The reader will kindly forgive any tendency to rough language or behavior on the part of the site owner...
TMGlogo2006-2007phs-copy.jpg
"Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
TMGbloglabel1 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel3 copy.gif
TMG MONTHLY ARCHIVES
[-]



TMGbloglabel10 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette Feeds

 

Add to Technorati Favorites
Technorati Profile
add.gif
Add to Google
addtomyyahoo4.gif
ngsub1.gif sub_modern5.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

digg.jpg

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

pl-news.gif

tvc_logo_small.png

Mrsg- Greyhawk's Profile
Mrsg- Greyhawk's Facebook profile
Create Your Badge
TMGbloglabel5 copy.gif
TMGbloglabel6 copy.gif
350.jpg
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by!
« The Sims | Main | More anti-pirate options »

April 14, 2009

greyhawk copy sm.png

Another hijack attempt on a US vessel

By Greyhawk

Fox:

An American ship was attacked Tuesday in yet another brush with pirates off the coast of Somalia, but despite damaging the vessel, the pirates' hijacking attempt failed.
<...>
On Tuesday, the Liberty Sun, with a crew of about 20 U.S. citizens, reported to the U.S. Coast Guard that they were being attacked by pirates. The Navy dispatched the USS Bainbridge, the same warship that came to the rescue of the Maersk Alabama last week.

But by the time the warship arrived several hours later at the scene of the attack on the Liberty Sun, the pirates were gone.

The pirates had fired rocket propelled grenades and automatic weapons at the ship, Liberty Maritime Corporation of Lake Success, N.Y., said in a written statement. The vessel sustained damage in the attack.

And "The Liberty Sun now is en route to Mombassa, Kenya, with American food aid cargo for African countries suffering from famine".

Reuters:

Somali pirates hijacked two more cargo vessels and opened fire on two others on Tuesday in attacks that showed a determination to go on striking at shipping on the region's strategic trade routes.

The capture of the Greek-owned MV Irene E.M. and Togo-flagged MV Sea Horse were a clear sign pirate gangs have not been deterred by two raids in recent days in which U.S. and French special forces have killed five pirates.

A "clear sign pirate gangs have not been deterred by two raids in recent days"? Not really - it's not even clear these particular pirates are aware of recent events.

Andrew Exum posts a question from a long-time friend: "So what does your erudite and brilliant readership believe that actions against the pirates should look like, toward what ends, at what costs, and with what risks?"

Without claiming applicability of the adjectives, here's my answer:

*****

Ignoring the 21st Century Easter Miracle and moving forward...

Goal: reduce or eliminate pirate threat.

Armed guys on boats transiting high threat area seems a good start. (Maybe Xe gets a new lease on life?)

Assumptions:

1. Though highly "motivated", Pirates balance risk and reward.

2. Many pirates will be dissuaded by warning shots alone (not talking about 22s here...) Others will need to take one on the chin.

3. Any who are shot after throwing a grappling hook may be (and will be reported as) an innocent fisherman or individual forced into piracy at gunpoint or by starvation. Bad PR will result.

4. Every ship transiting should carry some "humanitarian" cargo. Because it's a good thing to do.

5. Cost of [bad PR + increased security] / pirate related losses < 1 = go.

Some might argue for cost of "humanitarian goods" in the numerator too - but I say that's just a good thing to do. (Arguably it reduces the partly intangible cost of bad PR and needlessly complicates the equation.)

Unknown: I know nothing about maritime law.

Known: Seafarers International Union provides weapons training to members.

Not intended as a comprehensive solution, just a start.

*****

Here's a counterpoint:

"The risk of a sailor getting badly injured or killed is big," said Nicholas Walsh, a Portland lawyer who specializes in maritime law. "The financial liabilities are going to be huge."

About a dozen ships with a total of more than 200 crew members are being held hostage by pirates off the eastern coast of Africa, according to the International Maritime Bureau. The nonprofit organization, based in Malaysia, works to halt piracy and other forms of maritime crime.

