
![]() | |
October 2012
August 2012 July 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003
|
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by! March 19, 2006 Operation SwarmerBy GreyhawkOr: "So long, and thanks for flying Air Assault" A recent check of top internet news searches reveals Operation SWARMER has caught enough public attention to make the list. That's a rarity at this point in the Iraq saga; most such actions pass with little notice. Generally CENTCOM offers a press release, and the media yawns and mentions the coalition effort somewhere near the bottom of a long wrap up of news headlined "Bombs Kill 10 in Baghdad". But not this time. Here's the original press release: TIKRIT, Iraq – Iraqi Security Forces and their Coalition partners launched the largest air assault operation since Operation Iraqi Freedom I today in southern Salah Ad Din province to clear a suspected insurgent operating area northeast of Samarra.A dramatic start, especially if you're not familiar with military jargon - but those who actually made an effort to read to the bottom of this press release might find justification for yawning this time: The operation is expected to continue for several days as a thorough search of the objective area is conducted.Named after an exercise, practice for bigger things, searching for days, already did another area near by... MNF-I issues press releases all the time; soldiers discover weapons cache, Marines conduct cordon-and-search operation with Iraqi troops, VBIED found on roadside, hospital refurbished, school reopened, etc, etc. If ever considered otherwise, this is now seen as the unglorious yeoman's work of Operation Iraqi Freedom - the nuts and bolts of rebuilding a nation. The press wants something headline worthy - a mosque bombing, US troops accidentally shooting an elderly grandmother, or a report that someone in an Iraqi police uniform dragged somebody else off to nowhere in the middle of the night. But this time something in that press release caught somebody's eye: "...largest air assault operation since Operation Iraqi Freedom I." If you're a military insider you hardly notice the phrase. Why? Let's take a few words at a time - starting with "air assault". To many that means bombing campaign - and the comparison to OIF-1 brings immediate visions of Shock and Awe in Baghdad. To the most ardent members of the "anti-war" faction that iconic imagery epitomizes the capitalist aggressor's vicious assault on the people. And even the most ardent supporter of regime change in Iraq can acknowledge that bombs over Baghdad make a sobering visual: Here, this is what you wanted. Happy? Wrong vision. Shock and Awe was an assault from the air, but was not "air assault" as defined by the US military. "Air assault" means the troops were inserted via helicopter; no more, no less. And if you think the language barrier between English-speaking peoples contributed to confusion, imagine for a moment how the various translated versions of the story read in the foreign press. Now let's think about "largest since". The 101st was in on the initial invasion. Months later they rotated home. Without air assault units in Iraq we weren't launching air assaults. But now the 101st has returned to Iraq, therefore we are launching air assaults - it's what they do. But without that crucial piece of background knowledge the choice of phrasing makes it sound like something else altogether: escalation. So this time the press release (that probably caused yawns throughout CENTCOM) got a markedly different reaction in the rest of the world. Let's spread the blame for this a bit. When military public affairs offices issue press releases they use phraseology the military understands, as explained above. But the press isn't on the same wavelength; they read "large air assault" and they expect corpse photos, pain and suffering, death and destruction, and all those things that merit a Pulitzer Prize. With that kind of pulse punding lead you can hardly blame them for not reading the whole thing. So what we have here is a failure to communicate - and sender and receiver can both do better next time. But this time the phrase "launched the largest air assault operation since Operation Iraqi Freedom I" apparently touched off the largest round of TV coverage since OIF-1. Even last year's operations in Tall Afar - the largest of 2005 and perhaps the most spectacularly successful of the past three years - attracted relatively scant media attention. (Disclaimer: I don't live in America - my sense of the coverage is admittedly based on what I read about the coverage.) And with no reporters along for the initial ride (seating being at a premium and mission being the focus) apparently some of that coverage was a bit dramatic. Left on the sidelines for day one, a reporter's imagination could run wild. But on day two the first reporters are brought in. Perhaps some with visions of dead babies, crying grandmothers, leveled houses, and white phosphorous raining from the sky. Maybe others with fond desires that they may capture a few heroic photos on par with blogger Mike Yon's. Instead they find... Well, I'll be damned - Iraqi and American soldiers conducting the unglorious yeoman's work of Operation Iraqi Freedom. And that just pisses them off. Just another day in paradise. Thanks for flying air assault. Posted by Greyhawk / March 19, 2006 5:30 PM | Permalink 2 TrackBacksI'm still draggin'. I'm going to have to settle for another Read these list for now: Greyhawk: Operation Swarmer Greyhawk: The War that Wasn't John Hinderaker: Eureka, I Think Jim Lindgren: Grim Milestone Reached: US Deaths in Iraq Surpass Worst Read More ... Just an observation, folks: 99% of what you read in the paper was written by people who wouldn't know the difference between an aircraft carrier and a submarine, or between an M1A and an M-16. If your going to read the crap they write at all, read ... Read More 6 Comments |
November 26, 2010America@war [Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit. That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary. From their about page:
"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation: The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism. Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented. I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are. "Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result. Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web... And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed. The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down. But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:
Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down. If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real. And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale. We've already made history, it's time to save it. (More to follow...) Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink |
Comments (0) |
|
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
![]() Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house. I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email. Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed. Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com ![]() Tending Distant Far from hearth and home, watching What tales we'll tell When things grim Some distant sunset, vision fading Saluting fallen friends whose names - Greyhawk, Baghdad, December 2004 |
Thank you for breaking this down and clarifying the story.Ive seen the lefties really going with this one for the exact reasons you point out.
