The reader will kindly forgive any tendency to rough language or behavior on the part of the site owner...
TMGlogo2006-2007phs-copy.jpg
"Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
TMGbloglabel1 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel3 copy.gif
TMG MONTHLY ARCHIVES
[-]



TMGbloglabel10 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette Feeds

 

Add to Technorati Favorites
Technorati Profile
add.gif
Add to Google
addtomyyahoo4.gif
ngsub1.gif sub_modern5.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

digg.jpg

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

pl-news.gif

tvc_logo_small.png

Mrsg- Greyhawk's Profile
Mrsg- Greyhawk's Facebook profile
Create Your Badge
TMGbloglabel5 copy.gif
TMGbloglabel6 copy.gif
350.jpg
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by!
« Midnight Mudlinks | Main | Live from Iraq »

March 16, 2005

greyhawk copy sm.png

Bones of the Saints Updated

By Greyhawk

We first mentioned the auction of the "Pentagon" flag last week, in Mrs G's dawn patrol post, cautioning "read the story carefully". Those who did so know that the flag touted as a "Pentagon" flag was actually said to have been flying from a crane near the Pentagon on September 11th, 2001, and not from the Pentagon itself on that day. Today Mrs G linked this brief update detailing that the flag had sold for $317,000. Debra Burlingame, whose brother piloted the plane that crashed into the Pentagon was quoted as being upset when she heard that someone was auctioning off a flag that allegedly survived the terrorist attack.

I've said this before - I'm a free market guy. Cash wise any item is worth exactly whatever someone will pay for it. In regards to this flag any cash value question has been answered. And three cheers for David Nicholson, the seller, who is apparently motivated by cancer - our prayers for a recovery.

Beyond that, if proven authentic, is a flag that flew on a crane near the Pentagon a sacred American relic? Apologies to the relatives of the fallen, but no. And I'm willing to bet that Mrs Burlingame was given selective facts on the "Pentagon flag" by the Washington Post reporter and then quoted. I sense an attempt at a manufactured story here.

But as this now much longer story makes clear, there may be a real story too. Questions as to whether the flag even flew on September 11th have been raised. In fact a certificate of authenticity written on the letterhead of the construction company has been revoked.

Looks like there's a lot to sort out, but as far as discouraging future auctions of bones of the saints, threads from the robe, and shards of the one true cross the best thing that could happen would be a sucker paying big bucks for something that turned out to be less than what he thought it was.

A relative of a 9/11 victim, perhaps also fed incorrect information by the Post, gets the story exactly wrong, comparing a flag that may or may not have flown on a crane near the Pentagon on 9/11 to a real symbol of America:

Tim Sumner, whose brother-in-law, Lt. Joseph G. Leavey, was killed on Sept. 11, said the sale was "kind of like if during March 1945 you were selling the flag that was raised over Iwo Jima. We're still in this war. Maybe if it were 60 years later it would be different, but it feels like blood money."

You might not want to mention that to the Marines.

Nicholson was unapologetic. "I'm dying of cancer," Nicholson said. "When anyone can walk in my shoes with what I've got, I don't care who they are -- they'd sell the flag."

The controversy "really killed my auction," Nicholson added. "It would have brought a lot more" money, part of which would have increased the contribution he plans to make to cancer research.

Expect more updates.

What did I tell ya UPDATE!

Buyer Balks At Pentagon Flag's Authenticity, Withdraws Offer

The winning eBay bidder who pledged Monday pledged to pay $371,300 for an American flag that allegedly flew over the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001, has told the seller he is not convinced it's authentic and will not honor the sale.

Tim Sumner a 9/11 family member emails me with a bit more information on the subject.
There's a lot to question about the sale of that alleged Pentagon flag. The Washington Post and others did articles on it yesterday but none of them are getting this story near enough to accurate.

David Nicholson has stated that the flag was found in one of ten box of debris from the Pentagon crash site. If so, he was illegally in possession of ten boxes from a crime scene that may also contain human remains. Nothing of a number of the victims aboard Flight 77 (including two small children) and in the Pentagon have been found .

The Faccina Construction Company supervisor, Peter Elliott, who gave Nicholson those boxes wasn't authorized to take debris from the Pentagon site and he also was working as an auctioneer in training for Nicholson at the time. Nicholson was convicted for stealing $50,000 worth of clothing in 1988 and did a year of a 15 year (reduced to 7) sentence. Elliott gave Nicholson a signed certificate of authenticity on Facchina letterhead but Facchina says they didn't have a crane at the Pentagon on 9/11 (Nicholson is advertising it as the flag on a Facchina construction crane on 9/11), Elliott was reprimanded for using their letterhead for that certificate, and Facchina can not vouch for the origin of the flag. On March 8, 2005, Facchina asked eBay to pull the certificate from the ad and to inform potential buyers that Facchina could not vouch for the flag's authenticity. eBay did not comply.

