The reader will kindly forgive any tendency to rough language or behavior on the part of the site owner...
TMGlogo2006-2007phs-copy.jpg
"Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
TMGbloglabel1 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel3 copy.gif
TMG MONTHLY ARCHIVES
[-]



TMGbloglabel10 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette Feeds

 

Add to Technorati Favorites
Technorati Profile
add.gif
Add to Google
addtomyyahoo4.gif
ngsub1.gif sub_modern5.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

digg.jpg

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

pl-news.gif

tvc_logo_small.png

Mrsg- Greyhawk's Profile
Mrsg- Greyhawk's Facebook profile
Create Your Badge
TMGbloglabel5 copy.gif
TMGbloglabel6 copy.gif
350.jpg
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by!
« Shine on, you pale, crazy beacon | Main | More Happy thoughts »

October 4, 2008

greyhawk copy sm.png

These are not the Happy thoughts you're looking for

By Greyhawk

This point has weighed on my mind since I first heard that Chuck Schumer "inadvertently" launched a bank run back in July.

It does remind one of their attitude on the Iraq war: every set back was gleefully trumpeted and every minor advance was dismissed. They never much cared how their rhetoric or votes might embolden the enemy or unnerve our ally. The sole consideration was domestic political gain. If they didn’t want to lose they certainly gave every indication it was low on their list of priorities. Bashing the President, rallying their base and positioning themselves for the next election was clearly more critical.
Harry Reid's (no doubt also inadvertent) shock to the insurance industry doesn't ease my concern one bit.

Nor does the actual cornerstone tactic expressed by Schumer and Reid back in 2007, when they confidently predicted they could accomplish their goals because Republicans lacked sufficient political courage to take them on:

Democrats know they might lose this month's showdown with President Bush on legislation to pull troops out of Iraq. But with 2008 elections in mind, majority Democrats says it is only a matter of time before they will get their way. Senior Democrats are calculating that if they keep the pressure on, eventually more Republicans will jump ship and challenge the president - or lose their seats to Democratic contenders.

"It's at least my belief that they are going to have to break because they're going to look extinction, some of them, in the eye," said Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., of his Republican colleagues.

Added Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev.: "We're going to pick up Senate seats as a result of this war."

Now, of course, the war isn't an issue - after all, we all knew all along our boys could get 'er done.

It's the economy, stupid.

Update: More happy thoughts, featuring Joe Biden and his traveling mouth.


Posted by Greyhawk / October 4, 2008 3:35 PM | Permalink

10 Comments

FWIW: Spell checker suggests "Schumer" should be "Schemer", but I left it as is.

This whole thing is stinking like a great big set up. Pelosi, Reid and Schumer are all smart, experienced people who don't make these kinds of rookie mistakes "on accident". Getting the market to dump a trillion dollars in one day after giving the OK for Dem committee chairs to vote "no" last Monday does nothing but help one of the presidential candidates. Plus, they got to pass another $150 billion of junk that wouldn't pass any other way.

Don't forget this -- Obama (and his helpers) are short the market and economy. At the moment, they've got leverage that they are going to use to help him get elected. Get ready for 50% inflation to pay for all this fun.

Some of us will pay more than others for this debacle. All you gotta do is look at the Electoral College breakout to figure out who is "entitled" to freeload and who pays the bills.

I have been seeing speculation for years that the shit would hit the fan when the baby boomers started retiring. It may not be the cause of our current mess, but I suspect there's some relationship. Here's the thing about inflation - it's good for people with fixed-interest debt and somewhat-indexed income. Hold onto your job and take advantage of matching contributions until this settles down and your retirement will be a lot less likely to involve dwelling in a refrigerator box.

So what I'm reading into this is that the Dems, by virtue of a few carefully placed words, have the power to win/lose wars and topple our economy.

Now that's power.

Why wouldn't that be attractive? Might vs. right is an old contest, and might has usually won.

Repubs are behind the eight ball, and don't seem all that uncomfortable there. Where's the muscle? What's the message for those of us who can actually connect some of these dots? Be nice and roll over?

The primary reason the Democrats failed to completely destroy Iraq and the US military in 2007 (mere months after gaining control of congress by promising to do just that) wasn't their Republican opposition. The Dems made the same fundamental mistake McCarthy did decades ago - he thought he could bet against the US Army and win. Years later, Democrats probably mistakenly believe McCarthy's failure was attempting to take on communists, an historical mis-read that could explain their position in 2007.

That might be worthy of a much longer post, but for one illustration here's a description of a September 12, 2006 meeting between Representative John Murtha and Army Chief of Staff Peter Schoomaker from Bob Woodward's book The War Within: A Secret White House History 2006-2008. On that day, Schoomaker had called on the congressman (and ranking Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee) to discuss the Army's budget:

Schoomaker argued that it was important to win in Iraq. Most people he had met out in the country, he said, wanted to see it through. It was important to succeed.

Murtha launched into a diatribe against the president and the Iraq war. You can be as enthusiastic about the war as you want, he said, but we simply don't have the troops to sustain it for much longer. Public opinion was strongly against the war. How could the president ignore the American people? This is a democracy, Murtha insisted, pounding the table, waving a copy of the Constitution in the air and claiming that Bush had become a "dictator."

