being a Soldier in the United States Army is a full-time job. No one understands that more than the Soldiers assigned to the 3rd Heavy Brigade Combat Team, 3rd Infantry Division's unmanned aerial vehicle cell. Twenty-four hours a day they monitor the 3rd HBCT's area of operation from above. "We are always on the lookout for the bad guys," said Staff Sgt. Ray Lemlin, a platoon sergeant in Company A, Brigade Special Troops Battalion. "The goal is always to spot them before they can hurt us."

Revenge on the Taliban, from 10,000 feet -- [Washington Post]
In their joint operations against Taliban militants hiding in the tribal areas, the United States and Pakistan seem to have embraced a classic bit of battlefield advice: Don't get mad, get even.
...Although Pakistan publicly criticizes the drone attacks, the administration official stressed that the recent campaign "is being done in full concert and cooperation" with the Pakistani government. "We've been very pleased with the extent of the cooperation," the official said, adding that the so-called box of geographical coordinates within which the Pakistanis allow the Predators to operate was wide enough to allow attacks on targets that are "geographically dispersed."

Pakistan blast kills US soldiers (Video) -- [BBC]
Three US soldiers are among at least 10 people killed when a blast hit a convoy near a school in north-west Pakistan. Police said around 70 people, including 63 school girls and a US soldier, were injured in the bombing in Lower Dir.
The soldiers were believed to have been training Pakistan's Frontier Corps in counter-insurgency operations.
The two governments deny substantial numbers of US troops are based inside Pakistan, where public opinion is strongly opposed to their presence.

3 G.I.s Killed in Pakistan. Now Can We Start Treating This Like a Real War? -- [Danger Room - Noah Shachtman]
Last year, President Obama and his administration ruled out sending U.S. ground forces into Pakistan. Instead, the White House said, America's clandestine operations there would be waged solely by remote-control -- with Predator and Reaper drones. "There is a red line," said special envoy Richard Holbrooke. "And the red line is unambiguous and stated publicly by the Pakistani government over and over again: No foreign troops on our soil." Yet today, three U.S. soldiers were killed and two more were wounded

Never take it for granted -- [One Marine's View - in Afghanistan]
When we lose a warrior, a part of you goes with them....
...From the smiles of children walking down a street of a recently liberated village to the compassion of our young Marines that tend to those same children after recently slugging it out with the enemy, I often ask "Where do we get such men?" Such men that will sacrifice themselves to protect others they have never met? To demonstrate a nearly inconceivable wrath of weaponry onto the enemy and in a split second later help a young child or elderly man out of the street, sometimes even before the battle is over?
He is a Marine and willing to sacrifice everything to make something bad better off and make a difference. They will not be forgotten.

It's the Economy, Undergraduate -- [At War]
What do they think of all this back there, in your world?
I knew what answer he expected because of the surprise that registers on such soldiers' faces when I offer a different one. He expected that in my world of left-leaning professors and privileged students, the war he and his unit were waging would be viewed with scorn or disgust, and maybe that he and his profession would be, too.
That wasn't the case, I told him. From his expression, what I told him was worse: that in my world (if it really is my world, but that's another question) most students -- young people who are his peers, at least in terms of age and video games and music -- rarely spare his war more than a passing thought.

Around ANA Land -- -- [Afghanistan My Last Tour - in Afghanistan]
One of my stops today was the proposed site for the new library and literacy program. The ANA Garrison commander has designated some room space inside a large building to accommodate these programs. The current library is compressed into a small room and the shelves are sparsely stocked. There are 99 books for the entire library.

Dari Keyboard -- [Afghanistan My Last Tour - in Afghanistan]
For the past few days, I have been working studiously with my ANA counterpart on accountability. The tool I'm using is an Excel Spreadsheet. For anyone who has basic knowledge of computers and programs, this program is fairly easy to use once the formulas are created. Then it's just a matter of populating the data points. But for someone who only has a rudimentary knowledge of computers and a high school degree (Afghanistan level), it becomes rather challenging to explain basic algebra, formulas, etc. As such, I have finally made headway and when my counterpart does understand, it's like a bright light comes on in his head. For me, it's just another small victory in mentoring.

