The reader will kindly forgive any tendency to rough language or behavior on the part of the site owner...
TMGlogo2006-2007phs-copy.jpg
"Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
TMGbloglabel1 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel3 copy.gif
TMGbloglabel10 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette Feeds

 

Add to Technorati Favorites
Technorati Profile
add.gif
Add to Google
addtomyyahoo4.gif
ngsub1.gif sub_modern5.gif add2netvibes.gif Add to Plusmo subscribe2.gif myaol_cta1.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

digg.jpg

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

pl-news.gif

tvc_logo_small.png

Mrsg- Greyhawk's Profile
Mrsg- Greyhawk's Facebook profile
Create Your Badge
TMGbloglabel5 copy.gif

gngrey120x60.gif

TMGbloglabel6 copy.gif
350.jpg
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by!
« Baby Noor's Journey | Main | New Year's Resolutions »

December 31, 2005

greyhawk copy sm.png

2005, In Fact

By Greyhawk

Blogs tend to be focused on the latest news - the here and now. Responding to (or creating) the latest outrage, fanning (or dousing) the flames a bit, then moving on to the next big thing. Nothing wrong with that - in fact, that approach had a noticeable impact on the "news cycle" this past year. Stories that once could have been played for weeks or months in the nation's papers or evening news shows were debunked within days - or hours - if they lacked merit. And one thing that becomes obvious in reviewing the news of the past year is that the outrage of the moment has, in hindsight, repeatedly proven to be not so significant after all.

But, being focused on the latest, we often neglect to look back in review. This, of course, is the time of year for just that. And there's good reason to do so, because the totality of the effort reveals something that the individual parts can not. A single exposure of media bias, or poor reporting, or outright misinformation from any source can be dismissed - everyone is entitled to a occasional mistake, after all. But a year's worth, well, that's a bit harder to ignore.

Recruiting numbers, wounded troops, fictional "fallen heroes", reports from Iraq that were months out of date, newspapers mis-quoting soldiers, newspapers fabricating biographies of "anti-war" types, Senators manufacturing "scandals" involving the military - all of these are demonstrably false. These aren't examples of my opinion being different from the reporters - these are outright factual inaccuracies (to put it politely) we've exposed over the past year. So get set - we're going to review 2005 in Mudville. And this is just the first installment. A year's worth of simple facts from Mudville for starters, we'll review more complex things later. If you're looking for something new, stick around - many of the myths debunked below are still alive and well, they'll probably be back in the year to come (history tends to repeat itself whether you ignore it or not) and we'll be here when they do.

*****

Does the US military intentionally target and kill journalists in Iraq? When CNN's Eason Jordan made the claim it quickly became one of the earliest outrages of the year. Jules Crittenden of the Boston Herald joined us for a discussion on that topic. He had reported from the scene during the fall of Baghdad in 2003, and witnessed one of the most notorious examples first hand. The blowback from this event ultimately cost Jordan his job, but much about that has been subsequently mischaracterized: "blogs went after Eason Jordan, and succeeded in claiming his scalp." The reality is that blogs went after the truth - and though no smoking guns were found perhaps that result does indicate what that elusive truth might be.

Other truths aren't quite so elusive - just more obscure. Later in the year CBS reported that Route Irish - the road connecting the Baghdad Airport to the city proper, was one of the most dangerous stretches of highway in the world. This once was true - but the CBS report surprised me because just days prior I had noted a Washington Post report detailing how safe the road had become. But CBS had filmed their bit several months earlier, and elected to broadcast it as "news" without any regard for the progress of those months. Read The Road to Victory, where we sort it all out. (Later a CBS producer would acknowledge the failure.)

But perhaps Route Irish is still unsafe for CBS employees - at least, those who "embed" with the terrorists in Iraq. Early in the year a cameraman was wounded by US forces (there's that targeting story again) in a firefight immediately following a car bomb explosion in Iraq. But some of the civilian survivors of the attack exposed him as one of the terrorists to the US Soldiers, and they promptly arrested him. (Side note: those soldiers were part of the Deuce-Four, the unit Mike Yon was with in Mosul.) The cameraman was in possession of video of several such attacks - a few too many to be considered just a lucky coincidence. The military would also reveal that he tested positive for explosive residue. As with the Route Irish story, a few comments would be made, but ultimately the story simply "went away".

