The reader will kindly forgive any tendency to rough language or behavior on the part of the site owner...
TMGlogo2006-2007phs-copy.jpg
"Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
TMGbloglabel1 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel3 copy.gif
TMGbloglabel10 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette Feeds

 

Add to Technorati Favorites
Technorati Profile
add.gif
Add to Google
addtomyyahoo4.gif
ngsub1.gif sub_modern5.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

digg.jpg

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

pl-news.gif

tvc_logo_small.png

Mrsg- Greyhawk's Profile
Mrsg- Greyhawk's Facebook profile
Create Your Badge
TMGbloglabel5 copy.gif

gngrey120x60.gif

TMGbloglabel6 copy.gif
350.jpg
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by!
« On the radio | Main | Inside Special Forces »

October 3, 2009

greyhawk copy sm.png

Going grim

By Greyhawk

mcciiss.jpg"I arrived in Afghanistan in May 2002 and I have spent a part of every year since then involved in the effort. I have learned a tremendous amount about it and I will tell you, every day, I realize how little about Afghanistan I actually understand. I discount immediately anyone who simplifies the problem or offers a solution, or raises one finger and says 'this is what you gotta do', because they have absolutely no clue of the complexity of what we're dealing with."
    - General Stan McChrystal, Commander, International Security Assistance Force and Commander, U.S. Forces Afghanistan, Special Address on Afghanistan to the International Institute for Strategic Studies, London, 01 October 2009

*****

When did it become permissible for a senior commander to publicly question policy considerations while they were in the process of being formed?

Given that other questions are being asked of General McChrystal and he's providing answers, that question is now being asked with increasing frequency. To buy into the argument (and it's an argument formed as a question - and an unsubtle message that the general should STFU and keep his nose out of the business of his betters) you first have to accept that he's asking questions rather than answering them.

Has the general crossed a line? I certainly don't know - that's a line for the president to draw; as with most of the president's thoughts on Afghanistan that's a detail he's chosen to keep to himself. But I do know that any military officer refusing or undermining the orders of his Commander in Chief (as opposed to indirectly challenging the political views of other Americans by commenting on operational aspects of war on his battlefield) will have crossed a line - and the president's response should be clear and swift. Until then, the political and military intersect (in fact there is nothing about the military that isn't within the sphere of the broader political), and few embody that intersection more than those of flag rank. This isn't new (though rapid, worldwide communication is - relatively speaking). Arguments against his public pronouncements have as much validity as those against Hillary Clinton's on Afghanistan, perhaps less (though both approach zero). They are grown ups working for (and at the convenience and by appointment of) the president with advice and consent of Congress. The president can correct their behavior if need be. He probably doesn't need guidance on that, although obviously there are those who feel he does.

Bruce Ackerman is among that group willing to step up and help our inexperienced president see the error of his ways. You have to scroll to the bottom of his Washington Post diatribe to discover who he is: The writer is a professor at Yale Law School. Perhaps his compulsion can be credited to more than just a desire to lend intellectual aid to an ill-prepared and stumbling Harvard man confronted with a brutish West Pointer.

Whatever his motive, he's very upset:

Unless McChrystal publicly recognizes that he has crossed the line, future generals will become even more aggressive in their efforts to browbeat presidents.

What line has the general crossed?

If the president wanted McChrystal's advice, he was perfectly free to ask him to accompany Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs, when the council held its first meeting on Afghanistan this week.

But Obama did not extend the invitation, even though McChrystal was leaving Kabul and could have gone to Washington easily. Instead, Obama asked the general to report to the council via a brief teleconference.

A bit of confusion there - if the president wanted his advice he'd ask for it, which, um, well, he did. But clearly the general has exceeded his authority...

situationroom.jpg
President Barack Obama holds a strategy review on Afghanistan in the Situation Room of the White House, Sept. 30, 2009. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

But they did meet for 25 minutes on Air Force One this week, too. Perhaps the president took some or all of that time to clarify the general's position for him. Perhaps not, perhaps there was no need.

af1meet1.jpg
President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama greet Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal and his wife, Annie, aboard Air Force One in Copenhagen, Denmark on Oct. 2, 2009. The President and Gen. McChrystal, the Commander of U.S. Forces in Afghanistan, then held a meeting on the plane before the President flew back to Washington, D.C. (Official White House photo by Pete Souza)

Professor Ackerman must have insight into the president's position on Afghanistan that the rest of us lack, given his degree of certainty that General McChrystal is some sort of boorish rogue agent interrupting conversations in which he has no part. But this accusation is becoming a talking point used by those who are apparently concerned that McChrystal's comments are a ploy to influence public sentiment and steer an insecure president's decision process on Afghanistan. Since most statements in opposition to the general's assessment come from "a senior official" or "an official" "in the administration" or "at the Pentagon" (or even a "person familiar with the discussion") the good professor probably sees a great degree of unfairness in a real (and qualified and influential) person explaining his position and claiming ownership of his recommendations. His bottom line: the general should STFU, the masses can make do with what information news reporters can get from anonymous sources and filter for their eighth-grade reading level consumption. They'll still form their opinions, those opinions will still have whatever influence the president assigns them, but at least they won't be contaminated by some uniformed thug bent on destroying... uh... something. Perhaps even something we hold dear.

Also missing from the vague accusations leveled at the general is some sort of motive for his behavior. No one has accused him of racism yet, but others imply that perhaps this man who spent so much of his career in the near-invisible special ops world now enjoys nothing so much as seeing his name in the paper. Since that's true of many folks who feel their opinions are wrongfully ignored it's easy enough to project. Besides that, it seems every couple of years some general turns up out of nowhere and is suddenly an instant expert. Who do these guys think they are? Other than that, those who accuse the general tend to leave motive to the reader's imagination.