Schoomaker suggested that if Murtha thought the president's approval rating was low, he ought to take a look at recent polls. You'll find that the military is the institution that people have the most confidence in, followed by police and firefighters, then organized religion, he said. All these were above or near 50 percent approval. The president was down in the 30s, and Congress was in the 20s or lower. "Congress is even lower than the president, Schoomaker said.

"This meeting's over!" Murtha shouted, red faced and angry as hell.

Schoomaker left quietly.
In America, at least for now - betting against the Army is a losing proposition. But betting against Republicans isn't - the GOP has failed to gain anything on the domestic political front from gains in Iraq. One could blame the media for that, but I think the pols themselves share the responsibility. Throughout the turn around there they tried desperately to make anything else the focus of voter attention (see "illegal immigration" for one example) out of fear of failure. One might even surmise that while the Dems were betting against success, the Republicans weren't willing to bet against them.

I'm not sure who the Democrats are betting against on economic issues, though. I hope whoever it is they've got the same fortitude and determination as the American Soldier.


In the midst of an economic crisis, that so many people think now's a good time to hand the country over to a socialist collectivist Marxist with mixed feelings about his country and a wife (First Lady) who hates it more than loves it, is a disappointment.

Nor does the actual cornerstone tactic expressed by Schumer and Reid back in 2007, when they confidently predicted they could accomplish their goals because Republicans lacked sufficient political courage to take them on:
What's really, really sad is that once again, they were right.

Republicans really are the Spineless Party.

We are SO screwed -- even if McCain/Palin manage to win.

"It's at least my belief that they are going to have to break because they're going to look extinction, some of them, in the eye," said Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., of his Republican colleagues.
Where is the Republican Patton, who could inspire his party by saying, "I don't want you worried about your own extinction -- I want you to make those other sonsabitches worry about THEIR extinction!" ????

At Republican rallies, the crowd breaks into chants of “U-S-A! U-S-A! U-S-A!”

At Democratic rallies, the crowd breaks into chants of “O-ba-ma! O-ba-ma! O-ba-ma!”

350.jpg
Mrs G copy.png

November 26, 2010


America@war
[Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit.

That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary.

From their about page:

The Naval Institute shall remain

INDEPENDENT - A non-profit member association, with no government support, that does not lobby for special interests;

NON-PARTISAN - An independent, professional military association with a mission, goals and objectives that transcend political affiliations; and shall encourage

IDEAS - Through its respected journals Proceedings and Naval History, its conferences, its books and its online content, in support of those who serve.

"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation:

The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism.

Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented.

I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are.

"Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result.

Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web...

And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed.

The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down.

*****

But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:

Closing Blogs is nothing new. So many site's owners just give up on their own. They come and go, you know, these MilBloggers do. Like any other sort of blogger. Many post in the lonely down hours far from home, spill their guts for the world, then abandon their spots when the tour of duty is up. They have lives again somewhere in the world, and no need to share the details. So it goes.

Many are truly gone - no site left at all. "The page cannot be found." Other blogs remain, like abandoned defensive positions in shifting desert sands.

Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down.

If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real.

And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale.

We've already made history, it's time to save it.

(More to follow...)




Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) |

TMGbloglabel7copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
TMGrecentcomments.gif
  • Tony: At Republican rallies, the crowd breaks into chants of “U-S-A! read more
  • mariner: "It's at least my belief that they are going to read more
  • mariner: Nor does the actual cornerstone tactic expressed by Schumer and read more
  • jordan: In the midst of an economic crisis, that so read more
  • Greyhawk: The primary reason the Democrats failed to completely destroy Iraq read more
  • Feeling Pwned in PA: So what I'm reading into this is that the Dems, read more
  • Porkov: I have been seeing speculation for years that the shit read more
  • ChknLtL: Some of us will pay more than others for this read more
  • Concerned Citizen: This whole thing is stinking like a great big set read more
  • Greyhawk: FWIW: Spell checker suggests "Schumer" should be "Schemer", but I read more

MBC2010.jpg

MILBLOGS NEWS

*****

Latest Posts From MilBlogs

*****

milblogsa1.jpg Prev | List | Random | Next
Join
Powered by RingSurf!
TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Dawn Patrol Feeds

 

Add to Google Reader or Homepage Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to netvibes Add to Plusmo myaol_cta1.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

TMGbloglabel8copy.gif

TMGbloglabel9 copy.gif
Blah Blah Blah
me220.JPG

The Mudville Gazette is written and produced by Greyhawk, who recently retired from 24 years of active duty in the US military, but will maintain this disclaimer: Unless otherwise credited, the opinions expressed are those of the author, and nothing here is to be taken as representing the official position of or endorsement by the United States Department of Defense or any of its subordinate components.

Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house.

I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email.

Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed.

Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com

andsm.jpg

*****

Tending Distant
Fires


Far from hearth and home, watching
Cold alone but not alone
On distant shore and only wanting
Safe return and little more

What tales we'll tell
When that time comes
When tales can be told

When things grim
Seem far away
When other fires go cold

Some distant sunset, vision fading
Memories remain
And tired eyes gaze 'pon folded flags
While distant drums beat their refrain

Saluting fallen friends whose names
And youth will never fade
Here's to those on other shores,
for them live well, the price is paid

- Greyhawk,
Baghdad,
December 2004