The reader will kindly forgive any tendency to rough language or behavior on the part of the site owner...
TMGlogo2006-2007phs-copy.jpg
"Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
TMGbloglabel1 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel3 copy.gif
TMG MONTHLY ARCHIVES
[-]



TMGbloglabel10 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette Feeds

 

Add to Technorati Favorites
Technorati Profile
add.gif
Add to Google
addtomyyahoo4.gif
ngsub1.gif sub_modern5.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

digg.jpg

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

pl-news.gif

tvc_logo_small.png

Mrsg- Greyhawk's Profile
Mrsg- Greyhawk's Facebook profile
Create Your Badge
TMGbloglabel5 copy.gif
TMGbloglabel6 copy.gif
350.jpg
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by!
« The Difference Between "Almost" and "There" | Main | Special Ops Cody »

February 5, 2005

greyhawk copy sm.png

Matthews vs Hewitt

By Mrs Greyhawk

Hugh Hewitt is a guest on the The Chris Matthews Show on Sunday. Hugh will alerts the panel to the Eason Jordan story. This will make for some interesting conversation. Dont miss it.

The videotape of the Jordan remarks will be shown by MilBlogger SisypheanMusings soon!


Posted by Mrs Greyhawk / February 5, 2005 1:41 PM | Permalink

11 Comments

Greyhawk,

Would you mind taking a look at this?

MilBlogs for BlogNashville
http://sisypheanmusings.blogspot.com/2005/02/milblogs-for-blognashville.html

I was hoping someone would have a video of the Jordan remarks. If they were as clear as Byron York's contact who was in the room said they were, then this will be another major, major shot to the heart of MSM credibility. (and not just because of the comments themselves, the Jordan reaction and "clarification" of the comments after this got out will be just as damning.

If Matthews had even Jesus himself as a guest, it would take extraordinary willpower for me to sit and watch it.

Achtung, idiots. There are a fair number of we vets who think each and every one of you clowns who get killed get precisely what you deserve. This invasion was NOT about protecting America or Americans. It was a power grab by Bush's crazed neo-cons, and you bozos bought into it. Thanks for risking your necks for nothing except to make the world more dangerous.

Um, John... what the hell are you talking about? This is why people like us think that people like you are insane.

You appear to be talking either to yourself or to some imaginary third party.

Beyond the obvious mental deficiencies you have displayed, you are also apparantly an asshole.

It amazes me the people who want this country to fail in it's mission, to the detriment of the whole world, because of their hatred of one man, George W. Bush. Must be pathological, like inherited idiocy.

What "mission"? let's see--we invaded because of WMD. Nope, Bush and Rummy and Condi lied. Okay, we invaded because Saddam was a danger to the U.S. Riiggght. His "army", navy, and air force had been pulverized in Gulf War I and bombed every week under the No-Fly Zones. Okay, we invaded because saddam had something to do with 9/11. oops. Total lie.
So now, we're exporting democracy like Colombia exports cocaine. Where do we export it next? Iran? venezeula? Just so long as its' someplace with oil. As for the Sudan, Rwanda, etc.--screw 'em, no oil. As for the Pakis, the Saudis, etc.--screw 'em. Their dictators are in our pockets, just like Saddam and Noriega
used to be.
Here's a figure for you chicken hawks to choke on--5,500 deserters. That's right, boys. The Pentagon itself says 5,500 have deserted since Iraq was invaded. Lessee now---5,500 deserted plus 1,300 dead plus 11,000 wounded plus the Marines and Army fail to meet recruiting goals plus the National Guard having trouble with recruitment all over the country = ??? Oh yeah, right, anyone who questions this insanity is either insane themselves or unpatriotic. What don't all you bowhards sign up for lifetime tours so you can be fed into the wood chipper, hm? Because one thing is clear: Bush will soon need the draft. What will he get instead? You know the answer.
P.S.--I did 2, count 'em, 2 tours in Hajiville. I'm out now and I'm encouraging others to either never enlist or go over the hill. And brother,I'm the tip of the iceberg.

You joined the wrong military. You should be wearing one of those powder blue outfits.
What's your MOS? Cook?

Oh BTW, I'd like to express my gratitude for the splendid work of our superb Armed Forces...in spite of jerks like you.

