The reader will kindly forgive any tendency to rough language or behavior on the part of the site owner...
TMGlogo2006-2007phs-copy.jpg
"Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
TMGbloglabel1 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel3 copy.gif
TMGbloglabel10 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette Feeds

 

Add to Technorati Favorites
Technorati Profile
add.gif addtomyyahoo4.gif ngsub1.gif sub_modern5.gif add2netvibes.gif Add to Plusmo subscribe2.gif myaol_cta1.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

digg.jpg

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

pl-news.gif

tvc_logo_small.png

Mrsg- Greyhawk's Profile
Mrsg- Greyhawk's Facebook profile
Create Your Badge
TMGbloglabel5 copy.gif

gngrey120x60.gif

TMGbloglabel6 copy.gif
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by!
« Boom Frequency | Main | Milblogs Conference Registration Opens »

March 8, 2009

Diversions (III)

By Greyhawk

Remember the Iraq drawdown you heard about last month? The one where a Brigade originally scheduled for Iraq was going to Afghanistan instead? Well, a funny thing about that...

Last weekend we noted this obscure bit of news from ABC:

Gen. Odierno will receive a Stryker Brigade to replace the incoming replacement brigade diverted to Afghanistan just a week ago. That means that he will continue to maintain the current level of two Stryker brigades in Iraq.

While that story might be obscure, it's anything but insignificant. The diversion of the Stryker Brigade (one of two that were then scheduled to replace the two currently in Iraq) to Afghanistan made headlines as the President appeared at Camp Lejeune to announce his Iraq drawdown and Afghanistan "surge". As noted here at the time, that followup report - if accurate - "exposes everything you've heard about troop deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan over the past two weeks as an absolute hoax on the American public."

Read the first entry in this series for details of the preparations made by the Stryker Brigade for an Iraq deployment - 10-month Arabic language schools being just part of the training rendered useless by a reassignment to a country where the locals don't speak it.

Of course, "intensive, 10-month Arabic language training" and "exercises... where they had to help their commanders negotiate with native-speaker role players" were now useless - but if they were no longer needed in Iraq, so be it.

But they were needed in Iraq - just not as badly as the Obama administration needed to make it appear that troops initially slotted for Iraq were going to Afghanistan instead - seemingly making good on a key campaign promise. So with much fanfare the Iraq drawdown (consisting entirely of the Stryker Brigade)/Afghanistan surge (Strykers plus a Marine unit) was announced, and subsequent polls indicated Americans were wildly enthusiastic about the idea.

And a few days later no one would notice the bombshell reported by ABC: "Gen. Odierno will receive a Stryker Brigade to replace the incoming replacement brigade diverted to Afghanistan just a week ago" - perhaps because within 24 hours of reporting that news they changed it to this:

ABC News has also learned that Gen. Odierno will continue to maintain a Stryker Brigade presence in Iraq through the upcoming elections as he had requested. There are currently two Stryker Brigades in Iraq. When their tours end later this year, only one of those departing brigades will be replaced by an incoming Stryker Brigade.

Not only was there no explanation of the "correction", there wasn't even an acknowledgment of the change on the site.

But wait... there's more...

*****

I don't like conspiracy theories - I suspected that ABC's initial report was due to some sort of simple misunderstanding and that the corrected version was in fact correct. But to confirm that I sent a simple email to them:

Greetings Just linked this in a post, but subsequently discovered the line "ABC News has also learned that Gen. Odierno will receive a Stryker Brigade to replace the incoming replacement brigade diverted to Afghanistan just a week ago" has since vanished without explanation.

What happened?

Even though it was the weekend they were kind enough to reply:

That was updated.
I checked to see if they were referring to a subsequent update - they weren't. So I replied:
Clearly. But that's rather a dramatic change to make without explanation, don't you think? The original version indicates the entire narrative of diverting troops from Iraq to Afghanistan is a fraud perpetrated on the American public. The later version is hardly newsworthy.

Aren't corrections of that magnitude worthy of an appended explanation?

It's been a week since that was sent and I've received no reply. But that's probably because other developments have rendered the point somewhat moot.

*****

Specifically, last Monday the DoD announced:

The Department of Defense announced today that 4th Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division, based in Ft. Lewis, Wash., will deploy in the fall of 2009 to support Operation Iraqi Freedom.

The brigade consists of approximately 4,000 personnel and will deploy as a replacement unit for a formation currently operating in Iraq. Its deployment will provide commanders in Iraq the flexibility to maintain the appropriate level of effort based on their assessment of the security situation on the ground.

The next day's Tacoma News Tribune would report:

A Fort Lewis Stryker combat brigade will deploy to Iraq this fall, several months ahead of the original schedule, Army officials said Monday.

When the 4th Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division departs, all three Stryker brigades based at the Army post will be simultaneously deployed to combat for the first time. Each brigade has about 4,000 soldiers.

And ABC would change their story once again - this time with an explanation:

Editor's Note: Over the weekend, additional information led us to rework this article. We have restored the original wording as additional reporting reconfirms the information posted Friday night.

Gen. Odierno will maintain a two-Stryker Brigade presence through the rest of this year even though a replacement Stryker Brigade had been redirected to Afghansitan [sic]. The Pentagon's announcement Monday that the 4th Stryker BCT, 2nd Infantry Division will head to Iraq in the Fall means both brigades currently in Iraq will be replaced by Stryker Brigades. In shorthand, the 4th SBCT/2nd ID will replace the 1st SBCT/25th ID and the 3rd SBCT/2nd ID will the 56th National Guard Stryker Brigade.

Kudos to them for reporting it, but they fail to connect the dots - removing a Brigade from Iraq (or from the schedule to go to Iraq) and replacing it with another Brigade is no way to accomplish a "drawdown" (except in newspaper headlines).

