
![]() | |
October 2012
August 2012 July 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003
|
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by! March 28, 2009 The Plan Unveiled (III)By Greyhawk"The President's plan" for Pakistan and Afghanistan (I think it's important that its established order of priority is maintained - and not only because I concur with it) will be tough to implement without the support of all involved - that's obvious. Loyal, thoughtful, and constructive opposition is expected, but certainly not from some quarters where it's already beginning to appear. From the plan: The United States must overcome the 'trust deficit' it faces in Afghanistan and Pakistan, where many believe that we are not a reliable long-term partner. We must engage the Afghan people in ways that demonstrate our commitment to promoting a legitimate and capable Afghan government with economic progress. We must engage the Pakistani people based on our long-term commitment to helping them build a stable economy, a stronger democracy, and a vibrant civil society.Which makes you wonder if this guy read it:
That second story is from earlier this week. Why must Americans be forced to choose sides, as those who've decided to support President Obama will soon be forced to confront those who are equally determined to support President Obama instead? Is there no middle ground? Can't we all just get along? And best of luck to the guys in 4-82. You'll need it. Posted by Greyhawk / March 28, 2009 8:49 AM | Permalink 3 TrackBacks"Obama plan for Afghanistan, Pakistan short on bold"There is little wisdom or boldness in the new strategy. It's more like a 50/50 mix of hot coffee and cold cream, a compromise between national interests and domestic politics that makes the strategy n... Read More This quote...Asked why al-Qaeda, which is comparatively safe in its current sanctuaries in Pakistan, would want to return to Afghanistan, where more than 100,000 U.S. and NATO troops are stationed, Jones said, "That's a good question. . . . This is cer... Read More From the president's remarks at Elmendorf:I will not risk your lives unless it is necessary to America's vital interest. And if it is necessary, the United States of America will have your back. We will give you the strategy and the clear mission you d... Read More 11 Comments |
November 26, 2010America@war [Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit. That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary. From their about page:
"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation: The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism. Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented. I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are. "Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result. Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web... And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed. The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down. But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:
Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down. If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real. And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale. We've already made history, it's time to save it. (More to follow...) Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink |
Comments (0) |
|
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
![]() Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house. I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email. Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed. Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com ![]() Tending Distant Far from hearth and home, watching What tales we'll tell When things grim Some distant sunset, vision fading Saluting fallen friends whose names - Greyhawk, Baghdad, December 2004 |
And the 33rd BCT (ILARNG) who are months into the fight right now.
True that (and congratulations again, LTC).
I'm looking forward to putting together a roundup of Afghan-experienced milbloggers' responses to the plan. Checked some this morning (incl you), initial responses are positive but few are claiming any deep review yet. (And most responses so far are to media coverage vice the White Paper.)
My best to all our troops in Afghanistan, Iraq and elsewhere, as this is the war with no front.
I have major reservations with the Administration's plan, but a plan is better than no plan. Unfortunately it does not address the ISI or other non-Talibe but radicalist backing groups that extend beyond Pakistan and Afghanistan... that is not good for al Qaeda and the Talibe have more than one supply route at this point. Nor does it address that the enemy gets a say in things, and there are three places I can think of that al Qaeda and Talibe can stop all of this without a single assassination, but just keeping up ops as at their current tempo which is beyond the ability of Pakistan to cope with. And there is no second supply route... to get that would require all of Clinton's quite nasty side of the rolodex and willing to work hard with three Nations and one major non-state player in the region.
And I have problems on the tactical side, as well, but will leave that up to the experts in the armed forces. We can mitigate each of the problem areas on the strategic side with a much better force mix and shift in ROE, but it is mitigation, not outright negation.
Hopefully we can out-adapt the enemy yet again. Folks are always surprised we can do that.
What happened to the campaign plan (referenced only)to capture Osama Bin Laden. It's easy when you don't have to do it.
May I just remind you of the record of major powers agains the Afghans in previous wars?
British Empire 0 Afghan ragheads 3
Soviet Union/ Russia 0 Afghan ragheads 2
India 0 Afghan ragheads 1
Pakistan 0 Afghan rageads 1
You have to go back to Genghis Khan to find out when they last lost a war on their own ground.
Obama's plan is doomed.
India 0 Afghan ragheads 1.
Ian Thorpe,
I am not sure which "war" you are talking about between India and Afghan "ragheads" - we did support the Northern Alliance of Ahmed Shah Masood against the Taliban pre 9/11, but even this was nothing more than to counter pakistan using them for "strategic depth" vis-a-vis Kashmir.
I wonder if you are talking about Mohammed of Ghori who was of Afghan origin who played a major role in the Islamic invasion of India. But we would'nt call him a "rag head". He would be one of what Will Durant called the islamic invaders of India - barbarians.
Here's wishing Good Luck to the US troops and its allies.
The key to Afghanistan is opium.
Any one here think that we are winning the drug war? Any one think we can win the drug war?
Any one think that there is a military solution to a medical problem?
We have been at this opiate prohibition thing for 94 years. Any one think year 95 is going to be any better?
There is only a dissonance between the plan and the CinC's statements if one assumes that being a "reliable long-term partner" actually entails doing anything. I hope I'm wrong, but all indications I've seen are that Pres. Obama and his gang's plan is to basically throw enough money over the fence to say we're doing something and then leave. If they can't control it with us as a "long-term (financial) partner" then it's their fault.
Newsflash, PrezBo: First you're going to have to engage the Taliban, (what's left of)the al Qaeda,the terrorist moles in Pakistan's intelligence service, and the Taliban in their government. That means forceful engagement, not "negotiation without preconditions".
This moron was given a winning hand in Iraq and Afghanistan. Watch him blow it.
I find it really interesting that most of the problems around the world with security and terrorism are former colonies of the British Empire: Afghanistan, Pakistan, Mesopotamia (Iraq), the Levant (Middle East), etc.
As for the plan, in my opinion, it is way too incomplete and lacks comprehensiveness. As it was stated in the white paper and from the President (considerable differences by the way), it falls short of tackling the actual problems. It will neither defeat al Qaeda, or cut off the life cord between the local and global jihadists, the Pakistani security services ISI, and the Taliban.
Lubo
www.politea.org