The reader will kindly forgive any tendency to rough language or behavior on the part of the site owner...
TMGlogo2006-2007phs-copy.jpg
"Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
TMGbloglabel1 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel3 copy.gif
TMG MONTHLY ARCHIVES
[-]



TMGbloglabel10 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette Feeds

 

Add to Technorati Favorites
Technorati Profile
add.gif
Add to Google
addtomyyahoo4.gif
ngsub1.gif sub_modern5.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

digg.jpg

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

pl-news.gif

tvc_logo_small.png

Mrsg- Greyhawk's Profile
Mrsg- Greyhawk's Facebook profile
Create Your Badge
TMGbloglabel5 copy.gif
TMGbloglabel6 copy.gif
350.jpg
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by!
« Cindy Sheehan in Korea | Main | Hopefully This Buck Won't Stop... »

November 23, 2006

greyhawk copy sm.png

Anbar Rising (Update)

By Greyhawk

We reported on the formation and early activities of the Anbar Salvation Council several weeks ago. This group's rise drew extensive coverage in the Iraqi and Arabic media, but was largely ignored in the western press.

Since then? Well, nothing. But this week in the London Times, Martin Fletcher reports from Ramadi:

Fighting back: the city determined not to become al-Qaeda's capital.

While the world's attention has been focused on Baghdad's slide into sectarian warfare, something remarkable has been happening in Ramadi, a city of 400,000 inhabitants that al-Qaeda and its Iraqi allies have controlled since mid-2004 and would like to make the capital of their cherished Islamic caliphate.

A power struggle has erupted: al-Qaeda's reign of terror is being challenged. Sheikh Sittar and many of his fellow tribal leaders have cast their lot with the once-reviled US military. They are persuading hundreds of their followers to sign up for the previously defunct Iraqi police. American troops are moving into a city that was, until recently, a virtual no-go area. A battle is raging for the allegiance of Ramadi's battered and terrified citizens and the outcome could have far-reaching consequences.

Read the whole thing. (Hat tip to Bill Roggio, who will soon be reporting from Iraq himself.)

The situation is fragile. The Sunni Shieks are not fighting alongside Americans - they simply recognize the greater threat is al Qaeda.

As one US officer put it, the sheikhs are only "pro-American in the sense that they are fighting the same enemy".
But there is progress being made:

The US military wooed the sheikhs over what one US officer described as "hundreds of cups of chai and thousands of cigarettes". They agreed that their chosen instrument should be the police force, which was practically defunct thanks to al-Qaeda death threats against anyone who dared to sign up. In June there were only 35 recruits; in July Sheikh Sittar sent 300 members of his 30,000-strong Resha tribe for training.

Last month a record 409 new recruits were dispatched to the police academy in Jordan, and 1,300 are now signed up, many of them former Baathists. The US and Iraqi armies have armed and protected them against al-Qaeda attacks, and as fear of al-Qaeda has dissipated, so the process has accelerated.

Note that record from last month - one that went unreported during the record violence. These are the people who Abu Hamza al-Muhajir -- aka Abu Ayyub al-Masri (the late Abu Musab al Zarqawi's replacement as leader of al Qaeda in Iraq) gave until the end of Ramadan to repent and swear allegiance, or die. Apparently he has his answer:

Inside the heavily fortified Abu Faraj police station, just north of Ramadi, the recruits all said that they had been too frightened to join before. "Right now almost all the tribes are fighting the terrorists -- the women, the children and even the dogs are fighting them," said Major Saidey Saleh, the station commander and former Saddam army officer who bears the scars of four al-Qaeda bullet wounds in his right thigh.

Ramadi is a city ruined by war - and a city still at war, but a growing (albeit fragile) hope for the future remains.

Update: The Airstrike that Wasn't

More: Progress in Al Anbar

And follow the thread of this story here.


Posted by Greyhawk / November 23, 2006 12:30 AM | Permalink

11 Comments

Michael Fumento is another excellent source in the area now. Check his latest at:

http://www.fumento.com/military/ramadireturn.html

Iraq's Violence Spins Beyond Anyone's Control
Analysis: It has been clear for some time that the U.S. is not in control of events in Iraq. But the latest sectarian bloodshed suggests that even help from Iran and Syria may not be enough to stop the slide into chaos

Golly, if even Iran and Syria can't help I don't know what we'll do. They were our last hope.

Wow. The point of that just zipped right over your head and out of the park huh?

There is nothing in Iraq but chaos, violence and misery. What is coming will make Saddam's vile dictatorship look like the Smurf village.

I wonder how long before you accept this rather self evident fact; Bush while ignore bigger more important problems made a bad situation in Iraq worse.

There were no WMD.
There are no parades.
There are no grand squares.
There is no democracy.
There is no security.
There is no stability.
There is no peace with Israel.
There is no exit.
There is no plan.

There is however a nuclear Iran and North Korea.
There are more terrorists and terrorist causes.
There are more dead Iraqis and more dead Americans and more dead allies.
There is billions spent and for what?

Your acceptence of the facts, I guess, hinges on how vast and fragile your ego is.

I'm confused - do you want us to go to war with Iran or have then help us fix Iraq?

I'm confused -

I see that.

I'll see if I can make it simpler.

Iraq has gone from bad to worse as a direct result of an invasion by the United States under literally false pretenses. The fallout from this act is further instability in the Middle East and an increase in terrorism. Furthermore the real war on terror in Afghanistan was shorted in money and manpower and as such what could have been a victory has been relegated to a growing bloody stalemate.