*****

Let's recap the salient points here:

1. In September, 2008, the 5th Stryker Brigade Combat Team (SBCT) - after months of preparation - is ordered to Iraq. (One of two SBCTs that were then scheduled to replace the two currently in Iraq)

2. In February, 2009, President Obama announces his Iraq drawdown/Afghanistan surge - the 5th SBCT will be diverted to Afghanistan instead of Iraq.

3. March, 2009, the DoD announces the 4th SBCT will deploy to Iraq this fall, several months ahead of the original schedule replacing the 5th SBCT in the rotation in order to maintain two Stryker Brigades in Iraq.

For the record, I'm in favor of commanders on the ground getting the forces they need to get the job done. I have no doubt that two Stryker Brigades are needed in Iraq, and others in Afghanistan.

I'm deeply concerned when I see troop rotations "adjusted" in what appears to be an effort to fool the American public. But I appreciate that the Obama administration can do that in plain sight, even providing press releases detailing exactly how they're doing it.

I'm even more concerned that those efforts - and the ramifications thereof - are obvious to an American media assumed to be independent of the Executive Branch but apparently unconcerned about reporting its activities. Item two above was headline grabbing/TV news lead story material - item three indicates it was a fraud.

One year ago that would have been a hell of a story, don't you think?

More: Diversions (IV)


Bookmark and Share - via email, facebook, twitter, etc.

Posted by Greyhawk / March 8, 2009 11:52 AM | Permalink

16 TrackBacks

Fewer things in life must be more fun than sticking soldiers under a shell and shifting them around at will. Of course it’s easy to do when you have no vested interest in their mission — afterall the current Administation has taken every op... Read More

Diversions (IV) from Mudville Gazette on March 9, 2009 9:41 AM

A couple (among many) of interesting comments from the previous post:I'm a soldier in 4/2, so I thought I'd throw my two cents in. The way things are being explained to us is that if we want most of the combat brigades gone by 31 Aug 2010, 4/2 had to d... Read More

Diversity from Mudville Gazette on March 9, 2009 9:50 AM

Just an aside - after reading the comments here and here I've come to the conclusion I'm an Obama loving Obama hater. There's really no other explanation for it. (Though some might accuse me of being an Obama hating Obama lover, I suppose...) Unless...... Read More

Here's how you pull a Three-Brigade Monte: President Obama promised to drawdown Iraqi troops. He was going to pull out a brigade from Iraq. So, he does--he withdraws the troops from Iraq and puts them in Afghanistan. That means there... Read More

Welcome to the Dawn Patrol, our daily roundup of information on the War on Terror and other topics - from the MilBlogs and other sources around the world. If you're a blogger, you can join the conversation. If you link to any of these stories, add a li... Read More

Let the Mudville Gazette count the ways: Last weekend we noted this obscure bit of news from ABC: Gen. Odierno will receive a Stryker Brigade to replace the incoming replacement brigade diverted to Afghanistan just a week ago. That means... Read More

Fewer things in life must be more fun than sticking soldiers under a shell and shifting them around at will. Of course it’s easy to do when you have no vested interest in their mission — after all the current Administration has taken every ... Read More

Fewer things in life must be more fun than sticking soldiers under a shell and shifting them around at will. Of course it’s easy to do when you have no vested interest in their mission — after all the current Administration has taken every ... Read More

Keep your eyes on the ball from Right Minded Americans on March 14, 2009 12:18 PM

Why isn't this story all over the news? It looks like Obama is playing games. Not surprising seeing that any military knowledge he has came from playing Risk as a kid. The DoD announced: "The Department of Defense announced today... Read More

Fewer things in life must be more fun than sticking soldiers under a shell and shifting them around at will. Of course it’s easy to do when you have no vested interest in their mission — after all the current Administration has taken every ... Read More

Fewer things in life must be more fun than sticking soldiers under a shell and shifting them around at will. Of course it’s easy to do when you have no vested interest in their mission — after all the current Administration has taken every ... Read More

Fewer things in life must be more fun than sticking soldiers under a shell and shifting them around at will. Of course it’s easy to do when you have no vested interest in their mission — after all the current Administration has taken every ... Read More

Fewer things in life must be more fun than sticking soldiers under a shell and shifting them around at will. Of course it’s easy to do when you have no vested interest in their mission — after all the current Administration has taken every ... Read More

Fewer things in life must be more fun than sticking soldiers under a shell and shifting them around at will. Of course it’s easy to do when you have no vested interest in their mission — after all the current Administration has taken every ... Read More

Fewer things in life must be more fun than sticking soldiers under a shell and shifting them around at will. Of course it’s easy to do when you have no vested interest in their mission — after all the current Administration has taken every ... Read More

Fewer things in life must be more fun than sticking soldiers under a shell and shifting them around at will. Of course it’s easy to do when you have no vested interest in their mission — after all the current Administration has taken every ... Read More

36 Comments

So -- let's see if I have it correct. Obama's announcement of a redeployment of one incoming Stryker brigade from Iraq to Afghanistan was prominent on-the-air news.
The fact that this brigade has been learning Arabic for months -- useless in Afghanistan -- was not mentioned.
The fact that this brigade will be replaced by yet another Stryker brigade was not reported, but was deliberately ignored by the network. It was quietly posted instead, much later, on the network web site.
So the Administration is succeeding, with MSM connivance, to give the public the fraudulent impression that our Iraq combat forces are being drawn down quickly, (as promised by Obama in the campaign). Both reality, and the waste of resources associated with covering up reality, are being suppressed by the press.
Please correct if I'm wrong.

