The reader will kindly forgive any tendency to rough language or behavior on the part of the site owner...
TMGlogo2006-2007phs-copy.jpg
"Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
TMGbloglabel1 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel3 copy.gif
TMGbloglabel10 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette Feeds

 

Add to Technorati Favorites
Technorati Profile
add.gif addtomyyahoo4.gif ngsub1.gif sub_modern5.gif add2netvibes.gif Add to Plusmo subscribe2.gif myaol_cta1.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

digg.jpg

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

pl-news.gif

tvc_logo_small.png

Mrsg- Greyhawk's Profile
Mrsg- Greyhawk's Facebook profile
Create Your Badge
TMGbloglabel5 copy.gif

gngrey120x60.gif

TMGbloglabel6 copy.gif
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by!
« Jules Crittenden... | Main | Does the Military Support the Mission? »

January 20, 2007

A beginner's guide to getting your surge on

By Greyhawk

Or: "How to stop choosing the wrong damn side in this war"

President Bush announces The Surge - 20,000 additional troops to Iraq. "The vast majority of them -- five brigades -- will be deployed to Baghdad."

Americans respond:

Fox poll: "By 59 percent to 36 percent, Americans oppose sending more U.S. troops to Iraq."

That's right in line with other polls on the topic - so much so that it's hard to refute the results. USA Today/Gallup Poll: "those surveyed oppose the idea of increased troop levels by 61%-36%." Times/Bloomberg found 36% approve, 60% disapprove of the plan. CBS reported 33% favor sending more troops and 59% oppose.

But sixty-three percent (including most Democrats) say they personally want the plan to succeed. But with an eye on the above numbers,
Lawmakers were introducing Iraq legislation at a mad pace yesterday, at one point in the afternoon scheduling news conferences in half-hour intervals.
With poll results in, they wanted to confirm their own opposition to the plan. But what is it they oppose? By the same token, what is it that others are supporting? What exactly is this plan that most Americans "want to work"?

You might think you know. You might be under the false impression that 20,000+ troops who otherwise wouldn't be in Iraq will now be there. You'd be wrong - but it's not completely your fault. The President didn't offer details in his speech, and nowhere in all the subsequent coverage of "The Surge" will you discover an explanation of how it's being accomplished. But before deciding what you think about the plan you might want to take a moment to learn what it is. Clarifying that is not a difficult task - the issue isn't complicated and the information is unclassified. The Pentagon has released the details, and they are readily available on various public DoD web sites. Any reporter wanting to understand what's happening prior to filing their next story on the topic could discover this with about 15 minutes work - but we're going to make it even easier and do it for them.

First: no units are going to Iraq that weren't already planning on going.

Troop rotation plans for most of 2007 were revealed in this November DoD announcement:

For Operation Iraqi Freedom, the major units announced today are:

3rd Infantry Division Headquarters, Fort Stewart, Ga.

4th Brigade, 1st Infantry Division, Fort Riley, Ks.

4th Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division, Fort Lewis, Wa.

3rd Brigade, 3rd Infantry Division, Fort Benning, Ga.

1st Brigade, 82nd Airborne Division, Fort Bragg, N.C

173rd Airborne Brigade, Vicenza, Italy

What had yet to be determined officially was exactly when those troops would deploy. For most, late spring/early summer was the working plan. Likewise, their exact destination within Iraq was "for planning purposes only". For some (not all) it's now Baghdad, and sooner.

While not all those units will "surge", only one of the "surge" units is missing from that list - but that unit surged before the surge was cool. Brigades of the 82nd Airborne are America's "stand by" force, with one of the four always ready to deploy on short notice. For the 2nd Brigade that notice came on December 27, with little fanfare.

The 82nd Airborne Division's 2nd Brigade Combat Team received orders today to deploy to Kuwait in early January to become the theater command's "call forward" force, Defense Department officials announced today.

Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates approved the request from Army Gen. John Abizaid, commander of U.S. Central Command, yesterday, Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman told Pentagon reporters.

About 3,500 members of the "Falcon Brigade" headquarters will replace the 15th Marine Expeditionary Unit as CENTCOM's forward-deployed on-call force, ready to respond quickly to a full range of contingencies, he said.

And replace them they did. But the Marines weren't coming home - they had already moved into Iraq the month before:
The amphibious group moved into the Persian Gulf so the Marines could become the reserve force for Army Gen. John Abizaid, commander of the U.S. Central Command, who is responsible for Iraq and Afghanistan.

The Marine unit was sent ashore in mid-November to replace Army troops who had been transferred from Anbar to reinforce the effort to stop the increasingly deadly sectarian violence in Baghdad.

Then came the announcement of "The Surge":
DoD Announces Force Adjustments

As a result of the President’s Iraq strategy review, the Department of Defense announced today an increase of 20,000 U.S. military forces for Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Specific decisions made by the Secretary of Defense include:

The 2nd Brigade, 82nd Airborne Division, based at Fort Bragg, N.C., and currently assigned as the call forward force in Kuwait, will move into Iraq and assume a security mission there.

The 1st Brigade, 34th Infantry Division, Minnesota Army National Guard, will be extended in its current mission for up to 125 days and will redeploy not later than August 2007.

The 4th Brigade, 1st Infantry Division, based at Ft. Riley, Kan., will deploy in February 2007 as previously announced.

