
![]() | |
July 2010
June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003
|
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by! September 4, 2009 War SucksBy GreyhawkPut Afghanistan out of your thoughts for a moment. And Iraq, and Vietnam and Korea and World Wars One and Two and any nation's civil war or revolution and any other specific armed conflict between nation states and instead consider war as a real manifestation of its broader definition: armed conflict between opposing groups. Ignore for now any argument for or against the idea that a nation is justified in defending itself against violent aggression from another nation and any philosophical debate regarding the relative merits of a war of choice or a war of necessity. I don't intend to challenge your personal beliefs about any of those fine points, I'm not going to trick you into changing your mind. And, in fact, as much as I might wish that anyone who reads the words that follow will embrace my anti-war philosophy I am certain that you can read on without fear of a mind-altering experience. In fact, I strongly suspect that the next sentence you read will affirm for you that you are wise and I am but a fool. War, friends and neighbors, sucks. I could use a better term then "sucks", I suppose - but here in the world of the early 21st century it's one that can be widely understood. I can offer you a well thought out, intellectual argument supporting that statement. It would be full of undeniable supporting facts, numbers, and statistics. I can reference experts throughout history to buttress my points. I can appeal to your better emotions, too. I can describe atrocities - better yet, I can show you pictures and video and save myself the effort. I could crush any argument that anyone would dare to present in a feeble attempt to refute my irrefutable point: war sucks. And I'll present that argument - the moment anyone dares to speak up in opposition and presents some intellectually or emotionally tantalizing counter to that simple, two-word truth. None but a handful of psychopathic thugs (to use a term of convenience) are likely to view war as desirable, and all but the worst of them would experience second thoughts after experiencing a few seconds of war. So I doubt that any opposing argument is forthcoming, and certainly not from anyone capable of providing coherent points that might be worth the time required to respond. "But what of the Nazis?" you may be wondering at this point. If so, it's because you've already forgotten my first paragraph. I blame myself for failing to make it more memorable. No one is more anti-war than the warrior, the old saying goes. But it isn't true. Enough of us mere mortals are anti-war that claiming all of us are is close to true. The degree to which one is or isn't is a point of contention, and from such disputes arguments grow. If you wish to look me in the eye and claim "I'm more anti war than you" I'll offer no words to the contrary, and will even pledge to strive to improve myself with time. The wise and careful reader will note that in the two previous paragraphs I've accepted blame that might not truly be mine and acknowledged a willingness to avoid arguing a certain point that some might believe worth arguing. From that one might conclude that I'm a pacifist or a pushover. Were this an in-person discussion an aggressive person, were he perceptive enough to have caught those signals, might wonder just how far he could push me, what advantage he could gain. I'm an honest person, so I can provide a candid answer: that depends on the circumstances, and none that I won't yield willingly. If that response is insufficient, perhaps it's best for us both that a more specific answer remains forever unknown. "Ahhh", the more gentle reader might conclude at this point, "he's somewhat belligerent after all." Purely in the interest of civility, I will not disagree. I will, however, assure you I will strive to improve myself with time. Continuous improvement is essential to a life worth living, don't you agree? But forgive me, please - we seem to have gone off on a tangent. Let me restate our topic then, and we'll press on. War sucks. To the vast majority of humans who realize that - and perhaps more importantly to those of us who might participate in the endeavor - the question becomes how best to avoid it? There are those who say we as a nation must be powerful enough to ensure that none would dare attack us, and there are those who argue that we should oppose violence in all its forms - even as response to violence. That's not a description of two opposing camps - it's one description of the spectrum of authentic anti-war sentiment throughout humanity. Nor is there anything approaching an even split among the numbers of people in the two groups I've described - the pure pacifists are a small group at one end of the anti-war spectrum. (Though oddly enough, most people wish they could be part of that group, and many believe in some future when they - or their children - can). Proponents of "powerful enough to deter" represent a huge majority of the spectrum, with widely varying definitions of "powerful enough". Some may prefer the presence of standing armies at the ready, though their definitions of "standing" and "ready" (and "trained" and "equipped") are equally variable. Others might favor maintaining a capability to rapidly beat plowshares into swords should the need arise. As long as we're discussing this generic anti-war spectrum, it's worth noting that with few exceptions membership in some specific group doesn't necessarily establish one's position on that spectrum. You'll find doctors and lawyers and farmers sprinkled throughout. Likewise members of opposing political factions are interspersed, and can be found sharing (often uncomfortably and frequently denied) common ground. (This is less true with regard to specific wars - but our discussion remains generic.) And while Quakers have anchored themselves firmly as pacifists, you'll find Christians, Jews, atheists, and agnostics all over the anti-war spectrum too - and plenty of them can provide you a valid explanation of why that particular point is the appropriate place for them to be. War sucks, after all, and they've established the best position from which to effectively deter it. To be too weak or too strong is to invite