
![]() | |
October 2012
August 2012 July 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003
|
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by! May 22, 2005 OoopsBy GreyhawkLast week The Washington Post, jumping on the "defending Newsweek" bandwagon and supporting the magazine's right to publish unsubstantiated reports of Koran abuse in American prisons, provided a laundry list of similar allegations. Most were from prisoners, but one was from former Army interpreter Eric Saar: Erik Saar, a former Army translator at Guantanamo Bay who has written a book about mistreatment of detainees at the military prison, said in interviews and in his book that he never saw a Koran flushed in a toilet but that guards routinely ignored prisoners' sensitivities by tossing it on the ground while searching their cells.Unfortunately, the author quickly learned that if you're going to quote a book you might want to read it first. Here's today's correction: A May 18 article incorrectly stated that former Army translator Erik Saar said in previous media interviews that guards at the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, routinely tossed Korans on the ground. Saar has said there were "chronic problems" with the way military guards handled the Koran and failures to follow military procedures for respectfully handling the Muslim holy book when guards inspected cells, but he did not say that guards routinely tossed copies of the book.In the immortal words of Emily Latella, "nevermind". Don't worry though, we're sure the original WaPo claims will continue to be heavily quoted as "definitive". Corrections are notoriously hard to find, and this one's no exception. I'm at a loss as to why so many news outlets are so eager to get this story so wrong. Couldn't some minimum level of research be done prior to publishing something that's now demonstrably inflammatory? Aren't there some kind of "journalistic standards" for this sort of thing? I've heard that there are, but never having seen them I'll refrain from speculating as to whether they've been violated here. More on Saar's book, "co-authored" with reporter Viveca Novak here. Update: The author of this UPI report in Washington Times read the book more slowly and carefully: In his recent book "Inside the Wire," former Army interpreter Eric Saar noted that the issue of Korans at Camp Delta was so sensitive that only soldiers of the Muslim faith were allowed into cells at the onset of searches to handle them.Even the WaPo's "correction" sounds incredibly biased now. Pathetic. Posted by Greyhawk / May 22, 2005 12:29 PM | Permalink 3 TrackBacksBloggers on the job... Mark Tapscott takes down clueless professor Chris Hanson of the University of Maryland's Phillip Merrill School of Journalism. The Mudville Gazette takes down the Washington Post. Red State takes down the HuffPost. Blogger Dawn E... Read More How could anyone but the most biased come to any other conclusion that this is deliberate? Don't they teach research and fact checking at journalism school? Of course they do and this is just more proof that these stories are a deliberate attempt to ... Read More ....Mudville Gazette chronicles the devolution of the Koran abuse stories. It began with Newsweek's claim that a Koran was flushed down a toilet. When that story was fo... Read More 6 Comments |
November 26, 2010America@war [Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit. That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary. From their about page:
"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation: The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism. Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented. I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are. "Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result. Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web... And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed. The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down. But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:
Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down. If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real. And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale. We've already made history, it's time to save it. (More to follow...) Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink |
Comments (0) |
|
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
![]() Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house. I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email. Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed. Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com ![]() Tending Distant Far from hearth and home, watching What tales we'll tell When things grim Some distant sunset, vision fading Saluting fallen friends whose names - Greyhawk, Baghdad, December 2004 |
"I'm at a loss as to why so many news outlets are so eager to get this story wrong."
I believe they all share the same objective of discrediting Bush and making the USA look bad. A lie repeated often enough becomes the accepted truth. Examples of this are; the U.S. Government puposefuly spreading smallpox to Indians by handing out deseased blankets, and, more recently, the military targeting journalists in Iraq. Their credibility and reputation are secondary if they can accomplish their objective. Besides, having already been exposed as America-hating partisan frauds what do they have to lose?
"I'm at a loss as to why so many news outlets are so eager to get this story so wrong."
20 years ago, the NY Times and the Wash Post controlled US politics. Now the Big Players are USA Today and Wallstreet Journal.
USA TODAY, WASHINGTON FRI M DLY 2,612,946
USA TODAY, WASHINGTON M (M-THU) DLY 2,199,052
WALL STREET JOURNAL, NEW YORK CITY (NEW YORK CO.) M (M-F) DLY 2,070,498
TIMES, NEW YORK CITY (NEW YORK CO.) SUN DLY 1,680,582
TIMES, LOS ANGELES (LOS ANGELES CO.) SUN DLY 1,253,849
TIMES, NEW YORK CITY (NEW YORK CO.) M (M-F) DLY 1,136,433
TIMES, NEW YORK CITY (NEW YORK CO.) SAT M DLY 1,047,574
WASHINGTON POST, WASHINGTON SUN DLY 1,000,565
TRIBUNE, CHICAGO (COOK CO.) SUN DLY 953,814
TIMES, LOS ANGELES (LOS ANGELES CO.) M (M-SAT) DLY 907,997
NEWS, NEW YORK CITY (NEW YORK CO.) SUN DLY 835,121
WASHINGTON POST, WASHINGTON M (M-F) DLY 751,871
Source - http://abcas3.accessabc.com
The company that owns the Washington Post is the same company that owns Newsweek. Of course the WP would try to help out Newsweek.
WHY DON'T THE ADMINISTRATION MAKE THIS POINT LOUD AND CLEAR WHEN IT COMES TO ANONYMOUS SOURCES,
"CONSIDER THE SOURCE." NAMES NOT ATTACHED TO A REPORT SHOULD NOT BE GIVEN ANY WEIGHT AS TO ITS CREDIBILITY. SO NOW WE ARE TO BELIEVE THAT THE U.S. MILITARY TOOK PICTURES OF SADDAM. YEAH, RIGHT! WHO'S TO SAY IT WASN'T A MEMBER OF HIS LEGAL TEAM?
The Sunday Oregonian pulled this same crap today with a story titled, "Guantanamo Reports give US a black eye in world". Get a load of the subtext... "More than Muslim poulations take umbrage at released prisoner's stories of torture and abuse of the Quran." The story does make brief mention of Newsweek's retraction, but goes on to treat it as established fact just the same.
Why do Iraqis line up time after time for police recruiting lines after they are blown up by suicide bombers? What's behind that? Surely that is as newsworthy as what a soldier thinks about Rumsfeld.
What tactics are the jihadis using? What about reports of drivers chained to the steering wheel, and drugs found to be fueling Fallujah fighters. Was any of that confirmed? Inquiring minds want to know.
What accomplishments (not just sacrifices and traumas) have occurred on the ground? What incredible feats have our soldiers performed that have not been covered or even documented? Surely they are just as much a part of the story as Abu Ghraib. Again, not asking for cheerleading, just balance.