
![]() | |
October 2012
August 2012 July 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003
|
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by! May 18, 2005 Two Awards...By Greyhawk...were handed out this week. One for courage in exposing the criminals behind the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse scandal and the other to Dan Rather and Mary Mapes. May, 2005, New York, the Waldorf Astoria, a simple luncheon. As the Washington Post notes, The Peabody Awards ceremony doesn't have anything close to the red-carpet glitz and name recognition of the Emmys, but it has enormous cachet among those in the news business. It will have to do, I suppose. Perhaps it was enough cachet for Mary Mapes - we can only guess. We can only wonder what she was thinking as she watched Dan Rather accept the Peabody award for their work on the notorious Abu Ghraib scandal. In one of his first public appearances since leaving the network's anchor chair in March, Rather and Mary Mapes received the Peabody Award at a luncheon at the Waldorf Astoria in Midtown Manhattan.Watching as he was handed the award I imagine she might have let her mind wander back, to the moment someone handed something to her, and made it all possible... Wednesday, 28 April, 2004. Did William Lawson watch 60 Minutes that night? If he did it's likely the retired Master Sergeant would have been familiar with the content. Just over two weeks prior the Army had decided to Court Martial his nephew Ivan "Chip" Frederick Jr. for his role in the abuse of prisoners at Abu Ghraib. That decision seems to have been the point of no return for Lawson. "The Army had the opportunity for this not to come out, not to be on 60 Minutes," he said. "But the Army decided to prosecute those six G.I.'s because they thought me and my family were a bunch of poor, dirt people who could not do anything about it. But unfortunately, that was not the case."Frederick and his fellow guards had been discovered when another member of their unit had seen the photos and turned them over to his command. An investigation followed and ultimately Frederick was charged. Lawson, who also provided Fredericks' personal journal (begun after the start of the investigation into the abuse) to the Associated Press, was introduced to a 60 Minutes producer by retired Colonel David Hackworth. The rest is quite literally history. One year later, watching Dan Rather being handed the Peabody must have brought the image of being handed those pictures to Mary Mape's mind. With images in hand all that remained was to build a story around them. And what an ambitious story it was. A night of abusing and humiliating common criminals to celebrate a fellow soldier's birthday became a conspiracy sanctioned at the highest levels. And Mapes having a stack of photos handed to her became something else altogether. "We ended up chasing it," she claimed, "chasing it halfway around the world and back again. Trying not just to chase the rumors of it, but---but to find out... the reality of it." Rather said, "It took guts, and they had them." Rather received extended applause after telling the crowd, "Never give up, never back up, never give in while pursuing the dream of integrity filled journalism that matters."Mapes, who was fired by CBS after 60 Minutes' fraudulent story on the President's National Guard service was exposed by blogs, is writing a book about it all. Given her talent, courage, determination, and skill we'll no doubt soon discover who handed her those forged documents. May 16, 2005, Sgt Joseph M. Darby - a real hero - was handed his John F. Kennedy Profile in Courage Award by Ted and Caroline Kennedy. Last year, at the time he earned his honor, he was a Specialist. It was Darby who discovered the abuse photos from his fellow guards at Abu Ghraib last January - and turned them over to his chain of command. The news that Darby tipped off Army investigators to abuses in Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison didn't come as a shock to those who know the 24-year-old soldier.From an earlier report here: "He didn't fit in with the whole crowd because he didn't have a lot of material things, fancy clothes or a car," said Reffner, 50. Darby's stepfather, who died several years ago, was a former Marine, neighbors say, who taught old-school manners to his son. He was "respectful, brought up the proper way," Reffner said.Darby, in short, is a typical US soldier. Rather also said that he wasn't sure about the fate of "60 Minutes Wednesday," saying he was a reporter on the show and wasn't privy to the high-level deliberations about its fate. "Wednesday" has been plagued by low ratings in the 8 p.m. time period opposite one of the season's runaway hits, ABC's "Lost.""Lost" - that explains it. Update: 60 Minutes II is no more. "Courage". Posted by Greyhawk / May 18, 2005 12:24 PM | Permalink 1 TrackBackFirst, get on over to Mudville and read Greyhawk's Two Awards post. Then, Austin Bay nails the essence of events like the Newsweek scandal time and time again...a lot of the Main Stream Media is still trying to get themselves Read More 5 Comments |
November 26, 2010America@war [Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit. That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary. From their about page:
"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation: The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism. Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented. I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are. "Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result. Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web... And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed. The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down. But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:
Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down. If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real. And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale. We've already made history, it's time to save it. (More to follow...) Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink |
Comments (0) |
|
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
![]() Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house. I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email. Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed. Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com ![]() Tending Distant Far from hearth and home, watching What tales we'll tell When things grim Some distant sunset, vision fading Saluting fallen friends whose names - Greyhawk, Baghdad, December 2004 |
Beg to differ in one minor respect: Darby never turned the info over to his chain of command. He went straight to CID with it, and tried to do it anonymously. Chain of command at Battalion level and up was informed by CID.
And if SPC Darby felt that the Chain of Command would not act appropriatly he had every right to go to CID.
No, he had a DUTY to go to CID (or at least the appropriate military police authorities) if he knew of a crime being committed by a soldier. Had he gone to his chain of command, THEY would have had a duty to call in CID or MPI. Those are the two agencies with the authority to investigate alleged crimes in the Army. The chain of command is not.
"pursuing the dream of integrity filled journalism"
Oh, MAN! What a riot! I'm glad I wasn't drinking my coffee when I read that.
He definately deserves something - it tooks guts to report something when it seems everyone else is doing it. Going to CID is a good way to get the ball rolling, because they will always look into something, while the chain of command may take another action. The chain of command can definately conduct an investigation (15-6's, etc) though generally it's better to have MPI or CID conduct criminal cases so evidence is preserved, etc.