Three other Army combat brigades will deploy as follows:

The 3rd Brigade, 3rd Infantry Division, based at Ft. Benning, Ga., will deploy in March 2007.

The 4th Stryker Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division, based at Ft. Lewis, Wash., will deploy in April 2007.

The 2nd Brigade, 3rd Infantry Division, based at Ft. Stewart, Ga., will deploy in May 2007.

The Marine Corps will extend two reinforced infantry battalions for approximately 60 days. Additionally, the 15th Marine Expeditionary Unit (Special Operations Capable) will remain in Iraq for approximately 45 additional days.

And there you have it. Some troops already tapped to deploy will now go a few months early. Some troops in country will stay late. No troops will move into Iraq who weren't already scheduled to go to Iraq.

So is "The Surge" a simple numbers game, a bit of sleight of hand to make it appear we're doing something that we aren't? No - there will be a real increase in troop numbers in Iraq - especially combat troops and especially in Baghdad - until such time as the units currently in Iraq (and extended as part of the surge) start coming home.

And that is "The Surge". While naming it provides something "tangible" to oppose, if there was some way to "stop it" - short of withdrawing immediately from Iraq - the same troops would go to Iraq,

...just on their normal schedule and in time to hive-five the folks they will replace instead of reinforce. Those newly arrived troops will be completely up shit creek, of course, as no one in Iraq is going to take them at all seriously.
That's assuming not too much damage has already been done with the political grandstanding of the past week. Meanwhile, lost amid the hoopla surrounding those press conferences scheduled at half-hour intervals
Casey: First Additional U.S. Troops Arrive in Baghdad to Support New Plan

WASHINGTON – The first additional U.S. troops who will take part in new security operations in Iraq have arrived in Baghdad, the top U.S. military commander in Iraq said today.

“The initial elements of the first group are here," George W. Casey Jr., commander of Multinational Force Iraq, told reporters at a news conference in Baghdad.

For those interested in keeping up with all this in the future, I recommend frequent visits to MilBlogs - we tend to track this stuff rather closely over there.

Additional reading: Don't confuse the 'surge' with the strategy, from Small Wars Journal.


Bookmark and Share - via email, facebook, twitter, etc.

Posted by Greyhawk / January 20, 2007 6:01 PM | Permalink

2 TrackBacks

A short recon of whats out there that might draw your attention. Read More

It was a workmanlike speech... but... Read More

21 Comments

Soooo ... in essence .... it is the dems who have been "surged," yes?

Brilliant.

Maliki has arrested too many Mahdi Army types to retreat now. He's committed.

If the latest plan is sucessful and is seen as being successful, let's hope the Republicans will be smart enough to use the Democrats' gutlessness and defeatism against them.

I won't hold my breath, though.

Interesting the first few comments, and much of the content of this post is far more concerned about defeating Democrats rather than terrorists.

I guess politics are more important than winning the "long war"...

Well this clarifies some things I guess but being a bit of a simpleton, can someone please advise why the World's only Superpower has to wait until the clock is almost striking midnight before it behoves itself to actually commit to a comprehensive battle in Baghdad? Anyone who thinks that this effort will ever be repeated in the future is dreaming in technicolour. Had it been done a year ago, or even 6 months ago that would have one thing, but now it is a pure one-off.

I mean Omar at ITM was ,almost 6 months ago, telling anyone who cared to listen that Baghdad was the focal point of Iraq and that it had to be effectively cleared of the usual goons, not to mention the Iranian infestation. And lots of people were expressing the belief that Al-Sadr and his thugs had to go, one way or the other. YEARS AGO. And yet here we are in January 2007, reduced to what amounts to a hail-mary effort.

I know that 'counter-insugency' is hard, but it does not have to be THIS hard. It is the lack of 'progress' that has soured most people on the effort. People do get remarkably tired ot folks getting blown up when 'objectively' things just are not getting better.

Who in the military bureacracy is responsible for this SLOW reaction to a problem which has just been getting worse for months if not years ?

Was it Bush?
Was it Rumsfeld?
Was it the commanders on the ground?
Was it everyone?

Inquiring minds really do want to know as surely someone has some splainin' to do since even the 'optimists' now admit that the previous operational plans and ROE were hopelessly dysfunctional.

I don't really care about how many 'new' troops are introduced into Baghdad. All I care about is whether they are now allowed )or more accurately, expected) to "kick ass and take names". Period.


No, Talboito. Politics are NOT more important than winning the war against terrorism. At least, politics shouldn't be more important. But tell that to the MSM and critics of the alleged "surge." Tell that to the defeatists who callously refer to the Commander-in-Chief's military directive as a "long shot" or "last stand" in Iraq. IMO, this post and the first two comments (mine, albeit sarcastic) relate to refuting politization.

Who in the military bureacracy is responsible for this SLOW reaction to a problem which has just been getting worse for months if not years ?

Was it Bush?
Was it Rumsfeld?
Was it the commanders on the ground?
Was it everyone?

Inquiring minds really do want to know as surely someone has some splainin' to do since even the 'optimists' now admit that the previous operational plans and ROE were hopelessly dysfunctional..............

