
![]() | |
October 2012
August 2012 July 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003
|
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by! September 12, 2007 Katie Bar the door...By GreyhawkOr not. Iraq Is Ratings Drag for Katie Couric NEW YORK (AP) - If some people thought traveling to Iraq and Syria was a ratings stunt for Katie Couric, it didn't work out that way.I've heard that her reports were well done and well balanced. I haven't seen them - more by circumstance than choice. But at the time I read her earliest blog entries on the trip (of which I was extremely harsh in my own review ) I wondered if - having seen what she had in her first hours here, - she would depart as an advocate of the "troops home now" faith. (No one of good conscious who has been over here could leave as an advocate for abandoning the people of Iraq.) From what I've heard since, she did a very capable job. W. Thomas Smith had time to watch and review: In a world where reporting war and providing frontline analysis is often slanted, skewed, and just plain wrong, Katie is doing it right. Not perfect to be sure: Iraq is simply too difficult, and military operations (both static and rolling) are usually far too complex for observing journalists to fully get their arms around. But either CBS’s producers on this project have real defense-sense, or Katie has made the decision to avoid any preconceptions she may have previously held about the war and instead report life as she sees it in the trenches.So, why no viewers? More specifically, why would Katie in Iraq (just days ahead of General Petraeus' key report) draw fewer viewers than Katie in America? (Hopefully this eliminates any Katie-bashing in the comments). Here's what CBS says: "CBS said it wasn't surprising, and argued that last week's numbers were artificially deflated because of U.S. Open coverage." - But I'll offer an alternative. It's related to a point I made here before: no one reads deployed milbloggers. When you think about it, it's amazing - the story of the century, and folks are tuning out all over. I have a few thoughts as to why this is so, but just thought I'd toss it out for open discussion first. Posted by Greyhawk / September 12, 2007 12:47 PM | Permalink 7 Comments |
November 26, 2010America@war [Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit. That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary. From their about page:
"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation: The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism. Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented. I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are. "Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result. Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web... And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed. The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down. But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:
Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down. If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real. And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale. We've already made history, it's time to save it. (More to follow...) Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink |
Comments (0) |
|
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
![]() Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house. I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email. Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed. Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com ![]() Tending Distant Far from hearth and home, watching What tales we'll tell When things grim Some distant sunset, vision fading Saluting fallen friends whose names - Greyhawk, Baghdad, December 2004 |
Well at the risk of offending , may I offer an alternative to your proposition that no one reads the milbloggers.
No one reads ANYTHING. Or wants to.
The general population is astoundingly STUPID and CLUELESS about anything not directly within their limited sphere of behavior. It reaches its intellectual summit by postulating on the likely winner of the latest American Idol, or watching video of Brittany Spears self-destructing. It doesn't watch the news. It doesn't read the news, and it doesn't wander around the Internet searching out the news. It simply does not care. Which frankly is all well and good. The problem is when its members still have fixed opinions about what is in the news about which they deliberately know absolutely nothing. If you watched the farce from the House of Representatives this week, you would have seen Members of Congress who were seemingly so clueless that they could have changed places with their chairs and the level of discourse would have been nothing if not improved. Imagine what their constituents must be like. And we think Iraqis are largely 'ignorant'. Pot meet kettle, so to speak.
But perhaps things are not quite so bleak as that. I myself was not going to watch Ms. Couric in Iraq simply because I never watch MSM output any longer. Been there --- done that. I don't trust it to accurately reflect 'objective' reality, and spinning objects tend to make me dizzy. But after the reviews came in from the first show I watched every video clip as streamed from the CBS website. So in effect I did 'watch' the show but the ratings would never reflect that fact. Maybe others did as well as those videos were always the most watched streams when I visited.
One can but hope I suppose as Ms. Couric did in fact do an excellent and FAIR job. I was impressed with her professionalism and the manner of her presentation. Surprised but impressed.
dougf: Concur. Go here for more: http://philippinesphil.blogspot.com/
Do an experiment. Interview her on FOX, and see what happens to the ratings.
Do an experiment. Interview her on FOX, and see what happens to the ratings.
Perhaps it is because the majority of her audience watches her because her news coverage "agrees" with what they think it should be, and that when she provides information that runs counter to their world view, then they tune out.
The MSM is in a death spiral and it's almost certainly too late for it to recover. In this specific case, the CBS news has horrible ratings because they have alienated so much of the country with their Left-wing bias. Any attempt to report fairly will not work because it is too little, too late to get back lost viewers who have long since found other sources of information. At the same time, the remaining loyal viewers will desert them if there is any move to balance out their coverage. I wonder at what point the big three networks will decide to abandon major news coverage altogether. The CBS News will be the first to go as it's fast approaching the five million viewer mark.
I have a few thoughts as to why this is so, but just thought I'd toss it out for open discussion first.
My guess about people not reading deployed milbloggers is just a guess, but I think it's got something to do with many not constantly pumping out content (for obvious reasons). Blog readers--and many/most bloggers--have incredibly short attention spans, and if there isn't anything posted for a few days they just move on to the next shiny object.
I also think it may be that most people simply cannot relate to the material, and they probably feel a little intimidated about commenting. I mean, most readers don't comment at any blog, but there might be some civilian-comfortably-at-home guilt going on, or a feeling of voyeurism, with people who visit deployed bloggers. Basically, I'm saying I think there's a little bit of a psychological hangup thing going on. Again, just a guess, but you know how people are.
One thing I'm sure of, though--if someone starts blogging while deployed (having not done so before), it does take a while for people to even know they exist if they don't make a point of keeping up on what new blogs are out there. I know I've found deployed milblogs quite a few times where I only learned of them *after* they'd already left the area and quit blogging. It's the same conundrum with regular blogs, only amplified due to redeployments and the subsequent shift in focus.
I didn't see the Katie Couric thing, but she's like nails on a chalkboard for me. I don't watch her EVER, not even for a laugh. I can get much better reporting from Iraq from milblogs, anyway.
;-) As far as her regular viewers go, though, it's probably a little of what The Brain said (they don't want their views challenged). But since most people are more preoccupied with trivial crap, I'm guessing most didn't want to deal with hearing about the war and bursting their bubble of blissful ignorance. I'm reminded of people like my mother, who's "tired of the war" and just doesn't want to hear about it any more. (I won't even bore you with how much THAT pisses me off!)
So Greyhawk, why do you think people tune out the news from the front, whether it comes from milbloggers or people like Katie Couric?