But no one acts without a motive. So let's also consider that Professor Ackerman of Yale ("Bruce Ackerman is Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science at Yale, and the author of fifteen books that have had a broad influence in political philosophy, constitutional law, and public policy. His major works include Social Justice in the Liberal State and his multivolume constitutional history, We the People. His most recent books are The Failure of the Founding Fathers (2005) and Before the Next Attack (2006)." He's also a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and a Commander of the French Order of Merit...) is legitimately concerned about a constitutional crisis, an encroachment by the military into the sovereign territory of our duly elected or appointed civilian leaders - precisely the sort of thing that left unchecked begins the downhill slide to a coup and military dictatorship.

Now we're certainly approaching the deep end. Certainly we must all remain ever vigilant against such threats to good order, but before venturing too far into that territory something mentioned briefly earlier in this discussion bears a bit more consideration: "...the masses can make do with what information news reporters can get from anonymous sources and filter for their eighth-grade reading level consumption". Sadly, that's exactly what much of this discussion results from, and unfortunately even a Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science at Yale is vulnerable to stumbling into that trap.

Here's the trick (and newspapers do this all the time, in part on the assumption that readers will fall for it every time): take two people explaining all sides of an issue, quote only that part of each that makes it appear they're in opposition, and you've got a "juicy" story. The opposition may be real, but if nothing else the degree of that contention, or of either side's understanding of the position of the other (or the certainty of their own) must be ignored in the interest of portraying a brawl or smackdown that fans of professional wrestling can understand. Put that in writing (in addition to motive, leaving the audible grunts and visible sweat of the grudge-match contenders to the imagination) and you've got something that even a Yale Man can cheer (or jeer) from ringside.

At this point, for those interested in full quotes a good reading of (self-identified progressive) Spencer Ackerman's commentary and analysis is in order - and highly recommended. For those who appreciate insight from those a bit closer to the fire, here's a milbogger in Afghanistan who won't dissapoint. And for the rare few who might want to bypass all filters and read the general's remarks in their entirety, here they are. Should you prefer to view the proceedings, you can do so here.

*****

Hopefully at this point we're past the greatest part of foolishness in the argument (we aren't really - the world is full of wrestling fans) but before closing this discussion it's worth noting a final accusation from Professor Pain's cage match with General Disorder: "He emphasized that the president had "encouraged" him to be blunt when making his grim report on Afghanistan." The word report (or assessment) now appears to be inseparable from the adjective grim. (By the way, here's the report - you can decide for yourself whether that's the best possible one-word description.) The report (and the situation in Afghanistan) is grim, but suddenly there's another talking point bubbling up through the noise implying that this is deceptive. Nothing anyone would want to actually say, of course (at least not in a manner that their name or reputation could ever be connected to the comment), but like "the general is treasonous" the message is there.

What next? The general returns to the battlefield, of course - where other pressing issues will limit his time for The Press. Perhaps we'll hear little from him for a while - perhaps not:

To include his interview with 60 Minutes, taped before he submitted his assessment, General McChrystal has done a total of five press events in five weeks -- two of them not in English. In the same period, there have been nearly 100 requests for interviews with him from major U.S. and international media outlets. The general's "high-profile campaign on behalf of his assessment" is more the fever dream of political junkies in Washington than the reality of the current situation in Kabul.

That fever shows no sign of breaking just yet.


*****


af1meet2.jpg
President Barack Obama meets with Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the Commander of U.S. Forces in Afghanistan, aboard Air Force One in Copenhagen, Denmark on Oct. 2, 2009. (Official White House photo by Pete Souza)


*****


Update: SUNDAY! SUNDAY! SUNDAY! "Officials" push back - smack general with realistic metal folding chair!!!!

According to sources close to the administration, Gen McChrystal shocked and angered presidential advisers with the bluntness of a speech given in London last week.
<...>
An adviser to the administration said: "People aren't sure whether McChrystal is being naïve or an upstart. To my mind he doesn't seem ready for this Washington hard-ball and is just speaking his mind too plainly."
<...>
The remarks have been seen by some in the Obama administration as a barbed reference to the slow pace of debate within the White House.
<...>
A military expert said: "They still have working relationship but all in all it's not great for now."

Some commentators regarded the general's London comments as verging on insubordination.
<...>
White House aides have since briefed against the general's recommendations.
<...>
As a divide opened up between the military and the White House, senior military figures began criticising the White House for failing to tackle the issue more quickly.

The championship belt goes to whatever nameless, spineless, 98-pound weakling came up with this line: An adviser to the administration said: "People aren't sure whether McChrystal is being naïve or an upstart. To my mind he doesn't seem ready for this Washington hard-ball and is just speaking his mind too plainly."

*****

LATE UPDATE: Meanwhile, back in Afghanistan, Combat in Nuristan - U.S. Forces Afghanistan reports "eight ISAF and two ANSF service members" killed in action.

"Coalition forces' previously announced plans to depart the area as part of a broader realignment to protect larger population centers remain unchanged."

"Unchanged" also means "waiting for Washington" - and moving in slow motion. More here.


