
![]() | |
October 2012
August 2012 July 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003
|
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by! July 24, 2005 Support the TroopsBy GreyhawkLt David Lucas, just back from Iraq, writes an oped in the local paper. "Let's support our troops. Bring them home." Please don't ever say those words again. Nothing is so disheartening to our troops who are in harm's way than to hear our own citizens say things like that.Unfortunately, I think that's exactly why they say it. Posted by Greyhawk / July 24, 2005 4:13 PM | Permalink 3 TrackBacks1ST LT DAVID LUCAS, recently returned from Iraq: "Let's support our troops. Bring them home." Please don't ever say those words again. Nothing is so disheartening to our troops who are in harm's way than to hear our own citizens... Read More David Lucas, apparently a 1LT in the 10th Mountain Division, has written a rant in the Knoxville Sentinel (reg required) about his displeasure that people back in the United States are practicing democracy. There are so many errors in his editorial, an... Read More In a fact-filled op-ed a soldier just returned from Iraq disputes much of what MSM is reporting on the war. He also has some words for those whose "support" for the troops amounts to a demand that we withdraw from Iraq. Read More 8 Comments |
November 26, 2010America@war [Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit. That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary. From their about page:
"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation: The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism. Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented. I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are. "Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result. Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web... And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed. The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down. But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:
Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down. If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real. And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale. We've already made history, it's time to save it. (More to follow...) Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink |
Comments (0) |
|
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
![]() Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house. I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email. Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed. Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com ![]() Tending Distant Far from hearth and home, watching What tales we'll tell When things grim Some distant sunset, vision fading Saluting fallen friends whose names - Greyhawk, Baghdad, December 2004 |
Op ed by army officer? I always thought of officers as above the political fray, like judges. I have no objection to the substance of the LT's views, but this procedure looks portentous in a bad way. It smacks of a third world approach - where officers in uniform express and act on their political thoughts. Suppose some other officer wants to express the opposite perspective - is that kosher? If not, has this LT been led astray? Just as we cannot have the Chief of Staff of the Army getting into political and public "dust ups" with senators, we cannot properly encourage active duty LT's to go on about politics in op eds. Even if Bush and certain bloggers like such activity and encourage it, the professional appraoch for a US military officer is to stay above and outside politics. True?
"the professional appraoch for a US military officer is to stay above and outside politics"
A military officer serves the people, not a party. It does not mean that officers should not express their opinions. "Support the troops...bring them home"...is the equivalent of telling them that whatever it is they are doing...it has no value. It is no different than what Tokyo Rose was doing in WWII.
Why does the right seem so intent on defining the "true meaning" of what someone says? When I say, "support the troops, bring them home" is that what I mean? Yes, just that! I am not a traitor, I am not "tokyo rose" I am not trying to just "break the morale" of the soldiers. I am expressing an opinion and somehow I thought that is what we had the right to do in this Country.
If you continue to do this, why are you surprised when some on the right compare your GITMO to Nazi concentration camps? Both positions, the one you have espoused on your site and the Nazi concentration camp analogy are equally ludicrous.
I guess the left should just assume that what you are "really" doing by being in Iraq is setting up for the US to colonize the entire world, put it into slavery and make everyone either American or dead right?
Think of that paragraph above and how crazy it sounds. It is EXACTLY how crazy you sound when you compare those against this war to traitors etc.
Just because Bush went to war does not mean that he then gets a free ride to be stupid until the war is over.
Sorry, that is NOT America.. that is the Soviet Union, the Country you so hated (I presume).
Kevin, let me give you the perspective of a former soldier, perhaps you need that. Yes, you have a right to say "support the troops, bring them home". That is the point of free speech. And when I was a soldier deployed in combat I consoled myself with the thought that I was putting my life on the line so that you would have the right to say something like that. No matter that it was horribly destructive to my morale and to the morale of the other soldiers deployed with me.
If you can't understand that saying such things is destructive for the soldiers (and sailors, airmen and marines) deployed in harm's way then there is nothing I can say that will show you that it is. But I'm going to try. And I'm going to tell you that the military has been firmly convinced, for 35 years now, that the media and the left oppose >us
The left needs to ask itself how bringing the troops home is supporting them? If they mean by keeping them out of harms way then they should just say that.
I'd like to see the left say that to other professionals who have risky jobs: We support our policemen, keep them off the streets! We support our firemen, keep them away from burning buildings!
I think what they mean is that they don't support the war, so they don't want anyone else to either.
Well, first, I served for 10 years so I do know what it is like. Second, yes, bring the soldiers home for their sake and stop the war. So, what is the big deal? Yes, soldiers should know that the support for this war is dwindling dramatically every day.
It is clear that the reason we went there was flawed, the ties from Iraq to Al Qaeda were weak at best (our action has actually strengthened them) and the recent bombings in London show the idea of "We have taken the war to them" to be a bit short sighted as well.
So, yes, the troops should know that. If they start questioning the action all the better. They should ask their senior officers to explain this to them. Enough of that starts happenning and then the senior officers will rely to Rumsfeld that the troops are losing support for the action. Maybe (I say maybe because Rumsfeld's head is so far in the sand he may not see it) that will wake them up.
I did a little slideshow sometime back called “Coming Home.” Near the end I have these words, “Hoping you all will be coming home soon.” And this I truly and from the heart, meant. I use these words in the context of JOB WELL DONE or MISSION COMPLETE, the WARS ARE OVER. I use these words to say:
To you- The men and women of the United States Armed Forces....
Thank you for all you have done in the past… All you do today… and for all the things you will have to do in the future to keep me and my family safe. Thank you for all of the hard work you do, just to keep us free. Thank you for all the sacrifices you and your families have had to make, so you could serve this great country of ours. God bless you and yours, and most of all… I truly do hope you all will be coming home soon………
AubreyJ………………………………………
I am a Public Affairs Officer working with U.S. Central Command and I want to send this message out so that we can remember why we are still in country. Look at the good stories that are being done. Please see attached story...
http://www.centcom.mil/CENTCOMNews/Stories/07_05/16.htm
There are many more stories on the web site showing progression with the reconstruction efforts.
Thanks!