The reader will kindly forgive any tendency to rough language or behavior on the part of the site owner...
TMGlogo2006-2007phs-copy.jpg
"Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
TMGbloglabel1 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel3 copy.gif
TMG MONTHLY ARCHIVES
[-]



TMGbloglabel10 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette Feeds

 

Add to Technorati Favorites
Technorati Profile
add.gif
Add to Google
addtomyyahoo4.gif
ngsub1.gif sub_modern5.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

digg.jpg

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

pl-news.gif

tvc_logo_small.png

Mrsg- Greyhawk's Profile
Mrsg- Greyhawk's Facebook profile
Create Your Badge
TMGbloglabel5 copy.gif
TMGbloglabel6 copy.gif
350.jpg
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by!
« The Return of the Gullibles | Main | Revelations (III) »

May 10, 2009

greyhawk copy sm.png

Shots On Goal

By Greyhawk

Andrew Exum calls this Washington Post report "The Most Depressing Thing You'll Read Today".

I'd call it the most frustrating thing you'll read today, so if frustration depresses you than we're both right.

The idea was to train the Iraqis so that when the time came to distribute the wheelchairs, Blauser and the 20 or so U.S. soldiers who coordinated the giveaway could fade into the background as Iraqi troops presented 32 fully assembled wheelchairs to disabled children.

"We're trying to build rapport," said Staff Sgt. Craig Jackson, 34, of Pennsylvania, one of the squad leaders working with Blauser. "Show them that their government is trying to help its people."

A worthy goal, but...
Thirty minutes into the assembly tutorial, the crowd of Iraqi soldiers thinned as curiosity gave way to boredom. Soon, Blauser, 43, found himself surrounded mainly by U.S. troops.

"What happened to all the people who were supposed to be helping put these together?"

A good question. Unfortunately, instead of an answer from the reporter who was apparently on scene we get more questions:
It raised questions that haunt U.S. troops as they prepare to pull out of Iraqi cities by June 30: When the Americans leave, how will the Iraqi forces behave?
...leaving us to come up with answers (from half a world away) on our own.

First, let's dispense with this: US troops aren't leaving Iraqi cities by June 30th - that's a media fiction. In fact, the "non-combat" troops who will remain will be doing a lot more than distributing wheelchairs - so let's roll.

Like all military members I had ample opportunity to conduct training in my career. I confess to having seen yawns from the crowd (limited to the late night party animals, I'm sure), but never having someone up and walk away. Had it happened, I'd have swiftly trained them on that subject, too - in a manner memorable to all. But as for why the Iraqi troops wandered off, the possible answers are endless. Language barrier? Could be. Resentment of America? Who knows? Beneath their dignity? No idea. Lack of enthusiasm? No doubt. Ineffective trainer? Partly, at least. (Certainly the reporter doesn't explain, but not everyone is aware of their failure to effectively convey information even in the face of visible evidence in midst of the effort.)

Perhaps the trainees simply don't see wheelchair distribution as part of the job description. Certainly few in the pre-1990 U.S. military would view that sort of thing as a core competency - though a history of Berlin candy bombing and Toys for Tots has demonstrated the advantage of that weapon in the arsenal of Democracy. Bringing that spirit to distant battlefields has become unofficial (and effective) American military doctrine and offers stark contrast in a hearts and minds campaign to an enemy that offers public beheading as an alternative. Resulting "feel good" stories for the folks back home are nice, but efforts abroad are often life-essential; hunger, for example, is a feeling best not ignored.

Even without the minimal homefront PR gains, our small-scale, localized efforts to improve quality of life in Iraq and Afghanistan should continue on their intrinsic merits. The additional benefit - softening the public image of the tough guy GI, the master of blowing up things and killing people - is certainly worthwhile, but if an Army hasn't established that reputation in the first place (and it is useful as a deterrent to other "armies" who would like to establish it using you) its soldiers might not embrace the objective with the same level of enthusiasm as ours.

There may be a cultural component involved in their lack of enthusiasm, too. A certain fatalism grips the region, and non-Muslim Americans who view the Insh'Allah factor as eradicable by example are in for endless disappointment - or worse. What many Americans perceive as unwillingness to act, obstinacy, or downright laziness among individuals may indeed be examples of some or all of those aspects of human nature, but when validated by religious doctrine and centuries of custom those character traits become more than intractable.To the incautious or unaware, discouraging that behavior becomes less annoyance and more blasphemous in the mind of the "trainee"; results of that are predictable. (Patient indifference, at best.) This is not to imply hopelessness; Zakat (setting aside alms for the poor, preferably in secret) is one of the Pillars of Islam - but the approach to task by the non-believer is best done with caution.

Then again, it's possible the non-participants in this exercise simply didn't want to take part in a fraud.

"We're trying to build rapport," said Staff Sgt. Craig Jackson, 34, of Pennsylvania, one of the squad leaders working with Blauser. "Show them that their government is trying to help its people."
Which would have been fine if their government had somehow been involved, but this is the story of Brad Blauser and the folks back home:

Reach Out and Care Wheels, a Montana nonprofit organization that distributes pediatric wheelchairs assembled by South Dakota prison inmates, agreed to provide some to Blauser for $200 apiece, significantly lower than the retail price of similar chairs. Blauser reached out to friends, relatives and strangers online, seeking funds. By the end of 2005, he had raised $20,000 -- enough for 100 pediatric chairs to distribute in a country where they are a rarity.