Posted by Greyhawk / October 3, 2009 2:45 PM | Permalink

1 TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://www.mudvillegazette.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/16769

Also missing from the vague accusations leveled at the general is some sort of motive for his behavior. No one has accused him of racism yet...Here's why I said "yet":The army is also "in a war against the White House -- and they feel they have [Presid... Read More

17 Comments

Prof. Ackerman is full of it- ever since there has been a military, there have been commanders who "request" leadership, a mission statement, or at least a little guidance - the Civil War is rife with Generals who questioned Lincoln, indeed took the President to task over their part in the war.
It is not unusual, Indeed it would be more unusual, if a General, faced with the myriad challenges that Gen. McChrystal has to deal with, if he did not ask for clarification from his Commander in Chief.
The fact that the CINC has given him such short shrift is more indicative of the state of mind of a person who is disengaged from the realities of the military situation, and unfortunately does not know or care that their lack of rapport is affecting real world, life and death decisions.
Pity.

I thought the exchange between Dr. Bernard Finel, on his blog, and Spencer Ackerman, on *his* blog, was interesting. I tend to side with Spencer Ackerman, who links to multiple other examples of, well, what you'd expect of people in D.C, I'd imagine, in or out of uniform.

I don't know much about this topic, to be honest, and what is appropriate, but I really don't see it as so very egregious. Your point about a new media enviroment is astute: in this day and age, when speeches can be so easily broadcast online, does that change the standard civ-mil dynamic? I don't know.

Why did he give the speech and was it out of line with what previous generals have done?

I guess I still don't see it. I am yet to be convinced that in such a rapacious media and political enviroment, the GEN crossed the line so unequivocally. I just don't see it.

What can the President do to McChrystal? Reassign him. But doesn't McChrystal have the option of retiring, if he thinks this President ordering him to lead a disaster? If the general hasn't been told to keep his mouth such, I as a citizen appreciate hearing his views. If Obama fires him, he'll show up on Fox News within a month anyway.

And if Bruce Ackerman doesn't like it, he can go suck an egg.

What's the job of a general if not to give honest assessments to the CINC? The main reason he's making statements is that the President hasn't seen fit to meet with him and seek his advice, or am I wrong?

All good theatre.

As Iraq draws down we will have the troops to end the holding action in Afghanistan.

"Social Justice in the Liberal State"

What I dislike most about Ivy-league Law Professors is they are arrogant tyrants with idiotic degrees.


All the Liberal State has ever achieved through Social Justice is to abort the body of Christ in the Catholic Church; I do not want the Professor's Liberal State of Roman Polanskis anywhere near me

"The situation is serious, and I choose that word very carefully. I would add that neither success nor failure for our endeavour in support of the Afghan people and government can be taken for granted. My assessment and my best military judgment is that the situation is, in some ways, deteriorating, but not in all ways." GEN McChrystal

Okay, I've now listened to the address (having trouble with the Q&A), but, uh, that is the most plain vanilla speech (no offense to the General, I just mean it doesn't seem very political to me).

Seriously, it's exactly the sort of plain vanilla speech you'd expect a COIN-oriented General to give, particularly given the fact that this General was HAND-PICKED by the administration because he 'got it', and the other guy supposedly didn't.

Another thought occurred to me: the beginning and end remarks touched on the sacrifices of British soldiers. In a coalition, is such a speech so egregious? Do our coalition partners expect an American General to address them from time to time? Even if GEN McChrystal did go a little far, I think the situation is so complicated that the more fervid accusations thrown at him are completely unfair. It is a difficult and complicated situation. Anything he says could be politicized. If he said absolutely nothing, the accusation would be that he is being pressured to change his best military advice, or something. Well, I'm just spinning as a political animal. Anything these generals say, even if they say 'no comment', will be politicized.

In fact, if they say "no comment" we have what we had within hours of the leak of his report - others claiming on his behalf that he's ready to resign if he doesn't get his way.

With friends like that, as they say.

Here is Bruce

Oh look. He's writing for The American Prospect, the ultra-left neo-treasonous publication that people like William Ayers love.

Mutt. Uncovered.

To me as far as I can see, this could only mean one of two things

1.McChrystal wants Obama's attention. It seems Obama spoke with him ONCE before his meeting with him on AF1 - Obama has already spent more time talking to talk show hosts like Letterman and Leno. Not to mention that he is actually more concerned about public heath insurance and pushing forward cap and trade.

2.He is trying to make clear what the best strategy is going forward, no matter what the Commander in Chief decides - this seems to stem from what I perceive as McChrystal's lack of faith in Obama's commitment to winning the war.

the General sees that the situation as grave and that a wakeup call is needed to salvage the region and the war efforts so far.

Of course i may be imagining too much as well.But i think McChrystal is clearly concerned that he is not going to get the support that he thinks that he needs.

Lets be clear ... If the General were recommending we run away from Afghanistan the Ackerman article would never have been written ... end of story ...

Obama has not stated a public opinion about it one way or the other recently and all of his past pronouncements have been to fight to the bitter end ...

Sounds to me like the General was simply backing up his CINC's public stance with his own professional opinion ...

The military is under the direction and command of the civilian government ... the one thing that Obama better be very careful about is ordering military personnel to cease exercising their 1st amendment rights ... he can try it and they may follow his order but its not lawful and everyone knows it, including Ackerman ...

"If the General were recommending we run away from Afghanistan the Ackerman article would never have been written..."

By Ackerman. Ralph Peters would have been all over it, though.

Did Obama speak to McChrystal or did he LISTEN to him? On a war that's going south, Obama spends twenty-five (25) minutes with the general in command. Twenty-five minutes, after he spent weeks and hours shilling for Chicago with his boys Daley, et al. Yet, the Afghanistan war in which U.S. military is facing the fire, he can hardly find time to talk to McChrystal. Twenty-five minutes since August.