it, but right here is morally and intellectually just right. The possible variables are endless, a two-dimensional spectrum is an oversimplified conceptual model (but sufficient for this discussion) and to further complicate the issue, no one - at least damn few people - stakes out a fixed position on that spectrum, declares themselves immovable, and occupies that spot for their entire lives. We are human, and change is in our nature. To give one ironic example of that change point above, specific wars tend to turn some warriors into pacifists, and some pacifists into warriors. There's nothing better than experience to change our expectations, that fact of life encompasses much more than war. Short of war, nothing prompts a reevaluation of our positions along that anti-war spectrum more effectively than the threat of war. Questions rise, we wonder if we are where we truly thought we were. Prompted by noticeable discomfort, we seek our comfort zone. Whether we shift a bit or not, we look nervously about to see who's with us, and maybe adjust a bit more. Our individual decisions are based in reason; but for some reason the whole of those reasonable decisions is chaotic and defies simple explanation. In short, what results from that shuffling will vary from case to case, but while the shuffling is predictable the end state is not. Unfortunately, if the end state is insufficiently preventative, then war will be upon us whether we like it or not. And if you thought I was kidding, I'll say it one more time: war sucks. Posted by Greyhawk / September 4, 2009 4:06 AM | Permalink 1 TrackBackTrackBack URL: http://www.mudvillegazette.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/16605 The American Legion has a blog, and on that blog there is a post.It is a tale of two wishes: the wishes of a humble family in a time of grief, and the wishes of a powerful news giant in a time of crisis. The global news organization, the Associated Pre... Read More 1 CommentLeave a comment |
July 21, 2010Dawn Patrol 07/21/2010 [Mrs Greyhawk]
Welcome to the Dawn Patrol, our daily roundup of information on the War on Terror and other topics - from the MilBlogs and various sources around the world. If you're a blogger, you can join the conversation. If you link to any of these stories, add a link to the Dawn Patrol too and your trackback will be added to the list. Hat Tips to the Dawn Patrol are greatly appreciated. Always updating - refresh for updates. AFGHANISTANKabul Conference Endorses 2014 Afghan Security Takeover -- [Voice of America] Afghanistan Sets Security Timeline
Kabul Conference -- [A Major's Perspective - in Afghanistan] A City Tour for V.I.P.'s Attending the Kabul Conference -- [At War] US hunts wanted Taliban and al Qaeda commander in Kunar -- [LWJ - Bill Roggio] Highway to Hell -- [Kandahar Diary - in Afghanistan] Riding with Ghosts -- [Free Range International - in Afghanistan] Afghanistan's New Minister of Interior: A Potential Game Changer - [SWJ - Dr. Mark Moyar, Orbis Operations] Riz Khan - Afghanistan: Cash and corruption - [AlJazeera]
UK troops could start leaving Afghanistan next year, says Cameron -- [The Guardian] Both leaders are under strong domestic pressure to bring troops home as the ... was far less welcome than that of his predecessor, Stanley McChrystal Suspected Afghan army trainer opens fire on fellow instructors -- [Washington Post] Picture Of The Day - 20 JUL 2010 "Master Healer" -- [FaST Surgeon - in Afghanistan] IRAQSeries of deadly attacks in Iraq related to US pullout plan: analysts -- [Xinhua] Iraq Briefing - Gen Ray Odierno
Al-Qaeda Women Used As Couriers -- [MEMRI Blog] US envoy: Diplomatic presence in Iraq will shrink -- [AP/WFAA] Iraq's Conflict, Reflected in a Family Tragedy -- [NY Times] Iraq Border to Open to International Oil Companies -- [Epoch Times]
U.S. AND OTHER PARTS OF THE WORLDChina Protests US-South Korea Joint Military Drills -- [RTT News] U.S. Stealth Jets, Carrier Tell Norks: Back The Hell Up -- [Danger Room] Will a North Korean Attack Win the Yellow Sea for China? -- [One Free Korea] U.S. announces new sanctions against North Korea -- [Washington Post] WAR ON TERROR /TERRORISMAl-Qaeda Second-in-Command Ayman Al-Zawahiri: The Only Hope for Palestine is to Depose the 'Arab Zionists' -- [MEMRI Blog] Fighting the Ideological Battle: The Missing Link in U.S. Strategy to Counter Violent Extremism -- [Counterterrorism Blog - Matthew Levitt]
SUPPORTING THE TROOPSSSG Patrick Zeigler - Someone You Should Know -- [BlackFive]
MILITARY
WELCOME HOMEDozens of Kentucky Army National Guard soldiers returning home -- [WKYT] Local Seabees Return -- [WKRG-TV] Soldiers from the 278th return home -- [TriCities.com] VETERANSURGENT!! OIF/OEF VETERANS DISCHARGED FOR PTSD -- [Some Soldier's Mom] New treatment for PTSD? Dropping some Ecstasy. -- [Stars & Stripes] BLOGGING/MILBLOGS/SOCIAL MEDIAOh, poor Blogetry! -- [Jawa Report]
THE MEDIA/CULTUREWH Press Briefing- Top Secret means Top Secret -- [BlackFive - Uncle Jimbo] JournoList Members Discussed Whether the Government Should Shut Down Fox News -- [The Volokh Conspiracy] Breitbart On Sherrod's NAACP Speech: 'I Did Not Edit This Thing' -- [TPMMuckraker] VoteVets still whining about Fox -- [This Ain't Hell] STRATEGY & TACTICSWar is Boring: Fourth Time the Charm for NATO's Afghan Militia Plan? -- [WPR] SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGYThe real Star Wars: Laser used to shoot down a moving aircraft for first time -- [Daily Mail] CLIMATE AND SECURITYThe Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force -- [White House] Meet the National Ocean Council -- [White House Blog] In Midst of Gulf Disaster, New National Ocean Policy Gives Hope for Our Seas -- [Huffington Post - Sigourney Weaver Academy Award nominated actress] POLITICSKagan and the Military: What Really Happened -- [WSJ - Pete Hegseth] Hegseth on Kagan -- [This Ain't Hell] MILITARY HISTORYAmerican Civil War: It Begins at Bull Run -- [about.com / Military History] HUMOR/SATIRE(Need more? Dawn Patrols Archives are here.) |
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
![]() I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email. Original content copyright © 2003 - 2009 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed. Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com ![]() |
Very nice. I'm looking forward to part two.