Greyhawk,

There might be more to this story even than what you have written here. My niece's husband is based at Fort Lewis, and he was just deployed to Iraq. This past week we found out that his deployment was lengthened from 12 to something like 15 months. We also found out that she is due to deliver their first child in November, so we are hoping he will be able to come home for that. He works in a medical unit, and I don't know much more than that, but I can find out, if you would like.

So if I understand this correctly, you are saying that:

1. A brigade was diverted from deploying to Iraq to deploying to Afghanistan, and this was publicly identified as a "draw-down" of forces in Iraq.

2. Several days later it was reported that another brigade's deployment to Iraq is being pulled forward.

3, The comment above indicates yet another brigade's return to the US is being pushed back.

This all sounds like a net effect on manpower of essentially zero, but a negative effect on the fit between the training of the deploying forces and their duties. That will presumably result in degraded effectiveness, and thus increased casualties, am I right?

I can accept that a CiC might have to make sub-optimal military decisions in the face of political realities, but I would hope those realities would involve the interests of the nation, not simply the Potemkin-like fulfillment his political promises. In this case it sounds like it was the latter.

What are the duties / options of a the military commander in such a situation?

As my son is 5-2ID SBCT and took those Arabic Class's and, trianed his ASS off for Iraq. I could power a nuclear plant just by dipping my kiester in the water. Gotta think Geobbels would be proud of our media. Rick (Doc) Wright EX 82nd 1/05

A "Stryker Brigade" is basically a unit riding around in armored cars, right? Armored cars have been around since WWI and have generally fared poorly in combat against real armored vehicles, such as tanks. Why does a unit riding around in armored cars get a special designation?

If you'll recall from the campaign, when Obama wanted to transfer interpreters from Iraq to Afghanistan, he obviously doesn't know that there are different languages spoken in those two countries so the issue of the Arabic training doesn't matter to him. It's all about the permanent campaign.

Greyhawk,

This isn't the first time "THE ONE" has tried to manipulate the war operations to his advantage. Remember when he tried to get the Iraqis to stall U.S. redeployments for the sake of his campaign?

He wanted to make it look as if the impending withdrawal and success created by American military operations including the surge, were all his idea.
Link:
http://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2008/09/22/obama-tried-stalling-us-redeployment/

This narcissistic charlatan has no shame.

Sherlock
"net effect on manpower of essentially zero" - well, depends on what you mean. In Iraq, yes, but an increase in Afghanistan with no concurrent decrease in Iraq. As near as I can determine, none of the 17,000 troops "surging" (see this report from Afghanistan) into Afghanistan will be at the expense of totals in Iraq.

That total has decreased from surge levels and might continue to do so - depending on conditions on the ground. But thus far the only Brigade designated to go to Iraq this year then switched to Afghanistan has been replaced by another Brigade for Iraq.

But then again - there are 22 Brigades "in the pipeline" for Iraq, or in Iraq this year, so there are plenty more opportunities for "diversions".

I think this is a case of (more) bad reporting from the multi-layer fact checkers:

“These units have been identified for some time now to go in as replacement units,” he said. “This isn’t part of the additional capabilities that we’re applying. These are rotational forces and do not alter or change any announcements made last week. … We’re still at the same [troop] levels in Iraq and Afghanistan.”

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=53285

Sorry Sherlock - missed your last question: "What are the duties / options of a the military commander in such a situation?"

Answer: Salute smartly and lead the mission. (I'd bet on "successfully" too.)

J Reecer: many Brigades have some "special designation" - "Stryker", "Heavy", what have you. The Strykers are well qualified and proven for the mission they are performing, which is why they're in demand.

All you have to do is watch charleyy gibson's "news" cast to know that it's nothing but a 30 minute propaganda show for the obama presidency.

Isn't it funny how quickly the "milblogs" turn traitor as soon as there isn't a Republican president? Who'd have ever expected you to hate your country so quickly?

As a left-liberal who voted Green the past two elections, this doesn't totally surprise me. I doubt Obama will have all troops out of Iraq by the end of 2011, and, of course, his plan only includes Army and Marines; says nothing about USAF.

That said, the nutbar "conservatives" here fulminating about the pseudo-liberal media are good for a laugh. Time to put your tinfoil hats back on.

I'm speechless.


@SocraticGadfly,

Pseudo-liberal media? Wassa matta? The New York Times, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, Washington Post aren't "pseudo" liberal enough?

Leftwingnuts saturate the MSM, but all you libs can do is fling the tin-foil hat accusation.

Call your proctologist. He found your head.


Can anybody find a published TPFDL—time-phased forces-deployment list from OSD? That should solve this issue.

"The Realist" blathered:

Isn't it funny how quickly the "milblogs" turn traitor as soon as there isn't a Republican president? Who'd have ever expected you to hate your country so quickly?

Wow, the irony. A Democrat becomes president and suddenly dissent is treason.

Funny how the milbloggers found their dissenting voice shortly after noon, EST, on Jan. 20th. Can a wingnut Code Pink be far behind?

Ah, the sweet sound of projection.

I'm a soldier in 4/2, so I thought I'd throw my two cents in. The way things are being explained to us is that if we want most of the combat brigades gone by 31 Aug 2010, 4/2 had to deploy ASAP in order to fit in a 12-month deployment before the deadline. Not going to get into the political bit for obvious reasons. We just got back from Iraq in June 08 so it's a tough time for a lot of families, so keep us all in your thoughts. This is our job and we're proud to do it.

I realize the odds of getting an honest answer are zero, but would the lefties chiming in here please explain how pointing this out is somehow a bad thing and or 'dissenting'.