I am still not certain who labeled it an 'Air-Assualt',but regardless the term is being used and not in its proper context...oh well.
You know who I would trust to report what is happening in the war? Condolleeza Rice.
Condolleeza Rice needs the support of all good bloggers of 'right' thinking people that want to see her as the VP on the next GOP ticket.
Personally I would choose Frist as the POTUS but really,almost anyone of our contenders would be assured the White House with Ms.Rice beside him.
I believe that this would prepare Ms.Rice to accept the reigns of power as the Presidential candidate after serving as VP and I think that is what is needed.
Could you let me know how you feel about this?
R.Langbecker Czarmangis
Let's review todays Seattle Times, admitted a very left leaning city.
In order presented -
A story about a paralyzed veteran.
A doom and gloom 3 year anniversary story about hope fading in Iraq.
A story about a road project.
100's marching against the war.(mentions that some of the 100's may actually have been part of the St Patty's day parade, but doesn't mention how many in the St Patty' day parade)
3,100 climbing against Leukemia.
A story about an abused dog
A story about a sidewalk.
Somebody got murdered.
In the Nation/World Section
Some presidential advisor is in trouble.
A story about how cookbooks have been dumbed down
Something about Supreme Court Justices
Inability of the Government to track diseased cows.
Prostitutes searching for serial killers
Lot's of people not paying fines.
500,000 Protesting in France over a change in job security rules.
Despite this being the 3rd anniversery of OIF, a story about a sidewalk and a story about a dog make the front page.
Thanks for laying it out there like that, Greyhawk. I was coming to somewhat similar conclusions, but didn't have the experience to clarify it and back it up. Thanks for helping me understand it better. :)
When military public affairs offices issue press releases they use phraseology the military understands, as explained above.
One has to wonder why someone whose job is to ostensibly communicate with the American people, would only use their own language instead of the language most of America speaks. Is Army PR telling me they don't have someone that can speak the lingo of the average American? Do they need a computer to translate for them?
In some ways this is the exact kind of disinformation campaign the Army should be running, intentionally or not. By all means, fool the media in believing in things that you've never explicitly stated, in order to deceive them into covering the real news of Iraq for the American people. By all means, that's the job of PR. To get good coverage.
Ah, but that would mean the Army has to understand the media and what makes them tick... Psychological warfare doesn't seem to be on the training roster for PR servicemen however.
Fast reaction forces are obviously necessary to fight a counter-insurgency. But I guess nobody was paying attention to that part of the operation.
For a bunch of manipulating Al-Reuters, AP, and whatever, they sure don't seem to like it when the tables are turned. One reason why the Army should do it more. Hit back, you're not going to win the media war by hanging back on the defensive all the time. Even Bush had to concede after 9/11 was defense wouldn't do much to save lives.
That sounds exciting! But according to a colleague of mine from TIME who traveled up there today on a U.S. embassy-sponsored trip, there are no insurgents, no fighting and 17 of the 41 prisoners taken have already been released after just one day. The “number of weapons caches” equals six, which isn’t unusual when you travel around Iraq. They’re literally everywhere.
Hehe, literally everywhere. Hilarious. Hilarious, but also dangerous and costing American lives as our public relations get degraded via enemy and domestic propaganda.
More effort should be made to portray this as an operation run so efficiently and with so much firepower, that the insurgents literally ran away in fear at the sight of the combined arms and combined nationalities arrayed against them. They were so cowed, as cowed as the Iraqis were when they tried to enter Fallujah on 2004...
But you won't hear that stylistic take on things. Why? Because it would help the United States in the war. Obviously our enemies are not going to help us in a war they are fighting against us in.
Ymarsaker,
How big is the insurgency? There have been no real estimates for at least a year.
How many people are required to plant 100 IED's a week? 10,100,1000,10000.
I don't know, and I doubt anyone else really knows.
I don't think the numbers matter in a guerrila insurgency. Since the point isn't attrition, body bags are only useful meters for friendly morale.