The reader will kindly forgive any tendency to rough language or behavior on the part of the site owner...
TMGlogo2006-2007phs-copy.jpg
"Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
TMGbloglabel1 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel3 copy.gif
TMG MONTHLY ARCHIVES
[-]



TMGbloglabel10 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette Feeds

 

Add to Technorati Favorites
Technorati Profile
add.gif
Add to Google
addtomyyahoo4.gif
ngsub1.gif sub_modern5.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

digg.jpg

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

pl-news.gif

tvc_logo_small.png

Mrsg- Greyhawk's Profile
Mrsg- Greyhawk's Facebook profile
Create Your Badge
TMGbloglabel5 copy.gif
TMGbloglabel6 copy.gif
350.jpg
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by!
« Open Post | Main | The "Iraqi" "Insurgency" »

July 14, 2005

greyhawk copy sm.png

Recruiting

By Greyhawk

The Army has failed to meet it's recruiting goals almost every month this year, partly due to the authorized 30,000-troop increase in strength from last year.

Now Hillary Clinton and other Senate Democrats have put forth an interesting proposal:

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York and other Democrats proposed Wednesday to increase the size of the Army by 80,000 troops as a way to alleviate what she called a "crisis" in the military caused by lengthy deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan.

The lawmakers said they would introduce an amendment to the annual Defense Department authorization bill to raise the Army's authorized strength by 20,000 troops annually in each of the next four years, raising the total force to 582,400. Joining Ms. Clinton at a news conference announcing the proposals were three other Democratic senators, Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut, Jack Reed of Rhode Island, and Ken Salazar of Colorado.

Fine with me - but I'd like to see the 80,000 names first. Oddly enough, the story neglected to mention the Army's recent recruiting shortfalls.

Of course, if I were a cynic I might think this was just a way to get "crisis" into the headlines while pretending to support the troops. Or a way to dare Republicans to oppose such a measure.


Posted by Greyhawk / July 14, 2005 7:22 PM | Permalink

8 Comments

The size of the military was adjusted downward in the late 80's/early 90's because the demographics no longer supported it. This was an often discussed subject in the early 80's. As the recruiting pool shrunk, more MOS's were open to woman and the number of active divisions was decreased.

This is not just a problem for the US, it is even more of a problem for the Europeans.

I'm a Navy CPO (retired Sept.1997) who has tried since 40 minutes after 911 happened to get back in the military. The Navy has denied my request since I'm "retired". Hey I'm 48 but in damn good condition being an Aircraft Rescue Firefighter/Paramedic since I left the fleet. The other day I went to talk with the National Guard, I told them I'd take a reduction in rank,I WANT to attend boot camp whatever it would take. I was told there are alot of men like me both retired military and those who never thought of serving until reality set in on that terrible September day almost four years ago. But the Feds say absolutely not. Hey at least we could fill billets let the young ones get some better home time. It would also show that we're in this thing together. This war won't be going away for a long time, the sooner people realize it's all our fight the better.

Actually, if you were a cynic, you would suspect that they want the proposal passed so that the recruitment targets have to increase and any resulting shortfall looks worse.

I agree with Karl. When it concerns the jr. Senator from New York, I am very cynical.

They want to raise the troop levels even with the knowledge that the Army cannot currently meet it's recruiting goals with an end game of creating a need for a draft.

These people(liberals in Congress) are doing their level best to compare this current war(read quagmire) to Vietnam(read quagmire). The thing that made Vietnam so unpopular with this crowd and those of their ilk was the draft.

Mrs. Clinton understands what effect a draft would have with the electorate. And since a Republican got us into Iraq....

Not to mention the effect of "watering down" our warrior forces with men who obviously have no desire to serve their country.
Especially all the good little liberals who have been indoctrinated by academentia in this country.

I hope I'm wrong, but I can only trust Hilary about as far as I could throw her "missing" file box of Rose Law Firm billing records.