I mean what, exactly, are we dissenting about? That the CIC is using the troops as political props? Doesn't that bother (especially) you lefties that want the troops OUT NOW and, instead, he just pulled a flim-flam on you (this little sideshow was to trick YOU into thinking he was doing what he promised, not us)? And, even better, instead of condemining him for it, you're on here yelling at us because we're concerned (still!) about the troops and their families?!

God, it must be really interesting living inside some of your heads, what with all the loose change, gravel and water sloshing around.

Before Bush was president, the wingers were in full whine about 19 troops killed in Somalia. Then, while the planes were in the air on the way to Serbia on the first day of hostilities, they condemned the operation because they didn't like the CIC.

Then the partisan picture changed, and the wingers didn't bat an eyelash about a prez who lied his way into two wars and screwed 'em up royally. More than 4,000 Americans dead? Cost of freedom, bucko. Suck it up.

Now the partisan climate changes, and you are pacifists. It's so transparent. You couldn't care less about this country, and to you the military is full of people who are expendable for your politics. You don't know a single thing about real patriotism or love of country, and you never will.

Then the partisan picture changed, and the wingers didn't bat an eyelash about a prez who lied his way into two wars and screwed 'em up royally.

Actually, he didn't. Nice use of the "repeat a lie" technique though. You guys always resort to it in your rantings at some point.

For Teh Narrative!

Now the partisan climate changes, and you are pacifists.

Oops, another lie. Try again.

(Hm. Wonder if Willysnout/Whatever name he choses after getting banned again has wandered back under yet another name.)

Realist:

Instead of posting a bunch of non-sequitirs and revising history, can you just answer the following questions:

1. Are you happy that Obama *isn't* drawing down troop levels in Iraq?

2. Are you happy that, as it turns out, he LIED to you about this fact?

3. Are you at all bothered that because of this little political shell game, that there are troops that are now UNDER-PREPARED for Afghanistan and are going to be put in harm's way?

4. Are you at all bothered that because of this little political shell game, that there are troops that are now UNDER-PREPARED for Iraq and are going to be put in harm's way?

5. Does it even matter if we ARE a bunch of knuckle-dragging, war-profiteering, troglodytes working for Halliburton? Who cares if we're a bunch of hypocrites?! What difference does it make in the context of what is going on here and now?

Here's my answers and you tell me if I'm being a 'pacifist' or a 'dissenter' just because there's a (D) after the prez's name:

1. No, actually I'm pissed because a lot of fine men and women (and their families) were expecting them home and/or not expecting to see them leave so early.

2. No, actually I'm pissed because HE FUCKING LIED TO YOU, ME, AND EVERY OTHER AMERICAN IN BROAD DAYLIGHT, WITH FULL KNOWLEDGE OF THE ROPE-A-DOPE AND, APPARENTLY, ABC AT LEAST, WENT RIGHT ALONG FOR THE RIDE.

3. Yes, I'm pissed and upset because he's going to send under-trained troops into a war zone where, thanks to said under-training, they face worse odds of coming home alive and/or in one piece ALL IN ORDER TO APPEASE BRAINDEAD ASSHOLES LIKE YOU WHO, ALL OF A SUDDEN, DON'T SEEM TO CARE ABOUT THE TROOPS AT ALL (since, you know, you've been screeching for nearly a decade that you love the troops, but hate the war).

4. See answer 3 plus: we know you hate the troops, hate Bush, hate Iraq, hatehatehatehate and don't care if another bunch of 'knuckle-dragging, war-profiteering, troglodytes working for Halliburton' marches off to an untimely death because you never cared about the troops and ONLY care about your precious Obama (who, incidentally, fucked you over in front of the world!)

5. None of this should matter if you give a damn about our men and women in uniform (which you don't) because they're the ones being fucked in this deal, regardless if we're every bit as bad as you think we are. It doesnt matter how cartoonishly monstrous we are IF YOU CARE ABOUT THE TROOPS MORE THAN YOUR PRECIOUS OBAMA (who, incidentally, fucked you over in front of the world!)

The 'best' part is, he made ALL Americans in general look like the bunch of rubes you've been calling us in the 'Red States' for the past 8 years and at the expense of our soldiers' lives, you asshole. And the biggest joke is that, instead of being upset about the little political theater he gave you (before he gave you the hook), you're mad at us because we don't want to see the troops take it like you like it.

Some amplifying information that changes the spin a little: the diversion of a brigade from Iraq to Afghanistan was in the works with the previous administration. In this case, Obama was merely executing the plan that was already rolling (and taking credit for it). Separately, you will note in his big Iraq speech that he did indicate that levels will stay essentially status quo through the end of the national elections (through '09). That means we now need to replace the brigade he diverted. So no real drawdown until '10.

Realist, you are an ass (in the donkey sense).

When Rumsfield was screwing things up by not listening to the generals, I seem to remember a lot of conservatives griping about it. Obama is doing even stupider things now, and for purely political reasons.

For the sake of my Marine son, my Navy husband, and my Army brother, I hope to God someone talks some sense into him before he starts getting our soldiers killed. And make no mistake: every drop of blood from these brigades (and future deployments) resulting from inappropriate training, language barriers, and the wrong equipment will be on Obama's hands. Not Bush's. Time for the slacker-in-chief to sit his butt in the chair and learn his job.

I am a 4/2 SBCT mom, and now I am hearing on the comments here that this a 12-month deployment? We were told 8-months since they are going back way ahead of schedule.

Their training has been cut short. Their time of preparation has been cut short. Their time in garrison and with their families has been cut short, and my confidence in this CiC is nonexistent. It's going to be a long couple of years.

It might be worth pointing out that the last time 4/2 deployed it was also accelerated, that time due to the "surge." The media about wet its collective pants because the troops were missing out on valuable training because they were being rushed into the combat zone. Why no hand-wringing this time, I wonder?