But the odds of any one ship being seized by pirates are still very small, Walsh said, and those risks are outweighed by the potential dangers of having guns on board a vessel.

He said shipping companies are studying the piracy issue closely and likely will turn to governments to solve the problem rather than take on the security job themselves.

Wow, good luck with that.

Charles Krauthammer:

I think the idea of the United States organizing an international sort of agreement or sort of a committee, or some kind of concerted action, is not going to happen.

There are only two options -- a, you arm the ships, which is a passive mode, but I think it might be the most effective. The most effective is to attack the lairs -- that's the word you use for a pirate -- they don't have bases. They always have lairs -- attack them in Somalia.

But that requires a military operation of some scale at a time when we don't have a lot of slack or spare capacity. We have wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and this is not at that high enough level.

The Iraq and Afghanistan excuse doesn't work - there are 2,000 Marines on the Boxer who could get 'er done between meals.

Ain't. gonna. happen. In a make-believe world like the one on television news programs where the President of the United States authorizes use of deadly force and delegates decisions to a commander on scene in a hostage situation - maybe. In the real world where permission to engage must be requested and is actually denied until the pirates physically point a gun at the one hostage they're holding (under threat of death or bodily harm, hence "hostage") and multiple phone calls for ROE clarification and permission to fire are still required - no way. There's also a consideration of exactly what to do after the bad guys are done shooting back. "Get back on boat and leave" being okay by me but possibly political suicide. More on this option later - arm the merchant ships being a better way to start and the focus here. See what happens then and respond appropriately to changed circumstances.

Gotta credit Bill Kristol (same as previous link) for this one though: "The pirate street will be up in arms!" He's joking - but that's one reason the real world situation was handled as it was.


Posted by Greyhawk / April 14, 2009 11:21 PM | Permalink

4 Comments

Watch though. Next time someone is held hostage the words "in imminent danger" will be predicated by strict qualifiers.

I can't imagine any American flagged ship being willing to allow itself to be taken hostage now if it can be helped at all. The crews must know that. The propaganda value for the pirates would be enormous and we'd end up with another Iran hostage crisis on our hands. I wonder what would happen, would the ship's owner be allowed to pay a ransom, would the pirates (and their backers) even accept it?

Not to sound the wrong note here, but it seems to me than an American hostage is a lot more valuable than a Filipino one. For reasons that have nothing to do with the hostages themselves.

Maybe I'm crazy, but isn't there some historical precedence for the United States using force to eliminate a pirate threat? The Marine Corps did a fair job of handling business with the Barbary Pirates way back when.

I just wish one of our leaders would come out and let the pirates know, if targeting Americans is how they want to do business then we will oblige them in kind. We let them know that for every American killed, we burn down one of their lairs. We could start on the coastline and work our way inland.

Bottom line: If you are a threat to American citizens, you need to be eliminated.

Good points Sadie, you're right to be concerned.

I think Pirates are in it for money with little other consideration. I don't think they are concerned with propaganda.

As to relative hostage value - the prime hostage is the ship. And while much has been made of the "American flagged" issue in the coverage, that's not really of that much concern. The US Navy would not decline to aid a British flagged ship, vice versa, etc. etc X lots of navies in the area. (But not enough as the stories of the past week make clear.) The flag is often a tax (or other financial consideration)-based decision. See "flag of convenience" for extreme examples, but there are others less "shady". ('Tis a grey area, says I. Yaargh.)

Further, the owners (shippers and receivers) of the goods are parties other than the owners of the ships - all may be of nationality other than the flag it bears and the crews will be a mixed lot of folks from all over. Insurance companies, underwriters, etc. all factor in too.

The "American flag" (and crew) served to get the Alabama incident some media coverage. But the truth is there aren't that many "American flagged" vessels beyond the coastal US.

