
![]() | |
October 2012
August 2012 July 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003
|
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by! January 27, 2005 ThreeBy GreyhawkIs there a left wing attitude against success for the Iraqi elections? Certainly they won't be celebrating the outcome, regardless of what it may be. Their emotional investment in failure in Iraq is too deep for them to overcome. The problem isn't that they're opposed to peace for Iraq, it's just an aversion to George Bush that overwhelms every aspect of their thinking. Here's a perfect example, from Alternet, of the early (pre-invasion) shaping of leftist thought on Iraq. The title alone, "Bush Wins: The Left's Nightmare Scenario" reveals much. The discussion is of possible outcomes of the invasion: The first is an optimistic "We Win" scenario, which would result from massive protests and diplomatic pressure forcing President Bush to postpone an invasion indefinitely. (What has yet to be addressed is what exactly we win if Hussein remains indefinitely in power and the sanctions go on killing Iraqis.) With war seemingly imminent, the movement is being forced to fall back on a second scenario, "Everyone Loses," in which the warnings of a protracted and bloody war that destabilizes the Middle East and increases terrorism bear their bitter fruit. The reality is that we're much closer to that third scenario than we are to the second. A simple left wing response would be "sure, Iraq's turning out better than we thought - but look at the domestic situation in the US!" This response would likely have led to John Kerry taking the oath of office last week. But on the left the Bush Hate overwhelms all, and an insistence that the "everyone loses" scenario described above is what's actually happening is the result. At the very least, a willingness to believe everything that conforms to this mode of thought is an undeniable affliction of the left today. How low can they go? Want to see an example? Here's a left-wing blogger discussing watching a dying child graduate from his son's elementary school: When it was Lilly's turn, her teacher held the microphone up to her mouth, and she tried to speak her name -- tried desperately. But she couldn't do it. The motor skills just aren't there any more. So her teacher turned to the audience and said it for her: When your response to a child with cancer is to think how much you hate the president, you have a problem.
Joseph Lieberman, a Connecticut Democrat who strongly backed the war, urged a "resounding vote" for Rice to show "that we're together for what we're pursuing which is a successful conclusion to our involvement in Iraq and to the spread of freedom and democracy throughout the world." Daily Kos, the most visited left wing blog in the world, responds: We could look the other way if Lieberman represented, say, Utah. But does Connecticut truly deserve this neocon? I have a policy of neutrality for primary elections, but would make an exception in this case. I don't doubt that a legitimate primary challenger to Lieberman would garner serious netroot support. And if what I hear is true, there are serious efforts underway to draft such a person. Eschaton, left wing blog #2, agrees. (And don't miss the comments at Atrios site. The first one says it all.) Kos and Atrios represent Left Wing Information Toilets - information depositories where the "sewer base" of the Democratic Party feeds - and if the Party doesn't come to it's senses soon and flush that's all the support they'll have.
Posted by Greyhawk / January 27, 2005 3:35 PM | Permalink 7 Comments |
November 26, 2010America@war [Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit. That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary. From their about page:
"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation: The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism. Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented. I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are. "Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result. Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web... And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed. The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down. But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:
Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down. If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real. And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale. We've already made history, it's time to save it. (More to follow...) Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink |
Comments (0) |
|
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
![]() Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house. I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email. Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed. Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com ![]() Tending Distant Far from hearth and home, watching What tales we'll tell When things grim Some distant sunset, vision fading Saluting fallen friends whose names - Greyhawk, Baghdad, December 2004 |
This paragraph says it all, don't you think?: "The first is an optimistic 'We Win'" scenario, which would result from massive protests and diplomatic pressure forcing President Bush to postpone an invasion indefinitely. (What has yet to be addressed is what exactly we win if Hussein remains indefinitely in power and the sanctions go on killing Iraqis.)"
In other words: Hussein was only a bad guy because his presence caused us to impose sanctions on him, which killed innocent people. Hello, Tin-foil Wearing Barking Moonbat! IT WAS HUSSEIN WHO WAS KILLING IRAQIS BY THE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS BEFORE WE LIBERATED THEM FROM HIM, NOT THE SANCTIONS!!!! When will these lunatics come down to Earth and try to see reality? Never, is my guess. Alas . . .
