The reader will kindly forgive any tendency to rough language or behavior on the part of the site owner...
TMGlogo2006-2007phs-copy.jpg
"Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
TMGbloglabel1 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel3 copy.gif
TMGbloglabel10 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette Feeds

 

Add to Technorati Favorites
Technorati Profile
add.gif
Add to Google
addtomyyahoo4.gif
ngsub1.gif sub_modern5.gif add2netvibes.gif Add to Plusmo subscribe2.gif myaol_cta1.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

digg.jpg

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

pl-news.gif

tvc_logo_small.png

Mrsg- Greyhawk's Profile
Mrsg- Greyhawk's Facebook profile
Create Your Badge
TMGbloglabel5 copy.gif

gngrey120x60.gif

TMGbloglabel6 copy.gif
350.jpg
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by!
« Boom Frequency | Main | Milblogs Conference Registration Opens »

March 8, 2009

greyhawk copy sm.png

Diversions (III)

By Greyhawk

Remember the Iraq drawdown you heard about last month? The one where a Brigade originally scheduled for Iraq was going to Afghanistan instead? Well, a funny thing about that...

Last weekend we noted this obscure bit of news from ABC:

Gen. Odierno will receive a Stryker Brigade to replace the incoming replacement brigade diverted to Afghanistan just a week ago. That means that he will continue to maintain the current level of two Stryker brigades in Iraq.

While that story might be obscure, it's anything but insignificant. The diversion of the Stryker Brigade (one of two that were then scheduled to replace the two currently in Iraq) to Afghanistan made headlines as the President appeared at Camp Lejeune to announce his Iraq drawdown and Afghanistan "surge". As noted here at the time, that followup report - if accurate - "exposes everything you've heard about troop deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan over the past two weeks as an absolute hoax on the American public."

Read the first entry in this series for details of the preparations made by the Stryker Brigade for an Iraq deployment - 10-month Arabic language schools being just part of the training rendered useless by a reassignment to a country where the locals don't speak it.

Of course, "intensive, 10-month Arabic language training" and "exercises... where they had to help their commanders negotiate with native-speaker role players" were now useless - but if they were no longer needed in Iraq, so be it.

But they were needed in Iraq - just not as badly as the Obama administration needed to make it appear that troops initially slotted for Iraq were going to Afghanistan instead - seemingly making good on a key campaign promise. So with much fanfare the Iraq drawdown (consisting entirely of the Stryker Brigade)/Afghanistan surge (Strykers plus a Marine unit) was announced, and subsequent polls indicated Americans were wildly enthusiastic about the idea.

And a few days later no one would notice the bombshell reported by ABC: "Gen. Odierno will receive a Stryker Brigade to replace the incoming replacement brigade diverted to Afghanistan just a week ago" - perhaps because within 24 hours of reporting that news they changed it to this:

ABC News has also learned that Gen. Odierno will continue to maintain a Stryker Brigade presence in Iraq through the upcoming elections as he had requested. There are currently two Stryker Brigades in Iraq. When their tours end later this year, only one of those departing brigades will be replaced by an incoming Stryker Brigade.

Not only was there no explanation of the "correction", there wasn't even an acknowledgment of the change on the site.

But wait... there's more...

*****

I don't like conspiracy theories - I suspected that ABC's initial report was due to some sort of simple misunderstanding and that the corrected version was in fact correct. But to confirm that I sent a simple email to them:

Greetings Just linked this in a post, but subsequently discovered the line "ABC News has also learned that Gen. Odierno will receive a Stryker Brigade to replace the incoming replacement brigade diverted to Afghanistan just a week ago" has since vanished without explanation.

What happened?

Even though it was the weekend they were kind enough to reply:

That was updated.
I checked to see if they were referring to a subsequent update - they weren't. So I replied:
Clearly. But that's rather a dramatic change to make without explanation, don't you think? The original version indicates the entire narrative of diverting troops from Iraq to Afghanistan is a fraud perpetrated on the American public. The later version is hardly newsworthy.

Aren't corrections of that magnitude worthy of an appended explanation?

It's been a week since that was sent and I've received no reply. But that's probably because other developments have rendered the point somewhat moot.

*****

Specifically, last Monday the DoD announced:

The Department of Defense announced today that 4th Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division, based in Ft. Lewis, Wash., will deploy in the fall of 2009 to support Operation Iraqi Freedom.

The brigade consists of approximately 4,000 personnel and will deploy as a replacement unit for a formation currently operating in Iraq. Its deployment will provide commanders in Iraq the flexibility to maintain the appropriate level of effort based on their assessment of the security situation on the ground.

The next day's Tacoma News Tribune would report:

A Fort Lewis Stryker combat brigade will deploy to Iraq this fall, several months ahead of the original schedule, Army officials said Monday.

When the 4th Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division departs, all three Stryker brigades based at the Army post will be simultaneously deployed to combat for the first time. Each brigade has about 4,000 soldiers.

And ABC would change their story once again - this time with an explanation:

Editor's Note: Over the weekend, additional information led us to rework this article. We have restored the original wording as additional reporting reconfirms the information posted Friday night.

Gen. Odierno will maintain a two-Stryker Brigade presence through the rest of this year even though a replacement Stryker Brigade had been redirected to Afghansitan [sic]. The Pentagon's announcement Monday that the 4th Stryker BCT, 2nd Infantry Division will head to Iraq in the Fall means both brigades currently in Iraq will be replaced by Stryker Brigades. In shorthand, the 4th SBCT/2nd ID will replace the 1st SBCT/25th ID and the 3rd SBCT/2nd ID will the 56th National Guard Stryker Brigade.

Kudos to them for reporting it, but they fail to connect the dots - removing a Brigade from Iraq (or from the schedule to go to Iraq) and replacing it with another Brigade is no way to accomplish a "drawdown" (except in newspaper headlines).

*****

Let's recap the salient points here:

1. In September, 2008, the 5th Stryker Brigade Combat Team (SBCT) - after months of preparation - is ordered to Iraq. (One of two SBCTs that were then scheduled to replace the two currently in Iraq)

2. In February, 2009, President Obama announces his Iraq drawdown/Afghanistan surge - the 5th SBCT will be diverted to Afghanistan instead of Iraq.

3. March, 2009, the DoD announces the 4th SBCT will deploy to Iraq this fall, several months ahead of the original schedule replacing the 5th SBCT in the rotation in order to maintain two Stryker Brigades in Iraq.

For the record, I'm in favor of commanders on the ground getting the forces they need to get the job done. I have no doubt that two Stryker Brigades are needed in Iraq, and others in Afghanistan.