In spite of inheriting a winning hand in Iraq and Afghanistan, Obama has no intention of winning. He stated emphatically that “victory isn’t necessarily the United States’ goal”.
He blows off the external threats from Iran and Pakistan and is pathetically indecisive.
This war is not to nation build Afghanistan, but to destroy our sworn enemies where ever they hide.
Afghanistan has several religious sects and a host of different ethnic, linguistic, and tribal groups.
They are territorial and don’t like outsiders. And unfortunately, Hamid Karzai’s corrupt government is not fulfilling expectations.
President Punchdrunk is in way over his head. He has no idea how to manage the business of fighting the nations wars. To cut and run would give Islamofascists the ‘hope and change’ they’re looking for, and pave the way for a global resurgence in mass terrorism.
This narcissistic buffoon would rather dismiss the advice of a seasoned military commander than admit he has no fucking strategy.
The solution to this is to commit as many troops as necessary, give them the go ahead to go into Waziristan and Pakistan to hunt down and kill as many Taliban as possible. Fly Predator missions. Use MOABs and MLRS. Dedicate this country to winning this war and sending the message that America will not run from its enemies. Muslim fanatic fucksticks started this war, we will finish it.
If Obama has one iota of decency, he’ll get the hell out of the way and let the Army do its job.
My guess is that he doesn’t.

My take is that Gen. McChrystal is doing everything he can to complete the mission and not sacrifice our soldiers needlessly. This includes public comments to focus attention on the need to fish or cut bait in Afganistan. Having lived through the Vietnam debacle, the current situation has all the earmarks of another Democrat clusterf*ck where they dither while our guys and gals are in harm's way with no commitment to victory.

For Obama, Afganistan was always only a political issue to bash Bush. He is now trimming while trying to figure out how far he has to go to appease his base.

After Vietnam, it became clear that generals who 'shut up and soldiered,' or worse, echoed the party line, were blamed for failures not of their doing. It would not be surprising that a general might prefer being fired to having his judgment and honor compromised. If the President can't stand a public discussion of our options, then he should replace all of his high ranking officers with yes-men and have done with it. Nothing prevents McChrystal, or Petraeus, for that matter, from retiring and running for office. In fact, if they were to shut up and lose, then I expect that such action would terminate any political career which either might want. Could that be the idea?

When Clark was head of NATO, I shivered with his pronouncements and his general incompetency until Clinton fired him.

I get the same shiver, not with McCrystal, but with Obama. Unfortunately, "We The People" have to wait until 2012 to fire Obama.

Excellent post Greyhawk. Just damn excellent!

Thats a comprehensive and illuminating blog page. In fact, even though that is my primary time of visiting this weblog, i ought to confess that I have discovered a fantastic resource center. I can,t pay for to miss out on these pages. Appreciate it and keep up the excellent function.Best wishes!

Leave a comment

Mrs G copy.png

July 21, 2010


Dawn Patrol 07/21/2010
[Mrs Greyhawk]

Welcome to the Dawn Patrol, our daily roundup of information on the War on Terror and other topics - from the MilBlogs and various sources around the world. If you're a blogger, you can join the conversation. If you link to any of these stories, add a link to the Dawn Patrol too and your trackback will be added to the list. Hat Tips to the Dawn Patrol are greatly appreciated.

Always updating - refresh for updates.


Support Our Troops, Read Their Stories

----------------------------


AFGHANISTAN

Kabul Conference Endorses 2014 Afghan Security Takeover -- [Voice of America]
The donor conference in Kabul was the largest international meeting in Afghanistan since the 1970s. Security was tight in the capital. Coalition forces battled insurgents near Kabul the night before, but the conference proceeded peacefully.
...Analysts say while there is still work to be done, the Kabul conference was President Karzai's chance to show the international community his government is ready.
Recently, many coalition partners have voiced their desire to begin transferring security control to the Afghan forces. U.S. officials say they hope to start withdrawing forces next July.
But U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told delegates at the conference that this transition is not an ending, but rather, a new beginning.
"We have no intention of abandoning our long-term mission of achieving the kind of Afghanistan that President Karzai set forth in his speech," Clinton said.

Afghanistan Sets Security Timeline

Kabul Conference -- [A Major's Perspective - in Afghanistan]
A lot of news stories out there right now about the Kabul Conference that took place today, and rightfully so. (I wonder how much we really need to hear about Lohan going to jail -- I really dont care -- but I kinda expected that).
But I digress. Lot of great news stories out there, but there is something you didn't see in the news today, and it was a good thing. Why is this important? Because it was all the Afghans. Afghan led, and Afghan executed. For all the Taliban hot wind that was talked, the Afghan National Security Forces did a superb job in securing the conference.

A City Tour for V.I.P.'s Attending the Kabul Conference -- [At War]
In the opening scenes of Shakespeare's play "Measure for Measure," the Duke of Vienna takes off his fine clothes and disguises himself as an ordinary friar so that he can wander the streets and learn what the common people really think about the governance of his city.
The New York TimesIf Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and Gen. David H. Petraeus could do the same, wandering the bazaars and back streets of Kabul instead of attending the carefully guarded Kabul conference ...
...They would see the capital of the place where their policies will succeed or fail, and they would hear talk not of capacity building and clusters, but of the daily lives of the poor, of the millions of Afghans whose lives have not been touched by the dollars pouring in from donors and who do not have connections to the wealthy and powerful who can get them jobs. They would see a world of criminal gangs and they would hear that for many in Kabul, there is no belief in the future.