CBS could still claim credit for that Abu Ghraib story, of course. At least, as long as all the facts are ignored.

Speaking of Abu Ghraib, here's a telling quote from an Iraqi citizen:

"This might be a part of a political game, like when pictures of prisoners' abuses in Abu Ghraib prison were published, just to harm President Bush's reputation," said Hameed Shabak, 35, a Mosul resident.
The "this" he was referring to was Cindy Sheehan's camping trip in a ditch in Crawford, Texas.

The "Muslim Street" isn't all that gullible, you see. That's one of the reasons why Newsweek's Koran flushing story didn't really last all that long. If that story was designed to incite violence, it wasn't the first.

*****

Of course, some people have been "inspired" by such reports - inspired to violence. The result - more American GIs wounded and killed. But how many? If you listen to some media reports or claims from certain US Senators you may be led to believe that "over 15,000 have returned home mutilated". You would be wrong.

But in addition to physical wounds, there are serious mental scars borne by the troops. You might be surprised by the percentages of returning GIs suffering from drug and alcohol abuse, depression, PTSD, and other anxiety disorders. They are lower than the percentages for society as a whole.

Others, of course, have given the last full measure of devotion. The fallen return home too, and according to a recent report from another US Senator they are shoved unceremoniously into the cargo holds of civilian aircraft, sent home with the luggage and tossed out on the tarmac for their loved ones to claim. Is this true? No - it's another attempt to score political points using dead GIs.

There are two types of Iraq war veterans that have a tremendous appeal to the anti-war crowd - the fictional and the dead. Both types have a common, irresistible trait - others can claim to speak on their behalf.

That's actually from our look at one of the fictional and dead soldiers from the Iraq war. A newspaper in Illinois had been reporting about him for years. A newspaper in Colorado could probably sympathize - they were hoodwinked in a similar scam.

But neither of those stories could top the first bogus news event of the year - the kidnapping of GI Joe by terrorists in Iraq. (Actually, Special Ops Cody.)

Fortunately, MilBlog Commandos were ready!

*****

To their credit, the smaller newspapers involved in those phony fallen hero stories readily admitted they were wrong. Too bad the larger media outlets don't follow that example - instead refusing to budge when exposed for spinning absolute falsehoods about actual soldiers - even when exposed by those very soldiers:

My name is Kathleen Whitney and I am an emergency room nurse and a 1st Lieutenant in the Army reserve. A few weeks ago I was featured in a story on CNN.com.
But for modifying or fabricating quotes, CNN couldn't come close to the New York Times.

Of course, it wasn't just soldiers who were portrayed as something they are not in the major media - the anti-war crowd was too:

The seasoned protesters who organized tomorrow's antiwar demonstration are well-versed in many other causes. They have marched and rallied against police brutality, racism, colonialism and the policies of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund.

But their message on the Mall tomorrow will be singular: "End the war in Iraq."

Because of that sharp focus, they will be joined by novice protesters such as Patrice Cuddy, 56. Interviewed by phone yesterday, the former public school teacher in Olathe, Kan., said she had to pull off her gardening gloves each time a neighbor interrupted her yardwork to ask about joining the bus she had chartered to go to the nation's capital.

Patrice, of course, had been actively involved in anti-war groups for years. And as for that "singular focus..."

Which brings us to another memorable quote from Iraq:

To achieve their second goal, turning Americans against the war, the mujahideen need to shape their operations "to support anti- war sentiment in the west".
That's advice for terrorists and "anti-war" westerners from Saddam-era Iraqi army "strongman" Colonel Watban Jassam.

We'll do another year end round up just for the anti-war crowd later.