Did the Obamessiah tell us that they speak Arabic in Afghanistan? So no problem here. Move along you racist Obama hating neocons.

SFCMac, you just proved my point about laugh value!

And,no, they're not that liberal. They all supported the Bush bottom line on the invasion. Other than a fairly liberal stance on abortion, they're not liberal, not really liberal, on gay rights.

If I want really progressive info on foreign policy and such, I read The Nation and Counterpunch.

And, being a shithead, you'd know about proctologists.

===

Patrick, actually he DID lie. I guess if you tell enough yourself, you don't recognize them in other people.

===

ECM, especially, Kywhite and others: Why is it that everybody who hates Bush supposedly hates the military, too? Realist said nothing of the sort.

How does him pointing out the lies count as "treason" or whatever?

BUT, by you all CLAIMING he said stuff like that, you bring on caricatures about yourself.

Know what I mean?

You do, somewhere inside, but you won't admit it.

Why? Because, ultimately, you have a "martyr complex" and like indulging it.

===

MorgChop: Somebody is dumb for not sending the Ft. Lewis unit straight to A-stan. I'm sure the stupidity started with Shrub. It would be nice for Obama to overrule it.

Oh, for the record, my sister recently retired from a 20-year career between active duty Army, Reserve and Guard. I've never called her a mouthbreather, either.

Geez, you folks do feel persecuted.

It's not the lying by folks like Gadfly and Realist that bothers me. I'm used to it by now. It’s like having an enema (Gadfly will be thrilled by the scatological reference) - just ignore it and it will soon be over.

Of course peacniks hate the US troops - it's their trademark. We have nearly a decade of anti-military rants from the Far Left loons that has not yet been stuffed down the memory hole. Hate is their gist to America.

No - it's the fact that Gadfly and Realist are stupid and clumsy liars that bothers me. It is way too easy to disprove what they say. They honestly believe that we are stupid enough to swallow whatever swill they dish out. Such shoddy workmanship! Their mentor Joseph Goebbels would be disappointed.

SocraticGadfly breaks the irony meter with:

Patrick, actually he DID lie. I guess if you tell enough yourself, you don't recognize them in other people.

Ah, more projection. Typical.

(Anyone suspect "Gadfly" here is "Realist" posting under a different pseudonym? Or am I just hoping there isn't more than one of these... individuals floating around the net.)

I hope to God someone talks some sense into him before he starts getting our soldiers killed.

Hmm. Maybe 4,300 of them?

As a soldier in 3/2 SBCT we knew that one of the Stryker Brigades at Ft. Lewis was likely to be bumped to Afghanistan and the rotation for the other six Stryker brigades adjusted to fill the gap.

The Army only has 7 Stryker Brigades, and they are much better than "armored cars". They are Armored Fighting Vehicles, 20 tons of rolling steel that bring the pain. That is why Stryker Brigades are in demand in both theaters. We hit harder for longer than Light brigades and have a smaller logistical/maintenance footprint than Heavy brigades.

Since we were schedule to Iraq only a month or two behind 5/2 we were hoping to get the Afghanistan mission, but that didn't happen because the Powers That Be wanted a Stryker Brigade "right now" instead of "Right Now plus 6 weeks".

Mrs G copy.png

November 18, 2009


Dawn Patrol 11/18/2009
[Mrs Greyhawk]
Bookmark and Share - via email, facebook, twitter, etc.

Welcome to the Dawn Patrol, our daily roundup of information on the War on Terror and other topics - from the MilBlogs and various sources around the world. If you're a blogger, you can join the conversation. If you link to any of these stories, add a link to the Dawn Patrol too and your trackback will be added to the list. Hat Tips to the Dawn Patrol are greatly appreciated.Refresh for updates.


Support Our Troops, Read Their Stories

----------------------------

AFGHANISTAN/PAKISTAN

Boondoggle -- [3rd Time, New Country - in Afghanistan]
I know I am a little late on posting to my blog, but I returned from a boondoggle out to Mazar-e-Sharif in the Northern provinces. I even have some pictures to post with this entry. First, let me recap last week. We did make a normal trip to NDS. It was actually a clear, cool morning which is a rarity here in Kabul. The pollution is so thick that it is very rare to see the distant mountains. So, here is a picture of the snow-capped mountains, west of Kabul. This picture was taken last Monday. I haven't seen the mountains since. Other than that, it was a normal week of mentoring. There are always little things to work on and improve in the OT. Friday was another violent day here in Kabul. The Taliban used a SVBIED outside Camp Phoenix a little before 0800. There were no American casualties, but there were injuries.

Clinton in Kabul for Karzai's inauguration -- [Foreign Policy - AfPak]
U.S. President Barack Obama reportedly told CNN today that he is "very close" to making a decision about whether to send more U.S. troops to Afghanistan and plans to make an announcement "in the next several weeks," after more than two months of deliberations (Reuters, Reuters). Obama is reportedly angry about the stream of leaks that has come out about his Afghanistan decision, telling CBS, "For people to be releasing info in the course of deliberations is not appropriate" and said yes when asked if that is a "firing offense" (CBS, Politico). Meanwhile

The war of leaks -- [Foreign Policy - AfPak]
The Obama Administration's social media prowess has been a novelty among latter day political media machines. It helped to crowd-source the campaign funding needed to put Barack Obama in the White House, and generated a populist gloss that was, at the time, convincingly fresh and transparent. What was equally admirable was its apparent internal discipline over when information made the transition from government secret to press release. Controlling the flow of data and keeping secrets secret is a challenge under any circumstance. Combine that with a predilection for Facebook and Twitter, and a hyperactive security officer might expect policy waters to muddy more quickly than they would under normal circumstances.
So when U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan Karl Eikenberry's expressed his "discomfort" last week over a possible troop surge, via diplomatic cable to Washington, it's no wonder that the message ended up dominating headlines.