Taking Tea with the Taliban -- [Commentary Mag - Michael Rubin]
Addressing the nation on December 1, 2009, President Barack Obama laid out the case for an augmented American presence in Afghanistan to battle the Taliban forces seeking to push their way back into power. "Over the last several years, the Taliban has maintained common cause with al-Qaeda, as they both seek an overthrow of the Afghan government," he declared. The president offered a brief account of the Taliban's rise to power before the U.S. tossed them out in November 2001. "Al-Qaeda's base of operations was in Afghanistan," he said, "where they were harbored by the Taliban--a ruthless, repressive, and radical movement that seized control of that country after it was ravaged by years of Soviet occupation and civil war, and after the attention of America and our friends had turned elsewhere."

New Afghan police officers graduate -- [Helmand Blog]
The first class of Afghan police officers to attend a new training centre graduated in a ceremony in Helmand yesterday.
More than 130 recruits of the Interim Helmand Police Training Centre attended the event in the Lashkar Gah district. The centre was set up last month to help with the recruitment push for 160,000 police officers across Afghanistan by the end of this year. From March, the centre is expected to train 2550 students a year.
Helmand deputy governor Sattar Marzakwal told the graduates: "You have the responsibility of serving the Afghan people with dignity.

U.S. military officers could face punishment over ambush in Afghanistan -- [Washington Post]
A military investigation into an ambush that left nine Americans dead recommends that the Army consider taking disciplinary action against three U.S. commanders who oversaw the 2008 mission to send troops to the remote Afghan outpost, defense officials said Tuesday.

Afghans protest to Iran over border killings -- [Reuters]
Afghanistan protested on Tuesday against what it said was the killing of five of its nationals by Iranian border forces. Host to millions of Afghan refugees for decades, Iran is also a key transit route for Afghanistan's opium and heroin trade.
The incident happened on Monday when a group of seven Afghans were trying to enter Iran, an Afghan foreign ministry official said, adding all were teenage males.


IRAQ

Bomb kills 20 in Iraqi Shi'ite city of Kerbala -- [Reuters]
A bomb on a cart pulled by a motorcycle killed at least 20 in a crowd of Shi'ite pilgrims on Wednesday in Iraq's holy city of Kerbala where hundreds of thousands have gathered for a religious rite, police said.

Obama, Biden meet with Iraqi VP -- [AFP]
President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden met Monday with Iraq's Sunni Vice President, Tariq al-Hashimi, and discussed the importance

Iraq court lifts ban on hundreds of candidates‎ -- [Atlanta Journal Constitution]
An Iraqi appeals court Wednesday struck down a ban imposed on hundreds of candidates for suspected ties to Saddam

Blair Called a Liar in Iraq Inquiry -- [NY Times]
Only days after Tony Blair offered an impassioned defense of his decision to take Britain to war in Iraq, a cabinet minister who resigned over the war delivered a blistering condemnation of the former prime minister on Tuesday, accusing him of "conning" her and of deceiving his cabinet, the Parliament and the public in his resolve to have Britain join the United States in the invasion of 2003.


U.S. AND OTHER PARTS OF THE WORLD

Multiple Air Force crews, Landstuhl staff team up to save Peace Corps member injured in Kazakhstan -- [Soldiers' Angels Germany ]
What an amzing story. We all hear so many negative things that it's sometimes easy to forget how many wonderful, dedicated people there are in this world. And when multiple teams across Central Asia, Europe, and the US come together save a life, they can make miracles happen.

Iran hints at prisoner swap for 3 U.S. hikers -- [Washington Times]
President signals shift on uranium
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Tuesday proposed a swap of Iranians in U.S. prisons for three American hikers being held in Tehran.
In a television interview, Mr. Ahmadinejad also said Iran was ready to send its uranium abroad for further enrichment as requested by the United Nations, signaling a major shift in the Iranian position on the issue.

US Denies Speaking to Iran About Prisoner Swap -- [Voice of America]
The United States has denied speaking to Iran about a prisoner exchange after Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Tehran has held discussions about such a swap.

