The reader will kindly forgive any tendency to rough language or behavior on the part of the site owner...
TMGlogo2006-2007phs-copy.jpg
"Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
TMGbloglabel1 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel3 copy.gif
TMG MONTHLY ARCHIVES
[-]



TMGbloglabel10 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette Feeds

 

Add to Technorati Favorites
Technorati Profile
add.gif
Add to Google
addtomyyahoo4.gif
ngsub1.gif sub_modern5.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

digg.jpg

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

pl-news.gif

tvc_logo_small.png

Mrsg- Greyhawk's Profile
Mrsg- Greyhawk's Facebook profile
Create Your Badge
TMGbloglabel5 copy.gif
TMGbloglabel6 copy.gif
350.jpg
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by!
« Logistics | Main | Failure Stew »

February 15, 2005

greyhawk copy sm.png

Line in the Sand

By Mrs Greyhawk

Rowan Scarborough, in The Washington Times, reports on a Marine officer accused of murder:

To Lt. Pantano, the two Iraqis who came toward him despite his order in Arabic to stop were mortal enemies. Booby-trapped suicide bombers are killing Iraqis by the score and some have even feigned surrender in order to get close to U.S. soldiers. But the Corps views it as murder and filed charges against him Feb. 1.

On April 15, commanders dispatched Lt. Pantano's men to a house believed to hold insurgents and weapons. The Marines found bomb-making equipment and were removing it when two Iraqis tried to speed away in a sport utility vehicle, according to Lt. Pantano's account.

The Marines stopped the SUV by shooting out the tires, apprehended the two and placed them in flexible handcuffs. After setting up a security perimeter, Lt. Pantano took off the cuffs and had the two search the vehicle as he supervised. If it was booby-trapped, the Iraqis, not Marines, would pay the price.

It was at this point that the Iraqis stopped searching and moved quickly toward Lt. Pantano.

"They start talking in Arabic and turn toward him as if they are going to rush him," Mr. Gittins (his attorney) said. "He says, 'stop.' (in Arabic) They don't stop and he kills them. He didn't know what they were doing but they weren't listening to him. He was in fear of his life and he killed them and that?s what we do to terrorists who don?t listen to orders, It?s a combat situation ? kill or be killed,? Mr Gittens said.

Of course it turns out that they were unarmed and there were no weapons in the car. Lt. Pantano states he did not know that at the time. Pantano reported this event to his superiors and continued to serve in combat in the area for an additional 3 months.

Prince Pundit posts excerpts from Pantano's performace report. These will read differently to military insiders than to those that are unfamiliar with the key words and phrases used.

?Lieutenant?s Pantano progression as a young platoon commander and leader has been impressive.? he has dedicated himself to subordinate development resulting in the weakest platoon becoming one that is often the Company?s main effort. With a calm demeanor that speaks of confidence, Lieutenant Pantano has led his platoon into urban combat in Latafiyah, and he has also conducted convention operations in Falluja and Zaidon Province, Iraq. He is a proficient communicator, who should be promoted with peers. A proven warrior, Lieutenant Pantano is a Marine that I would proudly serve in combat with at any time.

His Battalion Commander, the reviewing Officer then noted:

?Concur with RS (Reporting Senior). Lt Pantano?s performance during the reporting period has been noteworthy and established his reputation as an accomplished infantry leader. His actions during the fighting in Falluja and Al Zaidon highlighted a solid understanding of tactics and an ability to anticipate the enemy. Leads form the front always and balances his aggressive style with true concern for the welfare of his Marines. Exceptional communication skills for a 2ndLt. Organized, aggressive, focused and driven. Ready for increased responsibility. Retain, promote and assign to challenging assignments.?

Pantano's lawyer says that the investigation was prompted by a complaint from an enlisted man that he refers to as "disgruntled".

There are several unanswered questions. Is a Marine officer being second guessed for a split second decision that he made to protect his life and the lives of his men? Why is General Richard Huck pressing charges when, at the time of the incident, it was investigated and cleared? Why did he let Lt Pantano stay in the field and only bring charges upon his return to the US? This happened in April 2004. Why did General Richard Huck wait until February 1, 2005? And who is this "disgruntled? enlisted man? Is he disgruntled or an eyewitness?

We have one side of this story and I hope for the sake of our military and for this Marine that this becomes a clear cut case with no grey areas. If not, one thing is certain, the line drawn in the sand will become less visible to our troops. These sort of charges could set a new precedent for our troops that could leave them confused and less productive and possibly get them killed.