Nicholson has the names of the 184 Pentagon and Flight 77 victims displayed across the bottom border of what he's selling. None of the NOK authorized him to include their family members names in the sale. Not only is this a violation of eBay's own policy but it is also a violation of California (where eBay is) civil code 3344 and 3344.1 which calls for punitive damages is such cases. Nicholson refused to remove those names when asked to do so by 9/11 family members.

On March 11th and 12th, eBay VP of Communications Henry Gomez was contacted by several 9/11 family members about both the unauthorized use of the names and the questions of the flag's authenticity. eBay continued to ignore their own policy and California law. The sale closed with the names still on the sale item. Gomez says eBay does not authenticate items for sale.
The winning bidder has now refused to pay the $371,300 winning bid. The flag is going back on sale today. As of this moment, he is asking for a first bid of $25,000 with zero takers. The 184 names are still across the bottom and Nicholson even mentions them in his new ad. In this morning's Washington Post, they quote Nicholson as threatening to go after Elliot and Facchina (for monetary damages) if the flag now brings less than $100,000.

This isn't the last eBay, Nicholson, and Elliott are going to hear about this from 9/11 family members. Did I mention the flag and ten boxes of debris allegedly came from crime scene and may contain human remains and 9/11 family members did not authorize Nicholson to use those 184 names in his sale? Yes I did.



Posted by Greyhawk / March 16, 2005 1:13 PM | Permalink

2 Comments

BTW, when I was in DC in 2003 I went to the Smithsonian and discovered that while Old Glory was downstairs in the basement being restored, its place of honor was being kept warm by the garrison flag that had been drapped over the side of the Pentagon following the 9/11 attack. Needless to say, I did not depart dry-eyed.

Did anyone ever followup? I heard this idiot was trying to sue Facchina. This is a sad, sad society that would let a thug like him get thru that system of justice unscathed.

350.jpg
Mrs G copy.png

November 26, 2010


America@war
[Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit.

That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary.

From their about page:

The Naval Institute shall remain

INDEPENDENT - A non-profit member association, with no government support, that does not lobby for special interests;

NON-PARTISAN - An independent, professional military association with a mission, goals and objectives that transcend political affiliations; and shall encourage

IDEAS - Through its respected journals Proceedings and Naval History, its conferences, its books and its online content, in support of those who serve.

"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation:

The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism.

Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented.

I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are.

"Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result.

Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web...

And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed.

The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down.

*****

But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:

Closing Blogs is nothing new. So many site's owners just give up on their own. They come and go, you know, these MilBloggers do. Like any other sort of blogger. Many post in the lonely down hours far from home, spill their guts for the world, then abandon their spots when the tour of duty is up. They have lives again somewhere in the world, and no need to share the details. So it goes.

Many are truly gone - no site left at all. "The page cannot be found." Other blogs remain, like abandoned defensive positions in shifting desert sands.

Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down.

If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real.

And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale.

We've already made history, it's time to save it.

(More to follow...)




Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) |

TMGbloglabel7copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
TMGrecentcomments.gif
  • harley: Did anyone ever followup? I heard this idiot was trying read more
  • 74: BTW, when I was in DC in 2003 I went read more

MBC2010.jpg

MILBLOGS NEWS

*****

Latest Posts From MilBlogs

*****

milblogsa1.jpg Prev | List | Random | Next
Join
Powered by RingSurf!
TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Dawn Patrol Feeds

 

Add to Google Reader or Homepage Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to netvibes Add to Plusmo myaol_cta1.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

TMGbloglabel8copy.gif

TMGbloglabel9 copy.gif
Blah Blah Blah
me220.JPG

The Mudville Gazette is written and produced by Greyhawk, who recently retired from 24 years of active duty in the US military, but will maintain this disclaimer: Unless otherwise credited, the opinions expressed are those of the author, and nothing here is to be taken as representing the official position of or endorsement by the United States Department of Defense or any of its subordinate components.

Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house.

I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email.

Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed.

Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com

andsm.jpg

*****

Tending Distant
Fires


Far from hearth and home, watching
Cold alone but not alone
On distant shore and only wanting
Safe return and little more

What tales we'll tell
When that time comes
When tales can be told

When things grim
Seem far away
When other fires go cold

Some distant sunset, vision fading
Memories remain
And tired eyes gaze 'pon folded flags
While distant drums beat their refrain

Saluting fallen friends whose names
And youth will never fade
Here's to those on other shores,
for them live well, the price is paid

- Greyhawk,
Baghdad,
December 2004