Posted by dougf at January 20, 2007 10:17 PM

doug,

I think the fault lies with a MSM that laments every "possible" civilian death as reprehensible in Iraq and refuses to distinguish between insurgents and innocent civilians killed, refuses to name the culprits of the increased violence (Mahdi Army and Sunni/al Qaeda assholes), and then proceeds to write stories that say, America should stop because too many people are dying, instead of "America should kick the insurgents' asses and get this over with so it will get more peaceful sooner". It is the media who have created the environment which halts American offensives, gives aid and comfort to the insurgents, and tries to make the Maliki government look like American toadies, so that government then has to issue statements and act like it isn't an American toady, thus hindering prosecution of the counterinsurgency effort. All the military start and stop is driven by the media putting pressure on politicians to "play nice" instead of kill our enemies.

This could all have been over by now if the news had said "Insurgents continue to kill innocents, despite losing the war. Maliki government cracks down. Thousands of insurgents die. Maliki takes on Death Squads. Al Sadr in hiding."

Instead they have painted a bunch of barefooted, ignorant, uneducated, immoral, and hotheaded boys and thugs as some invincible insurgency which can move anywhere undetected, kill anyone it wants to, and the US and Iraqi governments are powerless to stop them. NOTHING could be further from the Truth. Like the Soviet Union, they are not ten feet tall and bulletproof. But the American miltary is, or is as close to it as you can get without divine intervention.

Subsunk

"Interesting the first few comments, and much of the content of this post is far more concerned about defeating Democrats rather than terrorists."

However, the only appearance of the word "Democrats" in the post is this:
"...sixty-three percent (including most Democrats) say they personally want the plan to succeed."

I was surprised by your comment, as I expected most folks reading this would see the same thing I did - the botched handling of the announcement of the plan by the executive branch.

As for politicians proposing "anti-surge" measures, they include Olympia Snowe, Chuck Hagel, and other Republicans.

I tried to keep this post non-partisan and simply informative. As for my own political views, you're seeing a prediction I made right after the elections come true:

Sap the will of half the people, and the other half will not be able to confront a (seemingly) distant enemy while being obstructed on the home front. Until now that split has been defined by political party affiliation. But any upcoming "compromise" will likely have the interesting impact of alienating half of Republican voters and half of the Democrats -each for different reasons, of course, but this promises a potentially interesting variation from the pre-election partisan separation.

...as individuals shift their positions on Iraq (centrist Dems, Repubs, and Independents seek common ground while extremists and "party uber alles" types on both sides move to the fringes) I predict the media will pander to the minority - those extremists, who will make great headlines.

You'll be able to identify the extremes - one side will call for "troops home now" while on the other side "don't listen to Democrats - they want the troops home now!" will rally the faithful.

The rest of us will work to "fix" Iraq.
See here, including comments.

And I believe I'm right on all counts. Even Hillary Clinton acknowledges that the Dem-controlled congress won't actually be able to pass any meaningful resolutions to stop the surge.

Doug,
I think Subsunk pretty much nailed it. I'd add that there are many political tightropes being walked in Baghdad and Washington, and that's a damn shame but also an unfortunate reality in any combat situation. It's all well and good to talk of the commanders on the ground having free rein to get the job done, but that rarely ever happens (and sometimes those commanders even restrict themselves because they think that's what "the boss" wants). I'm sure as hell not trying to excuse that, just saying the bottom line is the blame game becomes counter-productive. There's been a leadership shuffle in Washington and there's one coming in theater, now let's press.

As for this:

I don't really care about how many 'new' troops are introduced into Baghdad. All I care about is whether they are now allowed )or more accurately, expected) to "kick ass and take names". Period.
I'm with you there. It's why I was opposed to the surge before it was announced. But in that announcement the CinC said we will be operating without "restrictions" that previously held us back. I'm hoping that translates into exactly what you said.

Thanks to Greyhawk and Subsunk for their insightful commentary.

And yes I agree with everything that you have said, but in the interest of FUTURE campaigns, and there will be future campaigns, would it not have been better to have simply bitten the media bullet and gotten the job done ?

You got all the crap press anyway so what would the difference have been ?

I saw a headline indicating that 34000 Iraqis had been killed in Iraq over the last year. Or at least I think the time frame was the last year.
I hate to use such a 'questionable' source but I believe that Uncle Joe once said--- "One death is a tragedy; a million is a statistic."

Frankly distasteful as it is to relate, he was probably correct in both a practical and psychological sense. What if that headline had said that 74000 Iraqis had died last year with the difference consisting of 'victims' of massive 'thoughtful' and consistent US pressure on the two centres of terror in Iraq. Would the 'headlines' be any different in tone or impact?

I think not. And continuing on, what if those 'extra victims' had really damaged the Shiite Militias, and the Al-Queda/Sunni 'assholes' so that Baghdad was now much more 'secure'?

I know it's simplistic but I firmly believe in the adage that in the end, you " might as well be hanged/hung for a sheep as a lamb."
The 'media' has been hanging you for 4 years, at the very least, someone should have been considereing making lemonade a long time previous to now.

But as I said, I'm a little simple.

So, you are basically saying that the only thing the President is doing is moving troops in about 1 month early and putting more in Baghdad?

If that is true then it is official that this guy is an idiot. That is how he is going to solve the quagmire we are in?

Or, could it be that he has nothing to surge with? Perhaps it is more of an "Urge" than a surge since he has not troops to surge with.

I got my hands on some briefing slides about the reserves and it is a disaster to say the least. Go to this site and you will see excerpts of those slides where basically the briefers (Full COLs) said that the reserve ranks are done.