Ridding Afghanistan of Corruption Will Be No Easy Task -- [Los Angeles Times]
Afghans have a name for the huge, gaudy mansions that have sprung up in Kabul's wealthy Sherpur neighborhood since 2001. They call them "poppy palaces." The cost of building one of these homes, which are adorned with sweeping terraces and ornate columns, can run into the hundreds of thousands of dollars. Many are owned by government officials whose formal salaries are a few hundred dollars a month. To the capital's jaded residents, there are few more potent symbols of the corruption that permeates every level of Afghan society, from the traffic policemen who shake down motorists to top government officials and their relatives who are implicated in the opium trade.

Afghan Minister Accused of Taking Bribe -- [Washington Post]
The Afghan minister of mines accepted a roughly $30 million bribe to award the country's largest development project to a Chinese mining firm, according to a US official who is familiar with military intelligence reports. The allegation, if proved true, would mark one of the most brazen examples of corruption yet disclosed in a country where the problem has become so pervasive that it is now at the heart of Obama administration doubts over Afghan President Hamid Karzai's reliability as a partner.

Vision for Victory, Part I -- [Washington Times]
The news from Afghanistan all year has been dispiriting, and the last few weeks have been especially tough in terms of the violence. Yet most foreign and Afghan officials and officers who I encountered on a recent weeklong visit sponsored by the U. military are guardedly optimistic about our prospects. How can this be so?

U.S. Turns to Local Guns-for-Hire to Guard Afghan Outpost -- [Danger Room - Noah Shachtman]
The U.S. military is turning to guns-for-hire to guard one of its outposts in Afghanistan. But Blackwaters of the world, take note: simply hiring former G.I.s or American cops or even Nepalese Gurkhas won't do the trick this time. At least half of the 50-man force has to come "from within a 50 kilometer radius" of the base, according to a contract solicitation issued by the U.S. Air Force. Over the summer, the American military signaled its interest in hiring an army of contractors to help handle security at as many as 50 outposts in Afghanistan. It's one of several efforts efforts designed to free up uniformed troops for combat and counterinsurgency work. Now, U.S. forces appear to be taking the first step towards building that country-wide private security force, by soliciting bids for a team that watch over Forward Operating Base Lightening, in Paktya province.

NATO Chief Confident Afghanistan Will Have More Troops -- [Voice of America]
The NATO secretary-general says he is confident the United States and other NATO allies will send more troops to Afghanistan, where insurgent attacks have surged in recent months. He spoke at the NATO Parliamentary Assembly Meeting in Edinburgh, where Britain's foreign secretary outlined the strategy his nation would support.

Germany to extend Afghanistan mission another year -- [AP]
Germany will extend its mission in Afghanistan for another year, the government said Wednesday, despite the growing unpopularity of the war at home



Pakistani Successes May Sway US Troop Decision -- [New York Times]
A month after the Pakistani military began its push into the Taliban stronghold of South Waziristan, militants appear to have been dispersed, not eliminated, with most simply fleeing. That recurring pattern illustrated the problems facing the Obama administration as it enters its final days of a decision on its strategy for Afghanistan. Success in this region, in the remote mountains near the Afghan border, could have a direct bearing on how many more American troops are ultimately sent to Afghanistan, and how long they must stay. Pakistan has shown increased willingness to tackle the problem, launching sweeping operations in the north and west of the country this year, but

Where are Taliban and al Qaeda commanders, US media asks Pak -- [Daily News & Analysis]
Washington: A day after senior Pakistani army commanders claimed that their forces have captured all major towns and population centres of the extremist-ridden South Waziristan, Taliban and foreign militants appear to have disappeared and not been eliminated.

Pakistani Army Shows Off Captured Taliban Posts -- [Washington Post]
A toy car booby-trapped with explosives, chemistry textbooks and handwritten case files from a Taliban court were among the debris left behind by fleeing Islamist militants in this remote village in the conflicted tribal region of South Waziristan. The now-deserted village, which was retaken by Pakistani army forces two weeks ago and visited by Western journalists on Tuesday for the first time since, had been a stronghold of Taliban forces for nearly five years.


IRAQ

Iraqi Kurds Warn of Election Boycott in Dispute Over Seats - [Washington Post]
Kurdish officials threatened Tuesday to boycott the upcoming national election in the three provinces they control in northern Iraq unless more parliament seats are allocated to the region. The threat came two days after Iraq's Sunni vice president said he would veto the election law passed last week unless more seats are set aside for representatives of Iraqi refugees. The majority of Iraqis abroad are Sunni. Vice President Tariq al-Hashimi has until Wednesday to veto the law, which legislators approved after weeks of wrangling, primarily over how the vote would be held in the disputed northern city of Kirkuk. The two ultimatums underscored the deep divisions among Iraqi politicians and raised fresh concerns about Iraq's ability to hold a credible election by Jan. 18.

Iraq's national elections in jeopardy as Sunni VP issues veto
-- [McClatchy News]
BAGHDAD -- Iraq's pivotal national elections were thrown back into turmoil and potential delay Wednesday after Vice President Tariq al Hashemi vetoed part of an election law and sent it back to parliament.

US has time to reconsider Iraq drawdown plan-Odierno -- [Reuters]
The US military does not have to decide until April or May whether to push back the end of its combat operations in Iraq due to...