Matt,

I dunno. I'll give Lieberman the benefit of the doubt. He ran a far classier campaign than any of the other democrats, and didn't take the cheap shots against Bush when he could have.

f

OOps... thougth I was at blackfive. "Matt" shoudl be "greyhawk."

f

I don't mind at all raising the size of the Army, nor in raising the pay and benefits in order to attract the extra recruits.

To pay for it we can start by transferring all monies spent on paying for abortions and for funding the innumerable left-wing activist groups we are taxed for now. We can also defund anything we're paying for that has Senator Byrd's name on it.

If this is a Democrat bluff to play politics with the Army at a time of war, let's call their bluff and raise them 80,000 troops and fewer left-wing activists.

I think this might be a step in the right direction in correcting her husbands big mistake of drawing down the military in the first place.

We would have this much of a force fatigue peoblem if we still were at the pre-drawdown levels. the reseves wouldn't be as taxed and Active units wouldn't be coming over as often.

350.jpg
Mrs G copy.png

November 26, 2010


America@war
[Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit.

That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary.

From their about page:

The Naval Institute shall remain

INDEPENDENT - A non-profit member association, with no government support, that does not lobby for special interests;

NON-PARTISAN - An independent, professional military association with a mission, goals and objectives that transcend political affiliations; and shall encourage

IDEAS - Through its respected journals Proceedings and Naval History, its conferences, its books and its online content, in support of those who serve.

"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation:

The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism.

Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented.

I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are.

"Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result.

Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web...

And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed.

The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down.

*****

But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:

Closing Blogs is nothing new. So many site's owners just give up on their own. They come and go, you know, these MilBloggers do. Like any other sort of blogger. Many post in the lonely down hours far from home, spill their guts for the world, then abandon their spots when the tour of duty is up. They have lives again somewhere in the world, and no need to share the details. So it goes.

Many are truly gone - no site left at all. "The page cannot be found." Other blogs remain, like abandoned defensive positions in shifting desert sands.

Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down.

If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real.

And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale.

We've already made history, it's time to save it.

(More to follow...)




Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) |

TMGbloglabel7copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
TMGrecentcomments.gif
  • Mustang 23: I think this might be a step in the right read more
  • oino sakai: I don't mind at all raising the size of the read more
  • Fred Schoeneman: OOps... thougth I was at blackfive. "Matt" shoudl be "greyhawk." read more
  • Fred Schoeneman: Matt, I dunno. I'll give Lieberman the benefit of the read more
  • MLR: I agree with Karl. When it concerns the jr. Senator read more
  • Karl: Actually, if you were a cynic, you would suspect that read more
  • sanjuro: I'm a Navy CPO (retired Sept.1997) who has tried since read more
  • Soldier's Dad: The size of the military was adjusted downward in the read more

MBC2010.jpg

MILBLOGS NEWS

*****

Latest Posts From MilBlogs

*****

milblogsa1.jpg Prev | List | Random | Next
Join
Powered by RingSurf!
TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Dawn Patrol Feeds

 

Add to Google Reader or Homepage Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to netvibes Add to Plusmo myaol_cta1.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

TMGbloglabel8copy.gif

TMGbloglabel9 copy.gif
Blah Blah Blah
me220.JPG

The Mudville Gazette is written and produced by Greyhawk, who recently retired from 24 years of active duty in the US military, but will maintain this disclaimer: Unless otherwise credited, the opinions expressed are those of the author, and nothing here is to be taken as representing the official position of or endorsement by the United States Department of Defense or any of its subordinate components.

Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house.

I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email.

Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed.

Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com

andsm.jpg

*****

Tending Distant
Fires


Far from hearth and home, watching
Cold alone but not alone
On distant shore and only wanting
Safe return and little more

What tales we'll tell
When that time comes
When tales can be told

When things grim
Seem far away
When other fires go cold

Some distant sunset, vision fading
Memories remain
And tired eyes gaze 'pon folded flags
While distant drums beat their refrain

Saluting fallen friends whose names
And youth will never fade
Here's to those on other shores,
for them live well, the price is paid

- Greyhawk,
Baghdad,
December 2004