The reader will kindly forgive any tendency to rough language or behavior on the part of the site owner...
TMGlogo2006-2007phs-copy.jpg
"Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
TMGbloglabel1 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel3 copy.gif
TMG MONTHLY ARCHIVES
[-]



TMGbloglabel10 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette Feeds

 

Add to Technorati Favorites
Technorati Profile
add.gif
Add to Google
addtomyyahoo4.gif
ngsub1.gif sub_modern5.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

digg.jpg

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

pl-news.gif

tvc_logo_small.png

Mrsg- Greyhawk's Profile
Mrsg- Greyhawk's Facebook profile
Create Your Badge
TMGbloglabel5 copy.gif
TMGbloglabel6 copy.gif
350.jpg
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by!
« Coming Home | Main | Fallen Warrior »

March 11, 2005

greyhawk copy sm.png

We Are the War

By Greyhawk

Vietnam veteran and author John Harriman returns to Mudville with the second installment of his series Warrior to Warrior, letters from a Vietnam veteran to our soldiers in Iraq. See the intro to the series here).

I know Mudville readers well enough to say you're going to enjoy this. And I am really looking forward to more.

Courage, soldiers, courage By John Harriman

Dear Warrior . . .

Courage.

Dan Rather signed off from his final broadcast as anchor of the CBS evening News the other with the word, courage. He said it to en-courage, if you will, families of victims of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, tsunami victims, the oppressed, journalists, you, the men and women in uniform in Iraq fighting terrorism, and who knows who else, maybe former draft dodgers still too scared to come home.

Sad to say, there's a whole other, darker side to his use of the word. Back in 1985 Rather took to signing off his news broadcasts with the mysterious "courage" for a week or so. Critics of Rather began to criticize him anew because it didn't seen to make much sense. It had no context.

Fast-forward to 2004 and the CBS 60 Minutes debacle over suspect documents used to discredit President Bush's National Guard service. After the documents were exposed as likely forgeries, Rather came under fire from his colleagues for continuing to defend the story. The gist of their commentary was that Rather should display courage and admit the broadcast was wrong. They mocked him with the word. Columnist William Safire actually wrote, "Courage, Dan."

So it's not inconceivable that Rather signed off his final broadcast using courage to get into the face of his critics to mock them back. In other words, "Now if you criticize my use of the word, courage, you criticize tsunami victims, 911 families, and our troops in Iraq. Go on, I dare you." Like that.

Which, to me, is a snide, petty shot that cheapens courage. It offends me personally because I met courage once.

During the Vietnam War, one of the shorthand terms used by antiwar activists, especially those in the press, was the name of a town: My Lai, pronounced ME-lie. In a most despicable criminal act, soldiers of the Americal Division under command of one Lt. William Calley herded civilians into ditches and began to shoot them down.

Anti-war activists, including those in the press, still cite the incident as proof that American soldiers were war criminals. Some say that all of us committed atrocities.

That false accusation is one of the reasons many Vietnam veterans rose up against John Kerry in the most recent presidential campaign. He was one of those who made such claims.

But what goes unreported in nearly every use of the shorthand term, My Lai, is an act of courage that goes beyond simple heroism to an act worthy of the Medal of Honor. By which I mean honor in its highest sense, even if not in the face of an enemy.

An army warrant Officer helicopter pilot by the name of Hugh "Buck" Thompson was flying overhead of the incident that day. He saw what was going on. He reported the incident over his radio. And then he did something that should force every man and woman in uniform into deep reflection.

Buck landed his helicopter. He got into the face of men who were killing innocent people in whatever frenzied state of mind possessed them. And he personally put a stop to the infamous My Lai massacre.

Of course, the deep reflection that I mentioned is this: "Would I have had the courage to do what Buck Thompson did?" He might well have died in the very ditches where the Vietnamese died, killed by their same bloodied killers.

"Could I ever muster that level of courage in myself?" It's a question for all soldiers, in all wars. That includes you. It's a question that defines the term, courage, at every level. It's a term that keeps new My Lais from happening.

I'm proud to say I knew Buck. He was a captain when I met him, and a long-time Army neighbor of mine in post housing at Fort Jackson, South Carolina. Truth be told, he was a bit of a rake, a Gus McRae-type straight out of "Lonesome Dove." He was a heavy smoker, hard drinker, fabulous storyteller. You know the type--once he got going on a story you never knew whether it was a joke or the truth until he got to the punch line. Every tale was a journey.

But the one tale he never told was that of his own courage at My Lai. That news leaked out of his wife Joyce's mouth under the influence at one of the neighborhood blended Margarita sit-arounds.

I had heard about the pilot who stopped the killing at My Lai. From the moment I knew this was Buck's story, I was awestruck. From then on, the word, courage, to my mind, was defined by Buck Thompson's action that day. Compared to him, I don't know even the meaning of the word.

And, dang it, neither does Dan Rather.

Till next week . . .

God bless you and Godspeed.