By 2003 the United States ranked 17th in number of oceangoing vessels, having fallen from a top-ten ranking just a few years earlier. The US merchant fleet ranked 11th on a deadweight tonnage basis. The US fleet's share of oceanborne commercial foreign trade, by weight, continued to be less than five percent.

As of year-end 2005 the U.S.-flag oceangoing fleet included 195 vessels (9.1 million DWT). Of this, 100 vessels (4.8 million DWT) were Jones Act vessels (US-built) eligible for domestic trades. From 2001 to 2005, the U.S.-flag privately-owned oceangoing merchant fleet declined by 26 vessels (1.0 million DWT). The Jones Act fleet declined by 31 vessels (1.6 million DWT), while the non-Jones Act fleet (foreign trade vessels) increased by 5 vessels (0.6 million DWT). As of year-end 2005, 47 percent of the U.S.-flag fleet (DWT) was older than 20 years. For the Jones Act segment, 67 percent of the fleet was older than 20 years.
And that's an altogether different concern.

More

More

More

350.jpg
Mrs G copy.png

November 26, 2010


America@war
[Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit.

That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary.

From their about page:

The Naval Institute shall remain

INDEPENDENT - A non-profit member association, with no government support, that does not lobby for special interests;

NON-PARTISAN - An independent, professional military association with a mission, goals and objectives that transcend political affiliations; and shall encourage

IDEAS - Through its respected journals Proceedings and Naval History, its conferences, its books and its online content, in support of those who serve.

"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation:

The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism.

Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented.

I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are.

"Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result.

Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web...

And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed.

The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down.

*****

But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:

Closing Blogs is nothing new. So many site's owners just give up on their own. They come and go, you know, these MilBloggers do. Like any other sort of blogger. Many post in the lonely down hours far from home, spill their guts for the world, then abandon their spots when the tour of duty is up. They have lives again somewhere in the world, and no need to share the details. So it goes.

Many are truly gone - no site left at all. "The page cannot be found." Other blogs remain, like abandoned defensive positions in shifting desert sands.

Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down.

If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real.

And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale.

We've already made history, it's time to save it.

(More to follow...)




Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) |

TMGbloglabel7copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
TMGrecentcomments.gif
  • Greyhawk: Good points Sadie, you're right to be concerned. I think read more
  • America's 1st Sgt: Maybe I'm crazy, but isn't there some historical precedence for read more
  • Sadie: I can't imagine any American flagged ship being willing to read more
  • Leo R: Watch though. Next time someone is held hostage the words read more

MBC2010.jpg

MILBLOGS NEWS

*****

Latest Posts From MilBlogs

*****

milblogsa1.jpg Prev | List | Random | Next
Join
Powered by RingSurf!
TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Dawn Patrol Feeds

 

Add to Google Reader or Homepage Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to netvibes Add to Plusmo myaol_cta1.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

TMGbloglabel8copy.gif

TMGbloglabel9 copy.gif
Blah Blah Blah
me220.JPG

The Mudville Gazette is written and produced by Greyhawk, who recently retired from 24 years of active duty in the US military, but will maintain this disclaimer: Unless otherwise credited, the opinions expressed are those of the author, and nothing here is to be taken as representing the official position of or endorsement by the United States Department of Defense or any of its subordinate components.

Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house.

I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email.

Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed.

Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com

andsm.jpg

*****

Tending Distant
Fires


Far from hearth and home, watching
Cold alone but not alone
On distant shore and only wanting
Safe return and little more

What tales we'll tell
When that time comes
When tales can be told

When things grim
Seem far away
When other fires go cold

Some distant sunset, vision fading
Memories remain
And tired eyes gaze 'pon folded flags
While distant drums beat their refrain

Saluting fallen friends whose names
And youth will never fade
Here's to those on other shores,
for them live well, the price is paid

- Greyhawk,
Baghdad,
December 2004