US hunts wanted Taliban and al Qaeda commander in Kunar -- [LWJ - Bill Roggio]
Qari Zia Rahman has allegiance to both the Taliban and al Qaeda. ISAF said he maintained a safe haven in the district of Marawara until a recent operation to secure the region.

Highway to Hell -- [Kandahar Diary - in Afghanistan]
It's been a busy day on Highway 1.
One convoy, en-route to Bastion, was engaged at about 0930hrs with small arms fire from about a section-size group of insurgents using abandoned houses and gardens 300m south of the MSR as cover. Our guards dismounted from their vehicles and returned fire. Fortunately, this time, no injuries or damages were reported and the convoy quickly pushed on.
Another of my convoys was not so lucky today. ...

Riding with Ghosts -- [Free Range International - in Afghanistan]
Editors Note: This article is too good not to share in its entirety. The reporter, Mitch Potter, was kind enough to give me permission to do so. Mitch contacted me through the blog and Panjwaii Tim told me he was a great guy with lots of experience and knowledge who he was happy to host. In Mitch's honor I hereby officially change the name for Team Canada to Ghost Team knowing full well the name change was supposed to be agreed on at the end of the summer piss up. What did I say at the end of my last post? Armed, outside the wire, experienced, contractors - this is what I was talking about.
Riding With Ghosts...

Afghanistan's New Minister of Interior: A Potential Game Changer - [SWJ - Dr. Mark Moyar, Orbis Operations]
During the Obama administration's strategic review last year, the U.S. government and media paid surprisingly close attention to the selection of Afghanistan's cabinet members, and pressed Karzai to retain the ministers whom Westerners deemed most capable. The forced resignations of Interior Minister Mohammad Hanif Atmar and National Directorate of Security (NDS) chief Amrullah Saleh last month garnered less attention, despite the fact that they were two of the government's most important figures. The decline in Western enthusiasm about Atmar no doubt contributed heavily to the tepidness of the response. Soon thereafter,...

Riz Khan - Afghanistan: Cash and corruption - [AlJazeera]

UK troops could start leaving Afghanistan next year, says Cameron -- [The Guardian] Both leaders are under strong domestic pressure to bring troops home as the ... was far less welcome than that of his predecessor, Stanley McChrystal

Suspected Afghan army trainer opens fire on fellow instructors -- [Washington Post]
A suspected Afghan army trainer on a shooting range in northern Afghanistan opened fire on his fellow instructors Tuesday, killing two American civilian trainers and one other Afghan soldier before being killed himself, NATO officials said. On a day when world diplomats gathered in Kabul for an international conference intended to further a transition to Afghan security responsibility, the violence showed the risks and setbacks that can come with a rapid expansion of Afghan military forces. The shooting, at a weapons training base near the city of Mazar-e Sharif, comes just one week after another rogue Afghan soldier killed three British soldiers at a base in Helmand province. "It's a great tragedy," said British Col. Stuart Cowen, a spokesman for the NATO Training Mission-Afghanistan, the command responsible for building up the Afghan security forces. Few details were immediately available about the circumstances surrounding the shooting, and NATO officials said they had started a joint investigation into the incident with the Afghan Ministry of Defense. The name of the contractor that provided the U.S. trainers was also not disclosed.

Picture Of The Day - 20 JUL 2010 "Master Healer" -- [FaST Surgeon - in Afghanistan]
...We were fortunate at FOB Shank to have LTC H (AKA Podalirius). Over the last 10 years, the military has identified an injury pattern known as mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Most of us would refer to this as a "concussion". mTBI is an injury caused mainly by explosive force (e.g. from Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs)). In Iraq, IEDs were consistently mortally devastating to our troops. Recently, our soldiers of Operation Enduring Freedom have benefited by the addition of MRAPs. I believe that there is significantly less trauma (Although there are still many instances of significant trauma and death) inflicted on our soldiers because of the protection offered by these vehicles. However, being in the epicenter of an explosion still leaves many with mTBI.
Most soldiers with mTBI rapidly improve with the innovative therapies applied by CPT J. However, ...


IRAQ

Series of deadly attacks in Iraq related to US pullout plan: analysts‎ -- [Xinhua]
Recent series of attacks by insurgents have left hundreds of people dead and wounded in Iraq

Iraq Briefing - Gen Ray Odierno


Suicide Attacks Kill Dozens In Iraq -- [AP /NPR]
Two suicide bombers targeting members of a government-backed, anti-al-Qaida militia struck within hours of each other early Sunday, killing at least 48 people and wounding dozens more, Iraqi officials said.
The bombings were the deadliest in a series of attacks across Iraq Sunday that were aimed at the Sons of Iraq, a Sunni group also known as Sahwa that works with government forces to fight al-Qaida in Iraq. The attacks highlighted the stiff challenges the country faces as the U.S. scales back its forces in Iraq, leaving their Iraqi counterparts in charge of security.

Al-Qaeda Women Used As Couriers -- [MEMRI Blog]
Al-Qaeda in Iraq is using a new strategy for transmitting messages and orders to its various cells, by using women known as mujahidat [committed to jihad] or mu'minat [believers].

US envoy: Diplomatic presence in Iraq will shrink -- [AP/WFAA]
The State Department is telling Congress that it intends to phase out a network of embassy branch offices in Iraq as soon as three years after the U.S. military leaves in 2011.
The Obama administration's choice to be the next ambassador to Baghdad -- James F. Jeffrey -- said an existing network of 16 military-civilian posts will be transformed by 2011 into a combination of three embassy branch offices and two consulates.
The three embassy branch offices will be phased out in three to five years, he said, while the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad and two consulates will remain indefinitely.

