
![]() | |
October 2012
August 2012 July 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003
|
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by! January 2, 2005 S*** SandwichBy GreyhawkEver had someone toss an insult your way and found yourself wanting a snappy comeback but unable to think one up quick enough? Here's an old all purpose one - the reader can decide when it's use is appropriate. Immediately following an unexpected verbal attack, respond: "Wow, I can't believe you said that after I just stood up for you the other day!" "How?" They might ask, if taking the bait. If not, press on anyway. "Somebody told me you ate a s**t sandwich, and I said 'that can't be true - he hates bread!' Of course, being a discerning and witty individual, (otherwise you wouldn't be here) you aren't going to resort to such a low blow. In fact, I confess I was hesitant to offer it up, for in spite of my warning above regarding rough language and behavior I'm certain it's not the sort of thing that readers expect to see here. Forgive me and please read on. Unless I miss my guess, what follows is why you came here, and I'll tie it all together shortly. A report on an "insurgent" video regarding the recent attack at a military dining facility in Mosul quotes one of the 'stars' of that video: "One of the lions from our martyrdom-seeking brothers will infiltrate the defenses of the enemy at the Morez base in Mosul. Indicating the event was the result of thorough planning and preparation on the part of a well organized enemy. We will assume they made similar preparations for the follow up assault, of which no doubt by now the reader is well aware. Or are they? After all, the results of that attack were less than successful for the "insurgents". On the afternoon of Wednesday, 29 December, at around 3:45 PM insurgents attempted to demolish the concrete barriers protecting an American outpost in Mosul using a car bomb. They then attacked the facility with small arms fire and rocket propelled grenades. An armored vehicle was dispatched to aid the American Soldiers defending the position. The level of planning on the part of the insurgents was considerable (although inadequate) as evidenced by the obstacles prepared for that vehicle. Several roadside bombs - including other car bombs - were pre-positioned along its route. All of them were detonated at stand-off distance by rounds from the vehicle's .50-caliber machine gun. Despite the delay, from reports of the incident the armored vehicle arrived in time to witness a demonstration of air supremacy; combined close-air support from Air Force and Navy aircraft, whose maverick missiles were apparently not included in the enemy calculations. Results of the event? At least 25 insurgents killed. Fifteen Americans wounded - one later died as a result. Here's an early paragraph from the NY Times coverage of the event: The insurgents' attack in western Mosul was the latest coordinated strike at American or Iraqi forces, and it came eight days after a suicide bomber killed 18 Americans and 4 others in Mosul by infiltrating a mess tent at a military base. The attack began about 3:45 p.m., when insurgents armed with a car bomb tried to blow down the concrete barriers of the combat outpost, which is manned by a small force of soldiers. An armored military vehicle then sped to the outpost. All of which is true. But the motive for intertwining sentences detailing the massive failure on the part of the insurgents with others about their recent success is questionable. While both stories do illustrate that the enemy is not simply rushing willy-nilly into battle with American Soldiers one wonders why the aspect of a complete American victory is so unpalatable to the tastes of the editors of the NY Times. Could it be they don't like bread? That paragraph might be forgivable, might even be evidence of over-sensitivity on my part, but the entire story alternates paragraphs describing those events in Mosul with yet another event - the story of the booby-trapped house in Baghdad, an event that killed a number of Iraqis. BAGHDAD, Iraq, Dec. 29 - United States troops and warplanes killed at least 25 insurgents who used car bombs and rocket-propelled grenades to try to overrun an American combat outpost in Mosul on Wednesday afternoon, the American military said. It was the fiercest fighting the restive northern city has seen in weeks. My sympathy to the reader who has no idea exactly what's going on and where it's happening from the above account. Note that only after these paragraphs is the nature of the US victory revealed, and then it is not described as such. What we are left with is the impression of an increasingly sophisticated and cunning foe and an Iraq slipping ever deeper into chaos. But those who read even further in the story will find this burried treasure (emphasis added): A top insurgent commander in Mosul was captured last week, Iraqi government officials said on Wednesday. The commander, Abu Marwan, a 33-year-old member of the Mosul terrorist group Abu Talha, which is affiliated with Jordanian militant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, was seized on Dec. 23 based on tips from Iraqi