A few words from medics for the 41st Brigade -- [The Oregonian]
I spent an hour or two last month with Oregon National Guard medics who are based at Al Asad Airbase, discussing a little of what they've observed since coming to Iraq this summer. The discussion, as you might think, covered issues in two categories: The physical and the mental. The Physical - CPT Scott Johnson of Newport, who is the highest-ranking soldier in the medical support unit at Al Asad, said that medics are seeing a significant share of orthopedic issues that stem from the heavy loads that soldiers carry. Even though the war has wound down considerably over the last few years, soldiers on convoys and at checkpoints still wear a lot of body armor and carry a lot of ammunition and weaponry, as much as 65 pounds or even more. Over time, even young soldiers experience increased stress on their joints from walking, running and jumping with that much gear.

Goodbye to Iraq, and thanks -- [The Oregonian]
The soldiers of Oregon's 41st Brigade are about halfway through their Iraq deployment, but I'm finally home after a gruelling passage through Kuwait and a misadventure or two. I said goodbye to my last acquaintance in the Oregon National Guard on Monday afternoon in Salt Lake City. SSG Tom McNeil of Central Point was peeling off to fly to Medford, close to his home in Central Point, while I continued on to Portland. Have a terrific Thanksgiving at home, Tom. Thanks to all the folks along the way, especially the soldiers of Oregon's 41st Brigade Combat Team, for the many kindnesses extended to me during my sojourn among them. This toast to you, and I'm starting with you two, since you challenged me to do this, Scott and Mike


U.S. AND OTHER PARTS OF THE WORLD

US, China in Strained Diplomatic Embrace -- [Wall Street Journal]
President Barack Obama was set to leave China on Wednesday after an awkward summit with some achievements but a long list of unfinished business - a result that suggests challenges ahead for the US as it struggles to come to terms with Asia's increasingly assertive superpower. The president secured a far-ranging framework for cooperation Tuesday with Beijing. But that deal was announced as frictions between the two nations appeared to increase over human rights and economic policy. President Obama and Chinese leader Hu Jintao issued their ambitious statement on cooperation in a clumsy fashion - at a media "availability" where they took no questions, didn't address each other and exhibited body language that seemed to say they had been frustrated by the entire exercise.

Obama: 'We've restored America's standing' -- [CNN]
A little more than a year after his election, President Obama said his administration has laid the groundwork for success on global and domestic matters. -- "I think that we've restored America's standing in the world

Somali Pirates : Maersk Alabama Attacked, Fights Back -- [Eagle Speak]
On the early morning of 18 November 2009, 350 nautical miles east from the Somali coast, pirates attacked MV Maersk Alabama, a US flagged, Danish owned, 155 meter long, Container ship.

Iranian COS Warns Russia: Your Security Is Tied To Ours -- [Memri Blog]
Iranian Army chief of staff Hassan Firouzabadi has warned Russia that delay in the supply of S-300 missile systems could harm Russia because its security is tied to that of Iran.




WAR ON TERROR /TERRORISM

Suspected Fort Hood Shooter Believed to Be Self-Radicalized -- [Wall Street Journal]
Some lawmakers briefed Tuesday on the Fort Hood shooting said the suspect, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, was most likely a self-radicalized extremist. The briefing for select members of Congress came as Republicans with oversight of national-security issues called on Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to open a full congressional inquiry into alleged government miscues in the case of Maj. Hasan. He is charged with murdering 13 people Nov. 5 on the sprawling US Army base where he served as a psychiatrist.

Guantánamo Won't Close by January, Obama Says -- [NY Times]
President Obama acknowledged for the first time on Wednesday that his administration would miss a self-imposed deadline to close the detention center at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, by mid-January, admitting the difficulties of following through on one of his first pledges as president.


SUPPORTING THE TROOPS...OR NOT

No Man Left Behind -- [Knottie's Niche]
We've all heard the military quote "No Man left behind" But it wasn't until last weekend as I sat listening to a veteran Marine talking to an Army Sgt about how the Army helicopter pilot who saved him and many others in Vietnam by flying in a hot zone repeatedly to save men that it hit home. The words took on a whole new meaning to me. When Micheal was killed the Army did not leave us behind. It started with a visit to tell us the news and they did not leave until there was no more they could do for us in that moment. Then there was the email to let us know no one else had been hurt from one of the medics. The Army did not leave us behind when they assigned us a causality assistance officer who walked us through each step, even offering to go to the store for us at any hour of the day if we needed anything at all. Then the emails, calls and instant message conversations from the men who served with Micheal began.

LTC Tim Karcher Update -- [Soldiers' Angels Germany]
Wonderful update on LTC Tim Karcher, Commander of the 1st Cavalry Division's 2nd Battalion, 5th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Brigade Combat Team, wounded June 28 in Sadr City.
4 weeks later, after fighting for his life in Iraq, here in Germany, and at Walter Reed, the loss of both legs was the least of his problems:

Support SA while Christmas shopping this year! -- [Soldiers' Angels Germany]
Through Soldiers' Angels, patriotic Americans can do their Holiday shopping or planning and support the troops at the same time!
The easiest way to do this is shop online at all your favorite stores. If you stop by GoodShop and Shop to Earn before you start, you can visit all your favorite online stores, purchase anything you want at the usual great prices, and a portion of what you spend will be donated to Soldiers' Angels--at no extra cost to you! On GoodShop, be sure you select Soldiers' Angels as the charity you are "GoodShopping for."

Trees for Troops: Helping Military Families -- [AdAge.com]
Military families. Transportation. Tree growers. Logistics. These seemingly incongruous words provide a case study in cause marketing.

FOX 5 Special: I-Team VA Loans -- [FOX News]


A FOX 5 I-Team investigation uncovered allegations of a nationwide scheme by banks and mortgage companies to defraud U.S. military veterans. The scheme, spelled out in court documents, claims banks are overcharging veterans on home refinancing loans.
The question raised in a racketeering and class action law suit is how many of those loans involved banks defrauding U.S. military veterans.