*****

Speaking of quotes from Iraq, here's a third:

"I can tell you in one sentence how my country feels about your country: thank you for coming, now please leave and take us with you."
Which brings us to the Americans and Iraqis in Iraq.

The troops: Who are all these troops in Iraq? And when are they coming home?

The answer to that first question is here. The second is tricky. But if you're interested in what was really said about the troop rotations (Higher? Lower? Who will decide?) before the calls for "bring them home now" rang out loudly once again - see here. Seeing that the troops were about to start coming home, "some" demanded that they be brought home defeated.

And what of the people of Iraq? Here's a look at trends in terrorist attacks there - and one of the results. On that topic, does anyone know what President Bush really said about civilians killed in Iraq?

*****

Given the reality of war one might expect a rough year for military recruiters. Was there? Yes and no.

Looking at the geography reveals that the Northeast is the only region under-represented in recruiting numbers. Media reports focused on over-representation of the south.

We looked at the drop in the number of black Americans joining (a 40% decline) here. The media tried to spin this one as a result of the Iraq war, but the sharpest drop was immediately after 9/11.

A GAO report in October revealed that 58% of age-eligible youths can't meet entry-level standards for health, education, aptitude, and other requirements - and are thus ineligible to serve.

Evaluating the economic status of recruits reveals one of the most amazing attempts at media spin of the year:

Many of today's recruits are financially strapped, with nearly half coming from lower-middle-class to poor households, according to new Pentagon data based on Zip codes and census estimates of mean household income.
Interesting phrasing from the Washington Post - but if "nearly half" come from "lower-middle-class to poor households" that means over half of all new recruits come form upper middle class to wealthy households. Wonder why they didn't say it that way?

But the Army did end up short of new recruits for the year - mostly due to end-strength increases called for by congress. In spite of Iraq and other demands of the war on terror, the actual numbers of recruits was similar to previous years:

To put this year's shortfall in perspective, the total of 73,400 people recruited is within 2 percent of the average recruitment each year for the past 10 years. And the Army finished the last four months of the year strongly, recruiting more than 8,000 people each month. The Army also exceeded its reenlistment goals, enabling it to just about make up for the recruiting shortfall.
That re-enlistment number is revealing too - the people who actually know what's going on are re-upping in record numbers, in the active and reserve components. Furthermore...
Nationally, of the nearly 500,000 Guard and reservists deployed since September 2001, only about 76,600 have been called up twice - and all but 2,200 of them volunteered for a second tour, according to the Pentagon.
Here's a look at reasons why

Of course, some folks want to make sure there's a bigger shortfall - or a draft - next year:

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York and other Democrats proposed Wednesday to increase the size of the Army by 80,000 troops as a way to alleviate what she called a "crisis" in the military caused by lengthy deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan.
Speaking of the Senate...

I'd rather not, but it was rather hard to ignore the outcry there this year as "some" took the claims that they'd been misled into supporting the war in Iraq to new levels.

Here's history the way some seem to remember March, 2003 now:

febprot.jpg

That attempt a humor is from April 2005. But as usual, what at first seems worthy of ridicule soon becomes the important public debate of the day - as defined by "some."

But history has been re-written - though it didn't begin in 2005. But this year I found two very interesting programs from PBS - both from the news series "Frontline".

Here's the description of the first, from immediately prior to the invasion of Iraq:

With the U.S. apparently within days of attacking Iraq, FRONTLINE draws on its 12 years of reporting on Iraq to chronicle the key moments in the history of America's ongoing confrontation with Saddam Hussein.
But months later, they would remember the build-up as somewhat less than 12 years long:
FRONTLINE traces the roots of the Iraqi war back to the days immediately following September 11, when Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld ordered the creation of a special intelligence operation to quietly begin looking for evidence that would justify the war.
For many folks of many differing current opinions, the world changed on September 11th, 2001. But history did not begin that day, neither did the war in Iraq. Our Brief History of a Long War - an effort still in progress - sets that record straight.

