
![]() | |
October 2012
August 2012 July 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003
|
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by! March 14, 2009 Hey, nobody's perfect...By GreyhawkShould the US Ambassador to Iraq speak Arabic? Should he have Middle Eastern experience? Should he have deep background in working with the military in counterinsurgency operations? Would two out of three "yes" answers be enough? How about zero for three? "I get the sense that the Department of State has never really switched on to the Iraq War." Says Abu M in something of an understatement. "And I worry about a fundamental difference between the way the military and policy-makers in Washington see Iraq and the way the Department of State sees it." That will be less an issue in Afghanistan, where the President "nominated Lt. Gen. Karl Eikenberry, who served in Afghanistan twice, including an 18-month tour that ended in 2007 as commanding general, to be ambassador in Kabul." Update: - counterpont from an anonymous commenter at Abu M: "Hill's experience in the Balkans and with complex, multiparty negotiations presumably will be useful in helping to get the political process moving in Baghdad. The reality is that the nature of the Iraq War and our influence has changed. The SOFA is not going away and the emphasis now needs to be on bringing together competing factions and convincing them to build on the foundation provided by the surge. Hill's past background suggests he should be able to do this... "By all accounts, he's had a very successful diplomatic career. He could happily retire to the private sector. Instead, he's agreed to do this-in the face of a bunch of people who will, undoubtedly, blame him for the entire failure of the Iraq War if he does not deliver results." Here's his State Department bio: Christopher R. Hill was sworn in as Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs on April 8, 2005. More - remarks by the President earlier this week: “The attacks of 9/11 signaled the new dangers of the 21st century. And today, our people are still threatened by violent extremists, and we’re still at war with terrorists in Afghanistan and Pakistan who are plotting to do us harm. "Yet terrorism and extremism make up just one part of the many challenges that confront our nation. In Iraq, we will surely face difficult days ahead as we responsibly end a war by transitioning to Iraqi control of their country." The nominations seem consistent with that point of view. I suspect that over the past couple of years Afghanistan/Pakistan (vice Iraq) has become the greater attraction for the angry young jihadist wanting a piece of the Crusader - a 180 from years past. I wouldn't consider that shift to be the sole cause of the divergent trajectories of the two campaigns, but it's certainly a contributing factor. Posted by Greyhawk / March 14, 2009 10:43 AM | Permalink 2 TrackBacksHaven’t done one of these in a while. Herewith some open tabs on my browser: This is a congressional op-ed that reflects some foreign trips that weren’t just junkets. I excerpted pieces in a post below but it’s worth reading. Mudvi... Read More Hmmmm...Brownback to block Iraq nominee Senator says Christopher Hill misled him Sen. Sam Brownback of Kansas threatened Thursday to take advantage of a Senate rule to block the confirmation of Christopher Hill as U.S. ambassador to Iraq on the grounds... Read More 6 Comments |
November 26, 2010America@war [Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit. That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary. From their about page:
"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation: The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism. Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented. I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are. "Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result. Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web... And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed. The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down. But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:
Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down. If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real. And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale. We've already made history, it's time to save it. (More to follow...) Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink |
Comments (0) |
|
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
![]() Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house. I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email. Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed. Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com ![]() Tending Distant Far from hearth and home, watching What tales we'll tell When things grim Some distant sunset, vision fading Saluting fallen friends whose names - Greyhawk, Baghdad, December 2004 |
Ambassador Hill sounds like just the person I'd want as an ambassador or high level envoy if I were President and had a central/east European problem. He'd very likely be a good ambassador for us to Germany, Ukraine or Russia. Indeed, ambassador to Russia would be a plum for him and a signal to the Russians that we're putting our best, most professional person forward.
I'm not so sure he's the right man for Iraq. I appreciate the counter-point, and his experience in cracking heads and getting people to work together should be helpful. But as you point out, his experience is most in Europe, he doesn't speak Arabic, and he very likely has had few opportunities to work with the military on various issues (though perhaps his Korean experience has something useful there).
I wouldn't count the man out, but it does make you wonder.
Diplomats (like journalists) apparently believe they can parachute in to a new posting and rely solely on their expertise in diplomacy (or journalism). Once they're familiar with the area, they get posted somewhere else, I believe because people in their fields are afraid they'll become too involved with the local area. Unfortunately, this is just the way diplomacy (and journalism and plenty of other fields) works, and as a result, we see diplomats and others who try to parlay their expertise in their own field into careers, often displaying laughable ignorance.
We are back to where all the trouble with Iraq started. An inexperienced ambassader to Iraq, promoted for affirmative action/political corrective and didn't have a clue on Saddam. Assumed that he was a honorable man and would not start and problems or wars in the Middle-East. Within days Saddam invaded Kuwait relializing that our state Department was being run by second raters. Appointing a second rate ambassader gives the terrorists a big boost in their endevors. Thanks to Obama.
I am retired military. I am also retired from teaching public school social studies. At one time I thought I wanted to be in the Foreign Service. I now have a very little respect for the U.S. state department. I feel that they are always undercutting the efforts of the military and frequently making unwise commitments that cost the lives of military personnel. Their mouth writes checks that the military has to cash.
You should check out a new grassroots political movement founded by Iraq and Afghanistan veterans. The Modern Whig Party is a mainstream movement that places common-sense, rational thought ahead of ideology. They have attracted about 25,000 moderate Republicans and moderate Dems, and have been deemed the "fastest growing mainstream political movement in the nation." Their general thing is fiscal responsibility, strong national defense and bold social progression.
Best of all, the founding members are the real deal in terms of support for military families and servicemembers. Even if you don't agree with all they say, it's cool to see what a bunch of recent vets are doing.
http://www.modernwhig.org
" counterpont from an anonymous commenter at Abu M: "Hill's experience in the Balkans and with complex, multiparty negotiations presumably will be useful in helping to get the political process moving in Baghdad."
WTF: The political process is moving. Idiot.
The US helped build the political system that is now in place.
Maybe Hill needs to come back here and find out why the USA, a stable long time Republic, didn't approve a budget until four months after it was due.