The reader will kindly forgive any tendency to rough language or behavior on the part of the site owner...
TMGlogo2006-2007phs-copy.jpg
"Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
TMGbloglabel1 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel3 copy.gif
TMG MONTHLY ARCHIVES
[-]



TMGbloglabel10 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette Feeds

 

Add to Technorati Favorites
Technorati Profile
add.gif
Add to Google
addtomyyahoo4.gif
ngsub1.gif sub_modern5.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

digg.jpg

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

pl-news.gif

tvc_logo_small.png

Mrsg- Greyhawk's Profile
Mrsg- Greyhawk's Facebook profile
Create Your Badge
TMGbloglabel5 copy.gif
TMGbloglabel6 copy.gif
350.jpg
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by!
« Open Post | Main | Open Post »

March 30, 2006

greyhawk copy sm.png

The Great Game

By Greyhawk

The great game is in full swing.

The UN:

The United Nations Security Council agreed on a statement demanding that Iran's government curb its nuclear program and assist inspectors, amid concerns from the U.S. that the research is an attempt to produce a bomb.

Iran will be given 30 days to show compliance with International Atomic Energy Agency requirements, including the suspension of uranium enrichment.

Washington:
The news that the U.S. and Iran plan to hold talks on mutual concerns in Iraq seemed somewhat incongruous, to say the least, coming at the end of a week during which President Bush had reiterated that Tehran was part of an Axis of Evil, Secretary of State Rice had chided Iran as the "central banker of terrorism," and Washington's man at the UN, John Bolton, had spoken of a threat from Iran akin to "9/11 with nuclear weapons." Yet within hours of Iran's national security chief announcing on Thursday that Tehran was open for talks on Iraq, the Bush Administration made clear that it was, too.
<...>
The Bush administration had, in fact, some time ago authorized its Baghdad ambassador, Zalmay Khalilzad, to seek talks with Iran about the situation in Iraq.
Tehran:
Foreign Ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi on Monday expressed outrage at ruthless mass killing of worshipers at Mustafa Mosque in Baghdad and termed it as savage act of terrorism.

Asefi said that the reports indicated involvement of US forces in the heinous crime which resulted in the killing of 20 worshipers at the Baghdad mosque.

He called on the international community and human rights organizations to bring those responsible for the mass killing of worshipers to justice.

"US wrong policies in Iraq never helped restore peace and stability in that country and instead caused escalation of tension and crisis there," Asefi said.

Iraqi media said that US forces invaded Mustafa mosque in Baghdad, opening fire on worshipers in which 20 died instantly.

Iraqi premier's spokesman Abdel Razzaq al-Kazemi said that Iraqi government has formed a committee to hold inquiry into the mass killing of worshipers by US forces.

More from Iran:
United Alliance of Iraq (UAI) on Monday urged U.S. forces to return control of security to Iraqis after last night's mass killing of worshipers in a Baghdad mosque in a military raid.

Issuing a strongly worded statement, the alliance made the demand as angry Shias buried victims of the massacre on Sunday night's military operation by US forces and elements of Iraqi forces working with US troops.

"The Alliance calls for a rapid hand-over of control of security matters to the Iraqi government," Jawad al-Maliki, a senior spokesman of the United Iraqi Alliance told reporters.

The building was not a traditional mosque but a former Baath party compound used by Shia Muslims for prayers and other religious events and was known locally as the Mustafa mosque.

(Side note: even the Iranians are willing to admit the building wasn't really a mosque.)

Baghdad:

American journalist Jill Carroll, abducted in early January by gunmen in Baghdad, was released to a Sunni Arab political party in the capital Thursday morning after 82 days in captivity.
<...>
Tariq al-Hashimi, the party's secretary general, said in a telephone call at 12:30 p.m. local time that "unknown people" released Carroll to the Iraqi Islamic Party's branch office in Amariyah, in the western part of Baghdad. The party then transported her by armed convoy to its headquarters in the Yarmouk district.
The reader is encouraged to connect the dots on their own - I note that most of the internet-based strategic-level chairborne rangers haven't yet done so. (Hint: for starters, break the players into three main camps: Sunni, Shiia, and American. This over-simplifies things - in most cases. But for this exercise, ponder who gains what from each of the above stories. Stronger hint: what = leverage.)

Oh, by the way...
The Iraqi commander during a controversial raid by American and Iraq forces is backing the U.S. version of a battle that left 16 Iraqis dead, CBS News correspondent Lara Logan reports.
<...>
The commander insisted his Iraqi Special Operations troops had to fight their way into the target building where they killed gunmen guarding a hostage and found various weapons including rocket launchers and heavy machine guns.