Pantano?s mother has established a web site Defend the Defenders.org with all the details. There is a great deal of information posted as well as supporting comments from fellow Marines and their families. Unfortunately getting to it has been very difficult since the site has exceeded its allotted bandwidth. I suppose in a way that is a good sign. Here is a cache page of Defend the Defenders.org and here's their latest news.

Don't miss (retired) Lt. Col. Allen B West, comments on this at Opinion Bug. He's a highly-decorated U.S. Army officer who coerced an Iraqi into providing information that foiled a planned attack on U.S. soldiers and also faced court martial for his actions.

For an opinion close to mine, read Lex.

Other bloggers covering the story:

Rosemary at My Newz N Ideas
Prince Pundit of Soldiers' Angels
Trying to Grok
Jack Of Clubs
Eric Hogue
Power Line
John Behan at Commonwealth Conservative

UPDATEFBI probing threat against accused Marine


Posted by Mrs Greyhawk / February 15, 2005 3:14 PM | Permalink

5 TrackBacks

More on Lt. Ilario Pantano from Commonwealth Conservative on February 15, 2005 3:40 PM

The blogosphere is buzzing this morning with talk of the Marine who was charged with murder in the killing of two Iraqis. Before we get to the blogosphere, I wanted to point out this column by Joseph Farah in WorldNetDaily, in which Farah demands that... Read More

I see that Bill O’Reilly has picked up the story and aired a segment tonight with Lt. Pantano’s Attorney, Charles Gittins. Bill is not happy and he is “troubled” by it and plans to “keep an eye on it.” Bill’s... Read More

The Mudville Gazette now has the story, as do PowerLine and Michelle Malkin. Tammy Bruce evidently interviewed 2nd Lt. Pantano's mother and has a link to Defend the Defenders, but since Tammy's page is not dated, I can't tell when this happened. Read More

Blackfive weighs in. His concern is the effect it will have on the soldiers and Marines who are fighting in the field: Read More

I've been waiting for more news to come out on this case before commenting on it, because it just seems too ridiculous. But according to all the information available so far, the Marine Corps has lost its freaking mind. Read More

11 Comments

Your response to this is very encouraging to me. Without information, assuming that someone is innocent is as foolish as assuming someone is guilty. I read your blog and Smash and Blackfive and whether it's those troops refusing to go on their convoy thingy or even Eason Jordan, I can expect that someone is going to say, "We don't have enough information."

There's been something bothering me about all this ever since I read the initial story yesterday, and I think I finally found it. When the terrorists turned from the vehicle and moved towards (rushed, whatever you want to call it) Lt. Pantano, it's almost as if they knew our rules of engagement might not let him shoot. While that's not as troubling as the "murder" assertions against a split-second decision, it's still troubling that they are (again and still) using our own rules and sense of morality against us.

Utilizing the term premeditated in a War Zone is ludicrous.

Read the finess reports closely. They are an example of the report every 2nd LT would like to receive. What happened? Need more info!

Didn't one of the editors of the Washington Times write "T]he media now force interracial images into the public mind and a number of perfectly rational people react to these images with an altogether natural revulsion. The white person who does not mind transacting business with a black bank clerk may yet be averse to accepting the clerk as his sister-in-law, and THIS IS NOT RACISM, no matter what Madison Avenue, Hollywood and Washington tell us."?

I am wondering if this was not complicated by complaints by the family members of the dead men. On of the things that I find interesting is the "destruction of property" charges. This would seem to indicate that someone was concerned about the damage inflicted on the vehicle, post shooting.

It may well be that there was a "disgruntled" service member who made a complaint, but I imagine this may have been coupled with a civilians complaint on the episode to move forward. it is most likely that one or both of these complaints languished at different levels or offices until they were brought together and, with corraborating complaints, false or otherwise, prompted an investigation.

Other political issues, such as the identification and relation of the Iraqis shot to some tribal entity of power or influence, may have prompted the delayed review of the incident.

Just thinking through the process and what other incidents have occurred and how they were managed.

I can't help to wonder if this is a byproduct of Abu Ghraib. It seems to me an investigation, ok, but a charge of murder?

I'm also a little concerned about the report that the IZs had been zip-tied prior to being released to search their own vehicle. If this is true, it means that they should have been searched, and that the 2LT therefore knew they weren't armed/wearing suicide belts. With his platoon all around him, not quite sure where his self-defense justification stands.

Additionally, what was to be learned by having the IZs search their own vehicle?

It's not a no-brainer, either way. It deserves looking into. Marines and troops are getting court martialed for abuses - what's the morale hit if an officer is accused by a troop and it doesn't go anywhere formal? Even if his accuser is disgruntled, it doesn't mean he is lying.

A formal process will air this all out.