I'm deeply concerned when I see troop rotations "adjusted" in what appears to be an effort to fool the American public. But I appreciate that the Obama administration can do that in plain sight, even providing press releases detailing exactly how they're doing it.

I'm even more concerned that those efforts - and the ramifications thereof - are obvious to an American media assumed to be independent of the Executive Branch but apparently unconcerned about reporting its activities. Item two above was headline grabbing/TV news lead story material - item three indicates it was a fraud.

One year ago that would have been a hell of a story, don't you think?

More: Diversions (IV)


Bookmark and Share - via email, facebook, twitter, etc.

Posted by Greyhawk / March 8, 2009 11:52 AM | Permalink

16 TrackBacks

Fewer things in life must be more fun than sticking soldiers under a shell and shifting them around at will. Of course it’s easy to do when you have no vested interest in their mission — afterall the current Administation has taken every op... Read More

Diversions (IV) from Mudville Gazette on March 9, 2009 9:41 AM

A couple (among many) of interesting comments from the previous post:I'm a soldier in 4/2, so I thought I'd throw my two cents in. The way things are being explained to us is that if we want most of the combat brigades gone by 31 Aug 2010, 4/2 had to d... Read More

Diversity from Mudville Gazette on March 9, 2009 9:50 AM

Just an aside - after reading the comments here and here I've come to the conclusion I'm an Obama loving Obama hater. There's really no other explanation for it. (Though some might accuse me of being an Obama hating Obama lover, I suppose...) Unless...... Read More

Here's how you pull a Three-Brigade Monte: President Obama promised to drawdown Iraqi troops. He was going to pull out a brigade from Iraq. So, he does--he withdraws the troops from Iraq and puts them in Afghanistan. That means there... Read More

Welcome to the Dawn Patrol, our daily roundup of information on the War on Terror and other topics - from the MilBlogs and other sources around the world. If you're a blogger, you can join the conversation. If you link to any of these stories, add a li... Read More

Let the Mudville Gazette count the ways: Last weekend we noted this obscure bit of news from ABC: Gen. Odierno will receive a Stryker Brigade to replace the incoming replacement brigade diverted to Afghanistan just a week ago. That means... Read More

Fewer things in life must be more fun than sticking soldiers under a shell and shifting them around at will. Of course it’s easy to do when you have no vested interest in their mission — after all the current Administration has taken every ... Read More

Fewer things in life must be more fun than sticking soldiers under a shell and shifting them around at will. Of course it’s easy to do when you have no vested interest in their mission — after all the current Administration has taken every ... Read More

Keep your eyes on the ball from Right Minded Americans on March 14, 2009 12:18 PM

Why isn't this story all over the news? It looks like Obama is playing games. Not surprising seeing that any military knowledge he has came from playing Risk as a kid. The DoD announced: "The Department of Defense announced today... Read More

Fewer things in life must be more fun than sticking soldiers under a shell and shifting them around at will. Of course it’s easy to do when you have no vested interest in their mission — after all the current Administration has taken every ... Read More

Fewer things in life must be more fun than sticking soldiers under a shell and shifting them around at will. Of course it’s easy to do when you have no vested interest in their mission — after all the current Administration has taken every ... Read More

Fewer things in life must be more fun than sticking soldiers under a shell and shifting them around at will. Of course it’s easy to do when you have no vested interest in their mission — after all the current Administration has taken every ... Read More

Fewer things in life must be more fun than sticking soldiers under a shell and shifting them around at will. Of course it’s easy to do when you have no vested interest in their mission — after all the current Administration has taken every ... Read More

Fewer things in life must be more fun than sticking soldiers under a shell and shifting them around at will. Of course it’s easy to do when you have no vested interest in their mission — after all the current Administration has taken every ... Read More

Fewer things in life must be more fun than sticking soldiers under a shell and shifting them around at will. Of course it’s easy to do when you have no vested interest in their mission — after all the current Administration has taken every ... Read More

Fewer things in life must be more fun than sticking soldiers under a shell and shifting them around at will. Of course it’s easy to do when you have no vested interest in their mission — after all the current Administration has taken every ... Read More

36 Comments

So -- let's see if I have it correct. Obama's announcement of a redeployment of one incoming Stryker brigade from Iraq to Afghanistan was prominent on-the-air news.
The fact that this brigade has been learning Arabic for months -- useless in Afghanistan -- was not mentioned.
The fact that this brigade will be replaced by yet another Stryker brigade was not reported, but was deliberately ignored by the network. It was quietly posted instead, much later, on the network web site.
So the Administration is succeeding, with MSM connivance, to give the public the fraudulent impression that our Iraq combat forces are being drawn down quickly, (as promised by Obama in the campaign). Both reality, and the waste of resources associated with covering up reality, are being suppressed by the press.
Please correct if I'm wrong.

Greyhawk,

There might be more to this story even than what you have written here. My niece's husband is based at Fort Lewis, and he was just deployed to Iraq. This past week we found out that his deployment was lengthened from 12 to something like 15 months. We also found out that she is due to deliver their first child in November, so we are hoping he will be able to come home for that. He works in a medical unit, and I don't know much more than that, but I can find out, if you would like.

So if I understand this correctly, you are saying that:

1. A brigade was diverted from deploying to Iraq to deploying to Afghanistan, and this was publicly identified as a "draw-down" of forces in Iraq.

2. Several days later it was reported that another brigade's deployment to Iraq is being pulled forward.

3, The comment above indicates yet another brigade's return to the US is being pushed back.

This all sounds like a net effect on manpower of essentially zero, but a negative effect on the fit between the training of the deploying forces and their duties. That will presumably result in degraded effectiveness, and thus increased casualties, am I right?

I can accept that a CiC might have to make sub-optimal military decisions in the face of political realities, but I would hope those realities would involve the interests of the nation, not simply the Potemkin-like fulfillment his political promises. In this case it sounds like it was the latter.

What are the duties / options of a the military commander in such a situation?

As my son is 5-2ID SBCT and took those Arabic Class's and, trianed his ASS off for Iraq. I could power a nuclear plant just by dipping my kiester in the water. Gotta think Geobbels would be proud of our media. Rick (Doc) Wright EX 82nd 1/05

A "Stryker Brigade" is basically a unit riding around in armored cars, right? Armored cars have been around since WWI and have generally fared poorly in combat against real armored vehicles, such as tanks. Why does a unit riding around in armored cars get a special designation?

If you'll recall from the campaign, when Obama wanted to transfer interpreters from Iraq to Afghanistan, he obviously doesn't know that there are different languages spoken in those two countries so the issue of the Arabic training doesn't matter to him. It's all about the permanent campaign.

