
![]() | |
November 2009
October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003
|
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by!
July 7, 2009The Mysterious Words of PowerBy GreyhawkWe must support the troops - in many ways that phrase sounds hackneyed now, even though many who used (and still use) it actually follow up with action - from emails to care packages to grabbing a lunch tab to spending time with the recovering wounded or petitioning their congressional representatives on specific issues that might impact the troops and their families. I'm proud to know many of those action-oriented folks myself, and while I was one of those troops for quite a long time and couldn't personally use the phrase without experiencing a sort of discomfort as potential beneficiary I certainly appreciate those who meant it when they said it. But I also know that there are many who derided those who said it (or had it on a bumper sticker - as my wife does) based on the possibility that they didn't really mean it or that their definition might be different. I can speculate endlessly on logical (and illogical) justifications for that position, but regardless of the validity of the arguments I can also concede that the phrase itself has become somewhat worn with the passage of time. Like the bright yellow ribbons that are (to so many non-subscribers to the ideal or non-participants in the effort) the only visible manifestation of that ideal, much of the luster of the new has certainly faded away. Still, that doesn't diminish the simple truth: we must indeed support the troops. Don't you agree? Perhaps we need a new phrase, then. New terminology, new words to replace the old - with the original meaning (and good intent) intact. Or maybe we already have them... Yesterday I mentioned - in another context - what I've come to recognize as Democratic Party talking points on military/veterans issues. ("All good points, by the way. But when will we see some action beyond talking? What will that action be?") You see, I share the opinion that without action those words are meaningless, at best nothing more than some sort of mantra that once spoken (maybe there's a hand gesture involved, too?) lends the speaker some sort of perceived power over (or shield from) questioners that I can't fully understand. On the other hand, I have this concern (maybe I'm the only one) that I should exercise caution when citing a lack of action associated with these words - that while supporting the troops can be as simple a thing as an appreciative email to a lonely front line soldier, that maybe these particular words are in fact so powerful that they can be used to justify any action - even ones that have only a vague impact on military families. I still don't know the answer to my questions, but for the record, here are those talking points as delivered by Joe Biden in Iraq: "...I realize the kinds of sacrifices that the military families are making. Beau was talking to me last night, he's pointing out multiple deployments have caused significant divorce rates, custody issues... real human problems that these deployed forces have." That's certainly seems more detailed than "we've got to support the troops" (or is it just the same thing/more words?) - but while I agree wholeheartedly with the sentiment I still have no real idea what his point was - he proposed no actions whatsoever. ("Free" group counseling sessions? Outlaw divorce? Disband the military? Have the government take custody of military children? Surely not...) But damned if a version of those same words didn't just turn up again somewhere else in a slightly different form and context: "I haven't done any kind of extensive review. And what I feel most obligated about is to make sure I tell the president, you know, my - give the president my best advice, should this law change, on the impact on our people and their families at these very challenging times," he said. That's Joint Chiefs Chairman Admiral Mike Mullen, on Don't Ask Don't Tell. (But he's not clear on any associated action either - beyond inferred studying of impact.) But given the range of applicability of these mysterious new words of power I can only conclude that even while they're beyond my comprehension as just a guy with 24 years experience at the head of a military family those are powerful words indeed. But I'm not sure if I'm one step closer to or farther from figuring out what they mean. Maybe it's nothing. Posted by Greyhawk / July 7, 2009 10:41 AM | Permalink TrackBackTrackBack URL: http://www.mudvillegazette.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/16409 3 CommentsLeave a comment |
November 18, 2009Dawn Patrol 11/18/2009 [Mrs Greyhawk]
Welcome to the Dawn Patrol, our daily roundup of information on the War on Terror and other topics - from the MilBlogs and various sources around the world. If you're a blogger, you can join the conversation. If you link to any of these stories, add a link to the Dawn Patrol too and your trackback will be added to the list. Hat Tips to the Dawn Patrol are greatly appreciated.Refresh for updates.