Yo cap'n kevin, are those letters in front of your name initials or are you really an O-3? If you're an O-3 how the hell did you lead your troops with an attitude like that one. Were I in your outfit I would have transferred the minute you uttered your defeatist philosophy to the public (=troops).

WOW - As I watch this play out on all sides. It reminds me more and more of Vietnam. I just hope and pray we dont pull out of Baghdad the way we pulled out of Saigon.

Vietnam Veteran

Wow, Kevin, you almost sounded intelligent until you started throwing around the idea of a "War for Imperialism". What exactly is in the water up there?

So first we have an officer in the U.S. Army encouraging and assisting troops in getting out of their sworn duty, then posting information on troop strength on the internet for OBL and his buddies.

Have you bothered to resign your commission yet? Taken up the wearing of kaffiyeh?

Greyhawk, great explanation of the misrepresented "surge". Folks need to spend some time reading in detail our AARs from the theater. By the way, our firm has a little initiative to support soldiers deployed in support of OIF / OEF.

“Adopt a Soldier Platoon” Helps US Troops Connect Through “Operation DVD” American soldiers in Iraq & Afghanistan can send videos to their friends and families back home.

Thanks to the Adopt-A-Soldier Platoon (AaSP) – a grass-roots initiative launched by Unilever USA employees in New Jersey and Connecticut – more than 25,000 troops stationed in Iraq and Afghanistan have the opportunity to make DVDs to send to loved ones back home. This was made possible by the Platoon’s latest initiative, “Operation DVD,” which was started almost one year ago and is the most far-reaching project the group has tackled to date.

Alan Krutchkoff, a Unilever employee, is the president and co-founder of the Adopt-A-Soldier-Platoon. “A video is powerful. It allows friends and family to see and hear a loved one far from home,” stated Krutchkoff. “It’s better than an email, a picture or a distorted webcam image. And if a picture is worth a thousand words, what is a DVD worth to the families and friends of these brave Americans? One of our ‘adoptees’ in Iraq suggested this ambitious project, so we gave it a try.”

After hearing about the program, Valhalla, NY-based Fujifilm U.S.A. wanted to be part of this effort and donated 25,000 DVDs. “Sending home a video is a natural way to bring the soldiers and their families together, which was especially important around the holidays,” said Gene Kern, Director of Advertising and Marketing for Fujifilm.

However, getting the several thousand pounds of DVDs to Afghanistan and Iraq was costly. The Army and Air Force couldn’t ship the DVDs and the shipment needed to be paid for privately. “It was getting a little depressing,” said Krutchkoff, “We had the DVDs but couldn’t afford to get them to Iraq, even with the special rate DHL was giving us. So, I made one last plea to our more than 200 members for help.”

And then another generous company stepped in – the Pepsi Lipton Partnership (PLP), a joint venture between Unilever and Pepsico. PLP makes all the Lipton branded ready-to-drink teas. “We had a great year,” said Joe Bigos, chief financial officer of PLP. “We wanted to share our success with America and the troops.”

“Thanks to everyone’s generosity, we’ll have helped these brave Americans send messages home, share their feelings, show they’re okay and connect with those who love them and miss them,” added Krutchkoff. “Now that’s a great picture!”

Click on the following AaSP link and find out how you can make a difference in the lives of our brave troops: Adopt A Soldier Platoon, or you can send an email to Alan.Krutchkoff(at)Unilever.com to participate.

In it to win!

Citizen Deux, LCDR USN

Several points on the surge

1. Wouldn't the surge have a better chance of success if the strategy had an element of surprise? Why do we announce to the world what our plans are? The cockroaches just scurry away and bide their time.

2. Why is our military so strapped for resources? Because the President never asked a Republican Congress for a significant increase in appropriations. Now its too late with the Democrats in power. What in the hell was Bush thinking? Are we at war or not?

3. Rumsfeld should have been fired over two years ago for not having a plan for the "occupation" other than to expect that we would be welcomed with open arms and for never sending enough troops. He wanted to go down as the DefSec that revolutionized warfare by winning with a smaller footprint. What an ego.

I supported going into Iraq with the expectation that the Bush administration had a clue. They didn't and now we are on the verge of losing which will have awful consequences across the globe. The incompetence of this administration, including the Defense and State Departments, is breathtaking.

Greyhawk, I was about to send you an email about an upcoming interview; but then I read your Contact message.

I just want to let you know that tomorrow on Fresh Air with Terry Gross there will be an interview that I would love to see your opinion on.

The official wording from their website :

Coming Up:
Jan. 25 · Lt. Ehren Watada was praised by his superiors in the US Army as exemplary. His career was on a fast track. Then he was ordered to deploy to Iraq. He refused, saying the war would make him party to war crimes

As a side note, the actual promotion I heard on the air was that Lt. Watada considers this an illegal war.

Hey kids, who are we at war with, and how do we identify them so we can "kick ass and take names?"

The "surge" would work if the bad guys would wear t-shirts that said "Bad Guy" in big block letters.

It's bad enough reading this chest/beer belly pounding drivel. I'm afraid this is the level of "discussion" in the administration.

We've followed Watada a bit more closely over at MilBlogs. Short version: The dipshit joined after we invaded Iraq.