Greyhawk,

This isn't the first time "THE ONE" has tried to manipulate the war operations to his advantage. Remember when he tried to get the Iraqis to stall U.S. redeployments for the sake of his campaign?

He wanted to make it look as if the impending withdrawal and success created by American military operations including the surge, were all his idea.
Link:
http://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2008/09/22/obama-tried-stalling-us-redeployment/

This narcissistic charlatan has no shame.

Sherlock
"net effect on manpower of essentially zero" - well, depends on what you mean. In Iraq, yes, but an increase in Afghanistan with no concurrent decrease in Iraq. As near as I can determine, none of the 17,000 troops "surging" (see this report from Afghanistan) into Afghanistan will be at the expense of totals in Iraq.

That total has decreased from surge levels and might continue to do so - depending on conditions on the ground. But thus far the only Brigade designated to go to Iraq this year then switched to Afghanistan has been replaced by another Brigade for Iraq.

But then again - there are 22 Brigades "in the pipeline" for Iraq, or in Iraq this year, so there are plenty more opportunities for "diversions".

I think this is a case of (more) bad reporting from the multi-layer fact checkers:

“These units have been identified for some time now to go in as replacement units,” he said. “This isn’t part of the additional capabilities that we’re applying. These are rotational forces and do not alter or change any announcements made last week. … We’re still at the same [troop] levels in Iraq and Afghanistan.”

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=53285

Sorry Sherlock - missed your last question: "What are the duties / options of a the military commander in such a situation?"

Answer: Salute smartly and lead the mission. (I'd bet on "successfully" too.)

J Reecer: many Brigades have some "special designation" - "Stryker", "Heavy", what have you. The Strykers are well qualified and proven for the mission they are performing, which is why they're in demand.

All you have to do is watch charleyy gibson's "news" cast to know that it's nothing but a 30 minute propaganda show for the obama presidency.

Isn't it funny how quickly the "milblogs" turn traitor as soon as there isn't a Republican president? Who'd have ever expected you to hate your country so quickly?

As a left-liberal who voted Green the past two elections, this doesn't totally surprise me. I doubt Obama will have all troops out of Iraq by the end of 2011, and, of course, his plan only includes Army and Marines; says nothing about USAF.

That said, the nutbar "conservatives" here fulminating about the pseudo-liberal media are good for a laugh. Time to put your tinfoil hats back on.

I'm speechless.


@SocraticGadfly,

Pseudo-liberal media? Wassa matta? The New York Times, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, Washington Post aren't "pseudo" liberal enough?

Leftwingnuts saturate the MSM, but all you libs can do is fling the tin-foil hat accusation.

Call your proctologist. He found your head.


Can anybody find a published TPFDL—time-phased forces-deployment list from OSD? That should solve this issue.

"The Realist" blathered:

Isn't it funny how quickly the "milblogs" turn traitor as soon as there isn't a Republican president? Who'd have ever expected you to hate your country so quickly?

Wow, the irony. A Democrat becomes president and suddenly dissent is treason.

Funny how the milbloggers found their dissenting voice shortly after noon, EST, on Jan. 20th. Can a wingnut Code Pink be far behind?

Ah, the sweet sound of projection.

I'm a soldier in 4/2, so I thought I'd throw my two cents in. The way things are being explained to us is that if we want most of the combat brigades gone by 31 Aug 2010, 4/2 had to deploy ASAP in order to fit in a 12-month deployment before the deadline. Not going to get into the political bit for obvious reasons. We just got back from Iraq in June 08 so it's a tough time for a lot of families, so keep us all in your thoughts. This is our job and we're proud to do it.

I realize the odds of getting an honest answer are zero, but would the lefties chiming in here please explain how pointing this out is somehow a bad thing and or 'dissenting'.

I mean what, exactly, are we dissenting about? That the CIC is using the troops as political props? Doesn't that bother (especially) you lefties that want the troops OUT NOW and, instead, he just pulled a flim-flam on you (this little sideshow was to trick YOU into thinking he was doing what he promised, not us)? And, even better, instead of condemining him for it, you're on here yelling at us because we're concerned (still!) about the troops and their families?!

God, it must be really interesting living inside some of your heads, what with all the loose change, gravel and water sloshing around.

Before Bush was president, the wingers were in full whine about 19 troops killed in Somalia. Then, while the planes were in the air on the way to Serbia on the first day of hostilities, they condemned the operation because they didn't like the CIC.

Then the partisan picture changed, and the wingers didn't bat an eyelash about a prez who lied his way into two wars and screwed 'em up royally. More than 4,000 Americans dead? Cost of freedom, bucko. Suck it up.

Now the partisan climate changes, and you are pacifists. It's so transparent. You couldn't care less about this country, and to you the military is full of people who are expendable for your politics. You don't know a single thing about real patriotism or love of country, and you never will.

Then the partisan picture changed, and the wingers didn't bat an eyelash about a prez who lied his way into two wars and screwed 'em up royally.

Actually, he didn't. Nice use of the "repeat a lie" technique though. You guys always resort to it in your rantings at some point.

For Teh Narrative!

Now the partisan climate changes, and you are pacifists.

Oops, another lie. Try again.

(Hm. Wonder if Willysnout/Whatever name he choses after getting banned again has wandered back under yet another name.)

Realist:

Instead of posting a bunch of non-sequitirs and revising history, can you just answer the following questions:

1. Are you happy that Obama *isn't* drawing down troop levels in Iraq?

2. Are you happy that, as it turns out, he LIED to you about this fact?

3. Are you at all bothered that because of this little political shell game, that there are troops that are now UNDER-PREPARED for Afghanistan and are going to be put in harm's way?

4. Are you at all bothered that because of this little political shell game, that there are troops that are now UNDER-PREPARED for Iraq and are going to be put in harm's way?

5. Does it even matter if we ARE a bunch of knuckle-dragging, war-profiteering, troglodytes working for Halliburton? Who cares if we're a bunch of hypocrites?! What difference does it make in the context of what is going on here and now?

Here's my answers and you tell me if I'm being a 'pacifist' or a 'dissenter' just because there's a (D) after the prez's name:

1. No, actually I'm pissed because a lot of fine men and women (and their families) were expecting them home and/or not expecting to see them leave so early.

2. No, actually I'm pissed because HE FUCKING LIED TO YOU, ME, AND EVERY OTHER AMERICAN IN BROAD DAYLIGHT, WITH FULL KNOWLEDGE OF THE ROPE-A-DOPE AND, APPARENTLY, ABC AT LEAST, WENT RIGHT ALONG FOR THE RIDE.