*****

As for those politicians, by late November President Bush's approval rating had reached a new low - 34%. A series of speeches would turn that number around before the year's end. But a less reported fact is the identity of the least-respected political group in America as indicated by those same polls - Congressional Democrats. Only 25% of Americans polled gave Democrats a favorable rating in November, compared with 31% in August, one of the biggest dips in approval. When you find yourself in a hole, stop digging - might be some useful advice for them.

It is not known whether any American political party has ever ended a year any deeper in the toilet.


Bookmark and Share - via email, facebook, twitter, etc.

Posted by Greyhawk / December 31, 2005 9:42 PM | Permalink

2 TrackBacks

Still Offline... from Air Force Voices on January 2, 2006 4:53 PM

Lots of great posts on 2005 and the impact of the blogosphere on world events. (See Mudville Gazette as an example). The holiday break has allowed me time to reconnect with family and return to reading many of my favorite Read More

1 Comment

Excellent roundup! Looking back, there was lots of interesting stories chronicled on this and other blogs in 2005.

Thankfully there are scores of American patriots who set the record straight!

The MSM paradigm is crumbling. I believe 2006 will be a banner year. Keep up the pressure!

Mrs G copy.png

March 19, 2010


Dawn Patrol 03/19/2003
[Greyhawk]
Bookmark and Share - via email, facebook, twitter, etc.

"Welcome to the Dawn Patrol, our daily roundup of information on the War on Terror and other topics - from the MilBlogs and various sources around the world."

Mudville was founded in March, 2003. Our efforts to bring the thoughts, words, and deeds of milbloggers to a wider world evolved to become The Dawn Patrol in March, 2005. With today's entry we're going to reset the clock - but not re-write the history - and recreate the world as it was - on a day the world changed...

mar03rmnews.jpg

(More front pages here.)

Updating... more to follow....

MILBOGS

Andrew Olmsted, 19 Mar 2003, Stateside: It would appear that the liberation of Iraq has begun.

Greyhawk, 18 Mar 2003, Germany: A united world could have, just maybe, brought down Saddam without firing a shot. We will never know. 19 Mar: We'll never know what a united world could have achieved... the UN could not agree on anything, the situation degenerated, and here we are. Status quo was not working. The French were too desperate for oil and trade at any cost. Well-intentioned Americans were led into the streets by Communists (and others) with an agenda. The media distorted the split. Many in America and abroad thought they could manipulate the situation to their personal gain. They miscalculated. The fire is lit.

Pontifx ex Machina, 18 Mar, undisclosed location: Rolling out the gate, the guard gets a quick "hook-em, horns" sign as we weave through the barricades. Then we're off, cruising through the desert in a battered-up SUV. On the eve of war, only one thing passes through our minds: is there going to be any appropriate music on the radio?

Lt Smash, 19 Mar, undisclosed location: Read the President's speech today. The clock is ticking.

Chief Wiggles, 22 Mar, Kuwait: The war started Wednesday morning for us right after the president gave a speech to the American people that lasted about 4 minutes. We were all very anxious for this whole thing to be either over or get it on its way.

Will, 22 Mar, en route: I am going to Baghdad to personally shoot that paper hanging son of a bitch!

Lt Smash 20 Mar, undisclosed location:
From: Public Works Department
To: Saddam Hussein
Subj: BLASTING OPERATIONS IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD

Sgt Stryker, 20 Mar, Stateside: Iraq to File U.N. Complaint About Attack

Primary Main Objective, 30 Mar, undisclosed location I Dare Kofi to Come Get Me.

pmomar03.jpg

BruceR, Flit, 19 Mar, Canada: AND SO IT BEGINS. Godspeed, Yanks. Come home safe and soon.

Andrew Olmsted, 20 Mar 2003, Stateside: The most important thing to remember over the next few days is this: the first reports are almost always inaccurate. First reports are generally submitted in the heat of battle before any real analysis can take place. Therefore, they're highly subjective, based on limited information, and rarely hit the mark. So as the first reports of 'surgical strikes' on Iraqi forces come in, it's best to take those reports with a grain of salt...