Ahmadinejad backs deal to remove bulk of enriched uranium from Iran -- [Washington Post]
A long-dormant proposal to remove the bulk of Iran's enriched uranium from the Islamic republic appeared to be revived Tuesday as President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Iran had "no problem" with a deal initially brokered by the International Atomic Energy Agency.
The deal, which Iran formally rejected weeks ago, would swap low-enriched uranium for fuel for a research reactor that produces medical isotopes. "If we allow them to take it, there is no problem,"

US wary as Iran president agrees nuclear deal terms -- [BBC]
The US has reacted warily after Iran appeared to accept a deal to swap enriched uranium for nuclear fuel.

Emergency Assistance Still Hasn't Reached Many Haitians -- [Washington Post]
Three weeks after a powerful earthquake destroyed Haiti's capital, aid officials are still seeking to reach hundreds of thousands of desperate people who apparently have not received food and shelter from an expanding international aid operation, U.S. officials said Tuesday.

China's threat to sanction US firms in arms sale could backfire -- [Los Angeles Times]
In Washington, a White House spokesman said it would "not be warranted" for China to slap sanctions on the US companies over the Obama administration's

Corrected: Obama to meet Dalai Lama despite Chinese warnings -- [Reuters]
He offered no details on how China would impose sanctions. Companies that could be affected by Chinese sanctions include Sikorsky Aircraft Corp,


WAR ON TERROR /TERRORISM

Panetta: Terror Attack in US Likely Soon -- [Military.com/AP]
Al-Qaida can be expected to attempt an attack on the United States in the next three to six months, senior U.S. intelligence officials told Congress.
The terrorist organization is deploying operatives to the United States to carry out new attacks from inside the country, including "clean" recruits with a negligible trail of terrorist contacts, CIA Director Leon Panetta said. The chilling warning comes as Christmas airline attack suspect, Nigerian Umar Farouk Abdulmutullab, is cooperating with federal investigators, a federal law enforcement official said Tuesday.

Would-be LAX terrorist's prison sentence overturned as too lenient -- [Los Angeles Times]
A divided appeals panel rules that the 22-year sentence for an Al Qaeda operative didn't follow guidelines. He had originally agreed to cooperate with authorities for a lighter sentence but reneged.

Bill Would Forbid Civilian 9/11 Trials -- [Military.com/Atlanta Journal-Constitution]
Saying America can't afford the costs or the threat to national security, U.S. Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.) and a bipartisan group of other senators introduced legislation Tuesday that would forbid public funding for a civilian trial of those accused of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
Instead, the senators want the government to try Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, alleged to be the Sept. 11 mastermind, and other terror suspects in a military courtroom at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

DOJ's New Tool Against Criticism: New Media -- [FOX]
Facing mounting pressure from both Democrats and Republicans over its handling of recent terrorism cases, the Justice Department is taking unprecedented steps to push back against critics.
Last night the Justice Department unveiled an entire web page -- titled "The Criminal Justice System as a Counterterrorism Tool" -- to address the growing debate.
One DOJ official described the new web page as an effort "to get the facts out there" and show that "the policy for handling these terrorism cases has not changed" from the way previous administrations handled such cases.

Brennan: All Transferred Detainees Who Returned to Terrorism Were Released by Bush, No Recidivism for Those Released by Obama -- [ABC News]
n a letter to congressional leaders sent Monday night, White House adviser John Brennan, the assistant to President Obama for homeland security and counterterrorism, argued that President Obama had made "significant improvements to the detainee review process" under President Bush and pointed out that all the former detainees released or transferred who have returned to terrorist activities were released or transferred under President Bush.

Is there an adult in there somewhere? Bueller? Bueller? -- [The Armorer]
It sure doesn't look like it.CNN's Steve Brusk tweets: "Law enforcement source says AbdulMutallah has been providing useful, current, and actionable intelligence. Leads being actively chased."Heh. This is smoke and mirrors, pure and simple.Let's take it at face value.It's been a month since AbdulMutallah proved himself an inept murderer-by-suicide. Hell, he's not even as successful as Achmed the Dead Terrorist.