"Watada has said he is not a conscientious objector because he is not opposed to all wars as a matter of principle, and so offered to serve in Afghanistan,[8] which he regarded as "an unambiguous war linked to the Sept. 11 attacks." This was also refused. Watada, in turn, refused an offer for a desk job in Iraq without direct combat involvement.[5]"

Lt Watada also faces a court martial, which he should. But you guys still want to "swiftboat" him, don't you.

Do your homework Greyhawk. Looks like your the dipshit.

"swiftboat" watada? No, he blew a hole in his own boat when he shot himself in the foot.

The surge couldn't have been something simply thrown together at the last minute. I don't think there's any way possible that that large a force could have been added into the Iraq AO without a great deal of pre-staging logistics. I suspect a surge or surge like operation was planned on being probable for a long time before we in the gen pop got word of it.

Also, the surge was preceded by some events that all too often get left out of the discussion when it comes to timing such a thing.

I believe it most likely that the 1920 Revolutionary Brigade coming to the US forces in Iraq and asking permission to switch sides, and the "Anbar Awakening" signaled a sea change in the battle shape that indicated that the time was right for The Surge, as we came to know it.

War, no matter its form, no matter what cool new terms are COINed for it, is both fluid and static in turns. There's a time to move fast and hit hard, there's a time to hunker down and endure. Its getting the timing right on both those aspects that win.

Iraq, for all the bullcrap that the defeatists, enemy lovers and knee jerk betrayers spewed up all over it, was one of the faster and more successful counter insurgency ops in history. And, it wasn't even a true counter insurgency op. It was as much a hostile invasion by every psychopathic jihadiscum devotee to the death/murder cult from every corner of the planet, as well as a low grade invasion by actual covert military forces from Iran.

The entire weight of the jihad fell onto Iraq with a slaughtering frenzy.

Mrs G copy.png

November 18, 2009


Dawn Patrol 11/18/2009
[Mrs Greyhawk]
Bookmark and Share - via email, facebook, twitter, etc.

Welcome to the Dawn Patrol, our daily roundup of information on the War on Terror and other topics - from the MilBlogs and various sources around the world. If you're a blogger, you can join the conversation. If you link to any of these stories, add a link to the Dawn Patrol too and your trackback will be added to the list. Hat Tips to the Dawn Patrol are greatly appreciated.Refresh for updates.


Support Our Troops, Read Their Stories

----------------------------

AFGHANISTAN/PAKISTAN

Boondoggle -- [3rd Time, New Country - in Afghanistan]
I know I am a little late on posting to my blog, but I returned from a boondoggle out to Mazar-e-Sharif in the Northern provinces. I even have some pictures to post with this entry. First, let me recap last week. We did make a normal trip to NDS. It was actually a clear, cool morning which is a rarity here in Kabul. The pollution is so thick that it is very rare to see the distant mountains. So, here is a picture of the snow-capped mountains, west of Kabul. This picture was taken last Monday. I haven't seen the mountains since. Other than that, it was a normal week of mentoring. There are always little things to work on and improve in the OT. Friday was another violent day here in Kabul. The Taliban used a SVBIED outside Camp Phoenix a little before 0800. There were no American casualties, but there were injuries.

Clinton in Kabul for Karzai's inauguration -- [Foreign Policy - AfPak]
U.S. President Barack Obama reportedly told CNN today that he is "very close" to making a decision about whether to send more U.S. troops to Afghanistan and plans to make an announcement "in the next several weeks," after more than two months of deliberations (Reuters, Reuters). Obama is reportedly angry about the stream of leaks that has come out about his Afghanistan decision, telling CBS, "For people to be releasing info in the course of deliberations is not appropriate" and said yes when asked if that is a "firing offense" (CBS, Politico). Meanwhile

The war of leaks -- [Foreign Policy - AfPak]
The Obama Administration's social media prowess has been a novelty among latter day political media machines. It helped to crowd-source the campaign funding needed to put Barack Obama in the White House, and generated a populist gloss that was, at the time, convincingly fresh and transparent. What was equally admirable was its apparent internal discipline over when information made the transition from government secret to press release. Controlling the flow of data and keeping secrets secret is a challenge under any circumstance. Combine that with a predilection for Facebook and Twitter, and a hyperactive security officer might expect policy waters to muddy more quickly than they would under normal circumstances.
So when U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan Karl Eikenberry's expressed his "discomfort" last week over a possible troop surge, via diplomatic cable to Washington, it's no wonder that the message ended up dominating headlines.

Ridding Afghanistan of Corruption Will Be No Easy Task -- [Los Angeles Times]
Afghans have a name for the huge, gaudy mansions that have sprung up in Kabul's wealthy Sherpur neighborhood since 2001. They call them "poppy palaces." The cost of building one of these homes, which are adorned with sweeping terraces and ornate columns, can run into the hundreds of thousands of dollars. Many are owned by government officials whose formal salaries are a few hundred dollars a month. To the capital's jaded residents, there are few more potent symbols of the corruption that permeates every level of Afghan society, from the traffic policemen who shake down motorists to top government officials and their relatives who are implicated in the opium trade.

Afghan Minister Accused of Taking Bribe -- [Washington Post]
The Afghan minister of mines accepted a roughly $30 million bribe to award the country's largest development project to a Chinese mining firm, according to a US official who is familiar with military intelligence reports. The allegation, if proved true, would mark one of the most brazen examples of corruption yet disclosed in a country where the problem has become so pervasive that it is now at the heart of Obama administration doubts over Afghan President Hamid Karzai's reliability as a partner.