citizens, they said. No comment as to how that might impact the sophisticated planning and courage of the insurgents. One could argue that "balance" is the reason for this sort of report. But I see fewer and fewer mentions of US and Iraqi success without this method of reporting being applied. The opposite seems less true; "successful" car bombs and assassinations seem to be reported without the clutter of "good" news to confuse or mislead the reader. Is that due to the rarity of "good news"? Glad you asked. Here are some of this weeks CENTCOM news releases, with some emphasis added. See how many you heard or read about in your local news. 29 December: IRAQI SECURITY FORCES DEFEAT INSURGENT COORDINATED ATTACKS, MNF DETAINS 18 31ST MEU ATTACKED FROM MOSQUE; FOILS INSURGENTS' IED PLANS 28 December: FIVE VBIED'S DETAINED IN BABIL PROVINCE 27 December: PRO-IRAQI FORCES CAPTURE 28 IN RAIDS SOUTH OF BAGHDAD An increasingly bold insurgency indeed. Those are just a few such releases from a 3-day period this week. No one expects America's newspapers to simply reproduce military press releases, and there's a bigger story in the world this week. But as Iraqi elections approach and violent acts become increasingly frequent it will be interesting to note which news organizations provide a steady diet of doom, broken only by an occasional sandwich. Contrary to some reports, there's no shortage of bread. What news you chose to consume is entirely up to you, but like grandma Greyhawk always said to me, "You are what you eat". Posted by Greyhawk / January 2, 2005 4:47 PM | Permalink 2 TrackBacksWhen imaginary reporters ask me for advice, I respond. Cub Reporter: I've got to do a piece on a recent... Read More I had very difficult time waking up this morning. My plan was to climb out of the rack at 5am to get some additional studying done before heading to the office, but when the coffee maker began making it's racket, Read More 8 Comments |
November 26, 2010America@war [Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit. That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary. From their about page:
"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation: The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism. Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented. I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are. "Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result. Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web... And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed. The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down. But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:
Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down. If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real. And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale. We've already made history, it's time to save it. (More to follow...) Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink |
Comments (0) |
|
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
![]() Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house. I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email. Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed. Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com ![]() Tending Distant Far from hearth and home, watching What tales we'll tell When things grim Some distant sunset, vision fading Saluting fallen friends whose names - Greyhawk, Baghdad, December 2004 |
Please bring us more encouraging news stories like this occasionally. Many of the Iraqi blogs apparently have been abandonded, are not updated frequently, or are focused on more personal musings.
Thank you for this. I've saved it to a word document and will be sending it to my local paper.
Happy New Year to you, and thank you for all you do. And Mrs. Greyhawk too!! And those kids of yours!
Thank you so much for all the good news. It's very encouraging. I believe in the ability of our guys in Iraq to get the job done, but I've had to do it on faith, since we gotten so little news (outside of bomb and body counts) from the regular media.
thanks for good news - we certainly don't get any from the media.
Well done Grey One. I love to hear that our men and women are doing their duty and doing it oh so well. Heroics means different things to our press than it does to a soldier. Our press thinks women who speak out against discrimination at the mall are heroes. You and I know our women who put on Kevlar, strap on a sidearm, and deliver medicine and food despite extreme "discrimination" from thugs and guerillas in a war zone are the real heroes. Some things are better left to real men and women, and not to reporters who "wannabe" on the side of God.
I am proud of you and your blog. Keep up the good work. Mrs. Greyhawk has a real gem in you.
Subsunk
Please consider posting stories like these @ least once a week. These are similar to Chrenkoffs updates, but are military oriented vs. his humanitarian type updates. Have a safe, happy, prosperous New Year.
Thank heavens (thanks GH) for some good news. Hope you get home soon to your family.
I've always prefered, "They said you weren't worth s***. I said you were."