MI5 hunting breast implants of death -- [WND]
Authorities alarmed by possibility of surgically placed bombs
Agents for Britain's MI5 intelligence service have discovered that Muslim doctors trained at some of Britain's leading teaching hospitals have returned to their own countries to fit surgical implants filled with explosives, according to a report from Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin. Women suicide bombers recruited by al-Qaida are known to have had the explosives inserted in their breasts under techniques similar to breast enhancing surgery.


SUPPORTING THE TROOPS...OR NOT

Impact of deployment on kids -- negative reporting and troop bashing hurts them too -- [You Served]
I highlighted the area in bold text below that needs a LOT of attention brought to the matter. Negative reporting on the war, and the lack of support of the war and our troops affects the morale of everyone -- including our military children. I am so sick and tired of the BS line "we support our troops but not the war." It's not true. It's contradictory and this report here shows how that very attitude is not only unsupportive, but it is outright harmful to the children of our deployed troops.
I am going to print out a copy of the actual report and will write up some more.

Interview with Lorrie Nichols of The Journal of An Army Wife -- [Army Wives Lives]
Lorrie Nichols, who blogs at The Journal of an Army Wife, answered our questions about her life as an Army Wife
...Tell us a little bit about your military spouse journey.
Mike is in the Army National Guard. He hasn't been deployed, yet. He served in the Air Guard for six years, then spent several years as a civilian, and joined the Army Guard last October. We have been married for 2 1/2 years, but I have only been a military spouse for about 4 months.
What are the challenges of being a military spouse?
Military time doesn't necessarily coincide with real world time.

The Predictably Unpredictable Army Strikes Again.... -- [SpouseBuzz - Andi]
My husband has been TDY on many, many occasions throughout our marriage. I wish now that I had kept track of it because I don't know if my guesstimate of 3-4 years is on target. As for non-TDY, more permanent deployment bye-byes, we've had two. One for a year and one for seven months. Both times, we had ample warning. Both times we knew approximately when he was leaving. Both times, the house became cluttered for weeks with gear that would accompany my husband to his destination. On both occasions, I had time to process what was happening, and prepare for it.
A couple of weeks ago, my husband came home late at night, quickly packed, and was gone the next morning. It was so odd.
There was no warning. No time frame to process. No time to prepare, physically or emotionally.

They Ache -- [SpouseBuzz - Sarah]
This deployment has flown by for me because I've been distracted with my pregnancy. It's a major event that keeps my mind off missing my husband. When I do think of him, they've been self-centered or baby-centered thoughts: I wish he were here to feel the baby kick, or fetch me a glass of water, or discuss middle names in person. I've also tried to come up with some silver linings for why it's better that I've been alone all this time. And I have contingency plans in case my husband doesn't make it home in time;

Military OneSource Tax Filing Services -- [Military OneSource]
Military OneSource brings you H&R Block At Home® (formerly TaxCut) online tax filing through the Military OneSource Web site and telephonic tax consultations by calling our tax hotline at 1-800-730-3802. Prepare your 2009 state and federal taxes with this easy-to-use program. Provided by the Department of Defense, H&R Block At Home® is and free to active duty, National Guard, and Reserve service members and their families. Have questions? See our FAQs.
Tax consultants are available 7 days a week from 7 am - 11 pm ET by calling the Military OneSource Tax Hotline at 1-800-730-3802.
Please Note - You must use the link on the Military OneSource Web site to access our customized product and create your account. Do not go to the public H&R Block Web site to create a user account.

Wounded Warrior returns to West Point as WTU Commander -- [Soldiers' Angels Germany]
Capt. Scott M. Smiley is a Soldier, infantryman, Airborne Ranger, combat diver, mountain climber, skier, tri-athlete, surfer, husband, father, and now Company Commander of West Point's Warrior Transition Unit.
He's also blind.


MILITARY

Law barring lies about military medals faces test -- [Washington Post]
A federal law against lying about military medals is facing First Amendment challenges in Colorado and California. Lawyers in both cases have made similar arguments against the Stolen Valor Act, saying that lying is protected by the First Amendment unless it does real harm.