Vision for Victory, Part I -- [Washington Times]
The news from Afghanistan all year has been dispiriting, and the last few weeks have been especially tough in terms of the violence. Yet most foreign and Afghan officials and officers who I encountered on a recent weeklong visit sponsored by the U. military are guardedly optimistic about our prospects. How can this be so?

U.S. Turns to Local Guns-for-Hire to Guard Afghan Outpost -- [Danger Room - Noah Shachtman]
The U.S. military is turning to guns-for-hire to guard one of its outposts in Afghanistan. But Blackwaters of the world, take note: simply hiring former G.I.s or American cops or even Nepalese Gurkhas won't do the trick this time. At least half of the 50-man force has to come "from within a 50 kilometer radius" of the base, according to a contract solicitation issued by the U.S. Air Force. Over the summer, the American military signaled its interest in hiring an army of contractors to help handle security at as many as 50 outposts in Afghanistan. It's one of several efforts efforts designed to free up uniformed troops for combat and counterinsurgency work. Now, U.S. forces appear to be taking the first step towards building that country-wide private security force, by soliciting bids for a team that watch over Forward Operating Base Lightening, in Paktya province.

NATO Chief Confident Afghanistan Will Have More Troops -- [Voice of America]
The NATO secretary-general says he is confident the United States and other NATO allies will send more troops to Afghanistan, where insurgent attacks have surged in recent months. He spoke at the NATO Parliamentary Assembly Meeting in Edinburgh, where Britain's foreign secretary outlined the strategy his nation would support.

Germany to extend Afghanistan mission another year -- [AP]
Germany will extend its mission in Afghanistan for another year, the government said Wednesday, despite the growing unpopularity of the war at home



Pakistani Successes May Sway US Troop Decision -- [New York Times]
A month after the Pakistani military began its push into the Taliban stronghold of South Waziristan, militants appear to have been dispersed, not eliminated, with most simply fleeing. That recurring pattern illustrated the problems facing the Obama administration as it enters its final days of a decision on its strategy for Afghanistan. Success in this region, in the remote mountains near the Afghan border, could have a direct bearing on how many more American troops are ultimately sent to Afghanistan, and how long they must stay. Pakistan has shown increased willingness to tackle the problem, launching sweeping operations in the north and west of the country this year, but

Where are Taliban and al Qaeda commanders, US media asks Pak -- [Daily News & Analysis]
Washington: A day after senior Pakistani army commanders claimed that their forces have captured all major towns and population centres of the extremist-ridden South Waziristan, Taliban and foreign militants appear to have disappeared and not been eliminated.

Pakistani Army Shows Off Captured Taliban Posts -- [Washington Post]
A toy car booby-trapped with explosives, chemistry textbooks and handwritten case files from a Taliban court were among the debris left behind by fleeing Islamist militants in this remote village in the conflicted tribal region of South Waziristan. The now-deserted village, which was retaken by Pakistani army forces two weeks ago and visited by Western journalists on Tuesday for the first time since, had been a stronghold of Taliban forces for nearly five years.


IRAQ

Iraqi Kurds Warn of Election Boycott in Dispute Over Seats - [Washington Post]
Kurdish officials threatened Tuesday to boycott the upcoming national election in the three provinces they control in northern Iraq unless more parliament seats are allocated to the region. The threat came two days after Iraq's Sunni vice president said he would veto the election law passed last week unless more seats are set aside for representatives of Iraqi refugees. The majority of Iraqis abroad are Sunni. Vice President Tariq al-Hashimi has until Wednesday to veto the law, which legislators approved after weeks of wrangling, primarily over how the vote would be held in the disputed northern city of Kirkuk. The two ultimatums underscored the deep divisions among Iraqi politicians and raised fresh concerns about Iraq's ability to hold a credible election by Jan. 18.

Iraq's national elections in jeopardy as Sunni VP issues veto
-- [McClatchy News]
BAGHDAD -- Iraq's pivotal national elections were thrown back into turmoil and potential delay Wednesday after Vice President Tariq al Hashemi vetoed part of an election law and sent it back to parliament.

US has time to reconsider Iraq drawdown plan-Odierno -- [Reuters]
The US military does not have to decide until April or May whether to push back the end of its combat operations in Iraq due to...

A few words from medics for the 41st Brigade -- [The Oregonian]
I spent an hour or two last month with Oregon National Guard medics who are based at Al Asad Airbase, discussing a little of what they've observed since coming to Iraq this summer. The discussion, as you might think, covered issues in two categories: The physical and the mental. The Physical - CPT Scott Johnson of Newport, who is the highest-ranking soldier in the medical support unit at Al Asad, said that medics are seeing a significant share of orthopedic issues that stem from the heavy loads that soldiers carry. Even though the war has wound down considerably over the last few years, soldiers on convoys and at checkpoints still wear a lot of body armor and carry a lot of ammunition and weaponry, as much as 65 pounds or even more. Over time, even young soldiers experience increased stress on their joints from walking, running and jumping with that much gear.