The invasion was a mistake launched on a lie to the detriment of not only America but the world. This is directly the fault of the Bush Administration.

These are not opinions these are facts and it seems only the very partisan are immune to them.

No, apparently you're confused. Please explain your plan for Iran - you've gone from "they're our last hope - but not much of one" to "they're our biggest threat" to "I'm pretending they don't exist" in three comments.

Focus.

"Furthermore the real war on terror in Afghanistan was shorted in money and manpower"

How many troops are there now? How many were there in 2001/2002?

Hawk,

He's stupid. Do these guys just assume new IDs and start trotting out the same line over and over, or is there really another generation of trolls being trained to be uneducated by the first bunch?

Just curious because their training plan needs work. It is, however, cyclical and repetitive. Perfect for generating proficiency in the Art of Stupid.

Subsunk

It wasn't a fair question anyway - I already knew the answer.

In March 2003, the United States had about 9,500 troops in Afghanistan. Today, there are more than 21,000 U.S. forces either under U.S. or NATO command in Afghanistan or directly supporting missions there. Some 20,000 troops from 37 NATO and non-NATO nations are also committed to the effort.
If we pull our troops from Iraq we will probably have to send them to Afghanistan - al Qaeda certainly will.

"These are not opinions these are facts " - no, they are your feelings - which I hope I haven't hurt. Facts are things like the numbers quoted above.

But back to the off-topic conversation you started, Salvage - do tell us your plan for Iran. (Hopefully you're realizing that bumper-sticker slogans won't get you very far here.)

You haven't fled, have you?

You may not have thought that Iran part through before cutting and pasting, so to be fair here are a few other great questions you've brought up that would benefit from further illumination on your part. A couple for starters:

"Saddam's vile dictatorship" - 12 years of global sanctions and near-continuous US air attacks failed to end that. What would you have done differently?

"There are more terrorists and terrorist causes." - How should we respond to this threat?

"There is no peace with Israel." What's the best way to bring that about?

It's possible that your real problem is that you hate George Bush - so ten bonus points if you can respond without referencing him. This isn't a George Bush blog (his name appears once on the main page in a quote from Senator Levin, and again in another media quote regarding the draft), or even a political blog, per se, our focus is military.

350.jpg
Mrs G copy.png

November 26, 2010


America@war
[Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit.

That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary.

From their about page:

The Naval Institute shall remain

INDEPENDENT - A non-profit member association, with no government support, that does not lobby for special interests;

NON-PARTISAN - An independent, professional military association with a mission, goals and objectives that transcend political affiliations; and shall encourage

IDEAS - Through its respected journals Proceedings and Naval History, its conferences, its books and its online content, in support of those who serve.

"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation:

The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism.

Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented.

I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are.

"Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result.

Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web...

And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed.

The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down.

*****

But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:

Closing Blogs is nothing new. So many site's owners just give up on their own. They come and go, you know, these MilBloggers do. Like any other sort of blogger. Many post in the lonely down hours far from home, spill their guts for the world, then abandon their spots when the tour of duty is up. They have lives again somewhere in the world, and no need to share the details. So it goes.

Many are truly gone - no site left at all. "The page cannot be found." Other blogs remain, like abandoned defensive positions in shifting desert sands.

Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down.

If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real.

And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale.

We've already made history, it's time to save it.

(More to follow...)




Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) |

TMGbloglabel7copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
TMGrecentcomments.gif
  • Greyhawk: You may not have thought that Iran part through before read more
  • Greyhawk: It wasn't a fair question anyway - I already knew read more
  • Subsunk: Hawk, He's stupid. Do these guys just assume new IDs read more
  • Greyhawk: "Furthermore the real war on terror in Afghanistan was shorted read more
  • Greyhawk: No, apparently you're confused. Please explain your plan for Iran read more
  • salvage: I'm confused - I see that. I'll see if I read more
  • Greyhawk: I'm confused - do you want us to go to read more
  • salvage: Wow. The point of that just zipped right over your read more
  • Greyhawk: Golly, if even Iran and Syria can't help I don't read more
  • salvage: Iraq's Violence Spins Beyond Anyone's Control Analysis: It has been read more

MBC2010.jpg

MILBLOGS NEWS

*****

Latest Posts From MilBlogs

*****

milblogsa1.jpg Prev | List | Random | Next
Join
Powered by RingSurf!
TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Dawn Patrol Feeds

 

Add to Google Reader or Homepage Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to netvibes Add to Plusmo myaol_cta1.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

TMGbloglabel8copy.gif

TMGbloglabel9 copy.gif
Blah Blah Blah
me220.JPG

The Mudville Gazette is written and produced by Greyhawk, who recently retired from 24 years of active duty in the US military, but will maintain this disclaimer: Unless otherwise credited, the opinions expressed are those of the author, and nothing here is to be taken as representing the official position of or endorsement by the United States Department of Defense or any of its subordinate components.

Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house.

I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email.

Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed.

Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com

andsm.jpg

*****

Tending Distant
Fires


Far from hearth and home, watching
Cold alone but not alone
On distant shore and only wanting
Safe return and little more

What tales we'll tell
When that time comes
When tales can be told

When things grim
Seem far away
When other fires go cold

Some distant sunset, vision fading
Memories remain
And tired eyes gaze 'pon folded flags
While distant drums beat their refrain

Saluting fallen friends whose names
And youth will never fade
Here's to those on other shores,
for them live well, the price is paid

- Greyhawk,
Baghdad,
December 2004