Why Stolen Valor doesn't violate 1st Amendment -- [This Ain't Hell...]
Last month I wrote about the Denver Post going squishy on Richard Strandlof's impending trial for a violation of the Stolen Valor Act. The Post wrote that convicting him would violate his 1st Amendment right to free speech. Well, apparently, there's some case law that says otherwise.
In 2008, Xavier Alvarez, while running for office on his local water board made the following statement on the campaign trail

Air Force Academy creates worship area for pagans, Druids -- [USA Today]‎
The Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs is establishing a worship area for followers of Earth-centered religions -- Wiccans, Druids, witches, pagans -- on a hill overlooking the campus, the USAFA says.

The Wiccan Cross -- [Greyhawk]
How would you complete the following sentence?
"Leaving a cross at a Wiccan* assembly area on a college campus is the equivalent of ____." (Consider the "blank" to be as long as you need.)
Why, the person who did this must be a ______.
Did you say "anonymous Christian supremacist"? Me neither.
Know why? Because first be not stupid is a good motto. At least that's what I always say.




WELCOME HOME



Arrival at Home- Final Post
-- [Doc H - home from Afghanistan]
I have been home for a few days now. Tricia and the kids met me at the airport around midnight. It was a joyous reunion that was just a little overdue. Amazingly the kids went to school and continued their activities the next day. There was a nice banner on display in the house welcoming me back home. Our trip to home was even more circuitous as time went by. Due to a heavy snowstorm in Baltimore, our transatlantic flight diverted to JFK airport in New York. We had a night in a hotel nearby and completed our journey to Baltimore the next day

Shorn -- [OPFOR - Lt Col P - heading home from Afghanistan]
am I of two constant companions since mid-August of last year-- my 9mm and my M4. I turned both in today, duly cleaned (and with a small net gain of ammo, to boot). I feel oddly under-dressed without them. I also removed the tourniquet and IBD that had been in my sleeve pockets for six months. Again, it doesn't feel quite right not to have them on board.
In about 24 hours or so I'll be airborne (!) back to the States, and this whole thing will be nearly done. That is the strangest feeling of them all.




THE MEDIA/SOCIAL MEDIA

If Not Now, When?: Duty and Sacrifice in America's Time of Need Wins 2010 Colby Award -- [PR Newswire]
(Chicago, Illinois, February 3, 2010) The military memoir by Medal of Honor recipient Colonel Jack Jacobs, USA (Ret.) has won the 2010 Colby Award.
Named for the late Ambassador and former CIA Director William E. Colby, the Colby Award recognizes a first work of fiction or non-fiction that has made a significant contribution to the public's understanding of intelligence operations, military history, or international affairs. The $5,000 award will be presented by Tawani Foundation in association with the Pritzker Military Library ...

CSI: Miami - Promoting the Good in Iraq -- [A Soldier's Perspective]
Many of us have seen the MSM misrepresent or not even report the good things that our military is doing in Iraq. We see TV shows and movies on the big and small screen that stand on either side of the issue. Some are very elaborate and in your face while others are more subtle. The latter was the case in last nights episode of CSI: Miami.
I don't always watch the show, sometimes I watch "Castle", so I didn't know that Cain's son had enlisted in the Army and been sent to Iraq. At the end of the episode they showed Cain signing into a video conference on his computer. The picture we see on the computer screen is Cain's son, in battle fatigues and in Iraq. There are the usual parent/child pleasantries and concerns passed from one to another. They could have ended the scene with that, but they didn't. They go on to have Cain's son talk about rebuilding the schools and how happy the kids are to have them.

Jeremy Renner nominated for best actor in 'The Hurt Locker'
"The Hurt Locker" honored with 9 Academy Award Nominations, including Best Picture
Cast includes TAPS mentor Brian Geraghty, Film depicts military's unsung heroes
Jeremy Renner nominated for best actor in 'The Hurt Locker'

'The Hurt Locker' may rewrite script on Iraq war movies -- [NY Daily News]
..."Maybe the winds have shifted, and people are willing to think about the war in cinematic terms," says Mark Boal, who was embedded in Iraq in '04 as a freelance journalist and is now nominated for a Best Original Screenplay Oscar for "Locker."
"'Hurt Locker' works as a magnifying glass on Iraq," says Boal, "but there's also a purely experiential level to it. Even for me, as a regular popcorn-buying member of the public, it's more than a war film."