"In this culture, children with disabilities are a curse from God, so you leave the children in the house, preferably in the back room," Blauser said. "When the parents get the wheelchairs, they say: 'To hell with this curse mentality. I'm going to take them to the market.' "

Blauser had raised an additional $56,000 by the end of 2006, including a $34,000 donation from his employer. The inmates in South Dakota could barely keep up. As of May 2007, as the U.S. troop "surge" was getting underway, Blauser had 100 wheelchairs ready for shipment.

By that time, Blauser had been promoted to a management position, making $170,000, nearly double his initial salary in Iraq.

By the time CNN did a report on the project in February 2008, Blauser's organization, Wheelchairs for Iraqi Kids, had distributed more than 230 wheelchairs. The piece triggered a flood of e-mails, donations and queries from people who wanted to get involved.

The donors included Ben Werdegar, an 11-year-old in Woodside, Calif., who raised $10,000 by playing his guitar at outdoor venues and who said he intends to keep at it until he brings in $1 million.
<...>
Blauser began thinking more ambitiously, realizing that his days as an unpaid humanitarian worker were numbered as the U.S. footprint in Iraq continued to shrink under a withdrawal timetable. Earlier this year, he put together a plan proposing that the Iraqi Health Ministry invest $20 million to build a wheelchair factory where dozens of newly employed workers would assemble 50,000 wheelchairs in five years. He presented it to the top U.S. military surgeon in Iraq, who works closely with the ministry. The minister politely declined.

The pediatric wheelchairs distributed in Fadhil were part of the last shipment Blauser had. Having spent the last year unemployed, he has burned through half of his personal savings.

"We're out of money and out of wheelchairs," Blauser said. "There's nothing left."
<...>
Prompted by the Americans, Alaa Dagher, head of the local council, gave a speech in the clinic's lobby.

"We are giving these wheelchairs to kids who got injured," he said. "We will help you lots in the future."

He then left, as did the Iraqi soldiers.

Noting the "prompting", I feel Alaa's pain. Perhaps the Iraqi government will help "lots in the future". But their current priorities stop somewhere short of wheelchair distribution. Given the other issues they currently confront, that's excusable. Blaming Iraqi soldiers for not playing along with an attempt to provide cover in this example is less so. Citing this well-intentioned effort by a small group of American soldiers as an example of why "billions of dollars and thousands of lives spent propping up and legitimizing the Iraqi government" might "have been a poor investment" is certainly dramatic but hardly an accurate picture of progress in Iraq - military, civilian, or otherwise. Unfortunately it's more indicative of what passes for journalism in America today. It also strongly reinforce a pre-existing "screw those people" mindset in many Washington Post readers, as evidenced by their comments appended to the online version of the story. If that was the author's goal he most definitely scored.

*****

Previous/related: Going Through Withdrawals


Posted by Greyhawk / May 10, 2009 7:49 PM | Permalink

1 Comment

As to the question of why the Iraqis were bored with the whole thing, I speculate it has to do with their cultural denigration of those who are weak. They respect strength and show little compassion, and indeed much contempt, for those that cannot defend themselves.

Leave a comment

350.jpg
Mrs G copy.png

November 26, 2010


America@war
[Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit.

That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary.

From their about page:

The Naval Institute shall remain

INDEPENDENT - A non-profit member association, with no government support, that does not lobby for special interests;

NON-PARTISAN - An independent, professional military association with a mission, goals and objectives that transcend political affiliations; and shall encourage

IDEAS - Through its respected journals Proceedings and Naval History, its conferences, its books and its online content, in support of those who serve.

"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation:

The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism.

Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented.

I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are.

"Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result.

Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web...

And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed.

The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down.

*****

But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:

Closing Blogs is nothing new. So many site's owners just give up on their own. They come and go, you know, these MilBloggers do. Like any other sort of blogger. Many post in the lonely down hours far from home, spill their guts for the world, then abandon their spots when the tour of duty is up. They have lives again somewhere in the world, and no need to share the details. So it goes.

Many are truly gone - no site left at all. "The page cannot be found." Other blogs remain, like abandoned defensive positions in shifting desert sands.

Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down.

If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real.

And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale.

We've already made history, it's time to save it.

(More to follow...)




Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) |

TMGbloglabel7copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
TMGrecentcomments.gif
TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Dawn Patrol Feeds

 

Add to Google Reader or Homepage Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to netvibes Add to Plusmo myaol_cta1.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

TMGbloglabel8copy.gif

TMGbloglabel9 copy.gif
Blah Blah Blah
me220.JPG

The Mudville Gazette is written and produced by Greyhawk, who recently retired from 24 years of active duty in the US military, but will maintain this disclaimer: Unless otherwise credited, the opinions expressed are those of the author, and nothing here is to be taken as representing the official position of or endorsement by the United States Department of Defense or any of its subordinate components.

Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house.

I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email.

Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed.

Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com

andsm.jpg

*****

Tending Distant
Fires


Far from hearth and home, watching
Cold alone but not alone
On distant shore and only wanting
Safe return and little more

What tales we'll tell
When that time comes
When tales can be told

When things grim
Seem far away
When other fires go cold

Some distant sunset, vision fading
Memories remain
And tired eyes gaze 'pon folded flags
While distant drums beat their refrain

Saluting fallen friends whose names
And youth will never fade
Here's to those on other shores,
for them live well, the price is paid

- Greyhawk,
Baghdad,
December 2004