MILITARY

Muslim discrimination in the U.S. military. Not. -- [Castra Praetoria]
I'm done listening to any more bellyaching about how Muslims have it bad in the American military. It's a lie.
At this very moment there are American Muslims serving in our armed forces with valor. Muslim interpreters work along side us daily who aren't even American citizens and they have proven themselves as well. All these pansies wailing and moaning about discrimination against them because they are Muslims are not doing anyone any favors. Take it from a guy who has served along side Muslim Marines and Sailors in combat; worked with Jordanian and Iraqi interpreters in country; trained with Iraqi-Americans who have contributed to the effort by working as role players and training our troops in culture and language classes.

Time to revisit firearms policies on military posts -- [Atlanta Journal Constitution]
Just as legitimate questions were raised following the mass killings on the Virginia Tech campus in 2007, both military personnel and civilian citizens

Army's Record Suicide Rate 'Horrible,' General Says -- [Washington Post]
Army Vice Chief of Staff Gen. Peter W. Chiarelli on Tuesday called the Army's record suicide rate this year "horrible" and said the problem of soldiers taking their own lives is the toughest he has faced in his 37 years in service. As of Nov. 16, 140 soldiers on active duty and 71 soldiers not on active duty were suspected to have committed suicide. "We are almost certainly going to end the year higher than last year,"




WELCOME HOME

Veterans' descendants welcome troops home to Fort Campbell -- [Clarksville Leaf Chronicle]
Their day concluded with the Welcome Home ceremony for 80 soldiers who returned from a year in Afghanistan. "We are descendants of our country's first

'Greywolf' Among First CAV Troops to Return Home -- [DVIDS]
Once the buses arrived at Cooper Field, chants of "move that bus" were heard from Families waiting to welcome home their Soldiers. Tommy Tatum, from Kempner


THE MEDIA

Where are Taliban and al Qaeda commanders, US media asks Pak -- [Daily News & Analysis]
Washington: A day after senior Pakistani army commanders claimed that their forces have captured all major towns and population centres of the extremist-ridden South Waziristan, Taliban and foreign militants appear to have disappeared and not been eliminated.

Army officials said that they have killed as many as 550 Taliban militants a month after the military began its campaign into the lawless territory, yet they acknowledge that hundreds, perhaps thousands more have melted away.
As the offensive into the area, considered to be a sanctuary of al Qaeda and Taliban militants gained momentum, Boston Globe said, "Vast numbers of Taliban and foreign terrorists had disappeared into the vast desert scrub and craggy hills surrounding their strongholds of Sararogha and Ladha".
"Where are they? That's what bothers me," New York Times quoted a senior American intelligence officer as saying.




POLITICS

Republicans Criticize Obama's Call to Delay Hill Inquiries on Fort Hood -- [Washington Post]
The Obama administration's request that congressional committees slow their investigations of the Fort Hood shootings sparked denunciations Tuesday from Republicans on Capitol Hill, who pushed for an immediate inquiry of any warning signs before the massacre. House and Senate Republicans, emerging from the most detailed briefings given to Congress since the Nov. 5 attack killed 13 at the central Texas Army post, said delaying investigations would put off legislative efforts to give military officials the tools to prevent similar tragedies in the future. They said such an effort would not interfere with the criminal investigation of shooting suspect Nidal M. Hasan, an Army major who was scheduled to deploy to Afghanistan.


Obama Approval Dips Below 50% For First Time
-- [Quinnipiac University]
Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds; Support For U.S. Troops In Afghanistan Drops Below 50% -- President Barack Obama's job approval rating is 48 - 42 percent, the first time he has slipped below the 50 percent threshold nationally ...


HUMOR / SATIRE

Day By Day



(Need more? Dawn Patrols Archives are here.)



, , , , , , , ,




Posted 12:28 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0)


Bookmark and Share - via email, facebook, twitter, etc.

Air For Valour-it wigetsm2.png
TMGbloglabel7copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
150px
TMGrecentcomments.gif
  • Jimro: As a soldier in 3/2 SBCT we knew that one read more
  • Realist: I hope to God someone talks some sense into him read more
  • Patrick Chester: SocraticGadfly breaks the irony meter with: Patrick, actually he DID read more
  • Mwalimu Daudi: It's not the lying by folks like Gadfly and Realist read more
  • SocraticGadfly: Oh, for the record, my sister recently retired from a read more
  • SocraticGadfly: SFCMac, you just proved my point about laugh value! And,no, read more
  • Federale: Did the Obamessiah tell us that they speak Arabic in read more
  • Murdoc: It might be worth pointing out that the last time read more
  • Claire: I am a 4/2 SBCT mom, and now I am read more
  • kywrite: Realist, you are an ass (in the donkey sense). When read more

6a00d83487393d53ef010536defce7970b-800wi.png

MilBlog Conference Sponsors

GA_150x253_milblog.jpg

onesource logo.bmp

BAE_BannerAd_MilBlog_0309.jpg

MILBLOGS NEWS

*****

Latest Posts From MilBlogs

*****

milblogsa1.jpg Prev | List | Random | Next
Join
Powered by RingSurf!
TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Dawn Patrol Feeds

 

Add to Google Reader or Homepage Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to netvibes Add to Plusmo myaol_cta1.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

TMGbloglabel8copy.gif

TMGbloglabel9 copy.gif
Blah Blah Blah
me220.JPG

The Mudville Gazette is written and produced by Greyhawk. Unless otherwise credited, the opinions expressed are those of the author, and nothing here is to be taken as representing the official position of or endorsement by the United States Department of Defense or any of its subordinate components. Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house.

I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email.

Original content copyright © 2003 - 2009 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed.

Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com

andsm.jpg