The Left does have a plan for Iraq, silly! :)
Their plan is as simple as it is brilliant (tic)...their plan is to say whatever the CNN opinion polls say people want, then to wait, then repeat. They'll forever say what they think people want to hear, and when asked "what are you actually DOING?", they'll respond with more poll-based gibberish.
"We're voting against the war while we vote for it"...etc....
Ahh, the brilliance of the Left.
-Jon
You watch, It wont be long before the soldiers coming home are "baby killers" once again. The Leftists are just ichin to throw that down. It will put to rest all the "we support the troops but not the war" bull crap.
I thought Kerry's "secret plan" was that he would have a plan within six months? I'll have to reread the transcripts of the last debate...
The Democrats don't need a plan. Same as with the Cold War, they'll just change the story to fit the new facts. They've pretty much written Reagan right out of the Cold War victory, and any victory in the Middle East will certainly require Bush to get written out, too.
Top Ten Signs that the war in Iraq has been won:
10. They'll stop calling it Bush's War (see also: Bush Economy).
9. The leadership of Syria and Iran will be spending less time supporting insurgents in Iraq and more time firming up their escape routes
8. The main complaint from Iraqis will be about how the government isn't providing enough services.
7. The rest will be complaining about how all the immigrants streaming in from other Arab nations are taking all the jobs.
6. Iraqi environmentalists will be complaining about all those damn oil wells and refineries
5. Iraq will join the U.S. and Israel on the worldwide Left's permanent shitlist of nations, replacing South Africa which dropped off the list a few years back.
4. Any terrorism in Iraq (and it will be perpetual at some level, as with Israel) will be relegated to the back pages of American newspapers alongside terror attacks on Israel.
3. The Iraqi government will be accused of abusing minorities in Iraq, something that nobody cared about when Saddam did it.
2. Inmates in the prisons will be fervently wishing the U.S. still ran the place.
And the number one sign that the war in Iraq is really over:
1. Brahimi, or some other U.N. flack, will win the Nobel Prize for bringing freedom to Iraq.
Jeez, why don't these guys just come out and bash Lieberman because he's Jewish. This "neocon" code word for Jews who support the war on terror is getting ridiculous. Do the lefty bloggers and MSM think they're fooling anyone with the "neocon" codeword for Jews?
Come on now -> why would "the left" have a plan anyway? Did "the Left" go to war? Nope.
The NeoCultists went to war, period. I find it much more interesting and SAFE living in a country like ours, where I can call the president a Dickhead, his wife a clown looking useless fat assed housewife and not end up hanging in some cell somewhere being punished for my outburst and opinion. So Far.
**Your make the war, you better have "the plan."
Not Senator Bob of some wingnut state...
I believe the military has helped to keep things like they are, safe, by having balls. I hope and pray you guys stay on the political sidelines, where you belong.
Col. David Hackworth is an example of the proper military man - toss in your commission when the shit starts to choke you to death! Unless shit sandwiches supplied by the likes of Rumsfeld and Wolfie - are good to go for you.
It's okay if the military sound off in the blogsphere and in your missives home to mom and girlfriends (all the wit and a warrior/hero talk). I know some of you guys are very smart with your War College chops and your add on degrees - MBA degrees for help moving loads of TP to remote areas of operations! My old man had degrees and did that crap for nearly 25 yrs, combat officer, SF VN 3 tours, not a stay-at-the-fort type.
I really do enjoy nothing better than watching a Five Star Air Force ring knocker general do the monkey dance. Nodding his head up and down in agreement - with all stained and the poop dripping off - from having to pull his head out of the ass of the commander-in-chief, in response to tall tales flowing from the "warrior ex-fighter pilot" guardsman (hee hee) in charge of all the troops everywhere! How do the Meyers of the service sleep at night? In a pile, I guess, for warmth and comfort.