AFGHANISTAN/PAKISTANBoondoggle -- [3rd Time, New Country - in Afghanistan] Clinton in Kabul for Karzai's inauguration -- [Foreign Policy - AfPak] The war of leaks -- [Foreign Policy - AfPak] Ridding Afghanistan of Corruption Will Be No Easy Task -- [Los Angeles Times] Afghan Minister Accused of Taking Bribe -- [Washington Post] Vision for Victory, Part I -- [Washington Times] U.S. Turns to Local Guns-for-Hire to Guard Afghan Outpost -- [Danger Room - Noah Shachtman] NATO Chief Confident Afghanistan Will Have More Troops -- [Voice of America] Germany to extend Afghanistan mission another year -- [AP] Pakistani Successes May Sway US Troop Decision -- [New York Times] Where are Taliban and al Qaeda commanders, US media asks Pak -- [Daily News & Analysis] Pakistani Army Shows Off Captured Taliban Posts -- [Washington Post] IRAQIraqi Kurds Warn of Election Boycott in Dispute Over Seats - [Washington Post] US has time to reconsider Iraq drawdown plan-Odierno -- [Reuters] A few words from medics for the 41st Brigade -- [The Oregonian] Goodbye to Iraq, and thanks -- [The Oregonian] U.S. AND OTHER PARTS OF THE WORLDUS, China in Strained Diplomatic Embrace -- [Wall Street Journal] Obama: 'We've restored America's standing' -- [CNN] Somali Pirates : Maersk Alabama Attacked, Fights Back -- [Eagle Speak] Iranian COS Warns Russia: Your Security Is Tied To Ours -- [Memri Blog]
WAR ON TERROR /TERRORISMSuspected Fort Hood Shooter Believed to Be Self-Radicalized -- [Wall Street Journal] Guantánamo Won't Close by January, Obama Says -- [NY Times] SUPPORTING THE TROOPS...OR NOTNo Man Left Behind -- [Knottie's Niche] LTC Tim Karcher Update -- [Soldiers' Angels Germany] Support SA while Christmas shopping this year! -- [Soldiers' Angels Germany] Trees for Troops: Helping Military Families -- [AdAge.com] FOX 5 Special: I-Team VA Loans -- [FOX News] A FOX 5 I-Team investigation uncovered allegations of a nationwide scheme by banks and mortgage companies to defraud U.S. military veterans. The scheme, spelled out in court documents, claims banks are overcharging veterans on home refinancing loans. The question raised in a racketeering and class action law suit is how many of those loans involved banks defrauding U.S. military veterans. MILITARYMuslim discrimination in the U.S. military. Not. -- [Castra Praetoria] Time to revisit firearms policies on military posts -- [Atlanta Journal Constitution] Army's Record Suicide Rate 'Horrible,' General Says -- [Washington Post]
WELCOME HOMEVeterans' descendants welcome troops home to Fort Campbell -- [Clarksville Leaf Chronicle] 'Greywolf' Among First CAV Troops to Return Home -- [DVIDS] THE MEDIAWhere are Taliban and al Qaeda commanders, US media asks Pak -- [Daily News & Analysis] Army officials said that they have killed as many as 550 Taliban militants a month after the military began its campaign into the lawless territory, yet they acknowledge that hundreds, perhaps thousands more have melted away.
POLITICSRepublicans Criticize Obama's Call to Delay Hill Inquiries on Fort Hood -- [Washington Post] HUMOR / SATIRE
Iraq, Afghanistan, War, Terrorism, Military, Politics, Media, MilBlogs, dawn patrol Mudville
|
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
![]()
![]() I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email. Original content copyright © 2003 - 2009 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed. Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com ![]() |
A little off topic but not really. I was reading an article about the controversy in Germany over the new medal for bravery. The government decided it needed to do something to recognize the actions of its soldiers and they've created a new medal which was recently awarded to 4 German soldiers who performed above and beyond in an IED incident in Afghanistan.
This is a big controversy in Germany because the last time Germany gave out medals for bravery it was the Iron Cross during WW II. Bad memories and all that. Anyway, one politican on the left in Germany is against the new medal because it might encourage "American-style patriotic celebrations of the military". I think he meant it as a bad thing.
May we never become that kind of country, where appreciation and support of the military is unacceptable. And yes, I know there are supposedly good reasons to keep Germans from thinking too highly of their military. But that must kind of suck for the average German soldier just trying to do his duty.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/row-over-new-iron-cross-1734427.html
As all of you share stories, news, and updates occurring abroad, take the chance to share some memories with those of us at home.
For each submission made, we’ll contribute one dollar to the Armed Services YMCA, up to $5,000. In addition, the top three winners of our contest will be honored with a customized Stetson hat named after them and incorporated into the 2010 line.
We look forward to sharing your story at www.stetsonsalutes.com
Follow us @John_B_Stetson for additional updates.
As all of you share stories, news, and updates occurring abroad, take the chance to share some memories with those of us at home.
For each submission made, we’ll contribute one dollar to the Armed Services YMCA, up to $5,000. In addition, the top three winners of our contest will be honored with a customized Stetson hat named after them and incorporated into the 2010 line.
We look forward to sharing your story at www.stetsonsalutes.com
Follow us @John_B_Stetson for additional updates.