Goodbye to Iraq, and thanks -- [The Oregonian]
The soldiers of Oregon's 41st Brigade are about halfway through their Iraq deployment, but I'm finally home after a gruelling passage through Kuwait and a misadventure or two. I said goodbye to my last acquaintance in the Oregon National Guard on Monday afternoon in Salt Lake City. SSG Tom McNeil of Central Point was peeling off to fly to Medford, close to his home in Central Point, while I continued on to Portland. Have a terrific Thanksgiving at home, Tom. Thanks to all the folks along the way, especially the soldiers of Oregon's 41st Brigade Combat Team, for the many kindnesses extended to me during my sojourn among them. This toast to you, and I'm starting with you two, since you challenged me to do this, Scott and Mike


U.S. AND OTHER PARTS OF THE WORLD

US, China in Strained Diplomatic Embrace -- [Wall Street Journal]
President Barack Obama was set to leave China on Wednesday after an awkward summit with some achievements but a long list of unfinished business - a result that suggests challenges ahead for the US as it struggles to come to terms with Asia's increasingly assertive superpower. The president secured a far-ranging framework for cooperation Tuesday with Beijing. But that deal was announced as frictions between the two nations appeared to increase over human rights and economic policy. President Obama and Chinese leader Hu Jintao issued their ambitious statement on cooperation in a clumsy fashion - at a media "availability" where they took no questions, didn't address each other and exhibited body language that seemed to say they had been frustrated by the entire exercise.

Obama: 'We've restored America's standing' -- [CNN]
A little more than a year after his election, President Obama said his administration has laid the groundwork for success on global and domestic matters. -- "I think that we've restored America's standing in the world

Somali Pirates : Maersk Alabama Attacked, Fights Back -- [Eagle Speak]
On the early morning of 18 November 2009, 350 nautical miles east from the Somali coast, pirates attacked MV Maersk Alabama, a US flagged, Danish owned, 155 meter long, Container ship.

Iranian COS Warns Russia: Your Security Is Tied To Ours -- [Memri Blog]
Iranian Army chief of staff Hassan Firouzabadi has warned Russia that delay in the supply of S-300 missile systems could harm Russia because its security is tied to that of Iran.




WAR ON TERROR /TERRORISM

Suspected Fort Hood Shooter Believed to Be Self-Radicalized -- [Wall Street Journal]
Some lawmakers briefed Tuesday on the Fort Hood shooting said the suspect, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, was most likely a self-radicalized extremist. The briefing for select members of Congress came as Republicans with oversight of national-security issues called on Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to open a full congressional inquiry into alleged government miscues in the case of Maj. Hasan. He is charged with murdering 13 people Nov. 5 on the sprawling US Army base where he served as a psychiatrist.

Guantánamo Won't Close by January, Obama Says -- [NY Times]
President Obama acknowledged for the first time on Wednesday that his administration would miss a self-imposed deadline to close the detention center at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, by mid-January, admitting the difficulties of following through on one of his first pledges as president.


SUPPORTING THE TROOPS...OR NOT

No Man Left Behind -- [Knottie's Niche]
We've all heard the military quote "No Man left behind" But it wasn't until last weekend as I sat listening to a veteran Marine talking to an Army Sgt about how the Army helicopter pilot who saved him and many others in Vietnam by flying in a hot zone repeatedly to save men that it hit home. The words took on a whole new meaning to me. When Micheal was killed the Army did not leave us behind. It started with a visit to tell us the news and they did not leave until there was no more they could do for us in that moment. Then there was the email to let us know no one else had been hurt from one of the medics. The Army did not leave us behind when they assigned us a causality assistance officer who walked us through each step, even offering to go to the store for us at any hour of the day if we needed anything at all. Then the emails, calls and instant message conversations from the men who served with Micheal began.

LTC Tim Karcher Update -- [Soldiers' Angels Germany]
Wonderful update on LTC Tim Karcher, Commander of the 1st Cavalry Division's 2nd Battalion, 5th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Brigade Combat Team, wounded June 28 in Sadr City.
4 weeks later, after fighting for his life in Iraq, here in Germany, and at Walter Reed, the loss of both legs was the least of his problems:

Support SA while Christmas shopping this year! -- [Soldiers' Angels Germany]
Through Soldiers' Angels, patriotic Americans can do their Holiday shopping or planning and support the troops at the same time!
The easiest way to do this is shop online at all your favorite stores. If you stop by GoodShop and Shop to Earn before you start, you can visit all your favorite online stores, purchase anything you want at the usual great prices, and a portion of what you spend will be donated to Soldiers' Angels--at no extra cost to you! On GoodShop, be sure you select Soldiers' Angels as the charity you are "GoodShopping for."

Trees for Troops: Helping Military Families -- [AdAge.com]
Military families. Transportation. Tree growers. Logistics. These seemingly incongruous words provide a case study in cause marketing.

FOX 5 Special: I-Team VA Loans -- [FOX News]


A FOX 5 I-Team investigation uncovered allegations of a nationwide scheme by banks and mortgage companies to defraud U.S. military veterans. The scheme, spelled out in court documents, claims banks are overcharging veterans on home refinancing loans.
The question raised in a racketeering and class action law suit is how many of those loans involved banks defrauding U.S. military veterans.



MILITARY

Muslim discrimination in the U.S. military. Not. -- [Castra Praetoria]
I'm done listening to any more bellyaching about how Muslims have it bad in the American military. It's a lie.
At this very moment there are American Muslims serving in our armed forces with valor. Muslim interpreters work along side us daily who aren't even American citizens and they have proven themselves as well. All these pansies wailing and moaning about discrimination against them because they are Muslims are not doing anyone any favors. Take it from a guy who has served along side Muslim Marines and Sailors in combat; worked with Jordanian and Iraqi interpreters in country; trained with Iraqi-Americans who have contributed to the effort by working as role players and training our troops in culture and language classes.