Iraq's Conflict, Reflected in a Family Tragedy -- [NY Times]
When the Americans arrived, Hamid Ahmad, a former air force warrant officer imprisoned under Saddam Hussein, imagined a new life for his family, freed from the burdens of tyranny. In seven hard years, nothing went as planned.
He spoke good English and believed in America. He got a job, his family says, with the United States military. Late last month, he wound up dead at the hands of his 32-year-old son, who had turned into an insurgent who sought money and purpose in fighting the Americans.
Despite difficult relations, an Iraqi oil official said Monday that Kuwait has given initial approval to open its border for crossing by international oil firms working in Iraq oil fields.

Iraq Border to Open to International Oil Companies -- [Epoch Times]
The new border crossing will aid the inflow of equipment for oil companies working on the Safwan and Rumaila oil fields, said the director of the Oil Ministry's licensing office, Abdul-Mahdy al-Meedi, according Reuters.
Iraq wishes to upgrade its oil production capacity from 2 million to 12 million barrels a day in the next six years, according to a report by Iraq newspaper Al- Sabah. But insufficient dock space and corruption at Kuwait's Umm Qasr port, would impede the proposed expansion.




U.S. AND OTHER PARTS OF THE WORLD

China Protests US-South Korea Joint Military Drills‎ -- [RTT News]
In a statement issued ahead of imminent joint major military drills by the United States and South Korea in the Sea of Japan, China expressed stiff

U.S. Stealth Jets, Carrier Tell Norks: Back The Hell Up -- [Danger Room]
bout 8,000 U.S. and South Korean sailors and airmen are preparing for a big joint military exercise this weekend to tell a wilding-out North Korea to rethink its recent aggression. Get ready for Invincible Spirit.
According to Admiral Robert Willard, the commander of American forces in the Pacific, the carrier U.S.S. George Washington and a bunch of destroyers from the Navy's Seventh Fleet will head to the Sea of Japan, along with surveillance aircraft and "destroyers, frigates, and some patrol craft" from the South Korean Navy, including the South Korean transport ship Dodko. Over 100 aircraft from the Air Force's Seventh Air Wing and the South Korean Air Force are going to fly above. And since a torpedo from a North Korean submarine sank the South Korean warship Cheonan in March, there'll be anti-submarine exercises as well. It's going to unfold over several days.

Will a North Korean Attack Win the Yellow Sea for China? -- [One Free Korea]
Is the Yellow Sea a Chinese lake? Under ordinary circumstances, I'd understand China's complaints about a U.S. naval exercise in an inland sea near its shores. It's not as if I'd want Chinese ships in the Gulf of Mexico, either, but these are not ordinary circumstances. This time, North Korea has sunk a South Korean warship, and China has both shielded North Korea from any consequences for that attack and continued to provide necessary financial support to the regime that carried it out. Argue among yourselves whether this makes China an accessory after the fact, but it certainly destroys the myth of China as a mature, responsible power promoting peace and stability. That's why the U.S. Navy is now forced to deter without any help from China.

U.S. announces new sanctions against North Korea -- [Washington Post]
Searching for new ways to punish North Korea after blaming it for sinking a South Korean warship in March, the Obama administration announced Wednesday that it will strengthen existing sanctions against the North and impose new restrictions on its weapons trade and trafficking in counterfeit currency and luxury goods.


WAR ON TERROR /TERRORISM

Al-Qaeda Second-in-Command Ayman Al-Zawahiri: The Only Hope for Palestine is to Depose the 'Arab Zionists' -- [MEMRI Blog]
In a new 1-hour 3-minute audio recording, Al-Qaeda second-in-command Ayman Al-Zawahiri reaffirms Al-Qaeda's basic strategy regarding Palestine and promised imminent victory in Afghanistan, and addresses words of praise and encouragement to the jihadist groups in North Africa, Somalia, the Arabian Peninsula, Iraq, the Caucasus, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.

Fighting the Ideological Battle: The Missing Link in U.S. Strategy to Counter Violent Extremism -- [Counterterrorism Blog - Matthew Levitt]
As nonaffiliate terrorist actors begin to take center stage and al-Qaeda's core strength diminishes, it has become clear that America is at war with a larger enemy: the extremist ideology that fuels and supports Islamist violence. Unfortunately, the United States is not well equipped to fight on this ideological battleground, and U.S. efforts to confront the ideology worldwide have not kept pace with more successful military targeting of high-level al-Qaeda leaders.
In a new Washington Institute Strategic Report my co-authors and I argue that rather than avoid any mention of the religious motivation behind the terrorism of al-Qaeda and other like-minded organizations, the Obama administration should sharpen the distinction between the religion of Islam and the political ideology of radical Islamism to successfully defeat Islamist terrorism at its most fundamental source.




SUPPORTING THE TROOPS

SSG Patrick Zeigler - Someone You Should Know -- [BlackFive]
Want to meet a real life superhero? A man whose strength and power defies what many believed was humanly possible? A man who defines the phrase "American soldier"?
Meet Staff Sgt. Patrick Zeigler.
For the past 8 ½ months, Zeigler has looked death in the face and refused to blink. He's battled back from eight brain surgeries and diagnoses that labeled him everything from "comatose" to "permanently disabled."
Zeigler was one of 32 who was injured on November 5, 2009 when accused gunman Army Major Nidal Hasan opened fire inside the Soldier Readiness Center at Fort Hood.


