
![]() | |
October 2012
August 2012 July 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003
|
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by! August 22, 2009 Lions and Tigers and BearsBy GreyhawkFormer Pennsylvania governor Tom Ridge, the first director of the Department of Homeland Security, says that he was pressured by other Bush administration department heads to raise the national security-threat level on the eve of the 2004 presidential election -- a move he rejected as having such uncomfortable political undertones that it could destroy the administration's credibility. "The disclosure comes in Ridge's new book, "The Test of Our Times: America Under Siege . . . and How We Can Be Safe Again," written with Larry Bloom and published by Thomas Dunne Books, an imprint of St. Martin's Press." I was in Iraq at the time, and my family was in Germany, so we weren't aware of the impact on Americans of these "threat levels" - I can only imagine what you folks must have experienced hiding in your basements, eating canned foods and rushing out only long enough to reelect Bush. And I understand that Book Sales are Important and that Bush was a Fear Monger and that Americans are Easily Duped, but seriously - isn't it time to stop living in the past and confront the future? After all, we're finally focused on the Real Central Front of the War on Terror now:
Of course we don't call it the War on Terror any more, but I think you get the gist. Posted by Greyhawk / August 22, 2009 12:32 PM | Permalink 9 Comments |
November 26, 2010America@war [Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit. That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary. From their about page:
"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation: The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism. Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented. I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are. "Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result. Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web... And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed. The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down. But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:
Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down. If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real. And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale. We've already made history, it's time to save it. (More to follow...) Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink |
Comments (0) |
|
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
![]() Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house. I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email. Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed. Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com ![]() Tending Distant Far from hearth and home, watching What tales we'll tell When things grim Some distant sunset, vision fading Saluting fallen friends whose names - Greyhawk, Baghdad, December 2004 |
Greyhawk, you write an important and complex question for this Nation. "And I understand that *book sales are important* and that *Bush was a Fear Monger* and that *Americans are Easily Duped*, but seriously - isn't it time to stop living in the past and confront the future?" This is only my answer, I really wish I could just "Face Front and Move Out". The problem is this, it just doesn't work that way. The only way to confront the future is to confront the past. If we don't, we'll never learn the important stuff related to *Real National Security*. I do not believe this should be done in an open civilian Court or Congress. I believe it should be done in a Secure Military Courts Martial Setting under the Procedures and Laws of the UCMJ. There should be a few additional points, 1) There will be no separation of powers, 2) All statements shall be under oath. 3) They shall answer all questions put to them to the best of their ability, 4) No Fifth Amendment Rights. 5) All records in your home or library in any format shall be construed as subject to search. They will just follow the truth, they need to just follow it wherever it goes. 6) There shall be a written and video/audio record to be seen only by POTUS, himself, No VP, staff or cabinet, or Congress in any format!
The main idea is like a controlled detonation, you want it to work its work and yet, not damage everything else. The idea is to put them in a situation where the former leaders are no longer in control. Now, it is them, who must obey orders, all of them.
I would hope that it could be public, but there is much, that we just can not do it.
Subjects: Persian Gulf I and the Iraq War, both Bush Presidents, Richard Cheyney, Donald Rumsfeld and George Tenet. I wonder, when Saddam's troops came South to the border with Kuwait, what were the Kuwaitis doing? Think about it.
This in no way reflects upon the Military, they just did their duty to the best of their ability. My deepest respects to all of them.
Personally, I'm tired of every what-if that was discussed in the White House (terror alerts, Al Quaeda assassinations, etc.) being treated as a crime.
As for terror alert issue, I believe this was discussed at the time because Al Qaeda had posted a video threatening the US. There were a lot of people in the media and elsewhere pressuring the White House to raise the terror alert, but ultimately Pres. Bush declined because he said he didn't want it to impact the election. It sounds like this is the time period Tom Ridge was referring to.
These were thoughts not actions and unless we are planning to start a thought police, thinking about something is hardly a crime. Personally, I'm glad we had a group of people in the White House willing to think outside of the box on difficult issues.
I'm with Grumpy. We should only investigate the two Bush presidents. THEY ARE THE ONLY WAR CRIMINALS!
We should completely ignore anything that Clinton did, and that Obama is doing.
It just wouldn't be fair to investigate Democrats!
@Dumpy, respectfully, I disagree with you. Though I disagree with the Bushes on many things, "THEY ARE NOT WAR CRIMINALS!"
@Dumpy, what is your goal with this comment? Is it just to demonize the Bushes? If this was your purpose, you missed my point altogether. I wanted a place to drain all of the information from all of these characters. We also wanted to maintain "Chain of Custody", security, in the house approach with authority. Why? The big reason is additions to the best lessons learned. Just maybe, we can stop making the same mistakes over and over again.
You write, "It just wouldn't be fair to investigate Democrats?" Please tell me -- why? Under the fundamental rules of fairness you would be required to treat them equally."
I think he was kidding, Grumpy. (On the other hand, I'm not clear what the "it" is you're talking about that should be done.)
The problem with any stoplight-type risk depiction is you don't want to be the guy who declares "green" or "amber" and be wrong. The consequences are far greater than saying "red" and being wrong. (Imagine the repercussions if a terrorist attack had occurred when the threat level was "amber" or lower and you'll see what I mean.)
By their very nature stoplight depictions, at least any with subjective criteria or intangibles as input, will lead any human decision-maker to over-estimate risk. There's no desire to deceive or even CYA involved whatsoever, it comes down to a simple decision based on the consequences of being wrong. Trust me on that one, I've seen it demonstrated time and again - stoplight charts are a military "gold standard".
Ridge, Powell, Buckley Jr., Noonan, Parker, Brooks, etc, etc etc....Dr. Martin Luther King F, Jr warned us about those Moderates:
http://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Letter_Birmingham.html
Good to hear from you, Syn - it's been a while.
Good points from MLK. I note in particular his explanation for swift action in Birmingham even though a new administration had hardly been given a chance.
@Dumpy, OK, I've been had, enjoy your laugh.
@Greyhawk, On the other hand, your comment 23 Aug 2009 1:20AM EDT, your comment is also kidding.
Greyhawk, I agree that Americans need to be more future-oriented, but I think learning about the crimes of the past instills the ethos of critical thinking, which is beneficial in the long-run. Our resources should be focused on finding Osama bin Laden and stemming the spread of violent splinter fundamentalist groups, but that will only happen when Washington judges that to be strategic for garnering public opinion support. This video has some telling perspectives from the media about Ridge's revelation:
http://www.newsy.com/videos/whistleblower_or_bestseller