Iraqi Blogs

Salam Pax, Baghdad: The bombing aould come and go in waves, nothing too heavy and not yet comparable to what was going on in 91. all radio and TV stations are still on and while the air raid began the Iraqi TV was showing patriotic songs and didn't even bother to inform viewers that we are under attack. at the moment they are re-airing yesterday's interview with the minister of interior affairs. THe sounds of the anti-aircarft artillery is still louder than the booms and bangs which means that they are still far from where we live, but the images we saw on Al Arabia news channel showed a building burning near one of my aunts house...

Other Blogs

Andrew Sullivan, The Daily Dish: How much more morally indefensible is appeasement when we also have complete international authority to do what must be done? I think we will look back in the future and not ask, as so many now are, how it was that diplomacy didn't get unanimity on this matter. We will look back and see the moral obtuseness of Chirac and Putin and Schroder and Carter and feel nothing but contempt for them, and their preference for state terror over the responsibilities of the free world. That's why I felt enormous pride tonight in the stand being taken by Blair and Bush. The president's speech was measured, firm, just. Blair's political risks - in order to do what he believes is plainly right - will confirm him in history as a great prime minister, the conscience of his party, and the leader of his country. I say that before this war begins, because the cause is just whatever vicissitudes of conflict await us...

Glenn Reynolds has a ton of links.

Other Opinions

Mark LeVine, Alternet - 'Bush Wins': The Left's Nightmare Scenario: ...With war seemingly imminent, the movement is being forced to fall back on a second scenario, "Everyone Loses," in which the warnings of a protracted and bloody war that destabilizes the Middle East and increases terrorism bear their bitter fruit.

However unpalatable in terms of destroyed lives and infrastructure, this latter scenario would at least quash the Administration's imperial dreams and force the kind of soul searching of United States' policies that is a major goal of the movement. But this outcome is less likely than many assume, and the antiwar movement would be well advised to plan for a third scenario: "Bush Wins."

In this third scenario, the war is over quickly with relatively low U.S. casualties, some sort of mechanism for transitional rule is put in place and President Bush and his policies gain unprecedented power and prestige. From my recent conversations with organizers and their latest pronouncements, it is clear that this possibility has yet to be addressed. Waiting much longer could spell disaster for the antiwar movement...

The social and political forces unleashed by the end of decades of Hussein's murderous rule will not easily be penned in by a US-sponsored show-democracy; but whether these forces use a reopened public sphere or turn to violence to respond to the likely betrayal depends in good measure on how adroitly the world progressive community can lay fast but deep roots in Iraq.

Newpapers

mar03cst.jpg

mar03wapo.jpg

mar03usatday.jpg

mar03nyt.jpg

Updating... more to follow....


(The Dawn Patrol's Archives are here.)



Posted 2:33 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0)


Bookmark and Share - via email, facebook, twitter, etc.

TMGbloglabel7copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
TMGrecentcomments.gif
  • Air Force Voices: Excellent roundup! Looking back, there was lots of interesting stories read more

MBC2010.jpg

MilBlog Conference Sponsors

GA_150x253_milblog.jpg

onesource logo.bmp

BAE_BannerAd_MilBlog_0309.jpg

MILBLOGS NEWS

*****

Latest Posts From MilBlogs

*****

milblogsa1.jpg Prev | List | Random | Next
Join
Powered by RingSurf!
TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Dawn Patrol Feeds

 

Add to Google Reader or Homepage Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to netvibes Add to Plusmo myaol_cta1.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

TMGbloglabel8copy.gif

TMGbloglabel9 copy.gif
Blah Blah Blah
me220.JPG

The Mudville Gazette is written and produced by Greyhawk. Unless otherwise credited, the opinions expressed are those of the author, and nothing here is to be taken as representing the official position of or endorsement by the United States Department of Defense or any of its subordinate components. Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house.

I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email.

Original content copyright © 2003 - 2009 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed.

Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com

andsm.jpg