Time to revisit firearms policies on military posts -- [Atlanta Journal Constitution]
Just as legitimate questions were raised following the mass killings on the Virginia Tech campus in 2007, both military personnel and civilian citizens

Army's Record Suicide Rate 'Horrible,' General Says -- [Washington Post]
Army Vice Chief of Staff Gen. Peter W. Chiarelli on Tuesday called the Army's record suicide rate this year "horrible" and said the problem of soldiers taking their own lives is the toughest he has faced in his 37 years in service. As of Nov. 16, 140 soldiers on active duty and 71 soldiers not on active duty were suspected to have committed suicide. "We are almost certainly going to end the year higher than last year,"




WELCOME HOME

Veterans' descendants welcome troops home to Fort Campbell -- [Clarksville Leaf Chronicle]
Their day concluded with the Welcome Home ceremony for 80 soldiers who returned from a year in Afghanistan. "We are descendants of our country's first

'Greywolf' Among First CAV Troops to Return Home -- [DVIDS]
Once the buses arrived at Cooper Field, chants of "move that bus" were heard from Families waiting to welcome home their Soldiers. Tommy Tatum, from Kempner


THE MEDIA

Where are Taliban and al Qaeda commanders, US media asks Pak -- [Daily News & Analysis]
Washington: A day after senior Pakistani army commanders claimed that their forces have captured all major towns and population centres of the extremist-ridden South Waziristan, Taliban and foreign militants appear to have disappeared and not been eliminated.

Army officials said that they have killed as many as 550 Taliban militants a month after the military began its campaign into the lawless territory, yet they acknowledge that hundreds, perhaps thousands more have melted away.
As the offensive into the area, considered to be a sanctuary of al Qaeda and Taliban militants gained momentum, Boston Globe said, "Vast numbers of Taliban and foreign terrorists had disappeared into the vast desert scrub and craggy hills surrounding their strongholds of Sararogha and Ladha".
"Where are they? That's what bothers me," New York Times quoted a senior American intelligence officer as saying.




POLITICS

Republicans Criticize Obama's Call to Delay Hill Inquiries on Fort Hood -- [Washington Post]
The Obama administration's request that congressional committees slow their investigations of the Fort Hood shootings sparked denunciations Tuesday from Republicans on Capitol Hill, who pushed for an immediate inquiry of any warning signs before the massacre. House and Senate Republicans, emerging from the most detailed briefings given to Congress since the Nov. 5 attack killed 13 at the central Texas Army post, said delaying investigations would put off legislative efforts to give military officials the tools to prevent similar tragedies in the future. They said such an effort would not interfere with the criminal investigation of shooting suspect Nidal M. Hasan, an Army major who was scheduled to deploy to Afghanistan.


Obama Approval Dips Below 50% For First Time
-- [Quinnipiac University]
Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds; Support For U.S. Troops In Afghanistan Drops Below 50% -- President Barack Obama's job approval rating is 48 - 42 percent, the first time he has slipped below the 50 percent threshold nationally ...


HUMOR / SATIRE

Day By Day



(Need more? Dawn Patrols Archives are here.)



, , , , , , , ,




Posted 12:28 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0)


Bookmark and Share - via email, facebook, twitter, etc.

Air For Valour-it wigetsm2.png
TMGbloglabel7copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
150px
TMGrecentcomments.gif
  • Grimmy: The surge couldn't have been something simply thrown together at read more
  • SFC D: "swiftboat" watada? No, he blew a hole in his own read more
  • DonkeyKong: "Watada has said he is not a conscientious objector because read more
  • Greyhawk: We've followed Watada a bit more closely over at MilBlogs. read more
  • DonkeyKong: Hey kids, who are we at war with, and how read more
  • Kent: Greyhawk, I was about to send you an email about read more
  • Gordo: Several points on the surge 1. Wouldn't the surge have read more
  • Citizen Deux: Greyhawk, great explanation of the misrepresented "surge". Folks need to read more
  • LJD: Wow, Kevin, you almost sounded intelligent until you started throwing read more
  • Rick: WOW - As I watch this play out on all read more

6a00d83487393d53ef010536defce7970b-800wi.png

MilBlog Conference Sponsors

GA_150x253_milblog.jpg

onesource logo.bmp

BAE_BannerAd_MilBlog_0309.jpg

MILBLOGS NEWS

*****

Latest Posts From MilBlogs

*****

milblogsa1.jpg Prev | List | Random | Next
Join
Powered by RingSurf!
TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Dawn Patrol Feeds

 

Add to Google Reader or Homepage Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to netvibes Add to Plusmo myaol_cta1.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

TMGbloglabel8copy.gif

TMGbloglabel9 copy.gif
Blah Blah Blah
me220.JPG

The Mudville Gazette is written and produced by Greyhawk. Unless otherwise credited, the opinions expressed are those of the author, and nothing here is to be taken as representing the official position of or endorsement by the United States Department of Defense or any of its subordinate components. Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house.

I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email.

Original content copyright © 2003 - 2009 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed.

Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com

andsm.jpg