Soldiers' Angels Welcomes New Trustee -- [Soldiers' Angels]
Soldiers' Angels announces the appointment of military veteran, new media expert and lobbyist Mark Seavey to the Board of Trustees. Drawing on thirteen years' experience advocating for veterans, Seavey will work closely with COL (ret) Henry Cook on legislative liaison efforts.
A strong advocate for veterans, Seavey began his career with The American Legion in 1997 as an Appeals Representative and later served with the National Legislative Commission as an Assistant Director and Grassroots Coordinator. Recently promoted to New Media Manager, Seavey serves as steward of The Burn Pit and also runs a highly-respected personal milblog which specializes in debunking fraudulent military service claims.


MILITARY


BREAKING: Stolen Valor Act ruled UNCONSTITUTIONAL (UPDATE 1) -- [BlackFive - Mr Wolf]
Sit back, take a deep breath, and get your BP meds ready. Stupidity has found another outlet in the judicial system. And be prepared to memorize this face.
One of our favorite impostors Richard Strandloff/Duncan has had the charges of Stolen Valor dropped due to a ruling from the District Court in Denver today. Judge Robert E. Blackburn issued a ruling today, dropping/dismissing the charges on the basis that says ''the Stolen Valor Act is unconstitutional.'' And by 'unconstitutional' he means it violates the First Amendment. He writes:




WELCOME HOME

Dozens of Kentucky Army National Guard soldiers returning home -- [WKYT]
Friends and family will gather at the Boone National Guard Center in Frankfort Wednesday to welcome home 86 Kentucky Army National Guard soldiers

Local Seabees Return -- [WKRG-TV]
Family members, relatives, and friends will welcome home more than 260 Seabees from ... to send an additional 30000 troops to Afghanistan late last year

Soldiers from the 278th return home -- [TriCities.com]
...every deployment is stressful because one parent ends up doing the job of two. In addition to taking care of their children by herself, Tara Spears said she also must do her husband's chores, such as mowing the lawn.
That's why she's thankful the Bootleggers have friends and family members who work together like an extended family during a deployment the same way its members become brothers while their in combat.
Technology also has come a long way in the five years since her husband's first deployment, and that's helped out a lot too. During the Bootleggers' 2004-05 deployment, Tara Spears said she was lucky if she could talk to her husband once a week. This year she's been able to use her Blackberry and Skype, an Internet-based video telephone service, to talk to her husband every single day that he's been gone.


VETERANS

URGENT!! OIF/OEF VETERANS DISCHARGED FOR PTSD -- [Some Soldier's Mom]
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
OIF/OEF Veterans: TIME IS RUNNING OUT. If you were discharged for PTSD and received LESS THAN A 50% disability rating from your service branch, you MAY be able to receive some additional benefits

New treatment for PTSD? Dropping some Ecstasy. -- [Stars & Stripes]
It's not the most likely prescription for veterans already suffering from paranoia and emotional imbalance, but a group of researchers with the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies in California are suggesting that 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (better known as Ecstasy) could prove valuable in helping combat vets in dealing with post-traumatic stress disorder.
The study, which tracked only 20 patients, found veterans using Ecstasy were more receptive to counseling sessions than those on a placebo.


BLOGGING/MILBLOGS/SOCIAL MEDIA

Oh, poor Blogetry! -- [Jawa Report]
Oh, the poor 73,000 blogs they hosted!!
Why, the FBI won't take my blog until they pry my cold dead fingers from the keyboard!!1! /sarcasm.
1. A site hosted by Blogetry was distributing Inspire magazine from al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula.
2. The FBI asked for nothing more than information about the particular site, one of 73,000 hosted by Blogetry.
3. BurstNET, acting on their own initiative, and in accordance with their own Terms of Service, pulled the plug on Blogetry.
The FBI did not shut down 73,000 blogs, period. But why let the truth get in the way of a good story...




THE MEDIA/CULTURE

WH Press Briefing- Top Secret means Top Secret -- [BlackFive - Uncle Jimbo]
I posted this over at Big Peace but since it is an ongoing series here I wanted a copy on our servers. I think some of the hype over whether this compromises classified information may have been overblown. That said, I don't think it really added anything to the debate and put too much of our secret business out in public.

JournoList Members Discussed Whether the Government Should Shut Down Fox News -- [The Volokh Conspiracy]
It appears from the last few days' stories that JournoList was even worse than I'd always suspected. The Daily Caller reports that UCLA law professor Jonathan Zasloff first raised the possibility of a government shutdown of Fox News and then defended pulling their White House press pass

Breitbart On Sherrod's NAACP Speech: 'I Did Not Edit This Thing' -- [TPMMuckraker]
The crux of the Shirley Sherrod controversy is what she said outside of the two-minute video clip posted by Big Government -- whether she was, as she claims, telling a story about how she overcame racial prejudice while helping poor farmers in Georgia, or whether the clip is a good encapsulation of her views. So we asked Andrew Breitbart, the founder of Big Government, why he hasn't posted the full video.
"I don't have it," Breitbart told TPMmuckraker in an interview. Breitbart said his source sent him just the edited clips at first, but is in the process of sending the full video.
Breitbart said he'll post the full video, if he can get permission from the video production company who filmed it for a local NAACP chapter. He also maintained that he didn't edit the clip and that it was sent to him already edited.