3. Yes, I'm pissed and upset because he's going to send under-trained troops into a war zone where, thanks to said under-training, they face worse odds of coming home alive and/or in one piece ALL IN ORDER TO APPEASE BRAINDEAD ASSHOLES LIKE YOU WHO, ALL OF A SUDDEN, DON'T SEEM TO CARE ABOUT THE TROOPS AT ALL (since, you know, you've been screeching for nearly a decade that you love the troops, but hate the war).

4. See answer 3 plus: we know you hate the troops, hate Bush, hate Iraq, hatehatehatehate and don't care if another bunch of 'knuckle-dragging, war-profiteering, troglodytes working for Halliburton' marches off to an untimely death because you never cared about the troops and ONLY care about your precious Obama (who, incidentally, fucked you over in front of the world!)

5. None of this should matter if you give a damn about our men and women in uniform (which you don't) because they're the ones being fucked in this deal, regardless if we're every bit as bad as you think we are. It doesnt matter how cartoonishly monstrous we are IF YOU CARE ABOUT THE TROOPS MORE THAN YOUR PRECIOUS OBAMA (who, incidentally, fucked you over in front of the world!)

The 'best' part is, he made ALL Americans in general look like the bunch of rubes you've been calling us in the 'Red States' for the past 8 years and at the expense of our soldiers' lives, you asshole. And the biggest joke is that, instead of being upset about the little political theater he gave you (before he gave you the hook), you're mad at us because we don't want to see the troops take it like you like it.

Some amplifying information that changes the spin a little: the diversion of a brigade from Iraq to Afghanistan was in the works with the previous administration. In this case, Obama was merely executing the plan that was already rolling (and taking credit for it). Separately, you will note in his big Iraq speech that he did indicate that levels will stay essentially status quo through the end of the national elections (through '09). That means we now need to replace the brigade he diverted. So no real drawdown until '10.

Realist, you are an ass (in the donkey sense).

When Rumsfield was screwing things up by not listening to the generals, I seem to remember a lot of conservatives griping about it. Obama is doing even stupider things now, and for purely political reasons.

For the sake of my Marine son, my Navy husband, and my Army brother, I hope to God someone talks some sense into him before he starts getting our soldiers killed. And make no mistake: every drop of blood from these brigades (and future deployments) resulting from inappropriate training, language barriers, and the wrong equipment will be on Obama's hands. Not Bush's. Time for the slacker-in-chief to sit his butt in the chair and learn his job.

I am a 4/2 SBCT mom, and now I am hearing on the comments here that this a 12-month deployment? We were told 8-months since they are going back way ahead of schedule.

Their training has been cut short. Their time of preparation has been cut short. Their time in garrison and with their families has been cut short, and my confidence in this CiC is nonexistent. It's going to be a long couple of years.

It might be worth pointing out that the last time 4/2 deployed it was also accelerated, that time due to the "surge." The media about wet its collective pants because the troops were missing out on valuable training because they were being rushed into the combat zone. Why no hand-wringing this time, I wonder?

Did the Obamessiah tell us that they speak Arabic in Afghanistan? So no problem here. Move along you racist Obama hating neocons.

SFCMac, you just proved my point about laugh value!

And,no, they're not that liberal. They all supported the Bush bottom line on the invasion. Other than a fairly liberal stance on abortion, they're not liberal, not really liberal, on gay rights.

If I want really progressive info on foreign policy and such, I read The Nation and Counterpunch.

And, being a shithead, you'd know about proctologists.

===

Patrick, actually he DID lie. I guess if you tell enough yourself, you don't recognize them in other people.

===

ECM, especially, Kywhite and others: Why is it that everybody who hates Bush supposedly hates the military, too? Realist said nothing of the sort.

How does him pointing out the lies count as "treason" or whatever?

BUT, by you all CLAIMING he said stuff like that, you bring on caricatures about yourself.

Know what I mean?

You do, somewhere inside, but you won't admit it.

Why? Because, ultimately, you have a "martyr complex" and like indulging it.

===

MorgChop: Somebody is dumb for not sending the Ft. Lewis unit straight to A-stan. I'm sure the stupidity started with Shrub. It would be nice for Obama to overrule it.

Oh, for the record, my sister recently retired from a 20-year career between active duty Army, Reserve and Guard. I've never called her a mouthbreather, either.

Geez, you folks do feel persecuted.

It's not the lying by folks like Gadfly and Realist that bothers me. I'm used to it by now. It’s like having an enema (Gadfly will be thrilled by the scatological reference) - just ignore it and it will soon be over.

Of course peacniks hate the US troops - it's their trademark. We have nearly a decade of anti-military rants from the Far Left loons that has not yet been stuffed down the memory hole. Hate is their gist to America.

No - it's the fact that Gadfly and Realist are stupid and clumsy liars that bothers me. It is way too easy to disprove what they say. They honestly believe that we are stupid enough to swallow whatever swill they dish out. Such shoddy workmanship! Their mentor Joseph Goebbels would be disappointed.

SocraticGadfly breaks the irony meter with:

Patrick, actually he DID lie. I guess if you tell enough yourself, you don't recognize them in other people.

Ah, more projection. Typical.

(Anyone suspect "Gadfly" here is "Realist" posting under a different pseudonym? Or am I just hoping there isn't more than one of these... individuals floating around the net.)

I hope to God someone talks some sense into him before he starts getting our soldiers killed.

Hmm. Maybe 4,300 of them?

As a soldier in 3/2 SBCT we knew that one of the Stryker Brigades at Ft. Lewis was likely to be bumped to Afghanistan and the rotation for the other six Stryker brigades adjusted to fill the gap.

The Army only has 7 Stryker Brigades, and they are much better than "armored cars". They are Armored Fighting Vehicles, 20 tons of rolling steel that bring the pain. That is why Stryker Brigades are in demand in both theaters. We hit harder for longer than Light brigades and have a smaller logistical/maintenance footprint than Heavy brigades.

Since we were schedule to Iraq only a month or two behind 5/2 we were hoping to get the Afghanistan mission, but that didn't happen because the Powers That Be wanted a Stryker Brigade "right now" instead of "Right Now plus 6 weeks".

Mrs G copy.png

February 3, 2010


Dawn Patrol 02/03/2010
[Mrs Greyhawk]
Bookmark and Share - via email, facebook, twitter, etc.

Welcome to the Dawn Patrol, our daily roundup of information on the War on Terror and other topics - from the MilBlogs and various sources around the world. If you're a blogger, you can join the conversation. If you link to any of these stories, add a link to the Dawn Patrol too and your trackback will be added to the list. Hat Tips to the Dawn Patrol are greatly appreciated.Refresh for updates.