That's the way, BignJanes--when you can't counter an argument, start calling names. But just think---5,500 desertions so far. And thousands of people like me trying to make sure more leave if they're ordered to Iraq, while at the same time helping discourage anybody from enlisting in Bush's wood chipper. And guess what? We're being successful. Doubt it? Then look at the re-up and enlistment figs. from the Pentagon. Here comes the draft. And when that happens, the lid blows off. Can't wait.

Thanks for your service to 'your country,' Mr. Riley, Oops and Head to the Border. You're welcome to join the Alec Baldwins, Jane Fondas and others who left the US after Bush was elected in 2000. [Oh, sorry, they didn't leave, either.] If Canada wants you, it's their loss. Personally, I will do what I can to make sure you don't get back into the US without a prison sentence.

As for your desertion figures, they are not much different than rates for other wars. For whatever reasons, some have been unwilling to fight. Like 'the poor,' they will always be with us. So, don't try taking 'credit' for something you didn't cause.

At the moment, I'm re-readng Ambrose's "Band of Brothers." Every member of Easy Company depended on the rest to watch his back. I wonder how the others in Oops' company felt about depending on him to watch their backs.

Thank God there are Greyhawks so we don't have to depend on Oops.

350.jpg
Mrs G copy.png

November 26, 2010


America@war
[Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit.

That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary.

From their about page:

The Naval Institute shall remain

INDEPENDENT - A non-profit member association, with no government support, that does not lobby for special interests;

NON-PARTISAN - An independent, professional military association with a mission, goals and objectives that transcend political affiliations; and shall encourage

IDEAS - Through its respected journals Proceedings and Naval History, its conferences, its books and its online content, in support of those who serve.

"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation:

The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism.

Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented.

I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are.

"Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result.

Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web...

And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed.

The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down.

*****

But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:

Closing Blogs is nothing new. So many site's owners just give up on their own. They come and go, you know, these MilBloggers do. Like any other sort of blogger. Many post in the lonely down hours far from home, spill their guts for the world, then abandon their spots when the tour of duty is up. They have lives again somewhere in the world, and no need to share the details. So it goes.

Many are truly gone - no site left at all. "The page cannot be found." Other blogs remain, like abandoned defensive positions in shifting desert sands.

Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down.

If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real.

And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale.

We've already made history, it's time to save it.

(More to follow...)




Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) |

TMGbloglabel7copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
TMGrecentcomments.gif
  • Bachbone: Thanks for your service to 'your country,' Mr. Riley, Oops read more
  • Head to the Border: That's the way, BignJanes--when you can't counter an argument, start read more
  • BignJames: Oh BTW, I'd like to express my gratitude for the read more
  • BignJames: You joined the wrong military. You should be wearing one read more
  • Oops: What "mission"? let's see--we invaded because of WMD. Nope, Bush read more
  • BignJames: It amazes me the people who want this country to read more
  • Dave: Um, John... what the hell are you talking about? This read more
  • john riley: Achtung, idiots. There are a fair number of we vets read more
  • Bachbone: If Matthews had even Jesus himself as a guest, it read more
  • dappin: I was hoping someone would have a video of the read more

MBC2010.jpg

MILBLOGS NEWS

*****

Latest Posts From MilBlogs

*****

milblogsa1.jpg Prev | List | Random | Next
Join
Powered by RingSurf!
TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Dawn Patrol Feeds

 

Add to Google Reader or Homepage Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to netvibes Add to Plusmo myaol_cta1.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

TMGbloglabel8copy.gif

TMGbloglabel9 copy.gif
Blah Blah Blah
me220.JPG

The Mudville Gazette is written and produced by Greyhawk, who recently retired from 24 years of active duty in the US military, but will maintain this disclaimer: Unless otherwise credited, the opinions expressed are those of the author, and nothing here is to be taken as representing the official position of or endorsement by the United States Department of Defense or any of its subordinate components.

Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house.

I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email.

Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed.

Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com

andsm.jpg

*****

Tending Distant
Fires


Far from hearth and home, watching
Cold alone but not alone
On distant shore and only wanting
Safe return and little more

What tales we'll tell
When that time comes
When tales can be told

When things grim
Seem far away
When other fires go cold

Some distant sunset, vision fading
Memories remain
And tired eyes gaze 'pon folded flags
While distant drums beat their refrain

Saluting fallen friends whose names
And youth will never fade
Here's to those on other shores,
for them live well, the price is paid

- Greyhawk,
Baghdad,
December 2004