
![]() | |
October 2011
September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003
|
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by! November 29, 2007 OverlookedBy GreyhawkAfter all the hand wringing, the embarrassment of a cathartic internal town hall meeting made public, the misinformed press stories about "soft diplomats," and the sometimes amateurish scramble by Human Resources to develop a policy and respond to concerns about directed assignments (the first time the Department had contemplated such a policy since the Vietnam War), it turns out there was no need for directed assignments after all.Seems to me there was quite a bit of coverage of the original story, but for some reason I almost missed this bit of news. Don't know why that is, but it is... By the way, that's from a State Department BLOG ENTRY. State has a BLOG. It's actually on a .gov site, even. The author of this particular entry is Brian Heath, who adds The Foreign Service I know and am proud to be a part of is an organization that invariably rises to meet a challenge. Indeed, more than 1,500 of my colleagues have served in Iraq since 2003. Three have been killed.Kudos to Mr Heath. Believe it or not, now that we've pretty much won this damn thing militarily one aspect of one of the many erroneous claims the war's detractors have made repeatedly over the past year is becoming valid* - in many ways the Army has done all it can to lay the groundwork, to create an environment where others can thrive. What's needed now is less combat skill and more rebuilding. This is not to say that Iraq is a safe place - just that it is fast becoming one. But make no mistake about it, if the troops were brought home tomorrow all hell would break lose, in a manner as yet unseen even in this part of the world. The next crucial step in creating the world where many of those troops can come home is exactly this - a steady inflow of folks with skillsets other than combat arms who can help create an environment where fewer guns are needed. We are at the entry point of an upward spiral; increased security sets the stage for improved quality of life for Iraqis which means less need for security forces to maintain that quality of life; without despair people have less incentive to sow chaos. We may have had a similar opportunity in 2003. Some have made that claim, though I'm not certain it's accurate. I'm more certain that at the time there were those who were bound and determined to violently oppose any effort on the part of the coalition to bring about a free and democratic Iraq. Only now can we gauge the depth of that commitment in the vast majority of the members of that group: death or about 4.5 years, whichever comes first. I believe many are hesitant to acknowledge our military victory in this conflict in recognition (or even expectation) that we can still reignite that flame (or even ignite it within those who have been steadfast in support of our efforts) with a few very stupid actions (or inactions) on our part over the coming weeks and months. In a nutshell, if we don't take advantage of this relative peace and charge very swiftly up that spiral we will lose all those gains, perhaps as quickly as some think we achieved them. Actions from folks like Brian Heath confirm my impression, and give me renewed hope that we can and will make that charge. (But more on how we can snatch defeat from the jaws of victory later.) *But they were wrong then, and any post-facto claims of prescience should be dismissed as forthrightly as their original blunders, along with any claims that it's time to quit. Posted by Greyhawk / November 29, 2007 5:09 PM | Permalink 7 Comments |
November 26, 2010America@war [Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit. That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary. From their about page:
"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation: The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism. Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented. I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are. "Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result. Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web... And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed. The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down. But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:
Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down. If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real. And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale. We've already made history, it's time to save it. (More to follow...) Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink |
Comments (0) |
|
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
![]() Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house. I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email. Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed. Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com ![]() Tending Distant Far from hearth and home, watching What tales we'll tell When things grim Some distant sunset, vision fading Saluting fallen friends whose names - Greyhawk, Baghdad, December 2004 |
I take it as a good sign when the anti-war crowd start identifying the "next" reason the war cannot be won. Somehow, almost like cause & effect, that excuse gets publicly crushed. So long as we have the political will to win, we will prevail.
I still cannot agree that we've won the war. We have unquestionably won what will be certainly seen as the crucial battle in the war - _if_ we don't pull out too soon and deliver Iraq into the hands of the enemy. In World War II terms, this is comparable to winning both the Battle of Britain and the Battle of the Atlantic. But winning those battles didn't guarantee victory in the war. So it is with the surge in Iraq.
Al Qaida and Iran (along with Syria) both have the capability of restarting in Iraq without constant vigilance to keep them out, and hunting them down when they do return. The war is not over until Al Qaida and Iran really do give up.
The next crucial battles are going to be political, and intertribal, fought with words, financial aid, and economic development. These will be no less critical to winning than the Battle of the Surge.
I don't care what they say, State department is pregnant with sissified wusses who want their mommies. Yeah, they are first to go to Paris and Hong Kong and last in line when there is _real_ diplomatic work to be done in Fallujah or Herat. The State guys just show up and dust when the real operators have done the deep cleaning.
I don't care what they say, State department is pregnant with sissified wusses who want their mommies. Yeah, they are first to go to Paris and Hong Kong and last in line when there is _real_ diplomatic work to be done in Fallujah or Herat. The State guys just show up and dust when the real operators have done the deep cleaning.
True, A.C., the Pentagon shouldn't allow itself to be bullied into withdrawing too soon just because of the vagaries of domestic politics.
I wonder too if the bin Laden tape to Europe released a couple of days ago signals a shift in AQ strategy away from Iraq, and toward Afghanistan. Maybe they sense that Iraq isn't going to be the safe haven they envisioned, so now they have to cut their losses and go back to their old Taliban stomping grounds.
A fascinating point to watch over the next year or so is whether State will demonstrate the same flexibility and adaptability that our armed forces have shown recently.
The military has progressed from its original, ineffective methods to a powerful COIN strategy that has begun to turn the entire situation around. Now, as Greyhawk notes, the nation builders have their chance.
Surely, State will also make its own share of mistakes as it begins the task of rebuilding Iraq - but will our diplomats match the adroitness of our soldiers when faced with unexpected crises? We can only hope...
Thanks for covering this news; it was ignored by a lot of the people who squawked the loadest just a few short weeks ago.
I've quoted you and linked to you here: http://consul-at-arms.blogspot.com/2007/12/re-overlooked.html