Support Our Troops, Read Their Stories

----------------------------


AFGHANISTAN/PAKISTAN

Pentagon Behind Obama Schedule for Deploying Troops to Afghanistan -- [FOX]
The Pentagon expects to deploy 18,000 of the 30,000 troops called up to Afghanistan by late spring, a slower pace than the White House envisioned, but necessary, say Pentagon officials, because President Obama did not want to shorten troops' rest time at home.

Mullen: Afghanistan success window small -- [Washington Times]
U.S. 'imperiled' if war not won, Joint Chiefs chairman warns
The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said Tuesday the next 12 to 18 months will be critical in reversing momentum gained by insurgents in Afghanistan, with nothing short of the war-torn nation's security at stake.
Not only that, Adm. Mike Mullen told the Senate Armed Services Committee: "Our future security is greatly imperiled if we do not win the wars we are in."

US Marines facing a 'different war' in Afghanistan -- [AFP]
For the US Marines deployed to the battlefields of southern Afghanistan, life is fragile and thoughts focus on the day they see their families again, but something about this war is different. They are preparing for an offensive on Marjah, one of the Taliban's big urban strongholds in the southern province of Helmand, but progress is slow with the militants apparently preferring fight to flight.
The Marines will soon be joined by tens of thousands more soldiers, the lion's share of the 30,000-strong troop surge promised by US President Barack Obama in December to try and turn around the grinding Afghan war.

Predators pound terrorist camp in North Waziristan -- [Long War Journal - Bill Roggio]
A swarm of unmanned US aircraft pounded an al Qaeda camp today in the Taliban-controlled tribal agency of North Waziristan.
Five unmanned US strike aircraft, likely the Predators and Reapers, are reported to have fired 18 missiles at a camp and vehicles in the village of Datta Khel, a known al Qaeda and Taliban stronghold. This is the largest recorded US airstrike in Pakistan, indicating a top al Qaeda, Taliban, or Haqqani Network leader, or leaders, may have been present.

Eyes in the Sky -- [Army Live]
Being a Soldier in the United States Army is a full-time job. No one understands that more than the Soldiers assigned to the 3rd Heavy Brigade Combat Team, 3rd Infantry Division's unmanned aerial vehicle cell. Twenty-four hours a day they monitor the 3rd HBCT's area of operation from above. "We are always on the lookout for the bad guys," said Staff Sgt. Ray Lemlin, a platoon sergeant in Company A, Brigade Special Troops Battalion. "The goal is always to spot them before they can hurt us."

Revenge on the Taliban, from 10,000 feet -- [Washington Post]
In their joint operations against Taliban militants hiding in the tribal areas, the United States and Pakistan seem to have embraced a classic bit of battlefield advice: Don't get mad, get even.
...Although Pakistan publicly criticizes the drone attacks, the administration official stressed that the recent campaign "is being done in full concert and cooperation" with the Pakistani government. "We've been very pleased with the extent of the cooperation," the official said, adding that the so-called box of geographical coordinates within which the Pakistanis allow the Predators to operate was wide enough to allow attacks on targets that are "geographically dispersed."

Pakistan blast kills US soldiers (Video) -- [BBC]
Three US soldiers are among at least 10 people killed when a blast hit a convoy near a school in north-west Pakistan. Police said around 70 people, including 63 school girls and a US soldier, were injured in the bombing in Lower Dir.
The soldiers were believed to have been training Pakistan's Frontier Corps in counter-insurgency operations.
The two governments deny substantial numbers of US troops are based inside Pakistan, where public opinion is strongly opposed to their presence.

3 G.I.s Killed in Pakistan. Now Can We Start Treating This Like a Real War? -- [Danger Room - Noah Shachtman]
Last year, President Obama and his administration ruled out sending U.S. ground forces into Pakistan. Instead, the White House said, America's clandestine operations there would be waged solely by remote-control -- with Predator and Reaper drones. "There is a red line," said special envoy Richard Holbrooke. "And the red line is unambiguous and stated publicly by the Pakistani government over and over again: No foreign troops on our soil." Yet today, three U.S. soldiers were killed and two more were wounded

Never take it for granted -- [One Marine's View - in Afghanistan]
When we lose a warrior, a part of you goes with them....
...From the smiles of children walking down a street of a recently liberated village to the compassion of our young Marines that tend to those same children after recently slugging it out with the enemy, I often ask "Where do we get such men?" Such men that will sacrifice themselves to protect others they have never met? To demonstrate a nearly inconceivable wrath of weaponry onto the enemy and in a split second later help a young child or elderly man out of the street, sometimes even before the battle is over?
He is a Marine and willing to sacrifice everything to make something bad better off and make a difference. They will not be forgotten.

It's the Economy, Undergraduate -- [At War]
What do they think of all this back there, in your world?
I knew what answer he expected because of the surprise that registers on such soldiers' faces when I offer a different one. He expected that in my world of left-leaning professors and privileged students, the war he and his unit were waging would be viewed with scorn or disgust, and maybe that he and his profession would be, too.
That wasn't the case, I told him. From his expression, what I told him was worse: that in my world (if it really is my world, but that's another question) most students -- young people who are his peers, at least in terms of age and video games and music -- rarely spare his war more than a passing thought.

Around ANA Land -- -- [Afghanistan My Last Tour - in Afghanistan]
One of my stops today was the proposed site for the new library and literacy program. The ANA Garrison commander has designated some room space inside a large building to accommodate these programs. The current library is compressed into a small room and the shelves are sparsely stocked. There are 99 books for the entire library.

Dari Keyboard -- [Afghanistan My Last Tour - in Afghanistan]
For the past few days, I have been working studiously with my ANA counterpart on accountability. The tool I'm using is an Excel Spreadsheet. For anyone who has basic knowledge of computers and programs, this program is fairly easy to use once the formulas are created. Then it's just a matter of populating the data points. But for someone who only has a rudimentary knowledge of computers and a high school degree (Afghanistan level), it becomes rather challenging to explain basic algebra, formulas, etc. As such, I have finally made headway and when my counterpart does understand, it's like a bright light comes on in his head. For me, it's just another small victory in mentoring.

Taking Tea with the Taliban -- [Commentary Mag - Michael Rubin]
Addressing the nation on December 1, 2009, President Barack Obama laid out the case for an augmented American presence in Afghanistan to battle the Taliban forces seeking to push their way back into power. "Over the last several years, the Taliban has maintained common cause with al-Qaeda, as they both seek an overthrow of the Afghan government," he declared. The president offered a brief account of the Taliban's rise to power before the U.S. tossed them out in November 2001. "Al-Qaeda's base of operations was in Afghanistan," he said, "where they were harbored by the Taliban--a ruthless, repressive, and radical movement that seized control of that country after it was ravaged by years of Soviet occupation and civil war, and after the attention of America and our friends had turned elsewhere."