"We know this, the building, is used for to capture the civilians, the civilian people, by bad guys and they need money," the commander tells Logan.

A man who claims he was held hostage in the building, says of his captors, "They beat me, they kicked me and they used an electric drill on me. I thought I was going to die."



Posted by Greyhawk / March 30, 2006 6:35 PM | Permalink

3 Comments

Yes, the US pulls levers on the security council over the Iranian nuclear issue, and the Iranians pull levers in Bagdhad over the formation of a government and sectarian violence.

Events designed to trigger full out civil war, were indeed successful in triggering a spike in violence.

So the security council gives Iran another 30 days to re-examine the cards in their hands.

Greyhawk,

And heaven forbid we should take the word of the American military as to what actually happens in one of the raids in their areas. We all know how unreliable their reporting is, right? Meanwhile, the Commander of the Iraqi forces involved backs up our story, and the MSM treats it like a whole new story about a new event. He gets 100% credibility in our media, but a US Colonel who has lived here all his life and has never been shown to lie in public, can't be trusted by a reporter to tell the True story.

Not that I want to cast any aspersions on the brave Iraqi commander, or any of his or our Men. Because I don't.

But why is it that insurgents and Iraqis whose loyalty to the Truth can't be proven are believed wholesale, without question, and trumpeted for all the Free World to read and believe and marvel upon ------ and our Men are not?

Subsunk

"The United Nations Security Council agreed on a statement demanding that Iran's government curb its nuclear program and assist inspectors..."

They are SO busted!

I bet they have to stay back after class and write "I will not threaten Israel with annihalation" on the blackboard 100 times.

That'll learn 'em.

350.jpg
Mrs G copy.png

November 26, 2010


America@war
[Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit.

That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary.

From their about page:

The Naval Institute shall remain

INDEPENDENT - A non-profit member association, with no government support, that does not lobby for special interests;

NON-PARTISAN - An independent, professional military association with a mission, goals and objectives that transcend political affiliations; and shall encourage

IDEAS - Through its respected journals Proceedings and Naval History, its conferences, its books and its online content, in support of those who serve.

"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation:

The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism.

Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented.

I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are.

"Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result.

Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web...

And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed.

The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down.

*****

But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:

Closing Blogs is nothing new. So many site's owners just give up on their own. They come and go, you know, these MilBloggers do. Like any other sort of blogger. Many post in the lonely down hours far from home, spill their guts for the world, then abandon their spots when the tour of duty is up. They have lives again somewhere in the world, and no need to share the details. So it goes.

Many are truly gone - no site left at all. "The page cannot be found." Other blogs remain, like abandoned defensive positions in shifting desert sands.

Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down.

If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real.

And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale.

We've already made history, it's time to save it.

(More to follow...)




Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) |

TMGbloglabel7copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
TMGrecentcomments.gif
  • Nicholas: "The United Nations Security Council agreed on a statement demanding read more
  • Subsunk: Greyhawk, And heaven forbid we should take the word of read more
  • Soldier's Dad: Yes, the US pulls levers on the security council over read more

MBC2010.jpg

MILBLOGS NEWS

*****

Latest Posts From MilBlogs

*****

milblogsa1.jpg Prev | List | Random | Next
Join
Powered by RingSurf!
TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Dawn Patrol Feeds

 

Add to Google Reader or Homepage Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to netvibes Add to Plusmo myaol_cta1.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

TMGbloglabel8copy.gif

TMGbloglabel9 copy.gif
Blah Blah Blah
me220.JPG

The Mudville Gazette is written and produced by Greyhawk, who recently retired from 24 years of active duty in the US military, but will maintain this disclaimer: Unless otherwise credited, the opinions expressed are those of the author, and nothing here is to be taken as representing the official position of or endorsement by the United States Department of Defense or any of its subordinate components.

Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house.

I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email.

Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed.

Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com

andsm.jpg

*****

Tending Distant
Fires


Far from hearth and home, watching
Cold alone but not alone
On distant shore and only wanting
Safe return and little more

What tales we'll tell
When that time comes
When tales can be told

When things grim
Seem far away
When other fires go cold

Some distant sunset, vision fading
Memories remain
And tired eyes gaze 'pon folded flags
While distant drums beat their refrain

Saluting fallen friends whose names
And youth will never fade
Here's to those on other shores,
for them live well, the price is paid

- Greyhawk,
Baghdad,
December 2004