John is a veteran of two combat tours in Vietnam and a member of the American Legion. These columns are excerpts from an upcoming book of the same title. His current book, Delta Force #1 : Operation Michael's Sword is a fictional account of the 9/11 attacks and the early days of Operation Enduring Freedom.


Posted by Greyhawk / March 11, 2005 9:25 PM | Permalink

6 Comments

You refer to Buck in the past tense. Is he still around? In any case, a story that deserves wide distribution.

Gawd...why can't he just write about Buck Thompson?...why does he have to use the heroism of Thompson to make a point about Rather? Instead of focusing on a soldier's heroism, now it's just a partisan attack...disappointing.

The Rather comment was an obvious lead in. Don't mistake personal dislike of a guy based on his character for partisanship. Military people generally dislike journalists simply because so many lack the fundamental strengths of character that are required of military folks - integrity and courage to name a couple. Some journalists break that mode, Rather wasn't one of them.

Sometime last year, 60 Minutes (no, I never watch it, but I accidentally caught the lead-in for this story) did a terrific report on Buck's story. They interviewed Buck and one of his 2 crew; the other man is deceased. It was an amazing account, and definitely should have had a tissue alert.

The Rather comment was an obvious lead in...as in predictable, lazy, overused...take your pick...I got nothing good to say about Rather, either, but all's I'm saying is if a guy's going to be afforded a weekly column, I'd like to think he could be more imaginative and less partisan.

Ed, the problem might be in your understanding of what the word 'partisan' means. I don't see evidence of partisanship in the post. There's a difference between personal opinions on a topic or person and partisanship.

Consider this: by labelling someone as 'partisan' you are also indicating that their opinion is not their own. A big problem with the Democrats is that they deny that anyone who disagrees with them is anything but partisan. but because their denial is about the very subject that is costing them any hope for anything but token participation in the American democracy it's likely that they are doomed as a viable political party.

The author has issues with Dan Rather, this doesn't make him a partisan. Look the word up.

350.jpg
Mrs G copy.png

November 26, 2010


America@war
[Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit.

That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary.

From their about page:

The Naval Institute shall remain

INDEPENDENT - A non-profit member association, with no government support, that does not lobby for special interests;

NON-PARTISAN - An independent, professional military association with a mission, goals and objectives that transcend political affiliations; and shall encourage

IDEAS - Through its respected journals Proceedings and Naval History, its conferences, its books and its online content, in support of those who serve.

"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation:

The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism.

Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented.

I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are.

"Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result.

Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web...

And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed.

The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down.

*****

But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:

Closing Blogs is nothing new. So many site's owners just give up on their own. They come and go, you know, these MilBloggers do. Like any other sort of blogger. Many post in the lonely down hours far from home, spill their guts for the world, then abandon their spots when the tour of duty is up. They have lives again somewhere in the world, and no need to share the details. So it goes.

Many are truly gone - no site left at all. "The page cannot be found." Other blogs remain, like abandoned defensive positions in shifting desert sands.

Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down.

If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real.

And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale.

We've already made history, it's time to save it.

(More to follow...)




Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) |

TMGbloglabel7copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
TMGrecentcomments.gif
  • Andy: Ed, the problem might be in your understanding of what read more
  • Ed: The Rather comment was an obvious lead in...as in predictable, read more
  • Stace: Sometime last year, 60 Minutes (no, I never watch it, read more
  • Courage: The Rather comment was an obvious lead in. Don't mistake read more
  • Ed: Gawd...why can't he just write about Buck Thompson?...why does he read more
  • Brian H: You refer to Buck in the past tense. Is he read more

MBC2010.jpg

MILBLOGS NEWS

*****

Latest Posts From MilBlogs

*****

milblogsa1.jpg Prev | List | Random | Next
Join
Powered by RingSurf!
TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Dawn Patrol Feeds

 

Add to Google Reader or Homepage Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to netvibes Add to Plusmo myaol_cta1.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

TMGbloglabel8copy.gif

TMGbloglabel9 copy.gif
Blah Blah Blah
me220.JPG

The Mudville Gazette is written and produced by Greyhawk, who recently retired from 24 years of active duty in the US military, but will maintain this disclaimer: Unless otherwise credited, the opinions expressed are those of the author, and nothing here is to be taken as representing the official position of or endorsement by the United States Department of Defense or any of its subordinate components.

Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house.

I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email.

Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed.

Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com

andsm.jpg

*****

Tending Distant
Fires


Far from hearth and home, watching
Cold alone but not alone
On distant shore and only wanting
Safe return and little more

What tales we'll tell
When that time comes
When tales can be told

When things grim
Seem far away
When other fires go cold

Some distant sunset, vision fading
Memories remain
And tired eyes gaze 'pon folded flags
While distant drums beat their refrain

Saluting fallen friends whose names
And youth will never fade
Here's to those on other shores,
for them live well, the price is paid

- Greyhawk,
Baghdad,
December 2004