New Afghan police officers graduate -- [Helmand Blog]
The first class of Afghan police officers to attend a new training centre graduated in a ceremony in Helmand yesterday.
More than 130 recruits of the Interim Helmand Police Training Centre attended the event in the Lashkar Gah district. The centre was set up last month to help with the recruitment push for 160,000 police officers across Afghanistan by the end of this year. From March, the centre is expected to train 2550 students a year.
Helmand deputy governor Sattar Marzakwal told the graduates: "You have the responsibility of serving the Afghan people with dignity.

U.S. military officers could face punishment over ambush in Afghanistan -- [Washington Post]
A military investigation into an ambush that left nine Americans dead recommends that the Army consider taking disciplinary action against three U.S. commanders who oversaw the 2008 mission to send troops to the remote Afghan outpost, defense officials said Tuesday.

Afghans protest to Iran over border killings -- [Reuters]
Afghanistan protested on Tuesday against what it said was the killing of five of its nationals by Iranian border forces. Host to millions of Afghan refugees for decades, Iran is also a key transit route for Afghanistan's opium and heroin trade.
The incident happened on Monday when a group of seven Afghans were trying to enter Iran, an Afghan foreign ministry official said, adding all were teenage males.


IRAQ

Bomb kills 20 in Iraqi Shi'ite city of Kerbala -- [Reuters]
A bomb on a cart pulled by a motorcycle killed at least 20 in a crowd of Shi'ite pilgrims on Wednesday in Iraq's holy city of Kerbala where hundreds of thousands have gathered for a religious rite, police said.

Obama, Biden meet with Iraqi VP -- [AFP]
President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden met Monday with Iraq's Sunni Vice President, Tariq al-Hashimi, and discussed the importance

Iraq court lifts ban on hundreds of candidates‎ -- [Atlanta Journal Constitution]
An Iraqi appeals court Wednesday struck down a ban imposed on hundreds of candidates for suspected ties to Saddam

Blair Called a Liar in Iraq Inquiry -- [NY Times]
Only days after Tony Blair offered an impassioned defense of his decision to take Britain to war in Iraq, a cabinet minister who resigned over the war delivered a blistering condemnation of the former prime minister on Tuesday, accusing him of "conning" her and of deceiving his cabinet, the Parliament and the public in his resolve to have Britain join the United States in the invasion of 2003.


U.S. AND OTHER PARTS OF THE WORLD

Multiple Air Force crews, Landstuhl staff team up to save Peace Corps member injured in Kazakhstan -- [Soldiers' Angels Germany ]
What an amzing story. We all hear so many negative things that it's sometimes easy to forget how many wonderful, dedicated people there are in this world. And when multiple teams across Central Asia, Europe, and the US come together save a life, they can make miracles happen.

Iran hints at prisoner swap for 3 U.S. hikers -- [Washington Times]
President signals shift on uranium
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Tuesday proposed a swap of Iranians in U.S. prisons for three American hikers being held in Tehran.
In a television interview, Mr. Ahmadinejad also said Iran was ready to send its uranium abroad for further enrichment as requested by the United Nations, signaling a major shift in the Iranian position on the issue.

US Denies Speaking to Iran About Prisoner Swap -- [Voice of America]
The United States has denied speaking to Iran about a prisoner exchange after Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Tehran has held discussions about such a swap.

Ahmadinejad backs deal to remove bulk of enriched uranium from Iran -- [Washington Post]
A long-dormant proposal to remove the bulk of Iran's enriched uranium from the Islamic republic appeared to be revived Tuesday as President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Iran had "no problem" with a deal initially brokered by the International Atomic Energy Agency.
The deal, which Iran formally rejected weeks ago, would swap low-enriched uranium for fuel for a research reactor that produces medical isotopes. "If we allow them to take it, there is no problem,"

US wary as Iran president agrees nuclear deal terms -- [BBC]
The US has reacted warily after Iran appeared to accept a deal to swap enriched uranium for nuclear fuel.

Emergency Assistance Still Hasn't Reached Many Haitians -- [Washington Post]
Three weeks after a powerful earthquake destroyed Haiti's capital, aid officials are still seeking to reach hundreds of thousands of desperate people who apparently have not received food and shelter from an expanding international aid operation, U.S. officials said Tuesday.

China's threat to sanction US firms in arms sale could backfire -- [Los Angeles Times]
In Washington, a White House spokesman said it would "not be warranted" for China to slap sanctions on the US companies over the Obama administration's

Corrected: Obama to meet Dalai Lama despite Chinese warnings -- [Reuters]
He offered no details on how China would impose sanctions. Companies that could be affected by Chinese sanctions include Sikorsky Aircraft Corp,


WAR ON TERROR /TERRORISM

Panetta: Terror Attack in US Likely Soon -- [Military.com/AP]
Al-Qaida can be expected to attempt an attack on the United States in the next three to six months, senior U.S. intelligence officials told Congress.
The terrorist organization is deploying operatives to the United States to carry out new attacks from inside the country, including "clean" recruits with a negligible trail of terrorist contacts, CIA Director Leon Panetta said. The chilling warning comes as Christmas airline attack suspect, Nigerian Umar Farouk Abdulmutullab, is cooperating with federal investigators, a federal law enforcement official said Tuesday.

Would-be LAX terrorist's prison sentence overturned as too lenient -- [Los Angeles Times]
A divided appeals panel rules that the 22-year sentence for an Al Qaeda operative didn't follow guidelines. He had originally agreed to cooperate with authorities for a lighter sentence but reneged.

Bill Would Forbid Civilian 9/11 Trials -- [Military.com/Atlanta Journal-Constitution]
Saying America can't afford the costs or the threat to national security, U.S. Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.) and a bipartisan group of other senators introduced legislation Tuesday that would forbid public funding for a civilian trial of those accused of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
Instead, the senators want the government to try Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, alleged to be the Sept. 11 mastermind, and other terror suspects in a military courtroom at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

DOJ's New Tool Against Criticism: New Media -- [FOX]
Facing mounting pressure from both Democrats and Republicans over its handling of recent terrorism cases, the Justice Department is taking unprecedented steps to push back against critics.
Last night the Justice Department unveiled an entire web page -- titled "The Criminal Justice System as a Counterterrorism Tool" -- to address the growing debate.
One DOJ official described the new web page as an effort "to get the facts out there" and show that "the policy for handling these terrorism cases has not changed" from the way previous administrations handled such cases.