It extremely bothers me that we ask our hero's to put their lives on the line and then question there actions when they feel threatened. For us here at home to judge a soldier's judgment will only make then question their own actions and put them at an even greater risk.

There is a new World Net Daily story out with new info.

http://ridingsun.blogspot.com/2005/02/update-on-ilario-pantano.html

It's a mix of good and bad news for Pantano -- a Navy witness corroborates his claim that the Iraqis refused his order to stop, but claims that the Iraqis were moving away from him, not toward him.

The best part of the new info is that the accuser's claim of a cold-blooded execution seems to be contradicted by Pantano's and the Navy man's accounts.

--GB

The problem with this entire issue is that the mojority of readers immediately jump to the defense of the Lieutenant. Have you thought that these charges may actually be true?

While the terrorists are absolutely willing to die for their cause, their MO tends to be blowing themselves up...not rushing a Marine, forcing him to kill them and face murder charges. Your heroic Lieutenant dismissed the majority of his men, had their cuffs removed, ordered them to search their vehicle (already completed by his Marines), and unloaded 60 rounds of 5.56mm rounds into two unarmed men in a vehicle. He actually had to change magazines. Sound heroic to you? Oh yeah...then he stuffed the bodies into the trunk and posted a sign on them. He then turned to his few witnesses and "recommended" that they stay silent. So yes...he passed muster on the original investigation. But when his men could no longer bear the weight of this secret, they reported the Lieutenant. That is why he faces these charges today.

That is what you will find out at the court martial.

350.jpg
Mrs G copy.png

November 26, 2010


America@war
[Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit.

That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary.

From their about page:

The Naval Institute shall remain

INDEPENDENT - A non-profit member association, with no government support, that does not lobby for special interests;

NON-PARTISAN - An independent, professional military association with a mission, goals and objectives that transcend political affiliations; and shall encourage

IDEAS - Through its respected journals Proceedings and Naval History, its conferences, its books and its online content, in support of those who serve.

"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation:

The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism.

Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented.

I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are.

"Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result.

Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web...

And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed.

The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down.

*****

But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:

Closing Blogs is nothing new. So many site's owners just give up on their own. They come and go, you know, these MilBloggers do. Like any other sort of blogger. Many post in the lonely down hours far from home, spill their guts for the world, then abandon their spots when the tour of duty is up. They have lives again somewhere in the world, and no need to share the details. So it goes.

Many are truly gone - no site left at all. "The page cannot be found." Other blogs remain, like abandoned defensive positions in shifting desert sands.

Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down.

If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real.

And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale.

We've already made history, it's time to save it.

(More to follow...)




Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) |

TMGbloglabel7copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
TMGrecentcomments.gif
  • SS: The problem with this entire issue is that the mojority read more
  • GaijinBiker: There is a new World Net Daily story out with read more
  • DebbieR: It extremely bothers me that we ask our hero's to read more
  • lex: I'm also a little concerned about the report that the read more
  • Steve: I can't help to wonder if this is a byproduct read more
  • kat-Missouri: I am wondering if this was not complicated by complaints read more
  • jri: Didn't one of the editors of the Washington Times write read more
  • mru: Read the finess reports closely. They are an example of read more
  • Dman: Utilizing the term premeditated in a War Zone is ludicrous. read more
  • hindmost: There's been something bothering me about all this ever since read more

MBC2010.jpg

MILBLOGS NEWS

*****

Latest Posts From MilBlogs

*****

milblogsa1.jpg Prev | List | Random | Next
Join
Powered by RingSurf!
TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Dawn Patrol Feeds

 

Add to Google Reader or Homepage Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to netvibes Add to Plusmo myaol_cta1.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

TMGbloglabel8copy.gif

TMGbloglabel9 copy.gif
Blah Blah Blah
me220.JPG

The Mudville Gazette is written and produced by Greyhawk, who recently retired from 24 years of active duty in the US military, but will maintain this disclaimer: Unless otherwise credited, the opinions expressed are those of the author, and nothing here is to be taken as representing the official position of or endorsement by the United States Department of Defense or any of its subordinate components.

Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house.

I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email.

Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed.

Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com

andsm.jpg

*****

Tending Distant
Fires


Far from hearth and home, watching
Cold alone but not alone
On distant shore and only wanting
Safe return and little more

What tales we'll tell
When that time comes
When tales can be told

When things grim
Seem far away
When other fires go cold

Some distant sunset, vision fading
Memories remain
And tired eyes gaze 'pon folded flags
While distant drums beat their refrain

Saluting fallen friends whose names
And youth will never fade
Here's to those on other shores,
for them live well, the price is paid

- Greyhawk,
Baghdad,
December 2004