VoteVets still whining about Fox -- [This Ain't Hell]
This morning I awoke to to some more VoteVets whining. They have new million-dollar ad that they're trying to cram down Fox's throat about this Clean Energy bill in Congress.


STRATEGY & TACTICS

War is Boring: Fourth Time the Charm for NATO's Afghan Militia Plan? -- [WPR]
The impetus behind the scheme was simple enough. "We clearly do not have enough police forces to provide security in enough of the populated areas," top Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell admitted.
Nevertheless, reaction to the plan was swift and alarmed. Afghan President Hamid Karzai reportedly objected to it -- and for good reason. On no fewer than three occasions in the last three years, NATO has experimented with militias and local security forces. All these previous efforts failed, sometimes spectacularly.
Morrell tried to downplay concerns. "These would be local community policing units," Morell said last week. "They would not be militias."
"It is clearly a sensitive issue for President Karzai and the Afghan government and the Afghan people, given their history with militias and warlords," Morrell told reporters. "And we are certainly understanding and sensitive to that."
"But that is not what Gen. Petraeus is proposing here,"


SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

The real Star Wars: Laser used to shoot down a moving aircraft for first time -- [Daily Mail]
Star Wars-style laser beams have been used for the first time to shoot down aircraft in flight, it was revealed last night.
The anti-aircraft laser shot down four unmanned drones at a US Navy test range off the coast of California.
Mounted on a warship, the space age weapon was fired over two miles to hit one drone travelling above the Pacific Ocean at more than 300mph.
The invisible beam can only be seen when it strikes its target.


CLIMATE AND SECURITY

The Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force -- [White House]
President Obama signed an Executive Order establishing a National Policy for the Stewardship of the Ocean, Coasts, and Great Lakes on July 19, 2010. That Executive Order adopts the Final Recommendations of the Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force and directs Federal agencies to take the
appropriate steps to implement them.

Meet the National Ocean Council -- [White House Blog]
Find out who represents your new National Ocean Council.

In Midst of Gulf Disaster, New National Ocean Policy Gives Hope for Our Seas -- [Huffington Post - Sigourney Weaver Academy Award nominated actress]
I have always loved the oceans. My father was a Navy man and one requirement he had for us growing up was that we had to live near a body of saltwater. I was raised listening to foghorns by night and being chased by horseshoe crabs by day.
...This is the most significant action any U.S. President in history has ever taken for our seas. It will help make our oceans stronger and healthier, and help them fight off the myriad of threats they face today. It will help clean up the pollution that contaminates our beachwater, protect endangered species, keep the seafood we love on our plates, and make the oceans more resilient to the impacts of climate change.


POLITICS

Kagan and the Military: What Really Happened -- [WSJ - Pete Hegseth]
Her intellectually dishonest opposition to our armed forces during a time of war shows bad judgment. She doesn't belong on the Supreme Court.

Hegseth on Kagan -- [This Ain't Hell]
Out buddy, Pete Hegseth, the executive director of Vets For Freedom, takes on Elena Kagan, the Supreme Court nominee, in the pages of the Wall Street Journal this morning on her contention that she's friendly towards the military


MILITARY HISTORY

American Civil War: It Begins at Bull Run -- [about.com / Military History]
July 21, 1861 - Union forces are beaten at the First Battle of Bull Run. Under pressure to defeat Confederate forces, Brig. Gen. Irvin McDowell advanced into Virginia in July 1861. Encountering Confederate troops under Brig. Gen. P.G.T. Beauregard behind Bull Run, he attempted a sweeping march around the enemy's left flank. This largely succeeded on July 21 and Union forces achieved early success before pausing their advance. This allowed Beauregard to rush recently arrived reinforcements, under Brig. Gen. Joseph Johnston, to the scene. As the battle progressed, the Confederates gained the upper hand and ultimately routed McDowell's army sending it reeling back towards Washington.


HUMOR/SATIRE


(Need more? Dawn Patrols Archives are here.)



Posted 8:35 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) |

TMGbloglabel7copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
TMGrecentcomments.gif
  • Lela Windly: Thats a comprehensive and illuminating blog page. In fact, even read more
  • GM Roper: When Clark was head of NATO, I shivered with his read more
  • wGraves: After Vietnam, it became clear that generals who 'shut up read more
  • Jack Okie: My take is that Gen. McChrystal is doing everything he read more
  • SFC MAC: In spite of inheriting a winning hand in Iraq and read more
  • apodoca: Did Obama speak to McChrystal or did he LISTEN to read more
  • Ol Sarge: "If the General were recommending we run away from Afghanistan read more
  • Jeff Carlson: Lets be clear ... If the General were recommending we read more
  • Nagarajan Sivakumar: To me as far as I can see, this could read more
  • Paul A'Barge: Here is Bruce Oh look. He's writing for The American read more

MBC2010.jpg

MILBLOGS NEWS

*****

Latest Posts From MilBlogs

*****

milblogsa1.jpg Prev | List | Random | Next
Join
Powered by RingSurf!
TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Dawn Patrol Feeds

 

Add to Google Reader or Homepage Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to netvibes Add to Plusmo myaol_cta1.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

TMGbloglabel8copy.gif

TMGbloglabel9 copy.gif
Blah Blah Blah
me220.JPG

The Mudville Gazette is written and produced by Greyhawk. Unless otherwise credited, the opinions expressed are those of the author, and nothing here is to be taken as representing the official position of or endorsement by the United States Department of Defense or any of its subordinate components. Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house.

I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email.

Original content copyright © 2003 - 2009 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed.

Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com

andsm.jpg