Brennan: All Transferred Detainees Who Returned to Terrorism Were Released by Bush, No Recidivism for Those Released by Obama -- [ABC News]
n a letter to congressional leaders sent Monday night, White House adviser John Brennan, the assistant to President Obama for homeland security and counterterrorism, argued that President Obama had made "significant improvements to the detainee review process" under President Bush and pointed out that all the former detainees released or transferred who have returned to terrorist activities were released or transferred under President Bush.

Is there an adult in there somewhere? Bueller? Bueller? -- [The Armorer]
It sure doesn't look like it.CNN's Steve Brusk tweets: "Law enforcement source says AbdulMutallah has been providing useful, current, and actionable intelligence. Leads being actively chased."Heh. This is smoke and mirrors, pure and simple.Let's take it at face value.It's been a month since AbdulMutallah proved himself an inept murderer-by-suicide. Hell, he's not even as successful as Achmed the Dead Terrorist.

MI5 hunting breast implants of death -- [WND]
Authorities alarmed by possibility of surgically placed bombs
Agents for Britain's MI5 intelligence service have discovered that Muslim doctors trained at some of Britain's leading teaching hospitals have returned to their own countries to fit surgical implants filled with explosives, according to a report from Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin. Women suicide bombers recruited by al-Qaida are known to have had the explosives inserted in their breasts under techniques similar to breast enhancing surgery.


SUPPORTING THE TROOPS...OR NOT

Impact of deployment on kids -- negative reporting and troop bashing hurts them too -- [You Served]
I highlighted the area in bold text below that needs a LOT of attention brought to the matter. Negative reporting on the war, and the lack of support of the war and our troops affects the morale of everyone -- including our military children. I am so sick and tired of the BS line "we support our troops but not the war." It's not true. It's contradictory and this report here shows how that very attitude is not only unsupportive, but it is outright harmful to the children of our deployed troops.
I am going to print out a copy of the actual report and will write up some more.

Interview with Lorrie Nichols of The Journal of An Army Wife -- [Army Wives Lives]
Lorrie Nichols, who blogs at The Journal of an Army Wife, answered our questions about her life as an Army Wife
...Tell us a little bit about your military spouse journey.
Mike is in the Army National Guard. He hasn't been deployed, yet. He served in the Air Guard for six years, then spent several years as a civilian, and joined the Army Guard last October. We have been married for 2 1/2 years, but I have only been a military spouse for about 4 months.
What are the challenges of being a military spouse?
Military time doesn't necessarily coincide with real world time.

The Predictably Unpredictable Army Strikes Again.... -- [SpouseBuzz - Andi]
My husband has been TDY on many, many occasions throughout our marriage. I wish now that I had kept track of it because I don't know if my guesstimate of 3-4 years is on target. As for non-TDY, more permanent deployment bye-byes, we've had two. One for a year and one for seven months. Both times, we had ample warning. Both times we knew approximately when he was leaving. Both times, the house became cluttered for weeks with gear that would accompany my husband to his destination. On both occasions, I had time to process what was happening, and prepare for it.
A couple of weeks ago, my husband came home late at night, quickly packed, and was gone the next morning. It was so odd.
There was no warning. No time frame to process. No time to prepare, physically or emotionally.

They Ache -- [SpouseBuzz - Sarah]
This deployment has flown by for me because I've been distracted with my pregnancy. It's a major event that keeps my mind off missing my husband. When I do think of him, they've been self-centered or baby-centered thoughts: I wish he were here to feel the baby kick, or fetch me a glass of water, or discuss middle names in person. I've also tried to come up with some silver linings for why it's better that I've been alone all this time. And I have contingency plans in case my husband doesn't make it home in time;

Military OneSource Tax Filing Services -- [Military OneSource]
Military OneSource brings you H&R Block At Home® (formerly TaxCut) online tax filing through the Military OneSource Web site and telephonic tax consultations by calling our tax hotline at 1-800-730-3802. Prepare your 2009 state and federal taxes with this easy-to-use program. Provided by the Department of Defense, H&R Block At Home® is and free to active duty, National Guard, and Reserve service members and their families. Have questions? See our FAQs.
Tax consultants are available 7 days a week from 7 am - 11 pm ET by calling the Military OneSource Tax Hotline at 1-800-730-3802.
Please Note - You must use the link on the Military OneSource Web site to access our customized product and create your account. Do not go to the public H&R Block Web site to create a user account.

Wounded Warrior returns to West Point as WTU Commander -- [Soldiers' Angels Germany]
Capt. Scott M. Smiley is a Soldier, infantryman, Airborne Ranger, combat diver, mountain climber, skier, tri-athlete, surfer, husband, father, and now Company Commander of West Point's Warrior Transition Unit.
He's also blind.


MILITARY

Law barring lies about military medals faces test -- [Washington Post]
A federal law against lying about military medals is facing First Amendment challenges in Colorado and California. Lawyers in both cases have made similar arguments against the Stolen Valor Act, saying that lying is protected by the First Amendment unless it does real harm.

Why Stolen Valor doesn't violate 1st Amendment -- [This Ain't Hell...]
Last month I wrote about the Denver Post going squishy on Richard Strandlof's impending trial for a violation of the Stolen Valor Act. The Post wrote that convicting him would violate his 1st Amendment right to free speech. Well, apparently, there's some case law that says otherwise.
In 2008, Xavier Alvarez, while running for office on his local water board made the following statement on the campaign trail

Air Force Academy creates worship area for pagans, Druids -- [USA Today]‎
The Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs is establishing a worship area for followers of Earth-centered religions -- Wiccans, Druids, witches, pagans -- on a hill overlooking the campus, the USAFA says.

The Wiccan Cross -- [Greyhawk]
How would you complete the following sentence?
"Leaving a cross at a Wiccan* assembly area on a college campus is the equivalent of ____." (Consider the "blank" to be as long as you need.)
Why, the person who did this must be a ______.
Did you say "anonymous Christian supremacist"? Me neither.
Know why? Because first be not stupid is a good motto. At least that's what I always say.




WELCOME HOME



Arrival at Home- Final Post
-- [Doc H - home from Afghanistan]
I have been home for a few days now. Tricia and the kids met me at the airport around midnight. It was a joyous reunion that was just a little overdue. Amazingly the kids went to school and continued their activities the next day. There was a nice banner on display in the house welcoming me back home. Our trip to home was even more circuitous as time went by. Due to a heavy snowstorm in Baltimore, our transatlantic flight diverted to JFK airport in New York. We had a night in a hotel nearby and completed our journey to Baltimore the next day

Shorn -- [OPFOR - Lt Col P - heading home from Afghanistan]
am I of two constant companions since mid-August of last year-- my 9mm and my M4. I turned both in today, duly cleaned (and with a small net gain of ammo, to boot). I feel oddly under-dressed without them. I also removed the tourniquet and IBD that had been in my sleeve pockets for six months. Again, it doesn't feel quite right not to have them on board.
In about 24 hours or so I'll be airborne (!) back to the States, and this whole thing will be nearly done. That is the strangest feeling of them all.