Charlie Brooker - How To Report The News



POLITICS

Seeking balance: the 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review -- [Foreign Policy Review]
he Defense Department today released the 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review, its Congressionally-mandated examination of defense programs and plans. The review is the latest milestone in Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates's campaign to focus the Defense Department on the need to win today's wars. As such, it is to be applauded. However, in concentrating on that goal, it too often shortchanges other challenges.
In its language, the 2010 QDR has clearly been Obamacized. It reads more like a corporate annual report than a strategy to guide the world's most powerful military, one that has been at war for most of the last decade. One is at pains, for example, to find in the document's 105 pages the word "win" (as in, "win the war in Afghanistan").

Don't ask Don't Tell -- [Greyhawk]
Gates and Mullen testify before the Senate Armed Services Committee, livestream:
Gates' prepared statement for the committee here.
That last line bears particular note - it's the often-ignored but fundamental and key truth at the heart of the issue - and it can't be repeated enough. "The ultimate decision rests with you, the Congress." That's not a decision Congress welcomes with open arms - and that reluctance presents a great illustration of one difference between power and responsibility - words that represent concepts that have meaning. Those concepts combined are such an enormous burden that the typical member of Congress can bear only one.

The Case Against Gays in the Military -- [Wall Street Journal]
Open homosexuality would threaten unit cohesion and military effectiveness. -- As expected, President Obama pledged during his State of the Union address to "work with Congress and our military to finally repeal the law that denies gay Americans

Credit Where Credit is Due -- [BlackFive - Grim]
I know that we frequently have some philosophical disputes with the Obama administration here. Still, once in a while, it's a good idea to step back and point out the things they have gotten right.

Marine Ilario Pantano for Congress! -- [BlackFive]
We've followed the trials and tribulations of USMC First Lieutenant Ilario Pantano for awhile here on BlackFive. We've supported him since the beginning (and had to fight some of our own to do so), and, now, Ilario is running for Congress in the Congressional District NC-7. The 7th District has not had a Republican since March 3, 1871!
Pantano and his family live in North Carolina where, since 2006, he continues to serve his community as a Deputy Sheriff.


HUMOR / SATIRE

'Gays Too Precious To Risk In Combat,' Says General -- [The Onion]

Day By Day



(Need more? Dawn Patrols Archives are here.)



, , , , , , , ,




Posted 1:24 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0)


Bookmark and Share - via email, facebook, twitter, etc.

TMGbloglabel7copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
MBC2010.jpg
TMGrecentcomments.gif
  • GM Roper: When Clark was head of NATO, I shivered with his read more
  • wGraves: After Vietnam, it became clear that generals who 'shut up read more
  • Jack Okie: My take is that Gen. McChrystal is doing everything he read more
  • SFC MAC: In spite of inheriting a winning hand in Iraq and read more
  • apodoca: Did Obama speak to McChrystal or did he LISTEN to read more
  • Ol Sarge: "If the General were recommending we run away from Afghanistan read more
  • Jeff Carlson: Lets be clear ... If the General were recommending we read more
  • Nagarajan Sivakumar: To me as far as I can see, this could read more
  • Paul A'Barge: Here is Bruce Oh look. He's writing for The American read more
  • Greyhawk: In fact, if they say "no comment" we have what read more

6a00d83487393d53ef010536defce7970b-800wi.png

MilBlog Conference Sponsors

GA_150x253_milblog.jpg

onesource logo.bmp

BAE_BannerAd_MilBlog_0309.jpg

MILBLOGS NEWS

*****

Latest Posts From MilBlogs

*****

milblogsa1.jpg Prev | List | Random | Next
Join
Powered by RingSurf!
TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Dawn Patrol Feeds

 

Add to Google Reader or Homepage Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to netvibes Add to Plusmo myaol_cta1.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

TMGbloglabel8copy.gif

TMGbloglabel9 copy.gif
Blah Blah Blah
me220.JPG

The Mudville Gazette is written and produced by Greyhawk. Unless otherwise credited, the opinions expressed are those of the author, and nothing here is to be taken as representing the official position of or endorsement by the United States Department of Defense or any of its subordinate components. Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house.

I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email.

Original content copyright © 2003 - 2009 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed.

Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com

andsm.jpg