THE MEDIA/SOCIAL MEDIA

If Not Now, When?: Duty and Sacrifice in America's Time of Need Wins 2010 Colby Award -- [PR Newswire]
(Chicago, Illinois, February 3, 2010) The military memoir by Medal of Honor recipient Colonel Jack Jacobs, USA (Ret.) has won the 2010 Colby Award.
Named for the late Ambassador and former CIA Director William E. Colby, the Colby Award recognizes a first work of fiction or non-fiction that has made a significant contribution to the public's understanding of intelligence operations, military history, or international affairs. The $5,000 award will be presented by Tawani Foundation in association with the Pritzker Military Library ...

CSI: Miami - Promoting the Good in Iraq -- [A Soldier's Perspective]
Many of us have seen the MSM misrepresent or not even report the good things that our military is doing in Iraq. We see TV shows and movies on the big and small screen that stand on either side of the issue. Some are very elaborate and in your face while others are more subtle. The latter was the case in last nights episode of CSI: Miami.
I don't always watch the show, sometimes I watch "Castle", so I didn't know that Cain's son had enlisted in the Army and been sent to Iraq. At the end of the episode they showed Cain signing into a video conference on his computer. The picture we see on the computer screen is Cain's son, in battle fatigues and in Iraq. There are the usual parent/child pleasantries and concerns passed from one to another. They could have ended the scene with that, but they didn't. They go on to have Cain's son talk about rebuilding the schools and how happy the kids are to have them.

Jeremy Renner nominated for best actor in 'The Hurt Locker'
"The Hurt Locker" honored with 9 Academy Award Nominations, including Best Picture
Cast includes TAPS mentor Brian Geraghty, Film depicts military's unsung heroes
Jeremy Renner nominated for best actor in 'The Hurt Locker'

'The Hurt Locker' may rewrite script on Iraq war movies -- [NY Daily News]
..."Maybe the winds have shifted, and people are willing to think about the war in cinematic terms," says Mark Boal, who was embedded in Iraq in '04 as a freelance journalist and is now nominated for a Best Original Screenplay Oscar for "Locker."
"'Hurt Locker' works as a magnifying glass on Iraq," says Boal, "but there's also a purely experiential level to it. Even for me, as a regular popcorn-buying member of the public, it's more than a war film."

Charlie Brooker - How To Report The News



POLITICS

Seeking balance: the 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review -- [Foreign Policy Review]
he Defense Department today released the 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review, its Congressionally-mandated examination of defense programs and plans. The review is the latest milestone in Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates's campaign to focus the Defense Department on the need to win today's wars. As such, it is to be applauded. However, in concentrating on that goal, it too often shortchanges other challenges.
In its language, the 2010 QDR has clearly been Obamacized. It reads more like a corporate annual report than a strategy to guide the world's most powerful military, one that has been at war for most of the last decade. One is at pains, for example, to find in the document's 105 pages the word "win" (as in, "win the war in Afghanistan").

Don't ask Don't Tell -- [Greyhawk]
Gates and Mullen testify before the Senate Armed Services Committee, livestream:
Gates' prepared statement for the committee here.
That last line bears particular note - it's the often-ignored but fundamental and key truth at the heart of the issue - and it can't be repeated enough. "The ultimate decision rests with you, the Congress." That's not a decision Congress welcomes with open arms - and that reluctance presents a great illustration of one difference between power and responsibility - words that represent concepts that have meaning. Those concepts combined are such an enormous burden that the typical member of Congress can bear only one.

The Case Against Gays in the Military -- [Wall Street Journal]
Open homosexuality would threaten unit cohesion and military effectiveness. -- As expected, President Obama pledged during his State of the Union address to "work with Congress and our military to finally repeal the law that denies gay Americans

Credit Where Credit is Due -- [BlackFive - Grim]
I know that we frequently have some philosophical disputes with the Obama administration here. Still, once in a while, it's a good idea to step back and point out the things they have gotten right.

Marine Ilario Pantano for Congress! -- [BlackFive]
We've followed the trials and tribulations of USMC First Lieutenant Ilario Pantano for awhile here on BlackFive. We've supported him since the beginning (and had to fight some of our own to do so), and, now, Ilario is running for Congress in the Congressional District NC-7. The 7th District has not had a Republican since March 3, 1871!
Pantano and his family live in North Carolina where, since 2006, he continues to serve his community as a Deputy Sheriff.


HUMOR / SATIRE

'Gays Too Precious To Risk In Combat,' Says General -- [The Onion]

Day By Day



(Need more? Dawn Patrols Archives are here.)



, , , , , , , ,




Posted 1:24 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0)


Bookmark and Share - via email, facebook, twitter, etc.

TMGbloglabel7copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
MBC2010.jpg
TMGrecentcomments.gif
  • Jimro: As a soldier in 3/2 SBCT we knew that one read more
  • Realist: I hope to God someone talks some sense into him read more
  • Patrick Chester: SocraticGadfly breaks the irony meter with: Patrick, actually he DID read more
  • Mwalimu Daudi: It's not the lying by folks like Gadfly and Realist read more
  • SocraticGadfly: Oh, for the record, my sister recently retired from a read more
  • SocraticGadfly: SFCMac, you just proved my point about laugh value! And,no, read more
  • Federale: Did the Obamessiah tell us that they speak Arabic in read more
  • Murdoc: It might be worth pointing out that the last time read more
  • Claire: I am a 4/2 SBCT mom, and now I am read more
  • kywrite: Realist, you are an ass (in the donkey sense). When read more

6a00d83487393d53ef010536defce7970b-800wi.png

MilBlog Conference Sponsors

GA_150x253_milblog.jpg

onesource logo.bmp

BAE_BannerAd_MilBlog_0309.jpg

MILBLOGS NEWS

*****

Latest Posts From MilBlogs

*****

milblogsa1.jpg Prev | List | Random | Next
Join
Powered by RingSurf!
TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Dawn Patrol Feeds

 

Add to Google Reader or Homepage Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to netvibes Add to Plusmo myaol_cta1.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

TMGbloglabel8copy.gif

TMGbloglabel9 copy.gif
Blah Blah Blah
me220.JPG

The Mudville Gazette is written and produced by Greyhawk. Unless otherwise credited, the opinions expressed are those of the author, and nothing here is to be taken as representing the official position of or endorsement by the United States Department of Defense or any of its subordinate components. Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house.

I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email.

Original content copyright © 2003 - 2009 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed.

Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com

andsm.jpg